Saturday, July 28, 2018

Short report from the first day of trial against Monika and Alfred Schaefer (Updates in the comment section)

Translated to English from

Published by: Kurzer on: July 02, 2018

Here is the report of a comrade who was present for the hearing:

On the first day of the trial against Monika and Alfred Schaefer, Alfred Schaefer was arrested in the courtroom today, on 2 July 2018, presumably because he showed on the demo in Nuremberg last Saturday how tall the little dog Pawlow can jump.

At the end of the trial, Monika Schaefer's lawyer submitted that the siblings Monika and Alfred Schaefer should at least be allowed to talk and greet in the courtroom, and that courtesy should be more appropriate to Monika Schaefer. When this request was denied by the prosecutor, Silvia Stoll exclaimed indignantly from the auditorium that this was outrageous, whereupon she was given a 2-day custody and was subsequently arrested in the courtroom.

A process observer, who comes from central Germany, remarked that such behavior would not have been possible even at the deepest GDR times.

Although the negotiation in the auditorium was hard to understand initially, the use of microphones was vehemently rejected by the judge. Only when the protests from the auditorium became louder and Monika Schaefer asked whether it should now be a public hearing or not, the microphones were turned on.

The court responded to remarks by Alfred Schaefer, saying that this was not a "Muppet Show".

There were about 20 process observers in the auditorium, so that, unexpectedly, a few more seats remained available.

Tomorrow it continues from 12:30 clock.


Lady Michèle Renouf was present outside the courthouse to promptly inform the English-speaking world, in which the event receives the utmost attention. Immediately after the trial, she talked to the solicitor of Monika Schaefer about the course of the negotiations. The result of the conversation she shared promptly with her audience on several English-language World Network sites.


WWS said...



From the Right End of the Horse

Paul and John, I am here in Munich on the first day of the Schaefer trial (of the Canadian-born Monika and her German-born brother Alfred). Upon my arrival at the Munich courthouse this morning, my attorney RA Wolfram Nahrath ( who also acts today for Monika Schaefer) warned me not to remain in the courthouse building (much less enter the courtroom ) as likely the same trick will occur upon me as played when the German police seized Monika ( while she attended the attorney Sylvia Stolz trial on January 3, 2018). This was when the judge interrupted that hearing to have Monika dragged off from the public gallery to the cells (for these past 6 months) to the Munich Prison and likely could be repeated today once court officials spotted me, as he says they certainly would, in the public gallery. Since February this year, I have been under criminal investigation having been charged with Volksverhetzung para 130/ populace incitement which carries a five years' custodial penalty following my ad-libbed speech at the Dresden Commemoration. Wiser our attorney says - but my call - that I leave immediately the risky vicinity to instead make reports from a nearby cafe when they provide me with a full account during the intervals of the day's proceedings - as a more useful option especially as I not able to comprehend German language proceedings anyway if witnessing the process behind enemy lines.

WWS said...

I decided to take my attorney's advice as a more effective option (than uselessly being hauled off to a prison cell ) and so am now sitting with Henry Hafenmeyer as he is not allowed inside the courtroom at this time. Henry awaits being called as a witness for the Prosecution for being considered as the video maker ( though in fact, he was not Monika's video maker).

Though RA Sylvia Stolz warmly thanked me for coming to show "International affection for the Schaefer siblings" she agrees that my making a report to include this advice as given by my own attorney in fact serves to strengthen the drama of the situation Alfred and his sister Monika are facing in this Alice in Wonderland anti-National Socialist non-Sovereign German legal-land where - 'first we have the verdict then maybe or maybe not we hear the defendants' evidence' - is the nonsensical norm for historical sceptics.

Alfred is set upon screening in the courthouse the full story of his awakening via the videos he has made. I am only anxious that the judge may manage to forbid this exposee by him . The great disadvantage here in Germany is that no transcripts are made of these processes. I shall do my best to give you the proceedings from the horse's mouth.

Day one began at 09.15. The following was reported to me by Attorney Sylvia Stolz. Before the entrance of the two professional judges and the two lay judges, Alfred was able to hug his handcuffed sister while the Press photographed them and while Alfred gave the Roman salute ( a harmless gesture ludicrously outlawed in still Allied / all- lies occupied Germany. Judge Hofmann and Judge Federl entered with the two lay/Schaffe judges but Alfred refused to stand in any acknowledgment of their authority. To this, the judges declared Alfred's disdain as an offence to the rules whilst Alfred declared them and the Federal Republic of Germany illegitimate since he adheres to the standing legitimacy of the German Reich.

WWS said...


In the "curiouser and curiouser" world of occupied-German law, the judge declared the defendants would not be allowed anything to drink, and if they insisted, the court proceedings would have be interrupted in recess while they drank water! Alfred instantly demanded a drink which resulted in Monika in handcuffs being temporarily removed from the courtroom. Truly a farcical act of "inquisitional" (as Alfred stated) power-playing to which fittingly Alfred added that the court was but a clownish "Muppet Show".

Alfred was told if he offended again he would be heavily fined for complaining that the proceedings were inaudible to him and to the public gallery because Judge Hofmann had ordered that the attorneys not press the live microphone buttons. This instruction wilfully denies due public access to hear the proceedings. When Alfred commenced to read his introductory remarks, the judge demanded he give only a summary. At this, his attorney and Monika's called for an interruption for two hours in order to draw up a rejection of the sitting judges whom they declared patently prejudicial to the defendant's right to express his defence in full. The "Holocaust"-denial laws adhere to those of the Queen of Hearts in Alice in Wonderland wherein these nonsensical trials precede via "first the verdict then the evidence". No wonder historical Revisionists are called religious heretics since the International Guidelines for Teaching About the Holocaust on page 11 determine that: "Care must be taken not to disprove the deniers' position with normal debate and rational argument"!

Even in the Allied occupier's land of Britain, not since 2008 has the BBC permitted another World Service broadcast under the title" Why Can't We Question the Holocaust?" In this unique broadcast, when I and Jewish Prof Deborah Lipstadt were invited as the main guests on this hour-long worldwide phone-in radio show, has the public had the normal opportunity to hear some of the Revisionist victories presented instead of the standard Hollywood version of WW2 history.

Ever since the German ex-Constitutional Court Judges Hassimer and Hoffman-Reim called for the repeal of the "Holocaust"-denial laws there have been numerous valiant attempts to enlighten and embolden the law-makers and law-proponents in today's Germany. Notably these valiant attempts in Germany and Austria were made by the late greats Ernst Zuendel, Dr Herbert Schaller, RA Rieger, Gerd Honsik, - and Horst Mahler, Sylvia Stolz, Germar Rudolf, Henry Hafenmeyer, Dr Rigolf Hennig, Werner Keweloh, Dr Hans Berger, Gunter Deckert, Herr Froerlich, Ursula Haverbeck, Sven L and Christian H to name but a few. Today's opportunity by Alfred and Monika Schaefer may justly capture the tide to call for this anti-debate law to be called into question and repealed.

Alfred Schaefer in person confirmed the report above given to me by Sylvia Stolz. At 12.30 they returned to the court which has since resumed and I await further news from the right end of the horse...

Meanwhile, persons in the public gallery (only about 6-8 which included two comrades from Japan) have recognised some of the Press as Antifa they recall from Pegida demos. There are about 6 in the Press benches, and one from Bild the popular scandal sheet.

"No surrender"!
Michele Renouf

Benny Kikeoutnow said...

Michele Renouf - Bravo!!! Such fair and truthful journalism. Hat's off to you.

"Alfred is set upon screening in the courthouse the full story of his awakening via the videos he has made." - Will they deny him to present his evidence??? - If they do, the judge should be immediately executed for Treason.

"Care must be taken not to disprove the deniers' position with normal debate and rational argument"! - Why?? Because it's the Biggest F'N Lie in History?, and the (((LIARS))) must keep the truth about their extortion, fraud, and deception sham called the Hollow-Hoax in the closet???? That's against justice and fair law. If the jew judge agrees with this, then he must recuse himself at this time so that he can be arrested and when found guilty of Treason, hanged until dead.

Next is for the jewish court to impose the death sentence for anti shemitism, as they did as bolsheviks? Murder peaceful people that happened to notice a mosquito attached to them, sucking their life blood from them, and saying something about the noticeable parasite?. Don't normal people slap the mosquito to death, as an involuntary reaction to the (((parasite))) biting them, and sucking their blood????? YES, THEY DO. The definition of Anti-Semitism should be: One who realizes truth and notices a parasite in the soup.

"Why Can't We Question the Holocaust?"... Since 2008???????? - 10 years of pure lies and keeping the truth suppressed can have quite an affect on the mass populace - the sheeple.... getting plump for their slaughter. lol

Dear People of England - and I do mean "people" - Your time for taking one of two paths has come. One of the paths will lead to your incarceration, as well as your whole family's incarceration, before your's and their execution by the jewz. If you take the right path, it will lead you and your family to prosperity and freedom. The choice is easy, if you know the truth. Please begin to take truth and justice back into your own hands. The people making up all the fairy tail Alice in Wonderland bull shit, needs to be stopped, before they kill you first. They judges and lawyers running your jewish bullshit shitshow need to be arrested, instead of the Schaefer's. Wake up "people" - wake up!

Bless you all, and a special blessing for you Michele Renouf. Thank you so very very much, and may God Speed. :)

WWS said...


FROM LADY MICHELE RENOUF: This morning, Tuesday July 3rd 2018, on day two of the Schaefer sibling's trial, we learn that the two days' punishment for Alfred who was taken yesterday into police custody is over already and after today's session he will be permitted to return home. He now has this further trivial case to face later for making a Roman salute in court yesterday during the pre-trial moments when he had been given the chance to hug his handcuffed sister Monika while the Press were permitted to film. Alfred, ever-fisty, has now been offered the option of bail of 5000 euros to secure his release, though he will have another action taken against him for this harmless historical gesture!

The trial resumed this afternoon at 12.30. Tomorrow we shall learn whether the lead Judge Hofmann will have to step down because of his evident bias towards the defendants. The disdain of this judge for withholding due microphone use so both defendants and the public gallery could hear the proceedings, and the ruling over the norm of a ready glass of water for defendants is but two of the obstructive aspects to the due basic rights which gives further surreality to the conditions under which Germans and foreigners must encounter under the Basic Laws in favour of prosecuting the expression of free opinion among citizens and right to discuss normal historical source criticism without protected exceptionalism.

Michele Renouf

Unknown said...

Treating them like concentration camp detainees... How apropos for the "we're the victims" Jews

zapoper said...

Short report from the third trial day against Monika and Alfred Schaefer at the Munich district court

Published by: Kurzer on:July 04, 2018in: Reports from Absurdistan

The third day of the trial did not begin at 12:30 as announced, but at 13:15. The subject of today's negotiations were lectures by the two siblings Schäfer about their previous lives, where they were born, where they grew up and what they have done in their lives so far. Both grew up in Arctic Canada in completely intact family relationships and were only allowed to speak German at home. When the grandparents wrote from Germany, the mother read the letter to the family. For each child there was also a separate letter, which the children then had to answer in German again. So they were forced to learn German, which they did not want as children.

As long as the parents were still alive, they often came to Germany during the long school holidays in Canada over 9 weeks to visit their relatives in North Rhine-Westphalia and Bavaria am Ammersee. Staying at the Ammersee was always like paradise, as they were able to live there very close to nature - as in Canada. Their love of nature has kept the two their whole life. So Monika Schäfer studied biology and later also worked as a park attendant in a national park in Canada before she became a music teacher for violin. In the National Park, she was often out and about with her horses for days in the wild.

Alfred Schäfer has led a decidedly adventurous life. He cycled for 5 years, cycled around America, cycled in the Orient or as a hang-glider in the air. He was often exposed to considerable dangerous situations, such as a crash with the dragon, which he believes he has survived only because he has a guardian angel. He has never stayed in hotels on his travels, but only in the open air.

The father of the two siblings, a survivor of the Rhine meadow camp, was active in Canada as a doctor in the Eskimos. From him they learned that a nature-related survival in extreme climates and with primitive peoples is only possible with a completely sincere and true attitude.

After the death of the father, the attachment of the siblings became closer together to maintain the family traditions. For Christmas, the sister visited Alfred and his wife on Lake Starnberg in Tutzing several times, so they could celebrate the celebration together as they have always celebrated with their parents in Canada.

When the defendant's speech was interrupted by the prosecutor, the lawyer pointed out that only the chairman could interrupt, but not her. It was unusual at all that another prosecutor was present at this trial day than at the first two days of the trial. It suggests that today's rendition of CVs could be completely irrelevant to the outcome of the trial if prosecutors are arbitrarily interchangeable.

Finally, a short excerpt of a video was shown, in which a Jewish star and a swastika were compared with each other described. This is obviously the subject of the indictment. Alfred Schäfer was interviewed about this video. The lawyer questioned the lawfulness of the interview because the image sequence was taken out of context, without asking why these two symbols were described in the video.

zapoper said...

Short report from the fourth trial day against Monika and Alfred Schaefer at the district court of Munich

Published by: Kurzer

Today started quite turbulent. After the appearance of the Inquisition Court, the Chairman asked the audience section who Mr. X was. When he reported he was confronted with the accusation that he had insulted a prosecutor in the anteroom the day before, saying to her that he wished her that she would also see a jail from the inside, what the judge - except aggravated with excitement - with 4 days in good order. Immediately after this proclamation, Mr. X was led out of the room by police officers. His advice that his car was still out there was answered by the judge angrily, saying that he did not care. He literally shouted to Mr. X, "Go harsh, I do not want to see you here anymore." Abruptly he also turned to Alfred Schäfer with the question what he think of it. Alfred Schäfer replied that he did not want to comment on this because words in this court were always reinterpreted and therefore a comment on it was too dangerous. The session was subsequently suspended for a short while because the judge said he needed 5 minutes to calm down.

When the session reopened, Alfred Schäfer's lawyer filed an application to refuse the judge for bias. As a result, the session was suspended for 2 hours, but the motion was rejected by the prosecutor after the beginning of the resumption of negotiations because of "sequence of assumptions".

Subsequently, the continuation of the already begun the day before video screenings. Again, two icons were pointed out that are juxtaposed in the video. On the left side of the picture a star of the Jews is shown and as a counterpart on the right in the picture a swastika, which is represented in the video by Alfred Schäfer as a symbol of evil, because at that time he still believed that the swastika symbolized evil. This juxtaposition of the two symbols is evidently the subject of the indictment.

In the video, whose widespread use caused great astonishment in court, Prof. Noam Chomsky is interviewed by a university in America on 9/11. Prof. Chomsky explains in the interview that there is no evidence of involvement of the US government in the terrorist attack. Alfred Schäfer had written to Prof. Chomsky on the basis of this interview and read in the video his letters to Prof. Chomsky and his answer letters. Although Prof. Chomsky has answered the letters of Alfred Schäfer, without actually answering the questions asked by Alfred Schäfer, which led Alfred Schäfer to formulate his letters more rigorously.

When the judge complains of an "aggressive tone" in his correspondence with Prof. Chomsky, Alfred Schäfer explains that one finally has to understand that Prof. Chomsky is "a guru" in the English-speaking world and his remarks on 9/11 are a great disappointment why he called him a "cowardly traitor" and "Zionist fascist". Prof. Chomsky missed a big chance because he could have rehabilitated himself. Instead, he put his good reputation at risk for his "brothers in faith" and destroyed himself with this admission even his full size, although he presented him with a clear factual situation.

The judge also accused Alfred Schäfer of having made a threat to all "Jewish friends" of Prof. Chomsky, saying in the video that they would be complicit if they kept silent about the 9/11 truth. Shot like a pistol, Alfred Schäfer explains to the judge the difference between a threat and a warning on the basis of a practical example. He also explained that this video was his first video and more or less represents the beginning of his recovery process. When he realized that some people could get more money by fraud and manipulation than by hordes of workers through honest work, this triggered a political process of thought.

zapoper said...

The second video shown is an interview with Henry Hafenmeyer on the theme "The masterminds of our present situation". The commentary on this video has been postponed to the following week.

Subsequently, a witness was heard, who claimed that Alfred Schäfer had been hounding with his speech at the commemoration ceremony in Bretzenheim on 25.7.2017. In addition, Alfred Schäfer completed his speech with a Roman greeting for 2 or 3 seconds. The judge questioned the witness whether the speech had been acknowledged by the audience with applause, but the witness could not remember. The court was shown a photo from the video.

Alfred Schäfer then explains to the court that in this speech he simply reproduced what his father had told him about the Rhine meadow camps and that he did not object to slandering his father as a harlot. His father, a prisoner of war in the Rhine meadow camps, had observed how prisoners were brought in healthily, but soon fell ill due to intentionally induced life-threatening circumstances and how daily trucks were transported away with the corpses of the deceased prisoners of war without anyone knowing where to go. His father had survived the Rhine meadow camp unscathed only by happy circumstances.

The request for detention by Monika Schäfer was rejected on the grounds that the charge had not changed.

Even today, the conduct of the negotiations in the auditorium was sometimes very poor.

The dates for the further negotiation days are the 12th and 13th of July, starting at 9:15 am.


Urgent cause! For immediate presentation!
Because of unjustified liberation
Official and public letter of publicity
Read HERE:

zapoper said...

Subject: Schaefer again arrested/ unsung Frau
Date: 2018-07-06 13:33
From: Michele Renouf

Cc: Michele Renouf

Greetings all, today at 2pm at the home of Alfred Schaefer - (he and I
had just finished watching and discussing matters re his videos he was
succeeding to screen in full in the Munich courtroom ...and then his
wife laid table for lunch after I removed my Laptop ...and so I went to
wash my hands). I then Heard Police knocking on my bathroom door
announcing their arrival. It was as if one was suddenly in a nightmare
hollywood movie about a police state action! At first I thought maybe
high-spirited Albert was playing a joke. On opening my bathroom door,
there stood 2 armed officers awaiting me. Gave my passport; said they'd
come to arrest Alfred. Saw 5 of them handcuff Alfred (and with the
little packed cheese lunch his experienced wife swiftly made and handed
to one officer for her husband) Albert was hauled away about something
he had perhaps said perhaps when yesterday ( as he has to do) he had
duly turned up at the police station twice per week since he is out on
bail. Whatever this "crime" was, he's again in a police cell now. His
wife advised that I and HH should disappear asap in case police returned
knowing now that we two were there, easy to haul in for good measure.
Vot a business. Cat and mouse but at least valiant Frau Schaefer made
sure we each took with us our lunch cheese!

"No surrender"!

Sent from my iPhone

Noor al Haqiqa said...

Thanks for this service Zap. This is hard information to find. Lady Renouf is a paragon of elegance and eloquence. I have had the pleasure of meeting her and she is a sterling human being.

As for the Schaeffers, they are in trouble. Germany is not for Germans any longer; it is for migrants and cucks. Just how occupying America (((serving as a branch of the future Pax Judaica) wants it to be.

zapoper said...

Dear All,

It is my understanding that Ms. Schaefer is being prosecuted in Germany for statements made in Canada. I'm a baffled. I don't understand how a statement made in Canada can be prosecuted in nation other than Canada. Do the Germans have worldwide criminal jurisdiction. I really doubt that.

If I committed a crime in Germany, the U.S. and Germany could extradite me and put me before a German court. But the U.S. court would not be able to prosecute me.

Do I have it wrong. Did some part of what is charged occur in Germany? Or have the Germans declared themselves the cops of the world?


From: Lady Michele Renouf
Date: Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 2:10 PM

Subject: Re: CBC NEWS STORY ON MONIKA AND ALFRED SCHAEFER: German law and UN Human Rights re Faurisson clarification

Dear All,

To answer the question:

Monika’s “crime” ie the video “Sorry Mum I was Wrong about the Holocaust” was committed on German soil. In 2016, Monika Schaefer posted two videos to YouTube, one in English, one in German, outlining her Revisionist-reliant arguments for why the omnipotent “Holocaust” narrative is flawed.

Concerning your question of jurisdiction:
The Germans do claim “extraterritoriality”, in other words, the right to put people on trial in German courts for “crimes” committed elsewhere in the world. This type of claim of extraterritoriality is not unique to Germany eg a few years ago a Spanish judge brought an action against the former Chilean leader Augusto Pinochet for alleged crimes committed on Chilean not Spanish soil.

In my forthcoming report on the Schaefer Siblings’ current trial in Munich I shall be giving the Scientist of Law Sylvia Stolz’s explanation of the extraordinary constitutional position in today’s Germany. As well, I shall be referring to the Para 49 of UN Human Rights Committee 2011 of which Robert Faurisson sought clarification concerning "general prohibition” versus specific instances.

Concerning your question re the “cops of the world”: ‘safe’ (!) to say the pro-Zionist USA hold that chuzpah title (having jettizoned their superior Jeffersonian ideal of “no meddling in other countries”).

Best to All,

zapoper said...

Monday update, July 9th 2018

Readers might expect that Alfred and Monika could seek protection from the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights – adopted by the United Nations in 1966 and supposedly in force since 1976, protecting basic human rights such as freedom of expression. Article 19 of this Covenant states “Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.” It continues: “Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.”

The third paragraph of Article 19 then qualifies these rights by accepting that they can be restricted, but only by laws which are necessary “for respect of the rights or reputations of others” or for protecting national security, public order, public health or morals. Article 20 goes on: “Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.”

There are obvious problems and potential contradictions here, and it is not surprising that there have been attempts to clarify the Covenant’s meaning. The UN’s Human Rights Committee has periodically issued commentaries for this purpose, and in 2011 the Committee’s “General Comment 34” offered some hope to criminalised dissident historians and others by stating: "Laws that penalise the expression of opinions about historical facts are incompatible with the obligations that the Covenant imposes on States parties in relation to the respect for freedom of opinion and expression.” A footnote referred specifically to the case of the French revisionist historian and expert on documentary analysis Professor Robert Faurisson.

On 22nd December 2011 Prof. Faurisson wrote to the Office of the UN High Commissioner asking whether the so-called Gayssot Act of 1990, a French law specifically designed to target Prof. Faurisson by criminalising sceptical enquiry into “Holocaust” history, contravened Article 19. He pointed out that France was "a charter signatory to the 1966 Covenant but a country which, nevertheless, sentences peaceable citizens to imprisonment for their writings on history.”

In particular, Prof. Faurisson drew attention to the admonition in the UN Human Rights Committee’s “General Comment 34” that "a law may not confer unfettered discretion for the restriction of freedom of expression on those charged with its execution.” He suggested that French law had done just that:
"With respect to paragraphs 35 and 36 I submit that France, in its checks on public expression of views on history under the Gayssot Act, has failed to “demonstrate in specific and individualised fashion the precise nature of the threat” to the rights and reputation of persons or to public order (Covenant, article 19) purportedly constituted by utterances and writings contravening the said Act, and has failed as well to demonstrate “the necessity and proportionality of the specific [restrictive] action taken, in particular by establishing a direct and immediate connection between the expression and the threat.””

zapoper said...

Almost seven years later Germany’s courts continue to ignore this human rights Covenant. Though Monika Schaefer has been held in prison for the past six months, there has been no attempt to demonstrate any precise threat, or any incitement of violence. Monika’s video is entirely non-threatening and pacific in its presentation, whatever one’s estimation of the “Holocaust”. Instead the German courts (in their customary fashion) rely on an “unfettered” general prohibition of certain historical opinions, in complete disregard of the Human Rights Committee’s warning.

The UK courts are by no means perfect (as we have seen in the recent prosecution of Jeremy Bedford-Turner), but the German law and German courts are far worse. In the UK it would be necessary to demonstrate either that the “criminal” words were “intended” to stir up racial hatred, or that “having regard to all the circumstances” they were likely to do so. Additionally the words must be found by the court to be “threatening, abusive or insulting”.

In Germany the courts hold that in and of itself “Holocaust denial” is a criminal incitement. There is no requirement to prove intention or likelihood to stir up hatred; and no requirement to prove that the words used were “threatening, abusive or insulting”. The expression could be entirely mild: so long as the content involves “Holocaust denial” it is deemed criminal in Germany – despite the failure of courts or legislators to define exactly what they mean by “the Holocaust”.

In the case of Alfred Schaefer, prosecutors in the present trial are seeking to bundle together a series of videos and present Alfred as “aggressive” and threatening. So far he has succeeded in playing the entire “9/11 Gatekeepers” video to the court, which cannot reasonably be viewed as aggressive, but prosecutors are persisting with their strategy of piecing together rhetorical expressions excerpted from different videos and speeches. This is an effort to criminalise a broader range of dissident political expressions, some of which are not covered by the “catch-all” prohibition of “Holocaust denial”.

The outcome of the Schaefer siblings’ trial will have vital implications for the liberties not only of Germans but of all visitors to European Union countries.

“No surrender”!
Michèle Renouf

Voltman said...

Santa Monika's Revelation

She suffers in her cell unjust incarceration
Her jailers come from hell with vile indoctrination
The muppets from the court won't have exoneration
Those puppets kill for sport and love extermination

Her fiddle holds the keys of inmate celebration
She speaks and sings with ease, a source of inspiration
She uncovers the truth of her generation
And discovers the root of her liberation

She played Don Messer's breakdown
Candles glowing in the wind
And danced me to the end of love
With her plywood violin

First she took Alberta
Then she took Berlin



Monika Schaefer: Letter from a German Prison
Lasha Darkmoon February 27, 2018

Dance me to the end of love

WWS said...


Dear Barbara, thank you, dear sister, for your long and wonderful letter and envelope with Elvis stamps in a heart. I notice details. Well that one would be pretty hard to miss -- haha – unless I was a dullard. And if I was a dullard, I guess I wouldn't be in prison for speaking words.

I must tell you, so you don't think I'm a slacker, that your letter took exactly 8 weeks and a day to reach me from when it was postmarked! I used to say that the average time for mail one way in and out of prison was about a month but now I would put the average at 6 weeks. Pretty bad eh? It leads to slow conversations. Maybe that's the equivalent of the slow food movement and I like the slow food movement so maybe the slow conversations are a good thing? Having just reread your letter before responding I'm kind of in free flow here, inspired by you.

Me too, I am totally into organic real food and have always grown veggies wherever I could. I grew up in a family of seven, five children, in a big city, but we were like Urban Farmers. Huge vegetable garden, fruit bushes, some small apple and cherry trees in the yard. The family would go berry picking in the river valley, we could walk there right from our home and pick saskatoon's, chokecherries, rose hips and I can't remember what else. We live really near the Storyland Valley Zoo. You should ask Alfred to tell you the story of how he used to talk with the seals. It was funny. Speaking of funny, you can probably imagine this without me telling you, Alfred had us in stitches a lot when we were growing up. (In case that is just a local expression, “in stitches,” that means we laughed a lot. Very fun and funny.

I love the image of you and Dolly singing to the dudes (?). That is just Priceless. Speaking of images, although that was a mental image, yes you can send me a few pictures but not too many. There is a limit of 20 pictures in the cell and I have my limit but when people send me a few more, then I can trade them out and send the excess into storage. So if you sent three or four pictures in a letter nobody gets in a sweat. I wonder what the storage looks like. Stuff keeps getting sent there, that people try to send me and I cannot have. I will need a few wheel barrels or a pickup truck when I leave here. People send stuff and I can't have it, how sad. It's pretty strict around here. Oh and you mentioned internet, definitely not! I wonder if people are trying to send me emails. Oh dear, I dread trying to wade through thousands of emails when I get out. I will probably just have to delete all and start over as it will be too overwhelming. [more...]

WWS said...


Very interesting that you got persecuted by the doctors for breastfeeding. When I had my daughter, breastfeeding was encouraged but the actual support to do so was not that great. I became a La Leche League leader and did that for a number of years in my town. I learned a lot about the industry of baby food, formula, etc. Boycott of Nestle ever since.

The hot water just got delivered through the little hatch in the door. I feel so special here, getting room service like that! Now I am going to enjoy my cup of coffee, knit and listen to music on the radio for a bit. That is my early morning routine I'll be back.

An hour later... I love that part of the day. Come to think of it, there are many parts of the day that I really enjoy. So you see, they are not getting me down. I am sure that you would be the same. You wouldn't waste very many minutes or seconds on self-pity and you would get right to work on becoming creative and using the time well.

On the subject of being well, I want to add that I certainly couldn't do it alone! Just like you said about the karaoke coming from God, I too feel I am being guided and helped by spirit and that includes all the loving energy thoughts and prayers coming from many many people including yourself. Thank you also for the Bible verses, and the Elvis lyrics. We used to sing the German folk song Muss I Denn, around the campfire when my dad's best friend came over from Germany and visited us one summer with his wife and two of his many children, they did that twice with different children the second time. He belted out those folk songs and we sang along and just loved it.

Well, my dear, it has been lovely spending part of my morning with you. Let's do it again sometime, yes? I'll put the kettle on... We are the birds flying free in this picture love Monica.


blake121666 said...

Have you seen this video, zap?

Alfred Schaefer appears to be advocating: "It's time to exterminate the kikes".

And he is tossing around Nazi salutes.

What's the point in this? Is he trying to be a clown?

zapoper said...

Yes I have seen it. I wouldn't post that here. What the hell is he thinking??? It makes me a bit paranoid about which side he is on.

No update on Renouf from yesterday's trial yet. Only one from a German site.

zapoper said...

Short report from the fifth trial day against Monika and Alfred Schaefer at the Munich district court

Published by: Kurzer on:July 12, 2018in: Reports from Absurdistan 4 comments Share printing by email

After the failure in the morning , the trial resumed at 13:30.

The security controls on today's fifth day of the trial were aggravated, as they now had to take off their shoes.

In the afternoon both Monika and Alfred Schäfer were led into the courtroom. The trial began with the screening of the film "Brainwashing 911 & the Holohoax" in English. Subsequently, the interpreter of the text, which was spoken in the film, was presented in German. Alfred has said that the interpreter has done well with the translation. This film is based on the charge of the sixth charge. A film with Russian subtitles is based on charges 7 and 8. However, this film could not yet be addressed because the translation was not yet ready.

Alfred Schäfer then explained the context he sees between 911 and the holo religion. The same pictures were repeatedly shown in the media and in schools about the terrorist attack in 911, so that the representation disseminated via the media would have burnt into the brains of the people, just as they had done with the HC. The schools are therefore no educational institutions, but Indoktrinationsanstalten. But the truth about 911 must be different than the presentation spread over the media. For how could it be that two airplanes had flown into two towers, but a third building had collapsed without an airplane flying into it? In connection with 911 he had met Christopher Bollyn, who at that time held a senior position within the American FBI. He told him that the same backers were behind 911 and the holo religion. Together with Christopher Bollyn he then made the film series "Brainwashing". Christopher Bollyn had to flee with his family from the VSA to Sweden. Alfred Schäfer also supported Christopher Bollyn financially because the truth-tellers are always trying to make them financially ready.

zapoper said...

Asked if he had ever been charged with these films elsewhere, Alfred said that this was the case only in this "free country", Germany. The only ones who reported were the Hasbara . "Hasbara" is a Hebrew word for "explanation". They had made their "statements" in the comment section on the videos at the lowest level to discredit the videos. The Hasbara but had become less over time, because the Enlightenment scene had grown exponentially. No matter if you were imprisoned or not, the truth could not be locked away. She will now spread unstoppable everywhere.

The film, which is charged with Monika Schäfer, was shown on today's day of the trial. However, Monika said nothing today because she was asked by her lawyer to say nothing because he does not feel well today. The motion to dismiss the lawsuit against Monika Schäfer was rejected by the Chamber with a litany of paragraphs justifying the conditions for the prosecution.

The court also took a look at a postcard that Alfred Schäfer sent to his relatives with the text "The devil loves betrayal, but he hates the traitor." Alfred Schäfer explains that he sent this postcard in disappointment over his own relatives to this, because it was she who had reported him. But it would not do them any good if they continued to rely on the Holoreligion's dead horse because they believe that they are dependent on their salary, for the truth will inevitably find its way into the light. He did not send this postcard to threaten someone, but to express his disappointment.

At the end, Alfred Schäfer said that he could be in court early in the morning. It should be better to release him, so that you do not forget him again, because he would also appear on time by appointment on time.

The judge did not use his microphone today, so that his comments were very difficult to follow.


WWS said...

"In connection with 911 he had met Christopher Bollyn, who at that time held a senior position within the American FBI."

Did Mike Piper know, or suspect, this?

zapoper said...

Short report from the sixth trial day against Monika and Alfred Schaefer at the Munich district court

Published by: Kurzer on:July 13, 2018in: Reports from Absurdistan 1 Comment Share printing by email

Monika Schäfer has read her statement today, which according to the judge is usually not allowed. Since Monika Schäfer does not speak perfect German, one wants to make an exception. She tells us that she has also been politically active and that she has felt deeply connected to green ideals. She also ran several times for a political office. This persisted until she found out that Israel's war had been justified by misrepresentations. Then she resigned from the party. She learned early to think for herself.

She did everything herself for the video. After completing and publishing it, she felt a happy relief and was relieved of a heavy burden because she had always put her parents under general suspicion, but now she knew that she did not have to blame you for the story had been a very different, as one has told since 1945. That's why they apologized to their mother in the video.

Due to the success of her video, many friendships had broken up and a ritual defamation campaign had begun against her. In a small newspaper in a place with 5,000 inhabitants, for example, read letters were published about them by readers from completely different areas who would normally not read this newspaper at all, but who only served the purpose of defaming it. In the beginning she had to force herself to go to her door at all. But if one broke such a taboo and did so with conviction, because one knew that the official statements about the period 1933-1945 were a shabby lie, then the targeted ritual defamations were easier to bear. Any attempt was made to intimidate her. So she had always ridden by bicycle. One day, at a traffic light, a car standing next to her drove away so that all the sand had been sprayed to her back. Also economically one tried to make them ready. Not a single student from her place had come to her to take violin lessons. There was a veritable witch-hunt against her, which split the place where she lived. While many had turned away from her, on the other hand many people had come to her who she did not know and who were completely stunned by what was going on. In addition, in July 2016, a law came into force, which made it possible to make music in public, even in the park in their vicinity. For this a license was necessary, which one had denied her however. After all, her brother Alfred had made her offer to come to Germany better if the situation in Canada became too dangerous for her.

Bartholomew Beauregard III said...

The Hoax is a circus, rising like a bagel in a bucket-a-grits to human consciousness these days, and fast. You can see that Alfred is very pissed at the situation of where the kikes have put all of mankind, with their incessant lying. If he is acting somewhat like a "clown" then so be it - Remember, he's performing in a jewish circus filled with lied and deception. Good for him to act, in their shoa.
Extermination is just one option. I would prefer a life sentence for those that spread venomous hate hate hate for innocent German people and the great man Adolf Hitler who happened to free Germany and the German population from the clutches of Satan's sperm all grown up. The Judge and court are a fraud. Germans should shut it down immediately and grant freedom to all current prisoners that have noticed the hollow-fraud, and said something about it. At that time, take the Judge outside the court house and escort him to a nice shady tree close by, and then hang the lying deceiving coward devil bastard from it.

A word to the wise.... Fish Swim, Birds Fly, and Jews Lie Lie Lie

zapoper said...

The judge asked why she made a video and did not choose the written form. He also wanted to know why she then pointed out where to find out about the topic, eg the video about Ernst Zündel or "Question about HC". Monika reports that the sources have been very helpful to her to understand everything. She wanted to invite everyone to learn more about it, to understand what really happened in the period 1933-1945. Asked by the judge why she found the lie shabby, Monika explained that the feeling of guilt should live on forever. The fact that she is here in jail is proof of that.

Alfred Schäfer adds that they therefore made a video and did not choose the written form, because a video would have a much higher range. People today would much rather watch a video than read texts.

He had also participated in videoconferencing, for example on a Jewish-operated, English-language block "Jews for Hitler", which is now also blocked. On this block he had talked to Jews who were also interested in an explanation because they feared that all Jews would suffer when the truth came to light. If the development here went on and we did not care about the truth, then there would be the danger that we would get the same conditions here as in Russia with the Bolsheviks, because here the same forces are working in the background as then.

To the video of Bretzenheim Alfred said he had not made the Hitler salute, but the Roman greeting. He said nothing to Hitler. The prosecutor asked Alfred what kind of flags were in the picture. Alfred explained that they were black-and-white-red flags, to which he could say nothing.

The hearing will continue on Monday, July 16, at 9:45.


zapoper said...

In the mean time, Where is Michèle Renouf with her own English updates?

zapoper said...

Trial of Monika Schaefer at Munich, day 6 from Richard Edmonds

Today is:
Saturday, July 14th, 2018

Subject: Trial of Monika Schaefer at Munich, day 6.
From: Richard Edmonds
Sent: July 14, 2018 10:38 AM

On the sixth day of the trial of Monika and Alfred Schaefer at the Munich court, 13th July 2018, Monika Schaefer gave her personal statement. Translation made by R. Edmonds.

Monika Schaefer read out her personal statement, which according to the judge is usually not permitted. But the judge accepted that Monika dos not speak German perfectly, hence he decided to make an exception. Monika related how she became engaged politically and how she felt herself deeply drawn to Green politics. She campaigned many times for political office. That had all continued till she had learnt that Israel’s wars were being justified by false claims. There-upon she left the party. She had learnt very early to think for herself.

She had made the video herself. Once she had made the film and put it in the public domain, she then felt a feeling of relief and felt freed from a heavy burden. She had always held her parents under a general suspicion, but now she knew that there was nothing to reproach them with, because History was quite contrary to what we had been told since 1945. This was this reason why she had apologized to her mother.

As a consequence of the success of the video, she had lost many friendships; and a campaign of ritual defamation commenced against her. For example, in a small newspaper of a town with five thousand inhabitants, readers‘ letters started appearing, written by readers from quite other districts, who would not normally read the news-paper. These readers‘ letters served the purpose of defaming her. At the beginning, she had to force herself to go to her front-door. However when one deliberately and with conviction breaks such a taboo, because one knows that the official claims regarding the period 1933 -1945 are a shabby lie, then such ritual defamations are easier to bear. Every attempt had been made to intimidate her. For example, she always rides by bicycle, and one day at the traffic lights a car had sped away from her throwing the sand of the street against her. Also attempts had been made to ruin her financially. Not a single student from her locality came any more to take instruction on violin-playing. A regular witch-hunt was organised against her. This witch-hunt had split the community in which she lived. Whilst many had turned away from her, on the other hand, many others whom she did not know had come to her; and they could not understand what was happening. In July 2016 a new local law gave permission for music to be played in the local park close to her. A licence for this was needed, but this licence was refused to her. Finally her brother had made the offer, that it was better to come to Germany, if the situation in Canada should become too dangerous for her.

The judge asked, why she had made a video rather than chosen to write an article. Also he wanted to know why she had given advice as to where information on the subject could be found, for example referring to the video about Ernst Zundel or “Questions about the HC.” Monika replied that she herself had found the sources very helpful in order to understand everything. She wanted to invite everybody to learn more in order to understand what had really taken place in the period of 1933 to 1945. In reply to the question from the judge, why she found the lie so shabby [threadbare, seedy, mean], Monika declared because the intention was that the guilt feelings should continue for ever. The fact that she was in prison proved that.

F I N I S.

zapoper said...

Saturday, July 14th, 2018

DAY 192 of Monika Schaefer’s loss of freedom
Day 70 of Ursula Haverbeck’s loss of freedom
Day 65 of Gerd Ittner’s loss of freedom
Day 64 of Jez Turner’s loss of freedom
Day 10 of Alfred Schaefer’s loss of freedom


Write to Monika at the following address:
Monika Schaefer
JVA Stadelheim
Schwarzenbergstr. 14
81549 München

Write to Ursula at the following address:
JVA Bielefeld-Brackwede
z. Hd. Ursula Haverbeck
Umlostraße 100
33649 Bielefeld

Write to Gerd at the following address:
Gerd Ittner
JVA Nürnberg
Mannertstraße 6
90429 Nürnberg

Write to Jez Turner at the following address:
Jez Bedford-Turner A5544EE,
wing E3-02,
HMP Wandsworth,
PO Box 757, Heathfield Road,
Wandsworth, London SW18 3HU.

Write to Alfred at the following address:
Alfred Erhard Schaefer
JVA Stadelheim
Stadelheimerstr. 12
81549 München

Dear Supporters of Freedom of Speech and Historic Truth,

Latest new on Monika Schaefer. Please share.

Mehr Licht!

Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press
“Digging to the issues since 1998”

zapoper said...

Short report from the seventh trial day against Monika and Alfred Schaefer at the Munich district court

Published by: Kurzer on:July 16, 2018in: Reports from Absurdistan No Comments Share printing by email

The 7th trial day started late today at 10:10.

The subject of the discussion was the second Brainwashing video by Alfred Schaefer. However, since the computer refused to work after 10 minutes, there were further delays until the proceedings could be continued.

Alfred Schaefer brings in the video also quotes by Sefton Delmer, the British propaganda chief in WW2. They are intended to represent a thinking aid, a bridge, which should allow the listeners to follow the video mentally and to understand the contents in context.

Quotation S. Delmer in the video of A. Schäfer: "We've won this war through atrocity propaganda and we're just starting to do it right now. We will continue this atrocity propaganda, we will increase it until no one is going to adopt a good word from the Germans until everything is destroyed that could bring them sympathy in other countries and until they are so confused that they no longer know what they are should do. When this is achieved, when they begin to pollute their own nest, not reluctantly but with zeal to obey the victors, only then is the victory complete. It will never be final. The re-education requires conscientious, undecayed care like an English lawn. Only a moment of carelessness and the weeds break through, this ineradicable weed of historical truth. "

Alfred Schaefer said that if the 1st and 2nd WK had not expired with this foul propaganda and this had not been accepted by the public as a historical truth, then there would have been no 911, because it could not have done so. Because there was always the same mastermind behind it. It was then a Jewish-Bolshevik gang who murdered the tsar's family and through this shock traumatized the people so much that they no longer had the courage to resist. The people would have endured everything because they feared for their lives because of the Bolshevik atrocities.

After reading the translation of the lyrics to the video, Alfred was asked why he did not just make a video about 911, but always made a connection to the Jews and to Israel. Alfred Schaefer explains that, of course, that is not possible any other way, because the Jews everywhere had their fingers involved in the game. On a sailing trip, he met several CEOs, engineers, and other well-to-do people, who surprised him a lot, because many of them knew that 911 had not gone down as it had been portrayed in the media. He also met an established, much-vaunted journalist who claimed she could publish everything. He had predicted to her that she could publish the truth about 911, but that she would be unemployed the next day. Probably it will be so that their research on 911 would not even be published. And indeed, it had come as Alfred Schaefer predicted, because they have never published anything in the doubt of the official version of the 911 events.

zapoper said...

The Fred Leuchter interview, he had only taken his videos because it was another puzzle piece, which would contribute to the understanding of the big picture. You do not have to know and know all the details to understand the truth. One has to understand only the biggest lies in order to realize, behind which mask the great things took place. The Jews, who were still silent now, who thought it was good that children were already being taught lies in the kindergarten about the HC, he could not understand because they made themselves complicit and had to reckon that the violence would turn against them when the truth comes to light.

The charge 5 is a sequence from an older video with a lecture by Ursula Haverbeck, because it was their common goal to shut down this madness.

The question of why he always speaks in his videos of the "Chosen", answered Alfred Schaefer to the effect that the chosen ones themselves could better explain what was meant by that.

The prosecutor was obviously not interested in the videos, because she was constantly busy with other things during the screening of the videos and did not pay any attention to the performance.

In the second Brainwashing video, Alfred Schaefer also used the following quote: " Wars are always the harvest of the Jews. "It shows that the Jews had always made good business with the wars and were now working to launch the third WK.

The third video was shown only as long as the translation was available.

The hearing will continue tomorrow, 17.7.2018 at 11:00.

Translated from: