Just one big problem with your theory is that it really requires a way of dealing with Hitler, in the end. So your have him not committing suicide, but rather escaping to Argentina, and hiding out there! So, even with the jew bankers protecting him, he manages to evade what would be the greatest freelance hunt for him, in all recorded history, and then he dies peacefully and unknown even today, somewhere in Argentina?
Have you considered a career as a novelist? You certainly know how to string a series of facts together to make a good story.
Hitler could have well lived under armed protection for the rest of his life. Also, a quick shave and a change of haircut would have the vast majority of the masses disbelieving any photo that might have been taken of him, and with the absolute Jewish control of the media they hardly had to worry about the story of Hitler's relocation getting to the masses did they!? Alan Buttle
Just another thought: Imagine Hitler letting his hair and beard grow and dressing himself like a Rabbi, curls 'n' all. Are you going to know who it is?
well done for focussing on Schachtybaby here. whilst piling through all the Bormann books I took a detour to take a swatch at the geezer. So I read Weitz's Hitler's Banker which I chose deliberately for its kosher credentials to see what the spin was. Well it was a blando nothing to see here move along load of bollox. Once you realise the whole thing is a set up, focussing on Schacht/Hess at the beginning then on to Bormann's sugar mommy, only obliquely ever mentioned, and then the getting rid of a too effective administrator in a key area like Heydrich, all the "mistakes" after 42 make sense.
So many mysteries of history make sense once you forget about the Hitler/Himmler/Goering NPCs. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA.
A question to consider is whether the WMD would have been made available to be used if the Czech research labs and weaponsfab works were not sabotaged at the administrative level by a Nazi muppet.
Not sure what katanas point is -a) what in the end happenned to AH isn't relevant either for this broadcast, or in general, and b) Osama Bin Laden.... ---------
My point is that once you go down the path of saying Hitler was a secret tool of the jews, or such like, then having him commit suicide in his bunker doesn't quite fit the overall story line. As in, his reward for destroying Germany was to be able to commit suicide? Really? Hence, having him flee to a secret base in Antarctica, or more plausibly, to a secret hide-away in Argentina, to spend his well earned retirement in luxury. Makes complete sense, not.
If you are interested in these sort of pot boiler stories, Andrew Hitchcock interviewed some guy who has written a book on that.
Osama bin Laden died soon after he didn't do 9/11, but was resurrected under Obama for him to kill him, all for show.
Katana, you seem to be deliberately focusing on the tiniest speculative comment in this hour-long podcast, which makes me think that i must have done a pretty good job at laying out the evidence of my theory.
Alan you are partly right. I’ve focused on your speculation at the end because it sums up your overall approach to your style of interpretation of events.
Presenting the idea that you are inclined to think that Hitler fled Germany after the war to Argentina, or wherever, is something that anyone can assess using their own commonsense.
Your interpretation of what Schacht did etc., requires some detailed knowledge that most listeners don’t have.
So I didn’t ignore the bulk of your podcast because I can’t dispute it, but rather because it’s not accessible to most people.
In other words, the idea that you think that Hitler likely fled to Argentina, demonstrates a type of credulous thinking, and the stringing together of a series of facts, that should cause you and your listeners, to seriously pause.
I mean, did Joseph Goebbels, his wife and their six children also flee to Argentina? Or did they commit suicide together in the bunker?
If you want to make podcasts that are meant to be serious, then say so up front and clearly. If you want to entertain us, also tell us up front.
Katana, i repeat again - it was a speculative comment, about Hitler's potential removal and relocation to Argentina. If you think that is hypothesis is absolutely impossible, then you will surely have evidence to prove its impossibility in which case i would very much like to see the evidence upon which you are basing that definite claim. I am very happy to change my stance on Hitler's Argentinian relocation theory from possible to impossible on evaluation of hard evidence. I reserve the right to speculate in my podcasts.
12 comments:
Just one big problem with your theory is that it really requires a way of dealing with Hitler, in the end. So your have him not committing suicide, but rather escaping to Argentina, and hiding out there! So, even with the jew bankers protecting him, he manages to evade what would be the greatest freelance hunt for him, in all recorded history, and then he dies peacefully and unknown even today, somewhere in Argentina?
Have you considered a career as a novelist? You certainly know how to string a series of facts together to make a good story.
More like international Jewish backstabbers
Hitler could have well lived under armed protection for the rest of his life. Also, a quick shave and a change of haircut would have the vast majority of the masses disbelieving any photo that might have been taken of him, and with the absolute Jewish control of the media they hardly had to worry about the story of Hitler's relocation getting to the masses did they!? Alan Buttle
Good show, covered a lot of ground I wasn't aware of.
Not sure what katanas point is -a) what in the end happenned to AH isn't relevant either for this broadcast, or in general, and b) Osama Bin Laden....
Just another thought: Imagine Hitler letting his hair and beard grow and dressing himself like a Rabbi, curls 'n' all. Are you going to know who it is?
Hitler's ears prove that
he was really Juan Peron.
Or was that Eva?
well done for focussing on Schachtybaby here. whilst piling through all the Bormann books I took a detour to take a swatch at the geezer. So I read Weitz's Hitler's Banker which I chose deliberately for its kosher credentials to see what the spin was. Well it was a blando nothing to see here move along load of bollox. Once you realise the whole thing is a set up, focussing on Schacht/Hess at the beginning then on to Bormann's sugar mommy, only obliquely ever mentioned, and then the getting rid of a too effective administrator in a key area like Heydrich, all the "mistakes" after 42 make sense.
So many mysteries of history make sense once you forget about the Hitler/Himmler/Goering NPCs. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA.
A question to consider is whether the WMD would have been made available to be used if the Czech research labs and weaponsfab works were not sabotaged at the administrative level by a Nazi muppet.
Unknown said...
Not sure what katanas point is -a) what in the end happenned to AH isn't relevant either for this broadcast, or in general, and b) Osama Bin Laden....
---------
My point is that once you go down the path of saying Hitler was a secret tool of the jews, or such like, then having him commit suicide in his bunker doesn't quite fit the overall story line. As in, his reward for destroying Germany was to be able to commit suicide? Really? Hence, having him flee to a secret base in Antarctica, or more plausibly, to a secret hide-away in Argentina, to spend his well earned retirement in luxury. Makes complete sense, not.
If you are interested in these sort of pot boiler stories, Andrew Hitchcock interviewed some guy who has written a book on that.
Osama bin Laden died soon after he didn't do 9/11, but was resurrected under Obama for him to kill him, all for show.
-------
KATANA
"all for show" yes... All of it including AH
Katana, you seem to be deliberately focusing on the tiniest speculative comment in this hour-long podcast, which makes me think that i must have done a pretty good job at laying out the evidence of my theory.
Alan you are partly right. I’ve focused on your speculation at the end because it sums up your overall approach to your style of interpretation of events.
Presenting the idea that you are inclined to think that Hitler fled Germany after the war to Argentina, or wherever, is something that anyone can assess using their own commonsense.
Your interpretation of what Schacht did etc., requires some detailed knowledge that most listeners don’t have.
So I didn’t ignore the bulk of your podcast because I can’t dispute it, but rather because it’s not accessible to most people.
In other words, the idea that you think that Hitler likely fled to Argentina, demonstrates a type of credulous thinking, and the stringing together of a series of facts, that should cause you and your listeners, to seriously pause.
I mean, did Joseph Goebbels, his wife and their six children also flee to Argentina? Or did they commit suicide together in the bunker?
If you want to make podcasts that are meant to be serious, then say so up front and clearly. If you want to entertain us, also tell us up front.
Katana, i repeat again - it was a speculative comment, about Hitler's potential removal and relocation to Argentina. If you think that is hypothesis is absolutely impossible, then you will surely have evidence to prove its impossibility in which case i would very much like to see the evidence upon which you are basing that definite claim. I am very happy to change my stance on Hitler's Argentinian relocation theory from possible to impossible on evaluation of hard evidence. I reserve the right to speculate in my podcasts.
Post a Comment