Good post Chainsaw, and thanks for considering me Scorpio but this tranny beast calling itself Lady Liberty couldn't play me if she were the last tranny on earth ;)
Satanists have been doing this for a long long time. Back in the day, they didn't have the chemicals and surgeries that they have today, so castrated men Satanic Priests just wore very baggy robes and makeup, and tried to change their voices.
Look closely again at the Statue of Liberty's face. It is clearly Donald Trump's face. Jim Fetzer should jump on this one for sure. He knows when there's a "monkey in the wood pile".
The statue may very well depict a man and there certainly is a tranny agenda underway these days, but regarding the title - "...dressed like a woman", I say BS. Before pants were created (for men on horseback) everyone - men and women - wore some type of dress, gown, or robe, and in many cultures, such is still considered acceptable for males. What constitutes "masculine" or "feminine" clothing has always been purely subjective, dictated by current, publicly-accepted societal and cultural indoctrination, and constantly changes with the times. For example, along with pants, high-heeled shoes were also originally created for men on horseback to help keep their feet in the stirrups. It wasn't until women began clamoring to wear them that they became acceptable for females. In fact, women have been appropriating "men's" styles for decades - just as they have in recent years with tattoos, yet no one ever accuses THEM of being "crossdressers" or appearing too manly. Painted nails, earrings and other piercings, and even the color pink, were long associated with masculinity - going back thousands of years. Tight, flared or bell-bottom pants also were once commonly acceptable for men, but now have largely become the domain of femininity. Such arbitrary distinctions regarding gender identity and clothing have always changed with the times - often to the complete opposite, so to get excited about a statue of a man in a robe seems a bit ignorant and short-sighted - just the regurgitation of one's current mental programming.
7 comments:
'Lady' liberty is a trannny! - Don't tell Jacky V. - lol
CSM - Yes, this deserves further discussion. We should all 'get in the room'.
Did you get the email I sent you a while back?
Good post Chainsaw, and thanks for considering me Scorpio but this tranny beast calling itself Lady Liberty couldn't play me if she were the last tranny on earth ;)
Satanists have been doing this for a long long time. Back in the day, they didn't have the chemicals and surgeries that they have today, so castrated men Satanic Priests just wore very baggy robes and makeup, and tried to change their voices.
I always thought, that was "some, ugly woman."
And now, I see, "It" sneering.
Look closely again at the Statue of Liberty's face. It is clearly Donald Trump's face. Jim Fetzer should jump on this one for sure. He knows when there's a "monkey in the wood pile".
Bullshit! Lady Liberty is a WOMAN! Look at the tits, and the hips, Man!!!
The statue may very well depict a man and there certainly is a tranny agenda underway these days, but regarding the title - "...dressed like a woman", I say BS. Before pants were created (for men on horseback) everyone - men and women - wore some type of dress, gown, or robe, and in many cultures, such is still considered acceptable for males.
What constitutes "masculine" or "feminine" clothing has always been purely subjective, dictated by current, publicly-accepted societal and cultural indoctrination, and constantly changes with the times.
For example, along with pants, high-heeled shoes were also originally created for men on horseback to help keep their feet in the stirrups.
It wasn't until women began clamoring to wear them that they became acceptable for females.
In fact, women have been appropriating "men's" styles for decades - just as they have in recent years with tattoos, yet no one ever accuses THEM of being "crossdressers" or appearing too manly.
Painted nails, earrings and other piercings, and even the color pink, were long associated with masculinity - going back thousands of years. Tight, flared or bell-bottom pants also were once commonly acceptable for men, but now have largely become the domain of femininity. Such arbitrary distinctions regarding gender identity and clothing have always changed with the times - often to the complete opposite, so to get excited about a statue of a man in a robe seems a bit ignorant and short-sighted - just the regurgitation of one's current mental programming.
Post a Comment