Sunday, December 22, 2013
65th anniversary for Rootless Cosmopolitans!
Today was one of my two candidates for the establishment of a Rootless Cosmopolitans Day. "Rootless Cosmopolitans" was a Stalinist code word for Jews, marking a deadly turn in the nasty anti-Semitic history of almost the entire life span of the Soviet Union. The USSR, already gripped by Stalinist paranoia in the purges of the 1930s, took an even more paranoiac ultra-nationalist, xenophobic turn following its victory over the Nazis, mimicking their bigotry, scapegoating, and destructive cultural policies (the era of Zhdanov). This ultranationalist, anti-western campaign against "unpatriotic" "cosmopolitan" elements began in 1946 (August 14, in Pravda), and on December 22, 1948, it was specifically tied to Jews, in this speech:
6 comments:
Bullshit - as Solzhenitsyn abundantly documented in Two Hundred Years Together, the Bolsheviks were the Jewish Revolutionaries; the Jews were the victimizers NOT THE VICTIMS. About 66 million innocent people were kidnapped and eventually died a hideous death at the hands of the Jewish "Ivan the Terrible" corps.
Jewish Freemasonry was the soil of the Russian Revolution.
How can people continue to ignore the truth of Jewish involvement in the destruction of the Russian People, of Western Culture in Europe, the ethnic cleaning of Palestine?
In other words Scott you know nothing about Solzhenitsyn's work, his views or either any history of Soviet Russia.
"Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together, a two-volume history of Russian-Jewish relations, initially grew out of The Red Wheel, his monumental opus on the Russian Revolution. In The Red Wheel, Solzhenitsyn had shown the Revolution in full complexity; and indeed—to avoid boiling down that complexity or skewing it via the narrow prism of Russian-Jewish relations—he gave The Red Wheel priority of publication in every major language, ahead of Two Hundred Years Together. Now that the full Red Wheel is well on its way to being published in English, an authorized translation of Two Hundred Years Together is in progress and scheduled for publication in 2024.
In Two Hundred Years Together, Solzhenitsyn emphatically denies (in Chapters 9 and 14) that the Russian revolutions of 1905 and 1917 were the result of a "Jewish conspiracy" (just as he had earlier forcefully criticized the extreme nationalists who were and are obsessed with Freemasons and Jews—see, e.g., Russia in Collapse, Chapter 25, “The Maladies of Russian Nationalism”). Two Hundred Years Together was first published in Russian in 2001–02, and several times since. The definitive Russian edition is published by Vremya (Moscow, 2015), as volumes 26 & 27 of their ongoing 30-volume collected works of Solzhenitsyn."
https://www.solzhenitsyncenter.org/his-writings/large-works-and-novels/two-hundred-years-together
I've read the book. Have you. You should rather than regurgitating summarizes from the internet. What shameless moronic fools share the earth with me.
http://mailstar.net/Solzhenitsyn-200YT-Complete.pdf
You don't know what you are talking about brother...
Page 595:
A contemporary writer reports: “for the first time ever a significant number of young Jewish communists arrived in rural communities as commanders and lords over life and death. Only during collectivization did the characterization of the Jew as the hated enemy of the peasant take hold — even in those places where Jews had never been seen before”
Regarding Jewish role in collectivization, it is necessary to remember that Jewish
communists participated efficiently and diligently. From a third-wave immigrant who grew
up in Ukraine. “I remember my father, my mother, aunts, uncles all worked on
collectivization with great relish, completing 5-year plans in 4 years and writing novels about life in factories”
In 1927 Izvestia declared “there is no Jewish question here. The October revolution gave a
categorical answer long ago. All nationalities are equal – that was the answer” (254).
However when the dispossessors entering the peasant huts were not just commissars but
Jewish commissars the question still glowered in the distance.
MICHAEL, dispossession as in the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. Familiar ideology and action.
Well over half of the organizing Revolutionary Bolsheviks were Jews (pg 456):
" What about the Jewish renegades? As we have seen, during the year 1917, there was no
particular attraction for the Bolsheviks that manifested among the Jews. But their activism has played its part in the revolutionary upheavals. At the last Congress of the Russian Social‐Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP) (London, 1907), which was, it is true, common with the Mensheviks, of 302‒305 delegates, 160 were Jews, more than half—it was promising. Then, after the April 1917 Conference, just after the announcement of the explosive April Theses of Lenin, among the nine members of the new Central Committee were G. Zinoviev, L. Kamenev, Ia. Sverdlov. At the VIthsummer Congress of the RKP (b) (the Russian Communist Party of the
Bolsheviks, the new name of the RSDLP), eleven members were elected to the Central
Committee, including Zinoviev, Sverdlov, Trotsky, Uritsky.1 Then, at the “historic meeting” in Karpovka Street, in the apartment of Himmer and Flaksermann, on 10 October 1917, when the decision to launch the Bolshevik coup was taken, among the twelve participants were Trotsky,Zinoviev, Kamenev, Sverdlov, Uritsky, Sokolnikov. It was there that was elected the first “Politburo” which was to have such a brilliant future, and among its seven members, always the same:Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Sokolnikov. Which is already a lot. D. S. Pasmanik clearly states: “There is no doubt that the Jewish renegades outnumbered the normal percentage…; they occupied too great a place among the Bolshevik commissioners.”
Remember this one?
"108morris108: 1953 Moscow Coup Against The Zionist Oligarchs-Letter From the Soviet Union"
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rnpylTZgmAY
-bb9
Scott is correct and has won the debate.
Good stuff man
cheers
Scott says "I've read the book. Have you."
Unless you can read French or Russian you have not read the book.
While this unauthorized, redacted and poorly translated English version is incomplete and missing whole chapters that contradicts this narrative which you are aiming to present.
Scott says "You should rather than regurgitating summarizes from the internet."
So citing Solzhenitsyn's own foundation who control his estate is considered as, "regurgitating summarizes from the internet" Now you are unable to contradict, so you change the topic to the medium, being "from the internet" This makes no sense.
Scott says "What shameless moronic fools share the earth with me."
Well ain't you so special. The fact that you are even trying to argue against the Solzhenitsyn foundation is beyond ridiculous. While you misrepresent Solzhenitsyn's work contradicted in the very source that you claimed to have read. [...]
Scott says "Well over half of the organizing Revolutionary Bolsheviks were Jews (pg 456):"
Being dependant upon an unauthorized and manipulative "translation" the above is unqualified. Quote Solzhenitsyn directly from something untouched. Even the party percentage does not support any such claims.
1. In the Council of People's Commissars in 1917, of the 16 members only 1 was Jewish, Leon Trotsky. *Total 8%*
2. In the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic before the Soviet Union was established in 1922, out of the 50 members only 6 were Jewish. *Total 12%*
3. Before the Provisional Government walked away in October and allowed Lenin's rise there were 30 officials of the Bolshevik party only 6 who were Jewish. *Total 20%*
4. On the Central Committee there were 7 members and 3 who were Jewish. *Total 40%*
Of the 50 party officials there was a total of 6 who were Jewish. So these Jews that allegedly held a majority represented a total of 12% of the party leadership.
Scorpio says "Scott is correct and has won the debate. Good stuff man cheers"
What debate? Nothing of Solzhenitsyn's was cited. Scott is using an unauthorized and poorly translated work which has selectivelt redacted whole chapters and passages that Solzhenitsyn views contradict such narratives alleged by Scott, as stated in the original link.
Post a Comment