Assange is an intelligence asset. If he were a threat to the powers that be he would not have been made into an international superstar by the (((mainstream media))).
This video is suspicious. First, it doesn't appear that this was actually posted on Wikileaks or originated from them. You can google it yourself. Second, I have seen some of this footage on the internet before, maybe three or four years ago. I don't remember where i saw it, but probably YT. This present video seems to be a combination of "real" (i.e. official) Apollo moon footage, with this new supposedly unseen-before footage of photographers on the set. This "new" footage looks reasonably authentic - I'm not sure why it was not accepted by the reputable moon-skeptics (such as Jarrah White, Marcus Allen, Bart Sibrel, and repeaters like McGowan), but they must have had some reason. Fetzer on his last Raw Deal claimed it was real - but Fetzer as you all know can be sloppy with the details sometimes.
This guy invented the Wiki - it has nothing to do with either Jimmy or Julian. It's this sort of ignorance about Comp Sci and the absurd "connections" that are made from it that drive me up the wall.
8 comments:
Sooo, while they're chemically lobotomizing Assange with BZ, this obvious hoax surfaces to discredit Wikileaks?
Assange is an intelligence asset. If he were a threat to the powers that be he would not have been made into an international superstar by the (((mainstream media))).
This video is suspicious.
First, it doesn't appear that this was actually posted on Wikileaks or originated from them. You can google it yourself.
Second, I have seen some of this footage on the internet before, maybe three or four years ago. I don't remember where i saw it, but probably YT. This present video seems to be a combination of "real" (i.e. official) Apollo moon footage, with this new supposedly unseen-before footage of photographers on the set. This "new" footage looks reasonably authentic - I'm not sure why it was not accepted by the reputable moon-skeptics (such as Jarrah White, Marcus Allen, Bart Sibrel, and repeaters like McGowan), but they must have had some reason.
Fetzer on his last Raw Deal claimed it was real - but Fetzer as you all know can be sloppy with the details sometimes.
Yes yes and they always try so hard to discredit intelligence assets - just look at CNN 🙄🙄
But they have lots of intelligence assets attempting to discredit anyone that has real information - maybe Alan is the intelligence asset...
The Lindsey dude just deleted all his previous posts. Maybe his jewish lawyer advised him to do so. Who the fuck cares.
My point is that any future post from GayLord should be spamboxed. Unless any of you guys feel like fucking with him like a cat does with a mouse.
If Assange is using part of the name of Wikileaks, isn't he in cahoots with them?
Wikipedia. Something doesn't add up here.
Nona, you're very very wrong about that:
http://wiki.c2.com/?WardCunningham
This guy invented the Wiki - it has nothing to do with either Jimmy or Julian. It's this sort of ignorance about Comp Sci and the absurd "connections" that are made from it that drive me up the wall.
Post a Comment