Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Red Ice Radio 02/22/16: Christopher Jon Bjerknes - Albert Einstein: The Myth, the Plagiarist & the Zionist


Christopher Jon Bjerknes is a writer and researcher who has published numerous books and articles on the history of the theory of relativity, Einstein, Zionism and the Armenian Genocide. “Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist” and “Mileva Einstein-Marity: Einstein’s Partner in Crime” are among Bjerknes’ most controversial works. In the first half, Christopher describes the evidence pointing to Albert Einstein's plagiarism of Hendrik Lorentz and countless other physicists in his development of the theory of relativity.

 He talks about Einstein the Zionist and the “Einstein Terror” – a Semitic method of suppression that was used to literally terrorize and imprison anyone who dared question the dogma of Einstein. We get into Einstein’s soured reputation in Germany and the big hype surrounding his arrival in New York City, where he relocated in order to specifically promote Zionism.

Download Hour 1

Download Hour 2


19 comments:

Negentropic said...

@Scorp

You might want to stick both files together also in audacity in one large file in the future and upload that too in addition to the two files option. It's very easy and takes about 5 minutes. It makes downloading much easier and faster. I know that's what I usually do for two files of the same show. I put them back-to-back in audacity, make a new file and download that to my mp3 player to take to the gym or hiking. That way I can just leave it on and not have to mess with the player at all to switch back-&-forth between files while I'm busy doing other things.

Scorpio said...

Neg - That's a good idea but I don't have audacity and my cumputer skills are minimal at best. BTW I heard your call into Hoaxbusters - good stuff. Hope to talk with you sometime on Skype in the future.

Cheers

Negentropic said...

@Scorp

Sure thing. Del has my skype contact and e-mail. I'm an admin on his site. I talked to Simon Shack for 3 hours a few days ago but we didn't record the call. It went really well so we will probably record the next call and put it out there. You should call in to Hoax Busters on Monday nights if you can, Chris always likes to talk to new people. Chris and John are both really cool guys and even if they don't necessarily agree with me and Del on who is at the top of the heap of the world power structure, they never have censored me once. Not even once.

You can download the latest version of audacity online for free in 5 minutes and there are at least a hundred video tutorials online on how to use it, short, medium or long in length. I didn't know shit before I did Neg Chron 1 either. Just watched a couple of videos and learned enough to navigate through it. Now I have 10 marathon pods stuck together. It's very easy to use once you get the hang of it and being an artist yourself, you can get real creative with it's multi-tracks and all that.

joseph smith said...

i like 2 files, easier to listen to on my Walkman...thx Scorp!

Negentropic said...

This was really a great show. Not a single minute was wasted. Bjerknes has come a long way since 2006 when I first heard about him. I wonder if he still thinks Hitler was "the destroyer" of Germany like he did in 2006.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhhqkyWa4dw&list=PLAEzt2i5JDW6IJ-wvJHUIjJOTZPK6e-pD

It didn't seem like it on this Red Ice show when they addressed Germany after they kicked the Jews out. He was quite complimentary towards the National Socialists. He also used to believe in the holohoax and the moon landings hoax, two unjustified opinions he can no longer get away with nowadays without being called a shill.

Christopher Marlowe said...

Generally Bjerknes has the correct assessment of the problem, but the wrong solution.
1. He says that Christianity caused the middle ages and prevented the ancient European cultures from developing. That is just plain stupid. He needs to look at the barbarian Germans trying to become Romans. The Germans were representative of the ancient European cultures. When Rome fell, it was the Church that preserved the knowledge and culture from the invading hordes of germanic/viking/muslim invaders. This is why the first universities came from the monasteries. Without the Church there would be no European culture.

2. Bjerknes contradicts himself by saying that the Church feeds into the Jewish NWO. At first he says that the Church promotes the JWO, which ignores 2000 years of history of the Church keeping Jewish forces at bay. All the countries that kicked the Jews out were Catholic countries. In the New Testament, St Paul says that the Jews are the enemies of mankind. In Revelations, the Jews are called the synagogue of satan. Later Bjerknes shows his own internal contradiction when he reveals that the Jews promote Islam and want to execute Christians. Why would the Jews want to eliminate Christianity if the Church promotes the Jewish NWO.

3. I take all of Bjerknes' warnings in re: Putin with a grain of salt. Who is defending Syria against the US/israel? Who promotes nationalism and Christian culture? Who is fighting against George Soros?


Negentropic said...

@Marlowe

Yeah, yeah, yeah. We know you'd sacrifice anything and everything for those Jesus & Mary action figure you have in your play room. lol Does it have the GI Joe action grip too? lol C'mon dude, when did you become so religious? I don't remember you being like this 6 years ago. The reason I even joined Info Underground was because I liked reading your posts and how funny and on-point they were at the time.

More important than tahat: Bjerknes says do not trust Putin which I agree with 100% because Putin passed holohoax denial thought crime laws and that's the equivalent of calling his country Jewssia and no longer Russia (land of the Reds, Russia was named after Rurik, a redheaded Viking. The country’s name literally means “Land of Reds." Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Andrew Jackson and Winston Churchill were also all redheads) but how are the Le Pens part of the plan but not Trump who kisses-up far more to Israel than Jean-Marie Le Pen ever did? If he wants to be against Marine Le Pen for betraying her father's integrity, fine. But don't throw all the Le Pens under the same bus as if they were all one and the same.

http://outsideradio.blogspot.com/2016/02/do-irish-have-highest-percentage-of.html#more

An amazing audio regardless and worth many listens.

VT Saxon said...

I agree Marlowe,, you should here what Bjerknes says about ww2 Hitler and the holohoax it will blow your mind!! He is dead wrong on those issues. But as a 1/4 Jew Bjerknes is right about the fraud Einstein? But Charlie g interview him a couple of weeks ago and I think he is complicating around on jewish flooding white nations with non whites and I don't think he believes in the holocaust any more.

Erik Paul said...

Putin is a Jew because his mother and grandparents were Jews. I saw a photo of a 1920s Bullshitvik that was a spittin' image of Pukin, same beady eyes, same nose.

Christopher Marlowe said...

Negentropic:
My comment made substantive challenges to specific flaws in Bjerknes argument, but yours preferred to comment on my personality... Is this what passes for reason these days? I did not raise the religion question. That was the (admitted) Jew Berknes that made the ridiculous claims against the Church. Catholic Europe could resist huge armies of invading Muslims in the middle ages, but now the Muslims can just waltz into any country in Europe, collect welfare and rape the women. But the Church was holding Europe back, right?

Putin's Russia did pass the holohoax law, but they also passed the anti-homo laws. I don't think it's an honest assessment to judge Putin by that one fact. I am not blindly behind Putin, but I think it's best to weigh the pros and the cons. I see Putin as fighting against the US/JWO.

Steven Lovett said...

@ C Marlowe May i suggest that the term 'Jew' as used in the Bible has an exoteric meaning and an esoteric meaning as the New Testament also states:

Romans 2:28-29 28For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: 29But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

So, according to St Paul, anyone can be a Jew , the esoteric meaning is one that is circumcised of the heart ( anyone of any race can be a Jew spiritually ), a Jew outwardly is a Jew circumcised of the flesh, we have to understand the context the Bible is using to ascertain the meaning.

Also in John 4:22 Jesus says that salvation is of the Jews.

22Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.

Here we need to know which 'jew' is being mentioned, it certainly isn't the exoteric meaning Jew but obviously the esoteric meaning of Jew.

Given these meanings i would suggest that the Church ( and the masses ) is only understanding the exoteric meaning of Jew as it supports the physical Jew and Christianity calls for the support of Israel and the Jews ( a physical race ), and rejects the inner, spiritual meaning of Jew. From the third/fourth century the Church made a fateful error, it rejected the esoteric, spiritual, symbolic method of interpretation and went down the path of the historical, literal interpretation, which is a Jew outwardly. This is why we are in the mess we are in now, misunderstanding and ignorance.

Christopher Marlowe said...

I think that the understanding of some of these passages can become confused if one is reading the Bible from a false zionist perspective. The Church has always taught that the meanings of words in scripture, like "Jew" as used by St Paul, have to be interpreted by the Church. It is the protestant view that everyone gets to decide for themselves, and which leads to confusion and contradiction.

First of all, it should be noted that the leaders of the Vatican II Church have begun to preach heresy, and to teach that things that are contrary to what the Church has always taught. Traditionally the Church did not support israel and the Jews. "Israel", in the traditional sense, is the people of God. This necessarily does NOT include the Jews (the physical Jews) because they rejected Christ. israel, the shitty little country in the ME, did not exist until 1947, and was not recognized by the Vatican until JP II. The creation of the shitty state involved the displacement of many Catholic Palestinians. The history of the Church in that region during the crusades was one of claiming that land for the Church, not for the Jews. That is consistent with the Church's teaching that the Christian people are the true descendants of Abraham.

The Church taught that the covenant with the Jews was no longer valid. The most sublime proof of this is that Jesus died on the Cross; but the law says that anyone who dies hanging from a tree is under a curse; God could not hold Himself under a curse; therefore the law is no longer in effect. In his first encyclical, Pope Francis stated that the old covenant is still valid. Therefore he is a heretic.

The Church traditionally taught that the Jews were not to be harmed; but neither were the Jews permitted to harm Christians. Pope Innocent III decreed as follows:

"As Cain was a wanderer and an outcast, not to be killed by anyone but marked with the sign of fear on his forehead, so the Jews . . . against whom the voice of the blood of Christ cries out . . . although they are not to be killed they must always be dispersed as wanderers upon the face of the earth."

It is very easy to see the stark contrast between what the Church traditionally taught and what is being taught by Church leaders today. And it is the traditional view that has always been taught: (1Thess 2:14-15)"For you, brethren, are become followers of the churches of God which are in Judea, in Christ Jesus: for you also have suffered the same things from your own countrymen, even as they have from the Jews, Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and the prophets, and have persecuted us, and please not God, and are adversaries to all men;"

Your point is well made in that passage, but it should be remembered that the audience in the passage is the Jews, and the term "Jew" to them was something to be esteemed. I would suggest that the use of the term "Jew" in that sense is singularly confined to a very few demonstrations in the Bible, (e.g. Rev 2:9 "I know thy tribulation and thy poverty, but thou art rich: and thou art blasphemed by them that say they are Jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.") "Jew" has not traditionally been used to describe Christians. They are in opposition. Aquinas said that partaking in Jewish ceremonies before Jesus was a good and holy thing; but that after His death and resurrection those ceremonies were sin because they demonstrated a lack of faith. This is seen in the traditional Good Friday prayer for the "perfidious Jews". Note that the post-Vatican II Church has eliminated that prayer.

Christopher Marlowe said...

@ Steven Lovett
As for the John 4:22 passage, it must be remembered that Jesus is speaking to the woman at the well before His crucifixion. Before Jesus, the only means of salvation was through the Law. But the Law was given to show the power of sin. (Gal 3:19) "Why then was the law? It was set because of transgressions, until the seed should come, to whom he made the promise, being ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator."

Prior to the coming of Jesus, the Jews were given the grace of God to be a good example to the other nations. But they did not live up to the task, and they sinned and were punished, and were sent into exile.

Scripture foretold that the Messiah would come, but that His own people would reject Him. That is why Jesus only preached to the Jews. The scripture had to be fulfilled. The passage you quoted shows this if we read it in context:

(John 4:21-26)"Jesus saith to her: Woman, believe me, that the hour cometh, when you shall neither on this mountain, nor in Jerusalem, adore the Father. You adore that which you know not: we adore that which we know; for salvation is of the Jews. But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true adorers shall adore the Father in spirit and in truth. For the Father also seeketh such to adore him. God is a spirit; and they that adore him, must adore him in spirit and in truth. The woman saith to him: I know that the Messias cometh (who is called Christ). Therefore, when he is come, he will tell us all things. Jesus saith to her: I am he, who am speaking with thee."

This traditional Catholic understanding is seen in the prophecy of Daniel: (Dn 9:26)" And after sixty-two weeks Christ shall be slain: and the people that shall deny him shall not be his."

See also John 1:10-11 "He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as received him, he gave them power to be made the sons of God, to them that believe in his name."

Christian said...

@Christopher Marlowe quote

"invading hordes of germanic/viking/muslim invaders"???

No one has ever have been so barbaic, gruesome to mankind in killing christians and other ethnicities than your jewish british imperialist ancestors, sephardic mass murders like the sassoons(opium wars) or the mass murders colonialist cecil rhodes, leo amery, churchill and their unchristian brother envy against the much better germans!



http://fathersmanifesto.net/amery.htm
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2009/3603brit-imps_created_jabotinsky.html
http://www.countercurrents.org/polya230109.htm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWGBJBwfxac

t brad said...

i woder if there will be a bounty on xtards in the u.s. if there is sign me up. or for that matter any religious fools. this rock will be better without all of them.

Christopher Marlowe said...

@"Christian"--> That was England after the protestants took over; which was soon conquered by the Jewish bankers, so your comment is not relevant to anything I said. I am not making a defense of England; or the Bank of England; or the Rothschilds; or the East India Company; or the Sassoons. I don't know what you are listening to. Perhaps it is a voice in your head.

Jon Steele said...

Fascinating interview! Thanks for posting hour number two.


Jon Steele said...

Christian said:

"No one has ever have been so barbaic, gruesome to mankind in killing christians and other ethnicities than your jewish british imperialist ancestors, sephardic mass murders like the sassoons(opium wars) or the mass murders colonialist cecil rhodes, leo amery, churchill and their unchristian brother envy against the much better germans!"

Good point. What the genocidal All-Lied bombers did to Germany's civilian population centers during WWII, especially Dresden, led by the bloodthirsty, incorrigible, "Bomber Harris", pales in comparison to any real or alleged barbarism committed by the German tribes so long ago.

Futurist said...

Two files is fine, most (if not all?) mp3 players and phone software should automatically play the next file. Kind of a standard feature I'd think.

Besides, you'd lose some audio quality by using Audacity as the file would be re-encoded. Mp3DirectCut would be a better choice as it does not re-encode the mp3 file.