Saturday, February 27, 2016

Dennis Fetcho's Inside the Eye Live Feb 27 2016

Dennis Fetcho, aka "The Fetch", is an American ex-patriot living in Amman, Jordan. He is the author of the Illuminatus Observor a blog regarded by many as simply the finest Hermetic Qabalah blog in all of blogdom.The Fetch also has a second site called Inside The Eye Live.

Hour 1 - AFED Exhibition
Hour 2 - Tom Bowie, AFP Vice Presidential Candidate
Hour 3 - Kevin Barrett, Truth Jihad Radio


Fetch's Archive Here


blake121666 said...

Kevin Barret has gone off his nut.

Zeetip said...

At least KB concedes the reality that the "moozlem invasion of the EU" is being clandestinely/diabolically orchestrated by rothschildCo.

I'd be interested to hear KB talk about WHERE on the map of "Greater/Eretz-Israel":
are the moozlemist "migrants" being relocated FROM? Are they disproportionately, even vast majority, from the "eretz" map? I'd guess so; but haven't seen any figures, "reliable" or otherwise, breaking down where they're from.

Dennis, if this comment finds you, what are your thoughts? Jordan & Lebanon are totally consumed in that eretz map, & huge chunks of N. Saudi, Iraq, Syria, & Egypt. :( But Jordan is peaceful wrt the zio-empire... what's the future hold for them?

Unknown said...

Fetch is right!!!! 6 million percent!! There is now way in a Jew year that in a muzzytard country like Jordan you could move in 6000 evangelical Christians from Alabama and the muzzytards would its say "it's cool cause it's all for DIEversity maan.

James Simon said...

good show. Fetch handled Barretts comments gracefully. It's the jews lying in the media about the sexual asault epidemic in Europe lmao.

Erik Paul said...

You can say that again! :-)

TheFetch said...

Good to see comments going up on the shows...

I understand the "Greater Eretz" plan and also how people feel that this plan plays into the current migrant crisis. I am not really convinced that this plan is at the heart of current goings on relative to Syria, although am not discounting it.

As regards Israel and Jordan, ultimately, both are economic vassals of the United States, with each requiring or benefitting from large sums of money contributed by the US tax payer. So long as Israel gets the lion share, and Jordan remains at peace with Israel, I don't see the status quo changing.

For its part, the Israeli's know very well that Jordan was the only country to actually defeat Israel in a battle. It is a celebrated part of Jordanian history and the strategy was the product of King Hussein during the 7 day war. I suspect that Israel wants no part of fighting Jordan, let alone disrupting the status quo.

As for Syria, Jewish lebensraum comes into play vis a vis the Golan Heights. Rumors of oil having been found in the Golan Heights, plus the water gained from controlling the Golan, each add to the strategic imperative for Israel to hold onto these heights at near all costs. The destruction of Syria, which has maintained support for Hezbollah and Palestinians each adds enough venom for Jews to keep the pressure on such that Syria is long in the rebuilding of their state.

As for Lebanon - Jews tried to take this in the 1980's and again a large portion in 2006. It was Hezbollah that remains the most effective fighting force against Israel and so long as the Iran-Syria-Hezbollah axis remains, there ain't squat the Israeli's can do about it.

Locally in Saudi there was a pretty publicized story about 4 Lebanonese being kicked out of Saudi Arabia for channeling money for Hezbollah. It may or may not have been true, but Saudi officials are very upset that Lebanon as a country did not condemn the attack on the Saudi embassy in Tehran recently, so these expulsions may be political messages regarding the long term economic risks Lebanon faces if it alienates Saudi Arabia.

Needless to say - lots going on lately.

An American that I am close to recently lost his trial for cussing out some Saudi interior or customs officials - not sure which. His actions were not the smartest, to say the least. His sentence is rumored to be 200 lashes and 6 months in jail. This comes from reliable sources as I have no spoken with the guy since he went to trial.

The case is under appeal.

Negentropic said...

Fetch said during the interview with Bowie "There were a lot of deaths among the 'first responders' on 9/11"?

Since when and proven by who? Where's the hard evidence?

You mean like these obviously photoshopped "firefighter" clowns here?

In Memoriam: Brian Bilcher
Age: 37
Place of Residence: Staten Island, NY
Location on 9/11: WTC
Occupation: FDNY, Engine 33/Squad 1, Firefighter
Hometown: Staten Island, NY

In Memoriam: Gerard T. Nevins
Age: 46
Place of Residence: Campbell Hall, NY
Location on 9/11: One WTC
Occupation: FDNY, Rescue 1, Firefighter
Hometown: Orangeburg, NY

In Memoriam: Brian Edward Sweeney
Age: 29
Place of Residence: Merrick, NY
Location on 9/11: Two WTC
Occupation: New York Fire Department, Firefighter
Hometown: Merrick, NY

And that's just the beginning. There are many more faked "firefighers," "first responders" and "victims," and NOT A SINGLE ONE of these supposed "victims" has a valid last address of record. No one knows where ANY of these people even lived. NOT ONE of them has an autopsy, only 446 have an SSDI entry and only 249 have a death certificate but NOT ONE has a valid last address of record.

So, why aren't all the so-called "real" firefighters and "first responders," if there were any real ones at all not previously filmed in the pre-manufactured TV movie PsyOp billions watched, complaining about the above frauds?

Negentropic said...

"I did an exhaustive check of the list of victims provided on the CNN website. What I found is that out of 2,970 people listed, only 446 appear in the Social Security death index. Of those only 249 have a confirmed death certificate on file. Of those, not a single one has a valid “last address of record” on file. That is a lot of clerical error," from "9/11 Reflections Part 2: Interview with Simon Shack of September Clues" by Ersun Warncke

More photoshopped "first responders":

In Memoriam: Gerald P. Dewan
Age: 35
Place of Residence: Rockaway Park, NY
Location on 9/11: WTC
Occupation: FDNY, Firefighter
Hometown: Boston, MA

In Memoriam: Frederick J Ill, Jr.
Age: 49
Place of Residence: Pearl River, NY
Location on 9/11: WTC
Occupation: FDNY, Captain, Ladder 2

In Memoriam: Alan Feinberg
Age: 48
Place of Residence: Marlboro, NJ
Location on 9/11: WTC
Occupation: FDNY, Engine Company 54, Battalion Cheif Aide

In Memoriam: Frederick C. Scheffold
Age: 57
Place of Residence: Piermont, NY
Location on 9/11: One WTC, Lobby of Marriott Hotel
Occupation: FDNY, Battalion Chief
Hometown: Bronx, NY

In Memoriam: Charles W. Garbarini
Age: 44
Place of Residence: Pleasantville, NY
Location on 9/11: WTC, Marriott Hotel
Occupation: FDNY, Lieutenant
Hometown: Bronx, NY

Negentropic said...

Obviously faked 13 foot and 21 foot KING KONG sized "jumpers":

Frozen Faced, Photoshopped, Hug-Me-Clone 9/11 Vic-Sims, the tip of the Iceberg:

Obviously faked shadows and light FAIL, proving that not just the planes and victims but the NYC skyline and scenery was also faked from scratch or doctored & layered in a computer:

Any of the faked planes or even ONE of these faked images of "victims" proven as fake in any proper court constitutes full justification for the entire case of the media's "official" conspiracy to be thrown out as the fully concocted fraud that it is. All that's needed is for this well-established principle of law to be evoked and it's all over:

falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus

False in one particular, false in everything.

This principle of Roman law is still respected and has been appropriated by other disciplines. The concept is that if a witness has been shown to lie in one particular respect in a case, he is not to be trusted in anything else he says. This is why it is important for attorneys to impeach opposing witnesses in court: it discredits the rest of their testimony. The object behind the principle is [b]to reject questionable testimony (even if it might be true) before accepting falsehood into evidence.

The legal principles of interrogating witnesses have been drawn into the task of evaluating historical sources. Just as a witness in court can be impeached by being shown to have lied, an historical source likewise loses much of its authority [b]if its author can be shown to have deliberately falsified something[/b]--how can we trust an author concerning fact X when we know him to have lied about fact Y? Such an author may corroborate something a better witness says, but has forfeited our trust where he speaks without corroboration.

Zeetip said...

^ Spammy-Clues much? And your Spammy-Clues megadump has what to do with this Fetcho show, again?

back on topic:

Mar 2 Richie Allen show, 41 mins:
Yvonne Ridley On The Real Reason For The Migrant Crisis, Zionism & The Greater Israel

Negentropic said...


LOL Mad much you paid shill? Shows you up for the deliberately lying disinfo-spreading shill that you are, doesn't it? lol

That's all you are and you're not fooling anybody here with your Sandy Hook Limited Hangout BS while pushing retarded "planes" on 9/11.

Negentropic said...

As for Kevin Barrett saying Islamic Iran is a good model for every other "democratic" nation. Not that "dictatorship of the lowest-common-denominator" majority mob led by a minority of elite media owners should be anybody's goal looking for "liberty" and "freedom" as Barrett claims to, but a country like Iran is SO FAR from having any real "freedoms," that it's ridiculous to suggest anything in its laws as a "good model." I don't think so. Is this the kind of BARBARIC laws Barrett would like to see in the West? This is not "Zioinist Propaganda," this THEIR OWN PENAL CODE:

Article 92. If the flogging of a pregnant woman or a woman nursing her child poses risks to the unborn or to the child respectively, the execution of the punishment shall be delayed until the said risk is no longer present.

Article 82. The penalty for adultery in the following cases shall be death, regardless of the age or marital status of the culprit: (1) Adultery with one's consanguineous relatives (close blood relatives forbidden to each other by religious law); (2) Adultery with one's stepmother in which the adulterer's punishment shall be death; (3) Adultery between a non-Muslim man and a Muslim woman, in which case the adulterer (non-Muslim man) shall receive the death penalty; (4) Forcible rape, in which case the rapist shall receive the death penalty.

Article 83. Adultery in the following cases shall be punishable by stoning: (1) Adultery by a married man who is wedded to a permanent wife with whom he has had intercourse and may have intercourse when he so desires; (2) Adultery of a married woman with an adult man provided the woman is permanently married and has had intercourse with her husband and is able to do so again.

Article 84. Old married adulterers and adulteresses shall be flogged before being stoned.

Article 85. Revocable divorce shall not relieve the husband or wife from the bond of marriage during the waiting period whereas irrevocable divorce shall do so.

Article 86. Adultery of a permanently married man or a permanently married woman who does not have access to his or her spouse, due to travel, incarceration or similar impediments, shall not require stoning.

Article 88. The punishment for an unmarried adulterer or adulteress shall be one hundred lashes.

Article 91. An adulteress shall not be punished while pregnant or in menstruation or when, following birth and in the absence of a guardian, the newborn's life is in danger. If, however, the newborn becomes the ward of a guardian the punishment shall be carried out.

Also NOBODY should ever be FORCED to take any flooding of ANY people in their own house, nobody extended family or culture of a country, should ever be FORCED to take a flooding of immigrants of any kind, white, brown or black, but SHOULD THEY VOLUNTARILY CHOOSE to accept immigrants as guests, THEY will be the ones choosing WHERE these immigrants come from or not, not some Jews in their government.

Negentropic said...

Some more of the wonderful Islamic laws Barrett fully supports:

Article 92. If the flogging of a pregnant woman or a woman nursing her child poses risks to the unborn or to the child respectively, the execution of the punishment shall be delayed until the said risk is no longer present.

Article 93. If an ailing woman or a woman in menstruation has been condemned to death or stoning, the punishment shall be carried out. If, however, she is condemned to flogging, the punishment shall be delayed until she is recovered or her menstruation period is over.

Article 100. The flogging of an adulterer shall be carried out while he is standing upright and his body bare except for his genitals. The lashes shall strike all parts of his body–- except his face, head and genitals-- with full force. The adulteress shall be flogged while she is seated and her clothing tightly bound to her body.

Article 102. The stoning of an adulterer or adulteress shall be carried out while each is placed in a hole and covered with soil, he up to his waist and she up to a line above her breasts.

Article 129. The punishment for lesbianism is a hundred lashes for both parties to the act.

Article 131. If the act of lesbianism has been repeated three times and punishment has been carried out each time, the death penalty shall apply if the act is committed a fourth time.

And that's just the beginning. Go read the rest of the laws if you want a trip back to the middle ages.

Music is banned from performance in public unless it is military or religious music, but women are not allowed to sing even those.

Zeetip said...

@ Fetch, thx for your reply @ 11:21 AM above; whew! nearly got lost in Neg's Spammy-Clues dumps here!

Neg @ 12:18 PM:
" paid shill...deliberately lying disinfo-spreading shill...not fooling anybody here...BS...retarded..."

^ heh, textbook illustration of the joowey propaganda/lying MO that KBarrett's latest guest Richard Hugus described in his article: "Zionist Propaganda and Deception", which begins:

"There is an interesting kind of inversion in Zionist propaganda whereby the thing the Zionist accuses his enemy of doing, he is doing himself. Sometimes it is called projection, but in this case it is not a psychological flaw; it is done consciously for the purpose of deceit."

Queue Neg with another joowey Flip the Script & Project ad-hom attack, with another Spammy-Clues megadump in 3...2...1... LOL :D

Anonymous said...

Just now listened -- 3/07/16 --

Holy crap..................Who wants to bet Barrett has a Jew in his woodpile?

5 Generations or less? Who will take the over-under?

There is no other explanation. Barrett is seriously mental. Only a Jew can lie and keep the straight face Barrett did.

Anonymous said...

Your restraint Fetch was ADMIRABLE! I couldn't do it.

TheFetch said...

You know -I was floored a bit. I could not believe what I was hearing - but then again, was not really all that surprised. The "mainstream" success stories seem to have the same underlying themes, and none of them are good for Western civilization.