Wednesday, January 9, 2019

Moon Hoax Doc Complete

16 comments:

Panzerfaust said...

So was every mission faked, including the lunar orbital missions and the Apollo 13 disaster? Strains credibility.

This Moon Hoax has reached religious levels of emotional dependence to its proponents just as have flat erf and holohoax.

Erik Paul said...

Yeah, I can't decide which is more absurd, Flat EARF Tardation or Moon Hoax lunacy (no pun intended).

Northerntruthseeker said...

Seriously??? I have to laugh at these commentators, for they are clueless about how it was impossible and still is impossible today to send anyone beyond Low Earth Orbit...

I have known for 40 years that NASA never ever sent anyone to the moon between 1968 and 1972... They ran what is known as the Apollo Simulation Project and used props here on Earth to pass off to the gullible people that they "went to the moon"..

And knowing that the moon landings were fake has nothing to do with the fraud of flat earth... That "flat earth" nonsense was purposely injected into the argument to create the falsehood that Apollo moon hoax believers also believe in flat earth... And it has worked its magic on so many gullible people as well..

I suggest for those who want to get up to speed on the moon hoax to look at the Aulis website at www.aulis.com, and also to look at the fabulous video series "Moonfaker" by Jarrah White....

zapoper said...

If some men went to the moon, they must have been using Tesla flying saucers and not The Saturn V rocket nonsense. The Apollo LEM is the most laughable contraption I've ever seen in my life.

P.S. Northerntruthseeker should have added the Q anon stuff for good measure.

Zeebra said...

some of us Gen-X+ peeps remember the flick "Capricorn One" (1977), suggesting the twoof of Apollo.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077294

"A NASA Mars mission won't work, and its funding is endangered, so they decide to fake it just this once. But then they have to keep the secret."

trailer(s), full synopsis etc @ IMDB link.

Panzerfaust said...

I will hold out the possibilities Apollo 11 did not land in order to reduce the odds of failure and high quality imagery taken on Earth was presented as authentic for PR consumption.

However the Van Allen belts are not uniform in nature, they are thin to non-existent in areas. Also it has not been definitely proven human life or any other life could not survive passage through the Van Allen belts. Top all this with the number of missions, hoaxing each one would be akin to repeatedly blowing up then rebuilding the WTCs. The prospect of building all that hardware for a hoax then pulling it off mission after mission while the USSR remaining silent and defeated at the height of the Cold War STRAINS LOGIC AND CREDIBILITY.

One thing I have noticed over the years is that even highly regarded "truth seekers" have blind spots and are prone to allowing their egos to suppress their critical thinking when tightly held, cemented, publically voiced positions are challenged, be it the JFK multiple shooter circular firing squad hypothesis, denying the Muslim migrant rape and stabbing epidemic, or delegitimizing Hitler as a Rothschild puppet politician.

I do not expect to ever convince any of the self-aggrandizing Lerned Elders of Conspiracy clutching onto these views to revisit them, much less shift their positions. I only hope listeners detach their personality loyalties and employ critical thinking.

zapoper said...

@ Panzer, I love you but it is much more than just the Van Allen belt. I mean that those cretins were trying to make us believe that their mini backpacks had an AC that could regulate the temperature so that they could endure 260F. Again I laugh.

I could go on and on but I feel lazy. BTW, I still don't know why Ognir still posts that sort of stuff. It's been case closed for me years ago.

The money for the Apollo program was funneled to black projects and the building of underground cities.

I don't want to sound arrogant but I will anyway. The reason that the USSR never "exposed" the USA is because at that time and still today, the same people control both sides. That is like a DUH! moment in my mind.

The Ogster said...

@Zap

New visitors to the site, make sure they know what we believe already

zapoper said...

Sure. No problem my friend.

liam said...

Here! Here! Northerntruthseeker. Hard to defy logical reasoning.

liam said...

Panzerfaust said... "USSR remaining silent and defeated at the height of the Cold War STRAINS LOGIC AND CREDIBILITY."

Can we consider ALL intelligence agencies are compartmentalised subsidiaries of the same corporation?
Was the "cold war" but another physiological operation, to maintain "shell-shock" without war.?

wanda said...

Zap... you're 100% right. You're getting a lot of stuff right today... i'm impressed. Part of this space crapola is to make us believe there are countless hundreds, if not thousands of satellites in space. There aren't... they tell us that to justify why the rates keep going up, astronomically, you might say. Do a check and you find they are all terrestrial based, 99% of them anyhow, utilizing cables under the ocean and on land, since the mid 1800s no less. The other 1% are done with weather balloons, right here in our own atmosphere (at-most-fear) and under the control of the military.

Panzerfaust said...

I see, NASA, LBJ, Nixon, and Ford were in cahoots with the Russians to fake Moon missions in order to funnel funds for a secret space program and every Apollo astronaut, program head, and subcontractor were guilty of collusion to perpetuate this fraud
The Russians even built and blew up their own rocket, killing scores on the launch pad, as part of a plot to create the impression there even was a Moon Race.

Let Mueller know, I'm sure he'll be interested.

SHEEESH

INCOMING!!!!!!! said...

Why would Nixon privatise all the spaceshit in 68? Why would Kubrik waste time off the A1? Why would the history writing project fake every captain's shit, ship log, deck log, bridgewatch, marine det log, shore log, wharf and quay log before they started shooting in 41?

Ahh the phukkwittery of the breakaway civilsation staybehinds.

Sooo much money and so few tales to funny up before soo many fuckwitz.

Panzerfaust said...

Ogster, from 2015 to a month ago (left because I didn't agree with changes in direction and presence of Rabbi Weev, among other issues) I was one of the regular members of Dailystormer's forum. Recently I asked about your participation there, which you awkwardly denied. Well, either you're being deceptive or someone copied your screen name and avatar to post there during the 2016 election cycle, and the writing styles are similar. Not only do I remember seeing an Ogster there, at the time something about your post prompted me to conduct a web investigation, which led me to theinformationunderground.com board. That said and in the interest of the community, especially the contributors to Mami's Shit, I again ask for an explanation.

I have a long history on discussion boards and have seen them infiltrated by parties seeking to monitor, steer, and ultimately control the platform
I have recorded websites changing hands without public announcement by WHOIS snapshots. For instance this happened to US Message Board in 2008, the self-described Former Marine sold it to a Chinese firm yet he remained and attempted to keep it hushed up. I suspect the deplatformimg and relentless DDOS attacks directed at Dailystormer facilitated it being "rescued" by Israeli intelligence. I sure as hell don't want to see Grizzom.Blogspot.com suffer a similar fate as the aforementioned or VOR.com https://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=145475 I'm positive others agree.

I have other questions but will pause for a reply. I have laid out my concerns. The ball is in your court Ogster.

Unknown said...

Forget about how many people are in collusion - how did they lift off from the surface of the moon?? There's no oxygen to burn there. Even if they brought enough oxygen to burn with them as soon as they open the exhaust to generate lift all the gas would be sucked out into the vacuum.

1PV/T = 2PV/T

The temperatures would be roughly equivalent because the O2 is liquid but the pressure difference is MASSIVE as well as the volume - and because the vacuum on the surface of the moon is uniform there's no way you can control the trajectory.

Things that can't happen, don't - everything else is noise.