Friday, October 27, 2017

For Panzerfaust: Jackie Shoots JFK?





Given that new JFK docs were just released, this seems relevant once again. Personally, it reminds me of the 'driver shot JFK' vid from the 1990's. (Bill Cooper, John Lear) Let's keep JFK related comments relegated to this thread for the time being. Thanks in advance - Scorp

37 comments:

Erik Paul said...

Scorp, it was a Fireball with an explosive round identical to the one James Files was using behind the picket fence. In fact, Files had given Jackie the weapon since they were secret lovers.

The numerous witnesses who were mere feet from the car were crisis actors who lied about what really happened.

The absurd story that Israel and their embedded assets were behind the assassination was pure disinformation.

Unknown said...

Just because you're secret lovers doesn't mean she can assassinate the president in broad daylight in front of the whole nation - unless she's like some uber monarch assassin.

I don't think the Israeli government per se was involved but I do think the Jewish mob was involved and that means support in Israel.

If Jackie was going to be the assassin, why do it there and not on the plane or drug him or whatever?

Unknown said...

What I'm struggling to understand is, other than adding one more to the conspiracy ring, what fundamentally changes about the JFK story?

It seems that some are really invested in "exposing this truth" which as far as I can tell doesn't really add anything one way or another - we still don't know who where when and why it was planned in precise detail.

robdsg88 said...

Hey Mr Unknown, You may find this of interest.
On today’s show I was joined by Robert Gaylon Ross to discuss, “The Clint Murchison Meeting,” which took place in Dallas on the eve of the Kennedy Assassination.
http://andrewcarringtonhitchcock.com/2017/08/03/the-andrew-carrington-hitchcock-show-399-robert-gaylon-ross-the-clint-murchison-meeting/
Erik - A president is assassinated in broad daylight on TV as a crime of passion. ROTFL again and again and again. Who needs stand-up comedy, when we have Mami's comments.

Unknown said...

I'd heard that before but thanks for reminding me robdsg88.

Cheers

Panzerfaust said...

I'm installing a fuel tank in my truck but will get to this tonight, thanks

WWS said...

Ridiculous.

Amanda said...

http://careandwashingofthebrain.blogspot.nl/2017/10/govt-jfk-assassination-files-show-jews.html

Panzerfaust said...

Fetzer claims a bullet passed through glass, striking JFK in the neck (rather than a hidden injection of a fast acting drug sourced from South America causing laryngospasm).
Where is the spray of glass then? No ricochets, no misses, no sparks or tuffs of upholstery. For that matter where is the spray of blood? With multiple snipers from a distance shooting at a moving target from a lower elevation the risk of missing and striking unintended targets would be tremendous. I read a law enforcement officer stated he heard the pop of firecrackers.
The Pink Panther shot JFK.

Panzerfaust said...

Edit: from a lower elevation than the book depositry

Scorpio said...

Not much evidence presented to support your theory, Panzer.

Annette A said...

food for thought https://pieceofmindful.com/2017/05/12/jfktv-new-revised/

the controllers and their gatekeepers have spent the years since the JFK "event" keeping the myth alive that he was assassinated. I was 12 years old when this happened and it damaged the nation immensely. I heard at the time that it would be 50 years before some documents would be released and only hoped I would live long enough to finally know what really happened. Luckily, a couple of years ago, I read a book by a guy with a very sharp mind....Tyrone McCloskey...the book is "JFKTV".....it seems long, but is actually a very fast read. Even if you don't buy into the idea, it can be read as fiction...but knowing what we know today about all the false flag events and psyops TPTB are using to keep us in fear...pretending to kill off a president was the ultimate psyop...possibly one of the 1st big televised events. JFK, was an actor and had a part to play....that role ended the day it was supposed to, in the way it was supposed to. Above is a link to the book....open your mind, we are surrounded by propaganda and events that didn't happen the way we were told by MSM. Since reading this and letting it sink in....my questions about "the killing of a president" have been answered....what a relief!

Panzerfaust said...

I have refrained to comment on your evidence Scorpio. Have viewed it several times and all I see at two black boxes. Is this a Rorschach test with no image? Has the government redacted it?

My position doesn't require evidence beyond what is already available + common sense.

Both the Oswsld lone gunman and multiple shooters theories require a ton of theorizing, defensive argumentation, and logic hoop jumping

You know, just like the Holocaust.

Unknown said...

"+common sense" common sense would dictate the wife can kill him any time she likes, no need for a convoluted plan and have the deed caught on film.

Unknown said...

Don't get me wrong, now I want it to be the Pink Panther - that really would be the cherry on top of the whole thing.

Panzerfaust said...

http://reformation.org/jackie-kennedy-was-cia-all-the-way.html

Dispense with the driver firing the first shot. No blood, no impact signs.

Erik Paul said...

These days people say the JFK assassination was a televised event or "they blew his brains out on live TV." B.S. I was 14 at the time.

There were NO moving picture images from Dealy Plaza at the time. There were no hulking TV cameras near the scene and even the press truck was at the end of the motorcade. All we saw were reporters on TV talking awkwardly into telephones.

The first live pictures we saw on TV were of the VC-137 returning his body to Washington Friday evening.

It wasn't until days later that we heard there was a home movie of the event...and that wasn't seen for over a decade (except for a few blurry still frames in Life Magazine).

So if this was some kind of scripted staged media event, they really botched it.

zapoper said...

Zapruder the Jew never flinched. He was there to document the event like the dancing Israelis for 9/11 IMO.

I'm not a big fan of opening my mind totally because a whole lot of shit gets in there.

I'm on creep shit! lol

Erik Paul said...

Actually Zap, Zap did flinch when the shots rang out. I think if they wanted a film of the event they wouldn't have relied on some old Jew with vertigo who needed his secretary's support to keep from falling.

They would have been better off with no movies.

Panzerfaust said...

Filming the event is just as important as the event itself for the "Kazarian Mafia".
Sends a message locked in time.

El Buggo said...

I'm convinced that ALL the relevant footage is fishy at best - see Cluesforum.info. Why? They created a Virtual Reality for us that we can investigate forever without getting anywhere.

So we really do not know what happened to JFK, except that he disappeared that day.

By far the best video on this is this news report where they prepare the public mind for a JFK assassination: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRQCjqAXkfU

Scorpio said...

Interesting perspective, Buggo. The Z-flim is certainly suspicious at best.
Good find with that vid and it certainly planted a few seeds in the minds of unsuspecting Amerikwans
with the help of CIA/Mockingbird media assets.

Erik Paul said...

We should remember that they never intended to ever release the ZAP-ruder (not za-PRUDER) film for public viewing. That was a fluke resulting from the Garrison investigation. Of course, they had greatly altered the film to make it better conform to the official story although it was still far from congruent. The only other film of the actual assassination that got out, the Nix Film, was also tampered with.

There were several other films shot from excellent vantage points that were confiscated at the scene and disappeared. I'm sure the movies created problems for them they would have preferred not to have and made much harder to sell their official bullshit.

Scorpio said...

It's amazing, from a security standpoint, that the President was allowed to drive around Dallas making hairpin turns in an open top limo. No cause for alarm. Please continue shopping. Thank you.

El Buggo said...

Re: The Z-flim is certainly suspicious at best.

It is not just that. The point is that ALL the footage is fishy, to put it mildly - ALL of it. I do not think we have a authentic frame of anything on what went on that day, so we are investigating in a virtual reality. That we can do for more than 50 years, and we will still be spinning our wheels. See cluesforum.info for more on this specific point.

Erik Paul said...

Like we used to say back in the day, it doesn't really matter who shot JFK, it only matters that someone did. ;-)

Panzerfaust said...

Who here is prepared to state the entire sequence of Jack grasping his throat with no evidence of projectile impact, Jackie hardly giving him or his throat a glance instead focusing her attention upon Connolly's words, her maneuvering an arm under JFK's head, his face being ripped off UPWARD, Jackie's juggling with something, etc a fabrication? Granted the film has been tampered with, but to this degree (Fetzer voice) IS ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS!

Panzerfaust said...

"It doesn't really matter who shot JFK"
Is equivalent in absurdity to Hillary's Benghazi hearing statement
"At this point what difference does it make!"

Panzerfaust said...

https://imgflip.com/i/1yj6n9

http://tapnewswire.com/2015/01/slow-motion-video-shows-the-weapon-that-killed-jfk-in-a-single-frame/

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YTdQzXuoXgU

Don't believe me, believe your own eyes.

Panzerfaust said...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ULZ9oCwY1pA

"Met a man from China
Went down to Geisha Minor"

A euphemism for meeting Onassis and spending weeks on a Greek island prior to the assassination under tight security. Difficult to verify (no surprise). Is there an accounting for her whereabouts not dependent upon mere Jackie O fluff pieces?

Panzerfaust said...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=w3IzpazVl-I

Haaapy birth day to you
Haaapy birth day to you
Haaapy birth day mister Pres-a-dent
They used me to get to you!

Unknown said...

"It doesn't really matter who shot JFK"
Is equivalent in absurdity to Hillary's Benghazi hearing statement"

You didn't get the joke, he's saying a lot of people wanted JFK dead, they didn't care who did, just that someone did...

Panzerfaust said...

Trading JFK for LBJ was no joke.

Panzerfaust said...

On that tapnewswire.com link: seems like quite alot of views. I'm interested in hearing from others, has this caused you to reconsider the JFK assassination?

https://imgflip.com/i/1yla2t

zapoper said...

Keep it up Panzer and see what happens.

Panzerfaust said...

Reverse Engineering the JFK Assassination

http://www.pdfhost.net/index.php?Action=DownloadFile&id=3b9ffd13dc26fc8da0f379bd5b02ab21

Panzerfaust said...

Zapoper,
Could you possibly post a screenshot of the first page along with a download link for the "Reverse Engineering The JFK Assassination" PDF posted in my previous reply?

The original blog site it was posted on was abruptly terminated several years ago and Wayback Machine didn't have it archived. Now that it is back on the public domain I believe making it visible here would be a service to the effort of understand what happened that day, who was responsible, how it was carried out.

Perhaps some will not be persuaded but I believe it important to examine all facets of such a monumental event. "Truth does not fear examination."