Watch/Download this while you can it keeps getting taken down on youtube
-Took a while for it to load for me
-Took a while for it to load for me
Watch "Banking With Hitler"
There are many people which directly connect Hitler with especially the British establishment and there is a fair bit written about them. 'Namely Stephenie von Hohenlohe, Unity Mitford, Lord Halifax, Lord Londonderry, Lord Rothermere, Lord Beaverbrook and others people named in the above video. Hjalmar Schacht was acquitted at Nuremberg and later went back to banking. If people are interested in reading more on this, those people may be a good start. I have not read anything at length on any them yet. Its interesting and worth further investigation. There is no doubt false information in this story that exists. Specifically surrounding the propaganda contained within the Nuremberg Trials. So once again getting to the truth on this matter is a minefield and needs careful research and discernment.
174 comments:
....and heeeere we go.....
Source: History [made a mystery] Channel
"Zionized for (((our))) protection!"
Ellen Brown on 'Hitler's Money':
http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/bankrupt-germany.php
Throughout the war at the BIS: "you wouldn't have known a war was on."
Yeah, because for them it wasn't. It was a war as far as the normal people of Europe were concerned but for those that manufactured the war - for the perpetrators - it was a just a very large-scale project which needed managing and the BIS managed the financing.
Fuck hitler
There's plenty of room for discussion here but one thing we can all agree on:
The Nazis had cooler uniforms than the other side.
The more inrteresting question is, what happened to the tons of patents the Americans, Brits and Soviets stole from us? Any takers?
No saucers in US and Russia?
Afaik, funny US B2 Bomber is a Horten IX copy, realized 40 years later. Night vision, german patent, Mig figfhters, German patent, rockets, German, Coler coil, vanished, along with field propulsion patents, US fighter planes, german derived tech.
I would be very careful to make fun of something you talk about, yet you have no deeper knowledge to talk. Those who know don't talk, those you don't know talk too much.
And get over rthe ridiculous allied narrative of Hitler being an asset, Ridiculous,according to this BS narrative, they imprisoned Hitler in Landsberg, just to back him. Are you out of your mind people? The US people have abolutely no sense of history and truth, caused by constant jewish mind poisin they are exposed to.
tekll me, is this why Hitler had shut down Rotthschild operations, and deported two Rothschilds who died from typhus "holocaust"?
The myth Hitler was an asset does not hold any water, these are German social democrat lies rehashed from the early 1920ies,when Hitler was just out of prison during the democratic Weimar regime, which was in fact a corporation.
The banker take over of Germany happened in 1919, and Hitler tried to take it back, guys.
All this is provable, only depends on German reading and comprehension skills, ie "Weimar constitution" and the Versailles treaty, which was enforced by this "constitution" of 1919.
The "enabling act" has to be seen precisely in the context of the "consituion", because it enforced "reparations". One day afer the act came into force, Judea declared war.
I'm with unknown on this and this documentary was ridiculous. Small mountains of gold lighters and cigarette cases - lol!
The point is, the BIS was created to loot (post war) Germany.
It is an utter twisting of facts, that the extraterritorial BIS in Switzerland had any benefit to Germany. To the contraryi os a croiminal mafia, and Germany opposed it, and was left alone by the supposedly anglo-saxon brothers, who sided with the jewish mafia, and still do their dirty work.
What damning money trail? Sources please.
Do you refer to the non existent Sydney Warbug Sutton brought up in his shady work of fiction to make up for the better earlier work on the Bolsheviks?
Try to address the jewish take over of 1919, and then tell me why they would support Hitler.
Woulod have been very bad investment, because NS Germany's primary target was the abolition of interest. Gottfried Feder wrote the manifesto on that.
You really need to learn so mnuch more, a YT Uni degree won't do.
1929 dude, that was Weimar times. Hitler came to power 4 years later.
Opel was sold to the Americans during Weimar times, iirc 1923.
You really know nothing man, and they you even have the chutzpah to claim I was defending official narrative,
It is you who peddles official masonic narrative, by peddling social democrat rehashed lies.
You have 100% no German skills, so you draw everything from your rotten system, in english.
So what are your sources, tell me, and I tell you who you are.
"We made a monster of Hitler, a devil. That is why (therefore) we could not after the war say otherwise.
We had personally mobilised the masses nevertheless against the devil. Thus we were forced after the war, to play along with this devil's scenario.
We could not possibly have made our people clear (to them) that the was was only an economic preventative measure!"
US forfeign minister James Baker.
You are actually trying to keep up the devil scenario.
Again, Weimar was the hostile take over by a corporation, starting in 1919. It was a sell out, Germans like Oswald Spengler addressed it during that time.
Weimar was a corporation, and post WWII has been a corporation based oin the "Weimar constitution"
But then there are morons in allied countries, who simply try to claim 1+1=3 because their mind has been so poisoned with lies that they can even see the truth, if it bites them in the bum.
Churchill created Israel(not Hitler)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/49HGDB0P5bft/
History lesson for those who claim 1+1=3
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2zm1fe
I thought we were deleting all comments by 'unknown'
Has there been a change? Just axin'
BTW this has nothing to do with silencing the person posting above only that there were many 'unkown' posters some of whom were trolls and socks of other users. I just need to clarify how this is being handled.
Too late now. There's a whole exchange between Chainsaw and that particular unknown. At least he's not being an A hole.
Would you guys please cdonsider rthat remaining unknown helps to stay out of trouble with the inquisition a bit?
I posted these comments from somewhere occupied by Us military, where thought crime laws are in place, and where they send 90 year old women to jail.
@Unkowen - Notwithstanding Churchill's lunatic dedication to the Jews Churchill was years out of office and in no position to do anything when when Israel was established in 1948. In fact it was Stalin who led the founding of Israel with the Soviets drafting and driving forward the UN document that provided for the State Israel. Throughout the latter years of his life Soviet diplomat, Andrei Gromyko, on being introduced to politicians and dignitaries, was in the annoying habit of announcing that they were shaking hands with "the hand that created Israel" What was in it for Stalin you may ask...well it's claimed he wanted Israel as a Soviet ally in the Middle East but I'd say a need for the atomic bomb was the probable reason for his assistance; the secrets of which were stolen by Jews in the US and then given to the Soviet Union.
Quote:
[...]Stalin played a vital, if often unappreciated, role in the creation of the Jewish state. At the United Nations, where the vote on independence was going to be close, he had his Ambassador Andrei Gromyko give an impassioned speech in 1947 on the terrible fate suffered by Jews in the war and their need to have an independent state. Stalin then organized the Eastern European Communist states to vote for the creation of Israel as a the decisive bloc that provided the two-thirds majority needed for victory in the UN vote of November 29, 1947. https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4737624,00.html
NB - Britain did not vote for the creation of Israel in the UN vote of November 29, 1947, but abstained instead.
Schacht and Norman jointly set up the BIS. They were so close that one of them was a Godfather to a child of the other (can't remember which way round now). The Skull and Bones-dominated Union Banking Corporation, including Prescott Bush, helped finance Hitler too. Hitler and the Nazis were built up by the international banking establishment in order for them to be ultimately destroyed along with the ideas he professed to have. That might also explain the ridiculous Hitlerian tactics with regard to the allied Normandy invasion. Since the destruction of Hitler and the Nazis "anti-Semitism" has never recovered. Nationalism has never recovered. White racial pride has never recovered. These are the things that needed to be destroyed to progress the NWO, and through the build up and subsequent destruction of Hitler they achieved this, alongside the decimation of Christian Europe, the creation of Israel, the United Nations, the European Union and the communist state of China which would ultimately be built up to economically replace the West as the international superpower.
@ Unknown. I fail to see how using that pseudo name makes you stealthier in relation to the agencies but go ahead for now. If we see other people using it then all bets are off. It just becomes confusing when multiple people use it even if their intent is not to troll.
@Alan - The idea for The BIS came from the Committee chaired by the American Owen D. Young. This was a financial group consisting of:
Americans: Owen D. Young and J. P. Morgan Junior; substitutes: Thos N. Perkins, T. W Lamont;
Germans: Hjalmar Schacht, Dr. Voegler; alternates: Dr. C. Melchior, Dr. Kastl;
Belgian: Émile Francqui, Camille Gutt; substitutes: Baron Terlinden, H. Fabre;
British: Josiah Stamp and John Baring; substitutes: Charles Addis, Basil Blackett;
French: Émile Moreau, Jean Parmentier; substitutes: Mr. Moret, Edgard Allix;
Italians: Dr. Alberto Pirelli, Fulvio Suvitch; alternates: Giuseppe Bianchini, Bruno Dolutta;
Japanese: Mr. Kengo Mori, K. C. Mr. G. Mr. Takaschiaoki; substitutes: Suburo Snoda, Jasummure Matsui.
NB - Montague Norman was not present.
The idea for the BIS formed part of the Young Plan which was to replace the Dawes Plan and it was opposed by the Reich Committee on the Referendum against the Young Plan which was set up on July 9, 1929. The NSDAP had a representative on that committee to oppose the BIS; his name was Adolf Hitler.
The idea for the BIS did not come from the Committee. That's just plain daft. It came from far above the management level which you copy/pasted. Norman was the governor of the Bank of England from 1920 through to 1944, so he was the governor of one of the most important central banks which would have accounts with the BIS from the start. You can't try to distance Norman from the BIS while saving your integrity. He was deeply involved from the start. He was also involved throughout the war with the BIS and the transferring of Czech gold to the Nazis to fund their continued war "effort" through his continued role as the governor of the bank of England. Soon after he resigned - good move i would say after all his treacherous work continuing to fund the Nazi "enemies"!
If Hitler was so opposed to the BIS, then why did he employ freemason Schacht to run his central bank and economy? Is your position on Hitler that he was a noble moron? Why did he not sack internationalist banker Schacht and replace him with some anti-BIS banker to run his Reichsbank and economy? It makes no sense at all if we're to believe that Hitler was against the international banking elite, especially when we understand that he relied on them completely.
I suppose you'll also try to explain away the tremendous support that Hitler ostensibly had from the British establishment and those people who populated the Anglo-German Fellowship (both Schacht and Norman were members of this as well as people like Joachim von Ribbentrop and Hitler's Jewish girlfriend Stephanie von Hohenlohe) and other such organisations, not least the Astors' Clivedon Set.
Gawd! I'm so sick of this Hitler fuck fest. I think I'll stop reading the comments for a while. LOL
All sides of WW2 were pro-Zionist (even the "anti-Semitic" ones! LOL). Go figure.
@Zap
I do know the troubles of an admin, but just think of people who simply have to stay anonymous, not all unknown are kike shills.
I certainly will not make an account on blogger.com, hugo or whatever requires registering.
On the topic, the simple answer is, the empire has to further demonize the man Hitler, the greatest danger for the criminals is that people realize Hitler stood on the right side of histroy, and they supported the evil "trade federation" with their droids who do to this day the shitshow of peddling lies after lies after lies.
@alan
Schacht was a a bureaucratic masonic tapeworm who already served in Weimar times.
The Reichsbank was under Rothschild control, hence NS Germany circumvented the Reichsbank with the Rentenmark.
Look at the US, suppose Trump was gonna take on the criminal FED, he had to deal with the same shit, he just got rid of tapeworm Bolton. The difference is, Trump is utterly controlled by Jew Adelson, and his Son took money from Soros, while Hitler was a private in WWI, who served as runner in the trenches, he knew war, and came from a family that was not milionaire like all the US presidents. FFS!
So, show me even one US president, who even remotely tried to clean this jew mess? JFK? Maybe, but he was still part of the US establishment.
Alan please direct your posts properly or they may cause confusion in the back n forth that ensues with others being involved.
You've got a theory. It's been around for years. It can't be proved and has never been proved simply because it's subjective nonsense.
You also forgot to mention how Time magazine voted Hitler Man of the Year...SO WHAT! And how before the American Jew, Bernard Baruch virtually bankrupted him and Austro-Hungarian Jew, Heinrich Strakosch, then saved him from that bankruptcy, that Winston Churchill, wrote in 'Great Contemporaries'...One may dislike Hitler’s system and yet admire his patriotic achievement. If our country were defeated, I hope we should find a champion as indomitable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations. - Again, SO WHAT!
You do know, don't you, that Strakosch was a close friend and colleague of Montagu Norman. That he created the Central Banks of India and South Africa. That he was the person giving Churchill the false information about the rate and extent of Hitler's rearmament, paid Churchill's debts and left him (in today's money) millions when he died in 1943. I could go on but why no mention of these FACTS Alan?
As for Hitler and Schacht? Hitler's Germany wasn't 'splendidly isolated' from the world and its financial markets. It could get only so much from bartering through the supply of goods and services. It needed foreign currency and other instruments. Schacht was regarded as one of the world's leading bankers and Hitler's new government needed all the help it could get in the wider world of trade and finance. It made sense to employ him and so it proved. But Schacht was never a member of the NSDAP and did not get along with Hitler. In fact Hitler eventually removed him from his position.
Churchill is your target here. He was the banker's puppet. You just don't want to see it that way.
Henry - I'm sorry but I'm not willing to believe that the Reich was able to build the most powerful military that Europe had even seen without help from international bankers who had their own secret agenda which was to build up the threat of the Hitlerian boogyman. This doesn't mean that AH was a puppet for anyone, only that secret forces were at work stirring up with winds of war and AH took the bait. There's plenty of evidence to support this view. One thing that is certain: Germany lay in ruins after WWII and remains an occupied country even to this day so ultimately AH screwed the pooch as they say. This doesn't mean that I think AH was a jew, a British agent or a secret Rothschild or any of that nonsense. And yes, Churchill was a banker's puppet. Rothschild bailed his family out of debt and gave them a large cash infusion to keep up the appearance that they were 'wealthy'.
Also, Hitler certainly supported sending jews from Germany into Palestine as a way to get them out of his country because after all, nobody else wanted them, not even Roosevelt.
Our views aren't even that far off from each other. Yes there are disagreements but no need for vitriol, imo.
Unknown - Just open a bogus Googoo email account that you only use for posting comments.
You can then pick whatever name you want. That aside, you are making interesting, cogent comments.
You've got a theory. It's been around for years. It can't be proved and has never been proved simply because it's demonstrable nonsense. That (mainstream) theory is that Adolf Hitler was opposed to the international Jewry.
In one breathe you say that Schacht was "a bureaucratic masonic tapeworm" but then that "Schacht was regarded as one of the world's leading bankers and Hitler's new government needed all the help it could get in the wider world of trade and finance." What kind of "help" could AH rely on from Schacht considering Schacht's known allegiances?! You're living in a complete dreamworld if you think that 1) Hitler, if he was indeed genuine as you speculate, would give so much power and control to a known enemy, and 2) that this known enemy would work honestly and diligently for Hitler regardless of Hitler's professed desire to destroy everything Schacht stood for, including most of his social circle. It is beyond ridiculous for you to state such absurdities.
@Scorpio
If I may, I would like to address your comment to Henry.
"Henry - I'm sorry but I'm not willing to believe that the Reich was able to build the most powerful military that Europe had even seen without help from international bankers who had their own secret agenda which was to build up the threat of the Hitlerian boogyman"
The fact of the matter is, the Wehrmacht was not the most powerful military, that was the Soviet army, with 30000 Vickers based T tanks, 6-7 million solders, 20000 aircraft, further strengthened by US and British ammunition shipments to Murmansk. Go figure why the German offensive went straight to take Murmansk, the Soviet harbor at the baltic sea.
The German military was only so successful, because the rearmament already starting under the Weimar regime produced a modern army, equipped with at that time very new and modern things, and new tactics. The Brits massively armed with long range bombers in the mid 1920ies, but they had nothing to foight with on the ground. Same for the outdated french WWI style army.
However, the Soviets were armed to the teeth, and this was heavily underestimated by Germany. Hilter was shocked, after Mannerheim told him that they found a giant tank factory in Donetsk, which produced tanks in a row, with thousands of workers living like animals to get these tanks out.
"Also, Hitler certainly supported sending jews from Germany into Palestine as a way to get them out of his country because after all, nobody else wanted them, not even Roosevelt. "
That is no secret, but the Brits already had created facts on the ground in Palestine in 1917 with Balfour and Jews had already been moved to Palestine by the Brits. German leadership was not happy with sending them to Palestine, but they caved in to avoid war with the Brits. Germany preferred before the war Madagaskar to settle the Jews there, but the final solution to the Jew problem was moved after the war, due to the outbreak of the war, which France and Britain declared.
My question would be, why is it so difficult for you to realize there was a leadership and a country that stood up against these criminal structures? You really need to get into Weimar times, so you can comprehend the dynamics which led to the election of Hitler.
This nonsense about Hitler being an asset always transports a message of "there is no hope" if you people do this, perhaps you indeed have no hope, are demoralized and surrendered to jewish BS? I don't know, but what I do know, the controlled opposition to jewish banking mafia is the communists. The Soviets were this controlled opposition you somehow try to paint on Germany.
The Hegelian dialectic was capitalism(US/UK) vs communism(Soviet), which has no room for a 3rd approach, and which is also not the synthesis of the two. That would be what some people call "communitarianism", I call it international socialism 2.0.
@Scorpio
Using an "unknown" handle prevents meta data collection for a handle, since there are many "unknown", it can't be mapped easily by automated algorithms.
"So, show me even one US president, who even remotely tried to clean this jew mess?"
There hasn't been one. Some of us are looking for the truth; others are looking for heroes to pin on the wall. I can see how, if your intent is finding yourself a hero, that you would plump for Hitler because of his ostensible values.
None of your "FACTS", Henry, do anything to support your case that Hitler was anti-"Jewish".
One thing that i think tells a story about Hitler is how he is presented photographically in the mainstream media today. Look at the photos which come up for Adolf Hitler on google images. The photos used of Hitler make him look handsome, stoic, determined, intelligent, even heroic. This is not how they depict their real enemies. Hitler's memory is kept very alive today by the "Jewish" media because they are not concerned at all about people falling into support for him. "Jews" also publish "Mein Kampf" to this day.
Additionally, does anyone here believe that Synagogue of Satan fake "Jews" are really biblical "Israel"? Hitler insisted on "Jews" taking "Israel" as an extra name. What could be more anti-White than denying true "Israel" their identity?
Scorpio - I'm sorry too. But you believe in a myth and your "I'm not willing to believe" adds nothing here. You know I didn't say that international finance had nothing to do with Hitler's Germany. I clearly said that Hitler required the services of Schacht precisely because of a need for his acceptance and expertise in the International field. You did see that didn't you?As for what Germany created within the reich. That was paid for through seigniorage. The profit from that resulted in the production necessary to elevate the German economy above those of the other miserable western nations who based their economies on the debts that result from the issue by bank 'credit' and still do...As Major-General J F.C. Fuller explained it in vol 3 of his The Decisive Battles of the Western World and Their Influence upon History Hitler demanded one mark of labour/productivity in return for every mark issued in currency and that it was only a matter of time before other nations saw the effect and followed suit eventually forcing the bankers and financiers to close shop and find other employment. Germany didn't even go into full military production until about 1941.
"This nonsense about Hitler being an asset always transports a message of "there is no hope" if you people do this, perhaps you indeed have no hope, are demoralized and surrendered to jewish BS?"
- And instead idolising Hitler, who failed miserably on everything he supposedly wanted to do, who oversaw the utter destruction of the country of our brothers and sisters, gives us more hope?!? Yeah right!
@Alan
Henry is obviously not me, and you somehow mix your drivel into one drivel stew trying to address both of us at the same time.
You seem to be confused, better return in the hasbara bunker, you seem to be triggered by the truth.
And the fucking truth which you fanatic brick heads hate so much is not "idolizing" rather than just the truth you hate to read.
@Unknown - I said themost powerful military that Europe had even seen. You can't possibly include the Soviet Union as part of Europe not then or even now. Obviously The Soviet Union had a much larger army which is why they kicked Germany's ass along with the help of two important generals: January and February given that Russia had the earliest winter in over 30 years at the time of the invasion of Russia.
You said: My question would be, why is it so difficult for you to realize there was a leadership and a country that stood up against these criminal structures? You really need to get into Weimar times, so you can comprehend the dynamics which led to the election of Hitler.
I've never denied any of the above, ( so I don't know where you are getting this). I only pointed out that the reich ended in disaster, which can hardly be disputed.
@Henry - What myth do I believe in?
Hitler received help from international bankers. If you don't believe that international bankers use hidden agendas to stir up war then I don't know what to tell you other than I strongly disagree.
You seem unwilling to accept any criticism against the reich.
What are we even arguing about?
Are you unable to recognise your own "quotations" Unknown? How big is your Hitler poster? You buy it from (((Amazon)))?
Sure you can, most of Soviet population, and nowadays Russia lives in the European part. Russians are Europeans if the live west of the Ural mountains.
The Reich is has nothing to do with Hitler, the reich is German state's name to this day.
The reich is an interesting topic, it only depend how deep you are prepared to get into, becauise the Reich is to this day enemy state to the UN, US, UK, France, China and 50 more countries.
The ruling is this, the Reich still exists, but has been unorganized since the occupation of Germany. Btw, a pretty similar ruling in the US coporation in regard to the USA, which is also unorganized. Their court rules, the American people failed to occupy the offices of the USA.
Let me get e bit deeper here, the USA became a corporation in 1871, the same year Bismarck founded the Reich modeled after the USA, with sovereign independent states.
since the USA became a corporation, the mafia would of course try to enforce corporate sturcture in the euopean clone too, which was achieved in 1919 unfortunately. The current occupation regime, calling itself the "german government" has been remote controlled from Washington DC since 1945, the curreent FRG is a criminal corporation as well, registered in Washington DC. It is n impostor and usurper, just like the US inc in DC in relation to the USA.
These provable fact lead the entire "Hitler was controlled" ad absurdum, because Hitler was the legal and lawful head of the "decorporated" Reich as intended by Bismarck.
More irrelevant filler from an Unknown source. How on earth does any of that, true or otherwise, support the theory that Hitler was independent of the international Jewish banking elite?
"Why is it so difficult for you to realize there was a leadership and a country that stood up against these criminal structures?"
Simply because of the vast irreconcilable evidence to the contrary.
No-one replies to my comments so i'm going freestyle.
"No-one replies to my comments so i'm going freestyle. "
Shut up Jew. You are totally transparent, Pinoccio.
Try to address the jewish/masonic takeover of 1919, which you people so desperately ignore all the time. Once you have done that, you will find yourself in an idiotic position, because there was no need to control a Hitler, the control was already there, and Hitler opposed it, hence they imprisoned him and throw dirt on him to this day.
I asked you how any of that gumpf supports the theory that Hitler was independent of the international "Jewish" bankers and all you could say in reply was "Shut up Jew". You clearly don't want to elaborate because it would become apparent just how weak your position is.
That you state that there was "no need to control a Hitler" shows just how little you (pretend to?) understand of how the "Jews" operate. They ALWAYS run their own "opposition". Of course there was a need to control Germany, and following Germany's defeat in WW1 and the following Versaille Treaty they controlled every aspect of German society. There was no possibility for a political force to emerge which was not permitted to by the dominant "Jews". We're expected to believe that Hitler was not only such a genius to achieve the impossible with his rise to power against all the odds, but that he was also so incredibly naive and moronic to make the most horrendous blunders that any leader ever has. Completely laughable.
Nice one for throwing names at me... gives me a bigger clue about your personality and perhaps heredity.
If you don't think there was "a need" for the "Jews" to manufacture the most devastating and bloody war of all time on European soil, may i gently remind you of all the ways they have benefited from doing so. The "Jews" do lots of things they don't "need" to. They don't "need" to be flooding our countries with foreign migrants. They don't "need" to be forcing pornography and transgenderism on our children. They don't need to be poisoning our babies with vaccines, that is the babies lucky enough to survive pregnancy. They don't *need* to do any of the things that they're doing. Does that stop them? Has it ever stopped them? Have they ever been satisfied? Will they?
You talk and quack like a Jew, who deploys his usual warped BS, yet you are so amateurish.
Watching a Yt video with shill Condit or drawing from Sutton does not make you suddenly an expert on German domestic policy. you basically know nothing, as you kindly demonstrated, but what you know is how to twist facts.
Point is, I have heard all this drivel and nonsense countless times before, you are free to believe any fairy tale you want. But rest assured, I am capable to notice a guy, who puts others words in the mouth, peddles some BS and claims a cracker of a joke
"Simply because of the vast irreconcilable evidence to the contrary."
Show me.
@Unkown - you are being disingenuous now and not addressing my original points.
@Scorpio
Is "Alan" you alternate nick or what?
I addressed some of your comments you made to Henry. I am pretty sure he doesn't mind, he would not comment that much differently.
I am still waiting for some of the 1+1=3 claimers to address please the jewish/masonic coup d'etat in 1919, which was conspiratorially prepared in the Circus Busch.
So, from 1919 onwards until 1933, you have a masocinic corporate traitorous regime, with mass unemplyoment, starvation, high crime, hyper inflation, and a political circus and degeneracy that was just like the one currently taking place in the US(Weimerica). Homosexuals, trannies and all this stuff is nothing new, this was Weimar, run totally in the interests of the jewish banking mafia.
So how does Hitler fit into this picture, according to your belief? Why would bankers support a nobody guy, a little WWI private, who gave public speeches directly naming, shaming and opposing them? The regime imprisoned him for that. Does this really sound like a banker asset? And still, why, if you already control the show?
"Shut up Jew and show me some evidence!" hahaha It's clearly not just me who finds you disingenuous. We're not talking about the 1919 "coup d'etat" - as you call it - neither are we talking about the supposedly mentally-retarded al-Zarqawi. You don't get to come here anonymously and dictate what we must discuss. The post was a video called "Banking With Hitler".
A period of severe hardship in Germany, manufactured by the SoS, was a necessary precursor for what they were going to build on it: a nationalist, racialist, "anti-Semitic" regime which they ultimately intended to destroy along with the values they professed to hold. The German people had to be prepared - softened up - for such a regime to be so heavily supported. The contrast between the hardship with preceded it and the improved quality of life under Hitler made him a hero to German people. The clampdown on the degeneracy which preceded Hitler was in order to restore - temporarily - pride in the German people and to show a clear difference between Germany before and under Hitler. The planned destruction of Germany would be even more demoralising considering the national pride that Hitler had restored.
All these childish questions like "Why would bankers support a nobody guy, a little WWI private, who gave public speeches directly naming, shaming and opposing them?" can be answered simply by showing just how stunningly they benefited from doing so. If you look only superficially at Lenin and Trotsky you could easily answer in the negative to the question "Does this really sound like a banker asset?" But they were, and Hitler was as well.
^
This is typical jew twaddle what Alan brain farts there, could be be written be a german antifa goon.
Hitler is guilty of destroying Germany, not the traitorous democrats, masons, and the anglo-saxon countries, who put a knife in our(and their) back for the enemy, instead of fighting with us against the enemy.
The enemy by now destroys them as well, yet there are people who still seek the evil Hitler under the sofa to blame him for that.
You are nuts.
In summary, WWI was fought to destroy the established European order, and replace it with a jewish system, at that time, the preferred system was Bolshevism/communism. Read Kalergi "Praktischer Idealismus" of 1924, which was the blueprint for the EUSSR.
WWII, a continuation of WWI, which is ongoing, was fought, because Germany slipped through the jewish greedy fingers under Hitler, and any gain made by the bankers was reversed.
This is why current occupied Germany is neither sovereign nor a nation state, it is still in a post war state of cease fire, to prevent German people to ever rise again and practice self determination which was denied with the Versailles "treaty" two Warburgs signed among themselves.
The tragedy is, England and US waged war on Germany, and by doing that, they effectively strangled themselves with it. The enemy regards them "nazis" as well by now.
Kalergi's autobiography "An Idea Conquors The World":
"Another Democrat who supported Pan-Europe was Dr. Hjalmar Schacht, whose actions - as President of the Reichsbank - in suppressing inflation and stabilizing the market had gained him great popularity throughout Germany. At our first meeting in the Reichstag building, Schacht made the principle speech." p.106
"Dr. Hjalmar Schacht saw the situation in a different light. He accomplished the extraordinary feat of remaining a supporter of Pan-Europe notwithstanding his admiration for Hitler. In his buoyant way, he told me: "In three months' time, Hitler will have become Chancellor. But don't worry; he is the only man able to reconcile Germany with the Western Powers. You will see: one day Hitler will achieve the unification of Europe." p.178
"If you are from German heritage you have a lot to be angry about"
I am not of German heritage, i am German, and my native language is German, and yes, I am pretty angry about the cluelessness of our anglo-saxon alleged brothers.
But seriously, you cannot even imagine what went down in Germany, and how savage the Allies have been truly. "Hellstorm2 should give you a glimpse, i haven't watched or read it, I have first hand account in the family.
If I would read it, I was just tempted to think the US and UK deserve to be nuked for their idiotic savagery that kills them as well by now. Sometimes I think, it really takes a devastating war on US soil, with some annihilated towns and cities, mass rapes and "denazification" ie terror, for them to wake up. Sad to say, I know.
But yes indeed, it is time to join forces, almost too late.
Well I've just arrived back home after a pleasant evening at a local restaurant only to find a smorgasbord of ridiculous delights waiting for me to chew over. I think this is my favourite...
Alan said...
Kalergi's autobiography "An Idea Conquors The World"
=========
Alan are you not aware that Winston Churchill wrote the foreword to that book?
You make my earlier point about your childishly naive confusion (or is it more sinister than that?)
Quote: "Churchill is your target here. He was the banker's puppet. You just don't want to see it that way"
Alan - why don't you crawl back to you squalid squat and ask your 'former' Jewish/Marxist/Trotskyist/Anarchist comrades to readmit you because you are failing miserably out here in the real world of FACTS...LOL
@Alan
Churchill btw gave a speech in 1947 in Zurich.
Here is a snippet...
"But I must give you warning, time may be short. At present there is a breathing space. The cannons have ceased firing. The fighting has stopped. But the dangers have not stopped. If we are to form a United States of Europe, or whatever name it may take, we must begin now."
https://rm.coe.int/16806981f3
So obviously, Germany was in the way of this masonic "United States of Europe"., Churchill also stated clearly, that the enemy is the German Reich, not national socialism, and that it must be annihilated.
Why do you moronic people humiliate yourself so much publicly by peddling nonsense so easily disproved?
You are getting spanked with it. Want more? Just say so, my ammunition depot with allied speeches and quotes is richly filled., and ready to be fired at you. Until now, I was just toying with you.
"The thing is the massive groups of European people were brought together in a mass death ritual. Why would any man with a wife and child want to go and participate in this?"
Why don't you ask this your relatives why they went to war and devastated Germany? Why they carpet bombed German towns?
German soldiers knew what they were fighting for, for Germany, Europe, and the preservation of European culture threatened by the bolshevik savage monstrosity in the east.
If it wasn't for the Wehrmacht, Stalin would have rolled over Europe only stopping in Spain, and at the Channel, at the doorstep of the warmongering Brits.
You know what could fix the mess a bit? A formal apology by a proper US and UK government, and a peace treaty. You are aware, the US, UK, Russia are technically still at war with us?
I'm indebted to Alan for making my earlier points re Churchill:
Quote:
You also forgot to mention how Time magazine voted Hitler Man of the Year...SO WHAT! And how before the American Jew, Bernard Baruch, virtually bankrupted him and Austro-Hungarian Jew, Heinrich Strakosch, then saved him from that bankruptcy, Winston Churchill, wrote in 'Great Contemporaries'...
Alan: From your choice of book with foreword from Winston Churchill...
Quote:
At the beginning of 1924, we received a call from Baron Louis de Rothschild; one of his friends, Max Warburg from Hamburg, had read my book and wanted to get to know us. To my great surprise, Warburg spontaneously offered me 60,000 marks to tide the movement over for the first three years... Max Warburg, who was one of the most distinguished and wisest men I have ever come into contact with, had a principle of financing these movements. He remained sincerely interested in financing Pan-Europe for his entire life. Max Warburg arranged his 1925 trip to the United States to introduce me to Paul Warburg and financier Bernard Baruch
Source: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=FQSLCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA128&lpg=PA128&dq=An+Idea+Conquers+The+World+foreword+by+churchill&source=bl&ots=IrvwFVnUtb&sig=ACfU3U2sRsvSRt4ZxxQiEoWQOtINgdnJlg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjt2Pbtu_zlAhUGZcAKHYnsAKU4ChDoATADegQICBAB#v=onepage&q=An%20Idea%20Conquers%20The%20World%20foreword%20by%20churchill&f=false
Paul Warburg (founder of the Federal Reserve) and the previously mentioned Bernard Baruch: controller of Churchill's investments and who eventually collapsed them virtually bankrupting Churchill.
Alan did you know that in 1931 a drunken Churchill was almost killed running around New York looking for Bernard Baruch's home?
Quote:
n New York in December 1931, on a lecture tour seeking to recoup his 1929 losses in the stock market crash, Churchill was searching for his friend Bernard Baruch’s apartment. Looking the wrong way halfway across Fifth Avenue, he was struck by a car and almost killed....
Source: https://winstonchurchill.org/publications/finest-hour/finest-hour-136/my-new-york-misadventure/
Here's a treat for Alan and all the other smug know-fuck-alls and shills who populate this so called forum.
From Winston Churchill's 1948 speech at The Hague; how he worked throughout the War for a "World Government"...
Quote:
...Nothing that we do or plan here conflicts with the paramount authority of a world organisation of the United Nations. On the contrary I have always believed, as I dared in the war, that a Council of Europe was a subordinate but necessary part of the world organisation. I thought at that time, when I had great responsibility, that there should be several regional councils, august but subordinate, that these should form the massive pillars upon which the world organisation would be founded in majesty and calm. This was the direction in which my hopes and thought lay three or four years ago. To take an example from the military sphere, with which our hard experiences have made us all familiar, the design for world government might have followed the system of three or more groups of armies-in this case armies of peace-under one supreme headquarters. Thus I saw the vast Soviet Union forming one of these groups. The Council of Europe, including Great Britain linked with her Empire and Commonwealth, would be another. Thirdly, there was the United States and her sister republics in the Western Hemisphere with all their great spheres of interest and influence.
In the mind picture which it was possible to form as victory in the war became certain, there was the hope that each of these three splendid groupings of states and nations whose affairs of course would sometimes overlap, might have settled within themselves a great number of differences and difficulties, which are now dragged up to the supreme world organisation, and that far fewer, but also far more potent figures would represent them at the summit. There was also the hope that they would meet not in an overcrowded Tower of Babel, but, as it were, upon a mountain top where all was cool and quiet and calm, and from which the wide vision of the world would be presented with all things in their due proportion. As the poet Blake wrote:
Above Time's troubled fountains
On the great Atlantic mountains
In my golden house on high.
To some extent events have moved in this direction, but not in the spirit or the shape that was needed. The western hemisphere already presents itself as a unit. Here at The Hague we are met to help our various Governments to create the new Europe. But we are all grieved and perplexed and imperilled by the discordant attitude and policy of the third great and equal partner, without whose active aid the world organisation cannot function, nor the shadow of war be lifted from the hearts and minds of men and nations. We must do our best to create and combine the great regional unities which it is in our power to influence, and we must endeavour by patient and faithful service, to prepare for the day when there will be an effective world government resting upon the main groupings of mankind.
Thus for us and for all who share our civilisation and our desire for peace and world government, there is only one duty and watchword: Persevere. That is the command which should rule us at this Congress. Persevere along all the main lines that have been made clear and imprinted upon us by the bitter experiences through which we have passed. Persevere towards those objectives which are lighted for us by all the wisdom and inspiration of the past.
Source: http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/WSCHague.html
I want to say something to Unknown. You are completely correct about the almost literally unbelievable savagery of the Allies. Unfortunately most Americans will not ever give an apology, they are too brainwashed, regarding WW2 and all of the invasions and wars of aggression that the USA has waged from that point to today. Learning about these events, such as those you referenced described and shown in Hellstorm, has truly isolated me from my peers. They just don't get it or worse don't care, and now the gap is too big to relate.
Americans don't know what it is like to have bombs fall on our soil. Every year we worship the Pearl Harbor event with 3,000 dead, and the 9/11 event with 3,000 dead. But Americans can't fathom that we committed literally 100 9/11s in just a single day, on purpose, against civilians, in these air raids, several times as a matter of policy. And that USA only ever bombs countries that it knows don't have the airforce infrastructure to bomb them back, and then turns the countries to rubble and the people to ash.
The drunken rapes and murders and tortures of civilians in Germany were not just committed by Soviet troops either. Sad to say that Americans did plenty of that as well. They even did it to French civilians who they were supposed to be liberating. Because American troops had no idea why they were going to Germany to fight. German men knew, but American men had no idea. Like WW1 it was just another hoorah opportunity to be a hero, and sadly many fell into that mindset, as well as an animalistic vengeful sick brainwashed state.
The icing on the cake preventing any kind of closure is that 90 year old women are imprisoned to this day for something that is supposed to be a cherished human right in the USA, and our jew shill fake representatives (really masons and zionists running the corporate slave plantation) don't defend such free speech martyrs despite frequent political and business interactions with Germany.
I just wanted to offer you one thought. I assume that you are a Christian. Every single filthy kike butcher that bombed, burned, shot, stabbed, beat, raped, and robbed your people and got away with it, is probably burning in hell at this very moment. Every single one of them who does not regret what they did, will burn for eternity.
Like Paul Tibbets, who nuked Hiroshima, also killed many civilians in France and Germany. He named his plane "Butcher Shop" for the raids over Europe, and to his dying day never regretted his extreme annihilation of civilians. This is the kind of filthy honorary kike that will spend eternity in the flaming butcher shop of hell. And for all the pilots that burned German civilians by the hundreds of thousands, telling God "I was just following the orders of some men on earth, they payed my salary and controlled my career" will not be good enough.
Completely irrelevant quotes and points considering none of us are supporting Churchill. Schacht, Hitler, Kalergi and Churchill were all co-conspirators in this WW2 bloodbath. They were all members of the Judeo-masonic society which still dominates the world.
Way to drown out the discussion though with verbose diarrhoea.
Jacky Vanmarsenille that last comment was directed at Henry and (Un)known, not you.
That's right Alan. You rely on your big idea that because Hitler was friendly with a Jew so he must have been under the control of the Jews. Only a psychologically Jew molested child of the mid-1980s (as you are) could be shocked enough to build a pathetically inept conspiracy theory around the claim (true or not) that Hitler had a Jewish friend and his country for a while did business with banks who will do business with anyone they can do business with.
You're up late; What's up at the squat...has it run out of Red Square Lager and crack cocaine?
I'll bury you under FACTS if I've a mind to.
Boy Wonder said: "Churchill. Schacht, Hitler, Kalergi and Churchill were all co-conspirators in this WW2 bloodbath"...So Hitler drew the short straw and killed his wife and then himself, eh?
You can't make this shit up, but Alan does...
It doesn't take much for the saboteurs to start getting ugly and reducing the discussion to Hollywoodesque bitchy trashtalk. I won't reduce myself to your level. My people have higher standards and some self-respect. I think you're confusing Red Square, which is in Moscow, with Red Stripe the Jamaican beer. Not something I drink though and no, alas, i have been drinking tea and eating bourbon biscuits this evening and i've even managed to resist swearing at anyone. Only by dishonestly trivialising the evidence that Hitler was in cahoots with the international "Jewish" establishment into a childish soundbyte can you make your position seem even remotely credible. You can't be adult and discuss the inconsistencies like adults because the weakness of your position would become obvious.
Your transparent, dishonest way of arguing - by challenging fiercely points that i have never made while ignoring every point that i have - won't wash here.
A blind man with cork eyes can se you’ve got no points. And you are well aware that “Red Square lager” is a sarcastic reference to your communist background.
You said Hitler was a co-conspirtor with Churchill et al....so address the point that your laughably inept theory throws up. Did Hitler draw the short straw and agree to kill his wife and himself?
I heard Hitler collapsed at freefall speed into his own footprint. It wouldn't be the first time that the official story isn't true. If 6 million deaths were faked in the Holocaust i would imagine faking Hitler's death and shipping him and Eva off somewhere would be straightforward.
You would rather discuss something which is impossible to prove either way rather than discuss things that we can know about. Let's talk about Schacht, Unity Mitford, Stephanie Hohenlohe, Lord Rothermere, Nancy Astor, the Anglo-German Fellowship, the Cliveden Set. Dare you.
What's your full name, Henry? What personal information have you shared with the world? Anything i can use against you? What have you done to contribute to the downfall of the Synagogue of Satan? Are these threads the extent of your efforts? Oh please do let us know where we can find your work.
You forgot to mention the Duke of Windsor, David Lloyd George, J F. C Fuller, Oswald Mosley, Arthur Kitson, John Amery, William Joyce and a thousand other famous people who flocked to Hitler. Your theory is catnip to the clowns that populate the Web. No one serious will tolerate it for a moment.
Shouldn’t you be in bed tucked up with yer big Jewish book of Jesus?
I'm with you Henry, Alan always has a cry about name calling but loves to be mocking or dismissive via different methods.
You want to talk about Stephanie Hohenlohe?
"She provided information to the Office of Strategic Services which was used in a 1943 report on the personality of Adolf Hitler. In May 1945 she was released on parole and returned to Germany, where she cultivated influential connections in post-war German society."
Straight from the wikipage.
Why are you Hitler enthusiasts deleting your comments?
Is it something about your respective egos and wanting to "look" smart and shit?
A whole day of arguing about nothing. BRAVO!!!!
I tapped the iPad 3 x cuz it didn’t respond and removed 2 repeat posts. I don’t know about any other deletions.
I was talking about your own comments that you deleted and Alan did the same too.
Not a big deal.
I'm not crying about name calling; to me it just shows someone struggling to compete in a discussion. I mention it just to highlight the low-level tactics being employed by rabid Hitlerites.
Yeah let's talk about Hohenlohe - she was Daily Mail owner Lord Rothermere's employee and served to relay messages and gifts backwards and forwards from Rothermere to Hitler. This was while Rothermere was working tirelessly with Beaverbrook to boost Britain's air power. She also personally organised the trip of the Duke of Windsor to Germany to meet Hitler. Hitler would also shower gifts, and a great deal of his time, on her, a known "Jewess" with the most elite connections throughout the European Judeo-establishment, including Rothschilds, Warburgs and European royal families. She was one of many of the internationalist elite which Hitler chose to be on very friendly terms with.
I deleted 2 comments after posting the same comment three times. The original comment remains above. What he has done is another matter entirely. Take it up with him.
Alan, Churchill’s archive at Cambridge contains letters from Jews like the Goldschmidts begging Churchill to do anything he can to help the Rothschilds in Germany/Austria to escape the Nazis and gain entry to Britain. So much for your big conspiracy eh?
I bet that we would have a Holocaust thread and we would all agree.
That archive available to the public is it? It really is hilarious what you expect us to consider as evidence Henry. What a joke!
Henry you must adore Churchill because you can't stop talking about him. Hitler and him did have many close mutual friends though maybe we can talk about all of them?
Like I posted earlier, only a child of the 80s like Alan, who has grown up listening to the Jew myth that Hitler wanted to kill every Jew on the planet, is shocked when he finds out that Hitler dealt with Jews in a non-homocidal way. Guess what Alan...the German military was filled with tens of thousands of Germans classed as Jewish by degree.
Another sound piece of judgement from your favourite goy genius Hitler.
So the letters in the Cambridge archive were written in the 1930s in anticipation of Alan’s moronic conspiracy theory being revealed almost 90 years later. Such foresight dem joooz.....Fuckin assclown.
In the 1930s the international establishment was already preparing for a war they knew would happen and equally preparing the public for war through anti-Nazi propaganda in Britain, of which this sounds like an example. Are you using mainstream anti-Nazi propaganda to prove that Hitler was against the "Jews"? Do you believe everything else that was in the letters? Why not post them here if they are so useful to our understanding?
Additionally, how is Churchill even remotely able to do a Rothschild a favour!! Do they always come to their own puppets for help?
This topic is extremely important and it is good that our people are willing to discuss it. Unlike Trump, Hitler is truly the closest we have to a leader to point to. If he was completely real then we should defend him to our dying breath. But if it turns out that he was controlled, then TRULY all the world is a stage, and never again should we ever fall for theatre that comes from the mainstream political arena. If he was controlled, then TRULY the satanic masons and jews have completely taken over this world and are stringing us along with every election and every war.
I can only repeat again, if you want to settle the issue, you got to push for a peace treaty at home. You will be amazed what length your rotten establishment will go to tell you, that they have a peace treaty, Ask them to show it, they cannot do that, it does not exist. all theey will show you is eventually "2+4", which explicitly prohibits a peace regulation.
A peace treaty would immediately sweep the EU away in the trash bin.
It is kind of difficult to trust any english speaker, if their country is still at war with Germany, and refuse to sign peace. Essentially, how to deal with this as a German? Any of you could be an enemy, Alan definitely is an enemy.
"I believe if the later is true we could all finally unite."
This is exactly why SoS shills sabotage threads like this to support Hitler. There will never be a consensus because of all the shills. We will never unify around Hitler because he does not stand up to honest scrutiny. We cannot build our house on such a weak foundation. I believe we just have to persevere with exposing Hitler until being pro-Hitler is no longer a credible position to hold for people in our movement. People need to get over the fact that we are not provided with a mainstream character worthy of our support. We can only unify as a race under God and to do so we have to give up idol worship.
"Any English speaker could be an enemy". Come on Unknown. How many in your country support the phony war on terror and how many oppose it? Probably the same as in the USA. Our countries are working together now with soldiers and defense department agents "just following orders" to destroy the Middle East and build up Israel. Both of our countries are controlled now. You know well that we have no influence over who enters our government or what they do.
I do not defend the savage monsters that burned and ravaged your people. This is an extremely unpopular opinion to have in America. I have been told with hysterical uncontrolled chimpout rage that I am "disrespecting the heroes that sacrificed all for our freedom" and etc. and etc. when I talk about the carpet bombing campaigns, the mass rapes, and the death camps for German soldiers after the war. You are here on this English speaking blog because we are saying what most English speakers don't.
"Any English speaker could be an enemy". Come on Unknown. How many in your country support the phony war on terror and how many oppose it?
The vast majority of Germans is against this "war on terror", is against US bases on our soil, is against warmongering with Russia. This amounts to over 60%. This is not the US, despite the constant 24/7 psychological warfare and "reeducation" Germans don't buy it.
But I don't get war your "war on terror" has to do with the non existent peace treay terminating WWI & WWII?
You said that any English speaker could be an enemy, and I pointed out that both of our countries' militaries now are "just following orders" for a common Jewish purpose.
Your people may be against it in majority, but your soldiers also went to Iraq and Afghanistan. If they "just follow orders" despite your population being against it, then you really have no say and you should understand that. You can see that our governments are run by the same parasite.
It is the same here in America. I am against the warmongering and bombings and drone strikes and invasions and coups and regime changes as well. But I have no say.
Your people might not be as brainwashed, and your country might not have done as bad as the USA in the middle east, but you see that your soldiers also "just follow orders" for the Jewish agenda today.
How can any of us demand a peace treaty when our soldiers and government agents are willing to bomb civilians and start the wars to begin with, just because an "authority figure" tells them to?
Maybe I mistook your comment. It just sounded like what jews tell their kids: "All goyim are the enemy. All goyim want to holocaust us. Anti-semitism is in their DNA".
Likewise I wouldn't encourage muslims to see all white people as the enemy because of what our governments have done in the Middle East.
"Your people may be against it in majority, but your soldiers also went to Iraq and Afghanistan."
Yeah some 500 or so, the rebel army "Bundeswehr" need to wait for some real military in case of war, these are not German troops, but auxiliary troops to US troops. The americans demanded German troops, and the vassals complied, because of UN charter.
I can only recommend you to read the UN charter, the enemy state clause makes any German vassal comply, or else we gonna be bombed and "liberated" again.
Do you understand, that WWI&II has not yet been terminated with a peace treaty? Nothing to do with "war on terror" which is a conflict within ongoing WWII.
Read this UN charter, specifically article 53, 77, 107 and consider what they say there, what consequences arise from that.
"The Security Council shall, where appropriate, utilize such regional arrangements or agencies for enforcement action under its authority. But no enforcement action shall be taken under regional arrangements or by regional agencies without the authorization of the Security Council, with the exception of measures against any enemy state, as defined in paragraph 2 of this Article, provided for pursuant to Article 107 or in regional arrangements directed against renewal of aggressive policy on the part of any such state, until such time as the Organization may, on request of the Governments concerned, be charged with the responsibility for preventing further aggression by such a state.
2. The term enemy state as used in paragraph 1 of the Article applies to any state which during the Second World War has been an enemy of any signatory of the present Charter.”
Military action can be taken against the enemy states without approval, meaning if any German or Japanese vassal government try to become sovereign, military action will be taken.
In fact, the German and Japanese people are held hostage.
Thank you for that information. Yes I understand what you are saying now and you are correct. I feel the same way here, held hostage by a tyrannical zionist occupied government that owns the military and police and sees people like us as an enemy to be at war with.
"this movement" a big LOL to that.
Antifa shills like the one posting here; a middle class clown who lived as like bum in a crack-den where every day was spent reading Trotsky and talking revolution, are not part of "this movement" not least because there is no movement to be a part of. That's his MO. To poison and defile anything fascistic while the clock is running down on the White race.
You better settle down Henry because next the BIS sends the jackals. lol
Being pro-Hitler is increasingly becoming non-credible, indefensible. Soon it will be seen as just as wilfully ignorant as believing the official 9/11 story. Like the 9/11 story, it took time for people to start understanding. The same applies today with Hitler. In the post-internet world people are gradually engaging with the evidence and honest truth-seeking people are slowly but surely coming to the same inevitable inescapable conclusion. The balance is definitely swinging away from Hitler now, and this can only be good for the survival of the White race. Shills like Henry can only attack the person with childish sub-civilised insults which frankly only make himself and his pro-Hitler shill tag-team look like the disingenuous anti-truth saboteurs that they are. So i say keep it up Henry. Your insults just show that your position is so pitifully weak that you have even given up trying to persuade people.
Chainsawmassacre ruins all my jokes. lol
Do you guys ever sleep?
No zap because the sun never sets on the jewish empire.
LOL Jacky
But really, what did this discussion accomplish? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!
It's like arguing about religion. It's not my first rodeo. Always the same outcome though.
At Chainsaw. 132=33 or 6
Let us all celebrate the JFK assassination. I know Fetzer will. LOL
Chainsawmillerman i am a bit more upbeat about this thread. I think it shows that clear progress is being made against the shills. The only serious contributors to it are at the very least sceptical about Hitler if not completely convinced of his treachery. This is a big change. A lot has changed this year regarding the movement's attitude towards Hitler.
Regarding all that garbage from (Un)known about official peace treaties: there has NEVER been real peace. For as long as the Synagogue of Satan has existed they have been at war with us whether we have realised that or not. Have they ever officially declared war on us? No. So who cares what they declare officially? WW2 was really a war between the Synagogue of Satan and the Whites, and i'm sorry to report that the SoS won convincingly, advantaged by their complete lack of moral limitations, with losses of a few hundred thousand compared to our losses of about 100+ million, and that's not to mention our huge political, economic, cultural losses. All that nonsense about official peace treaties, none of which serve to contribute anything of any value to this discussion about Hitler's legitimacy or otherwise, is pure distraction away from the connections which have been shared already in this thread to demonstrate Hitler's true allegiance.
Here we go again. I suspect this will end up with broken keyboards and spilled coffee in about two days.
Don't stop Alan, you're the perpetual motion machine that runs on nothing. Your childish evidence ("Hitler knew Unity Mitford & Co") has as much impact on the truth as the proverbial fart against the wind.
Below is real evidence that Hitler was not your "co-conspirator"...
From a letter sent by Stephen Wise to Felix Frankfurter following the Biltmore Conference in May 1942 we receive an illuminating insight into what was going on from the Jewish point of view:
May 21, 1942
To Felix Frankfurter, Washington
I think he [Chaim Weizmann] is acting with truest wisdom in remembering a Jewish war must not be against England, but against Hitler. It is very easy for some of the grand Zionist statesmen to urge us to smash England, and I think Emanuel Neumann errs a little on that side. But if England goes, everything is lost; if England wins we still have a chance re Palestine and a Jewish future....Weizmann's attitude has not been feeble or cowardly, as is alleged, but wise in its comprehension of the immediate issue.
You must know that I am personally very fond of both [David] Ben-Gurion and [Nahum] Goldmann, but I can't help feeling that in this hour Weizmann's course, unlike their own, is one of higher statesmanship.
Stephen S. Wise.
Source: Stephen S. Wise: Servant of the People, Selected Letters, p.248.
My emphasis above in bold.
Can you read that Alan. If Hitler wins the Jews will have no Palestine and no "Jewish future".
Here's a list of the Jews named. Compare it to your silly list of socialites and VIPs...
Stephen S. Wise -
President of American Jewish Congress;
President of World Jewish Congress;
Editor of the Balfour Declaration.
Felix Frankfurter -
Senior legal advisor to President of the United States;
Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court;
Founder of American Jewish Congress.
Emanuel Neumann -
Chairman of the American Zionist Emergency Council;
President of the World Union of General Zionists;
Founder of the Herzl Foundation.
Nahum Goldmann -
Second President of World Jewish Congress;
President of World Zionist Organization;
Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Jewish Agency;
Author of and signatory to the settlement for the Jewish Material Claims Against Germany.
Chaim Weizmann -
First President of Israel;
Chairman of the Provisional State Council of Israel;
President of World Zionist Organization;
Editor of the Balfour Declaration.
David Ben-Gurion -
Head of the Jewish Agency for Israel (de facto government of World Jewry);
First Prime Minister of Israel;
Minister of Defence of Israel;
Chairman of the Provisional State Council of Israel.
Not an unimpressive list I think you'll agree.
Who the fuck would have went along with "smashing England"? WTF
LOL
It's the Rothschild's playground.
Whoever said the Jews were fuckin normal
A list of deceivers of the first order, covering their tracks. They somehow to fail to mention Hitler's Transfer Agreement though... what an embarrassing omission!!
Henry just try to distract people from analysing Hitler's own decisions, associations, etc., - things that would actually give an insight into Hitler. He also doesn't want people to look into all the positive supportive relationships which Hitler had with the international establishment. He would rather people analyse what leading Synagogue of Satan operatives have written, which, considering nothing which is truly top-secret is ever released to the public, gives no insight into the real truth. When was this letter made public? They're public because they're a limited hangout. That you are relying on SoS liars to prove the legitimacy of your hero is pathetic, wouldn't you agree?
You still didn't tell us where we can find your own work? Don't tell me you're not letting any of us benefit from the research and insight that you can offer!?
Additionally they were never so stupid to send honest letters to one another, especially in English, in case they were intercepted. You are not going to find a letter in English by a bunch of SoS elite detailing how they are managing the whole war.
@Unknown - don't start accusing me of using a sock called 'Alan'.
I've done my own podcast in the past and Alan does his own.
I'm an admin here - I don;'t use socks so piss off.
It's about time that you reply to that one scorpio. I was biting my lip all this time. Imagine what it looks like now. LOL
BTW. I'm in the room.
Alan, you are pathetic, you basically peddle plan B narrative, I am pretty familiar with that, it is the narrative of controlled "alternative" german "news", like antifa's Sonnestaatland.
You have been simply recognized for what you are.
Who is this "us"? You guys in the Jew bunker?
Are you a bit schizophrenic? Why do you talk in plural?
Group think red collective? Your kosher conspiracy "movement"?
Transfer agreement, yes, 60000 Jews were transferred in a humane manner, they kept all their assets and it met the goal of getting the jews out of Germany, the war stopped the Transfer agreement, it ended with the British declaration of war.
You somehow forgot the Balfour declaration of 1917, which created facts on the ground, and 20000 Jews had already been moved there by the Brits, apart from the fact that Rothschild activity in Palestine started in the 1850ies already.
I would bet, you are a Jew, your obsession with lies and Hitler just matches.
You are obsessed, you can't live without the ideological enemy, just like the US and britsh press, who are obsessed with demonizing Hitler and call "nazi" every two words.
But dare to point out that Hitler was a good man, you get the full spectrum drivel, hate and BS by the obsessed. In fact, it is your religion, you define yourself as being "anti-Hitler", simply a moronic fanatical antifa idiot with a knack of crazy conspiracy theories, void of any facts.
@scorpio
Perhaps you should mark or quote a sentence if you address it. You made a fuzz about something I simply don't get. If you take part in a discussion, you are not an admin, so you should indicate who you are talking to.
I won't call you something is return, I think you just will delete the comments then, you are obviously unhappy people give you a counter to the horse crap that is peddled here. That's ok, I know where to sort you in then.
Rothschild activity started a lot longer ago in Germany! Before the sons of Mayer Amschel Rothschild were sent to London, Paris, Vienna, and Naples around the turn of the 19th century they were based in the Jewish ghetto in Frankfurt am Main in Germany. The family changed its name to "Rothschild" around the start of the 17th century in Frankfurt. Don't worry though, by the time Hitler came to power, after a Judeo-orchestrated economic collapse, they were probably completely powerless to stop Hitler and his band of Roman soldiers coming to power and employing Rothschild asset Hjalmar Schacht to run his economy and central bank.
@Unknown - Skip the persecution complex. None of your comments have been deleted.
You made a false accusation. I didn't call you anything so I don't even know what you're talking about.
We previously were not allowing 'unknown' posters due to the proliferation of trolls and weirdos using that
monicker, including some fruitcake who was selling herpes creme.
Half of your comments don't even make any sense and you seem unwilling or unable to read what I have
posted in previous comments.
I've extended every courtesy to you, including allowing you to post under 'unkown' so behave yourself.
@Scorpio
You expect a knee fall for allowing comments? Not gonna happen.
You already said right in the beginning you were gonna remove "unknown" comments, and the impression it made was, you want this horse crap unchallenged.
Half my post don't make sense, hmm, ok, I would think your are just mentally unable to follow then, you haven't done your homework.
You started the aggression with "piss off", I have no clue why you said this and in what context. But if you insist, I can return the favor, which would make you delete the comment, I bet on that.
Anyway, what is actually your problem now? I asked you some questions you simply ignored, which is not surprising given your stance on the topic you also aired on your radio program, if I am not mistaken.
I told you to 'piss off' because you made a false accusation, saying I was using a sock.
Again, you didn't read my comments. So piss off and post whatever you want just don't base your arguments on insulting other posters.
Fuck you Anon Unknown!
I'd love see evidence for Alan's claim that "uniting under God" is going to change anything - since he loves to talk about evidence while ignoring all of the evidence presented. Uniting under a Jewish God to defeat Jewish influence??? LOL
You are the shill Alan and FWIW I think Napoleon was probably more real than controlled too.
Alan you're losing...badly.
If you knew anything about the Transfer Agreement then you'd know that every Jew mentioned in connection to Stephen Wise's letter was violently opposed to it and worked successfully to kill it.
And this...
Alan said...
"Additionally they were never so stupid to send honest letters to one another, especially in English, in case they were intercepted. You are not going to find a letter in English by a bunch of SoS elite detailing how they are managing the whole war"
=====
Wow, your reasoning really is low IQ, isn't it. You are saying here that in order to disguise their activities the Jews hoped that in the event of that letter being intercepted the Allies wouldn't know what the Jews were getting up to and think the Jews were just considering whether or not to "Smash England"
I almost feel sorry for you.
I feel sorry for you too Henry. Being caught in a cult and all.
"I told you to 'piss off' because you made a false accusation, saying I was using a sock."
If you feel somehow addressed when Alan is addressed, I am tempted to ask such question.
There was no need from your side to state "piss of", because my comment went to Alan. hence my question.
Fuck you Zap, you old drunkard, we have chatted peacefully some time ago, perhaps a beer less gets you clear headed again.
Anynway, I am out if this retarded shitshow here.
@henry
Waste of time, I think we both know who and what we are dealing with by now.
Unknown, can you just come clean and admit you're Dennis Fetcho?
"Henry", my point was simply that the letter is worthless for anyone trying to determine whether Hitler was legitimate or not. For anyone wanting to learn a bit more about the Transfer Agreement: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rk24LXer8kw
This is a really funny video in my opinion as the "Jewish" desire to make money directly clashes with the desire to protect "Jewish" interests. "Jew" Edwin Black squirms as he talks about his least favourite, but most successful, book.
Unknown wrote "@Scorpio
Is "Alan" you alternate nick or what?"
Stop lying.
@scorpio well at least it proves its not Fetcho lol
Mr Z. What's the point of this shit fest that you laughingly run here...is it really "let's get pissed and LOL away every day pretending to give a fuck about what's actually happening in the world" because that's what it looks like. And I'm not in any cult. I just counter the lies peddled on this so called "forum"
Seems that Kyle Hunt and others have you right after all.
@Unknown - Yes just as it was getting interesting.
Henry, you actually think important "Jewish" secrets would be published by Stephen Wise in the book of his letters? What planet are you living on? Beyond moronic. But, yes, Henry would rather have you focused on this kind of nonsense than any of Hitler's provable connections. Hjalmar Schacht is really all anyone needs to know about Hitler. All the shills always want to change the subject away from Schacht because this was the "Jews'" biggest mistake. That Schacht was put in charge of the German economy and central bank is the biggest giveaway as to the true nature of the Nazi regime. It is for this reason that Schacht's name is more or less completely unknown to the general public when you compare to all the lesser important and yet much more famous Nazi top officials.
lol @knownunknown (clever name change, btw)
Kyle Hunt doesn't know shit from Shinola when it comes to me. We all know that he was visited by the FBI though. Don't we?
Henry - our views aren't as divergent as you seem to think.
That 'unknown' character was like something out of Monty Python's Argument Store sketch
Like I said to you a few days ago: 'get the fuck out of here" if you don't like it.
Kyle Hunt would have never let that shit slide like I did when you called me a jew lovin whatever.
Henry - you have no idea what happened with Kyle Hunt, if you did, you wouldn't have brought it up.
Discussion of AH is second only to the flat earth when it comes to hurt feelz and emotions taking the chimpometer to maximum overdrive. You've made some excellent points and I'm not discounting your point of view in totality, not by a long shot.
Don't remember many insults flying the other way though...
Yes Alan, you have been respectful and avoided heading into chimpout territory, not that I agree with all of your views but I do believe you to be sincere in you beliefs.
It wasn't a secret. It was comment in a letter.
Do you want something from the World Jewish Congress archive, Jew-lover?
Try this...
We must at length face the fact that we have been defeated by Hitler. Not only are there countries today that are completely Judenrein, making much more difficult the situation of the Jews in countries which have not yet reached this stage, but what is even more important, the world became Jew-conscious. This is the greatest triumph of Hitler and Goebbels since it will make restoration on a large scale impossible. Europe will be split after the war and in some countries the people may be chiefly united on one point. The Jewish question.
Source: Jacob Robinson to Stephen Wise and Nahum Goldman, June 25, 1943, CZA, Z5/644.
I still think a moderated debate between the two of you would have been cool....almost as cool as those nazi uniforms which were probably some of the best uniforms ever designed.
Henry seems unfamiliar with the concept of "Jews" lying in public and conspiring in secret.
You just keep on pretending to be someone you're not when you wish to make a point using someone else's words by editing them to make a completely different point to that of the person you stole them from....
No Alan, that's precisely what's been exposed regarding yourself & Co.
"You just keep on pretending to be someone you're not when you wish to make a point using someone else's words by editing them to make a completely different point to that of the person you stole them from.... "
Who was that directed at, it's not obvious?
So do you Alan. After all you keep pointing to connections that were out in the open... Duh.
Its Alan abuse of logic that find much more offensive than anyones name calling.
Where's the evidence that Jewsus worship will save us Alan?
Nope that didn't make any sense. The World Jewish Congress is not exactly a secret meeting. Neither are the published letters - in English (clearly for goy audience) - of famous US rabbis. If you don't understand the deception that they are trying to weave, that is your failing. If your insinuation is that they love telling us the whole truth in public forums, then in which WJC meeting minutes can i find them discuss how they are going to flood the West with non-White migrants for the purposes of genocide? Or maybe because they didn't announce it in the WJC it's not happening?
It was directed at "Chainsawmillerman"
And hmm.... which bunch of destroyers just loves to mock Jesus?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it the Jews who rejected Christ and ordered his murder?
I'm out now. I'm done with conversing with the morally retarded who seem to be permitted carte blanche to blaspheme, insult, curse and just behave like sick Satanic scum. It seems that "Jewish" values are welcome here... just not "Jewish" opinions. Ridiculous as far as i am concerned. Good night Scorpio, Zap, Chainsawmillerman. See you all on some thread soon no doubt.
Alan, please, people can see that you are Jewing. It's so unseemly. You'll upset the goyin.
Hasbarat? Any one?
Final summary of the argument: Everyone here is a lying Jew!!!!
I was so hoping it wouldn't devolve into this yet here we are...
Just before i unfollow the thread, here are the three podcasts of mine which cover issues related to this "discussion" about Adolf Hitler for anyone who's interested:
Hour 7 - Adolf Hitler was a product of the international bankers, and Hjalmar Schacht and the BIS prove it - https://www.podcasts.com/alan-buttle-radio-show-3ffaa8b26/episode/Hour-7-Adolf-Hitler-was-a-product-of-the-international-bankers-and-Hjalmar-Schacht-and-the-BIS-prove-it-e0e0
Episode 23 - Hitler's "Dear Princess", Princess Stephanie von Hohenlohe - https://www.podcasts.com/alan-buttle-radio-show-3ffaa8b26/episode/Episode-22-Hitlers-Dear-Princess-Princess-Stephanie-von-Hohenlohe-d089
Episode 24 - Fascism in 1930s Britain - https://www.podcasts.com/alan-buttle-radio-show-3ffaa8b26/episode/Episode-24-Fascism-in-1930s-Britain-ca91
It's returned to its own vomit and brought a pile more to go with it.
It looks like Henry is an Hasbarat troll or if he's not, he's fucking acting like one.
You know what Mr. Zippy...that's exactly what I think of you. Difference is I've been active in nationalism since 1974 and have a recorded history to prove it. I also have the facts to prove everything I say. What do you have other than a fetish for Elton John and a Google Blog that identifies itself as "Shit"....
Zap takes the biscuit here.
He posts news from Haverbeck, and does not realize that Henry is a key player in getting this information out, instead he calls him a hasbarat. What a madhouse, you people are so lost.
Funny how Henry and Unknown are lockstep. Keep hitting me, I can take it.
I thought you were 'out of here' Unknown. Try and keep your promises. 'a key player' - lmao
Henry, you've figured it out. Zap is exposed. He has posted thousands of anti-zio audio for over 10 years now because he is working for the jews. Congrats, you get the brass ring!
fuh fuh fuh
"He has posted thousands of anti-zio audio"...like Alan Buttle etc, etc... Yeah I got the picture.
He sure likes music. Is his favourite Bluesman Muddy Waters...
@Scorpio
You have always been a pretty daft dickhead, now I am out.
DO NOT ENGAGE!!!
Do not Muddy the Waters!!!
Alan who spends several posts disparaging everyone and all the evidence presented has a massive cry about "satanic" blasphemy. Lol.
Now that's some name calling!!!
@scorpio you know there was more than one Jew getting crucified there that day right? Does that mean all the others were awesome because the Jews wanted them dead too?
Alan is Bible-dupe of the highest order and its why he isn't willing to accept we can ever save ourselves....
DO NOT ENGAGE!!!
Category 5 Chimpstorm Status: Ongoing. Proceed with caution.
Bravo Sierra alert.
Operation BaldomoJew666 complete - return to bunker.
Lesson #1 straight outta the Nizkor playbook..."Do not engage"
Chainsaw: Note the lower right watermark from about 4:55 on.
Post a Comment