September 02, 2015

Carbon Dating Suggests World's Oldest Koran Is Older Than Muhammad

When will Humanity wake up from their dangerous Jewish Constructed Delusions?
Last month, fragments of a Koran were discovered within the pages of another Koran from the late seventh century in the library of the University of Birmingham in England. Experts at Oxford University examined and carbon-dated the pages, and they determined that they were produced some time between 568AD and 645AD, according to The Times.co.uk. That means that those pages could predate the founder of Islam himself, as the dates typically ascribed to the Prophet Mohammad are between 570AD and 632AD.
(opposingviews)

12 comments:

Thugnacious said...

There was a strong jewish presence in the Arab peninsula, especially in Medina, Jews worked as merchants and tax-farmers for the Persian Empire, Christianity had backfired on the jews in that period, the creation of Islam might have been a jewish attempt to create a new servant class for them, Muslims prayed originally into Jerusalem direction until Mohammed made Mecca the sacred city.

coincidenceskeptic said...

While I do question the mythical origins of the various brands of worship, this article is of little help.
Radio carbon dating is rarely accurate enough to pin down dates that are this close. And who can trust the dates proclaimed for the founding of a particular religion or the birth date / death date of a founder of one of these cults..uhh...religions.
Could it be true that any follower of an Abrahamic religion not claiming to be Jewish is - whether they know it or not - a Crypto Jew?
Now who are the chosen ones my Zio piglets? How many of us can we fit into those settlements...after the 30 million Christian Zionists, how much room could be left?
And if we ever get past the distortions of the Scofield Bible Commentaries it could "prove" that God gave the land to all of Abraham's children...which is what the Bible actually says....although no one can prove God talked to anyone...or signed a deed over to anyone.
If I were to make a claim like that today, I'd be committed...and rightly so...to a rubber room without a view.
Has anyone asked God's escrow agent regarding the title? Obviously not.

rodin said...

Carbon dating was invented to authenticate the fake Dead Sea Scrolls

foon1e said...

Sorry Rodin - Not true: Check this link to see actual reasons for invention and application of carbon Dating - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_dating#History

Unknown said...

HAHAHA! I do hope that's sarcasm foon! Using jewkipedia as the source to try and prove something?! LMFAO!!!

Anonymous said...

Try these websites for radiometric dating/radio carbon dating.

Radiometric Dating Does Work!
http://ncse.com/rncse/20/3/radiometric-dating-does-work

Answers to Creationist Attacks on Carbon-14 Dating
http://ncse.com/cej/3/2/answers-to-creationist-attacks-carbon-14-dating

How Does Radiocarbon-14 Dating Work?
http://www.environmentalscience.org/how-radiocarbon-14-dating-works

SatanicJewsClues911 said...

Well, so much for calling my next kid Muhammad :(

BillyBob said...

Imagine Scientists saying that Carbon dating works, is that the same ones who confirm global warming? Why when You send in a sample from an Architectural Dig do they insist on having an estimated date? You'd think if it works - they could actually tell You!

Thugnacious said...

Some interesting articles about the Dead Sea Scrolls from the Institute for Historical Review:

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v08/v08p-79_Larson.html

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v03/v03p119_Larson.html

A curiosity: only the Book of Esther wasn't found among the DSS from the Old Testament books

Anonymous said...

And to stir the pot of confusion, enter Zionist supremacist (and possibly Jewish), Robert Spencer, who claims, on the other hand, that Muhammad was a completely fictional creation AFTER the Arabs conquered the various lands around them.

Both this claim and Spencer's can't be true, but it sure does confuse things, which is exactly what our Zionist and Jewish supremacist enemies like, in making us chase down their various rabbit holes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6bBeyaRjac

Anonymous said...

Someone please correct me if there is an error in my logic, but that the pages they found were carbon dated to between 568-645 AD, but that the Qur'an is ascribed to coming from Muhammad from 570-632 AD (actually 610-632 AD). But 610-632 falls within the range of 568-645, so, assuming the carbon dating is accurate, it doesn't at all show that those pages were written earlier, as it's saying they were within that range.

foon1e said...

610 minus 568 = 42 years Faux. By your numerical admission, that's plenty of time to falsify a document about a historical character - fictional or not. Carbon Dating isn't *that* accurate - it just puts you in the historical ballpark so to speak. But even you must see that the whole third side of the Abrahamic Triangle is nothing more than Jew Conceived and controlled Bullshit?