January 23, 2025

G-Man In Absentia Show 2025.01.22 (Davis Lurmann, Scorpio and Mike Sledge)




This is a temporary show, ‘G-Man In Absentia’, provided until G-Man returns.








26 comments:

KnownUnknown said...

That fat cuck jones seems to be off the booze. I bet a bunch of jews own his platform now

Panzerfaust said...

On the Daniel Davis Deep Dive show former CIA analyst Larry Johnson gives a clear and honest assessment of Trump's first three days in office. A refreshing change from the hyperbolic garbage.

https://youtu.be/Im1nTzlO9OI

cjag said...

Try Ozempic. The fatman quiting booze is like pajeet's no longer working at call center's

Good podcast yesterday...
Looking forward to more in the future.


Clinton
from Ontario

Tim said...

why not do a show with jonathan greenblatt and promote his unit 8300 idea? lurmann can tell ya all about it ..

Tim said...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PswP6h9oi0U kang arthur

handgranadier said...

" That fat cuck jones..." ...is he a jude ? thanks for info

grok said...

LOL "handgranadier "!!!!

Oh look! It's the king of fake, contrived comments! The golden boy himself! The resident chameleon sociopath... SCORPIO!!!!!

Scorpio, I think you meant "Thanks for the infos", as to be in true "John Miller " form and style, you fucking WEIRDO!

Scorpio can't help himself, he must keep appearing as these fake alter egos characters he creates (there is a long list of them). He thinks he is smarter than everyone else, but he needs therapy. He keeps inserting these fictional characters he creates into threads at Mamis. It seems he does it to create interest in the thread and for his own pathetic self promotion.
Just imagine what would happen, if a guy like Scorpio was ever put into a position of power! LOL

Ed in Salt Lake said...

Were you not also assumed to be one of the multiple pseudonymnous manifestations as well?

grok said...

No Ed, I'm Chainsaw, I changed my name to grok. Scorpio is Grokk with the little porcelain blackface ornament as his avatar.

grok said...

Can't you keep up with all the absurd fuckery going on here? LOL

Ed in Salt Lake said...

Ahhh! I knew you were at least monitoring the comments here since your last exit, however I wasn't aware you were back under "Grok."

I try not to involve myself too much with the drama at Miami's, but I understand how sometimes it's simply a part of regularly interacting, or that some meathead needs to be called out from time to time. Regardless, hope things are well with you Chainsaw!

grok said...


Ed, check this out,
Start at 35:30 is my recommendation as it starts getting interesting at that
point. Take care brother!

Canada Patriot Updates via Trump Inauguration & the 51st State?! Derek Noonan, Norm Traversy & More
https://rumble.com/v6caapd-canada-patriot-updates-via-trump-inauguration-and-the-51st-state-derek-noon.html

zapoper said...

https://www.sec.gov/edgar/search/#/q=CANADA&dateRange=all&ciks=0000230098&entityName=CANADA%2520(CIK%25200000230098)&sort=desc

grok said...

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/230098/000119312524282084/d845542d18k.htm

grok said...

Within the Annual Report for CANADA in the above link there is a warning of sorts...

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Potential Tariffs on Canadian Goods

In a November post on Truth Social, a social media platform owned by Trump Media & Technology Group, U.S. President Elect Donald Trump, posted that he would impose a 25% tariff on all Canadian and Mexican goods entering the United States, which he would effect through an executive order on the day of his inauguration in January of 2025. The United States is Canada’s most important trading partner, accounting for approximately three-quarters of Canada’s total merchandise exports. Canada is the United States’ second largest trading partner and the largest destination for U.S. merchandise exports. Such a tariff, if enacted, along with any retaliatory tariffs or other protectionist economic policies promulgated by either the United States or Canada could have a material adverse effect on Canadian exports and, potentially, on the Canadian economy generally.

Cautionary statement for purposes of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

This annual report, including the exhibits hereto, contains various forward-looking statements and information that are based on Canada’s belief as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to Canada. When used in this document, the words “anticipate”, “estimate”, “project”, “expect”, “should” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. Among the key factors that have or will have a direct bearing on Canada are the world-wide economy in general and the actual economic, social and political conditions in or affecting Canada.

grok said...

What Is a Safe Harbor?
A safe harbor is a legal provision to sidestep or eliminate legal or regulatory liability in certain situations, provided that certain conditions are met.

grok said...

Then of course there is the amended Bank Act, SC 1991, c46 (CANADA) that I reported on in the summer around June 2024 that called for Canadian commercial banks and Bank holding companies business ending date to be June 30 2025, then was amended approx 60 days later, to June 30 2026.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sunset provision

Section 21 (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (4), banks shall not carry on business, and authorized foreign banks shall not carry on business in Canada, after June 30, 2026.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Video below of the slim bag Pierre Poilievre playing dumb, or being dumb, you choose!

Canadian bank act Sunset provision after June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AinEeR1MZTM

Ed in Salt Lake said...

Yeah!,...they'll "take a look at subsections #2 & #4 afterwards," but notice no urgency to write anything down or have him expound on, or repeat anything. More stooge "filler material" to appease the public!

Ed in Salt Lake said...

Interesting document! So much "hidden history" that we are oblivious to. Call me skeptical, but I don't see this somehow galvanizing Canadians, at least those who eventually become aware of their 1839 "DOI." As with anything potentially threatening to them, those "powers that be" will conceal, invalidate, dismiss, revise, propaganda, smear, etc.

As a side note from yesterday-for the life of me, I don't know why I wasn't unable to put two-and-two together the last week or two and figure out that "Grok" was actually you because, I will usually always at least take a peek at links posted here that I'm not usually familiar with, or that appear at least somewhat interesting.

As with many of your links posted in the past, I was noticing that "this Grok guy" was posting some worthwhile and informative content every now and again. Why I didn't make the- what appears now in hindsight- "obvious connection" maybe just reveals my lack of attention to detail?

The heavy Canadian-angle should have at least raised my curiosity. I thought when you exited stage-left some weeks back, you had had enough(which I can understand)and were gone for good, at least as far as actively commenting goes. I'm assuming that you have, or had, some kind of association or relationship(s) with some of the regs here, outside of simply the interactions through commenting? Just speculative hunch on my part that's probably none of my business anyway!

grok said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
grok said...

I hit the post button by mistake while I was on the phone, before I finished my post


Actually, I see the above document as interesting, but guys like Doug Force who put together "The Myth is Canada" website has done more work on proving Canada is defacto nation and it's had zero traction.

https://www.themythiscanada.com/

The thing that makes me wonder about this is, coupled with all the "bold moves" trump is making and all the 51st state rhetoric, makes me wonder if something is being cooked up to bring in the new and improved corporate USA with expanded territory and resources. I doubt we are moving away from a usury/ corporate growth with a real natural/common law system. However I don't know! This whole thing with Quebec essentially being a state could potentially be the catalyst that takes Trump's statements from rhetoric to a real spark that creates a move from Corporate Canada into Corporate USA LOL
Imagine if Quebec was the first to move into the States. How many other provinces if given the choice would want to remain "Canadian"? I'm not suggesting it's going to happen. It's just strange that this shit is happening in the same time that Trump is rolling out his broad and sweeping EO's.

grok said...

Your right I had enough several weeks back and left. Then I was talking to zap a few times and he tricked me back into this operation he's running here! LOL
Your posting style actually reminds me of guy that used to post here years ago under the name Captain Ahab. Your a good guy Ed, Cheers!

grok said...

International Public Notice: The New Canal Plan and Gaza Destruction
http://www.paulstramer.net/2025/01/international-public-notice-new-canal.html

Ed in Salt Lake said...

Im sure maybe there are probably multiple good reasons for you to conflate my "posting style" with that of the former poster under the moniker of Melville's infamous captain of the doomed Pequod. I too consume all things related to the brutish White Whale! "Wonder ye now at the fiery hunt?"

grok said...

LOL EXACTLY!

grok said...

A day later and here is the story of CTV news and Quebec is being referred to as a Nation.

Quebec Immigration Minister wants to create ‘social contract’ for newcomers
https://www.ctvnews.ca/montreal/article/quebec-immigration-minister-to-table-integration-law-this-week/

Interesting language here. The use of "nation" instead of "province" is an interesting choice.




"Quebec’s minister responsible for immigration and the French language announced on Monday he is planning to table an “integration” bill, saying newcomers need to embrace the “common culture.”

Roberge said this proposed law would build off the language reform Bill 96 and secularism law Bill 21, the latter of which will soon be evaluated by the Supreme Court. Roberge said these laws “give Quebec its pride back.”

“For the first time in our history we will define who we are and how we want to keep evolving as a nation,” Jean-François Roberge said in a video posted on X.

“We will propose a social contract that will unite all Quebecers.”

He said the bill would require immigrants adhere to values like democracy, gender equality and secularism — which Quebec previously tried to outline in its proposed Charter of Values — and center the French language.

“These values, in a way, make up the basis of our society and will have to be respected in all spheres of our nation. A nation that proudly asserts itself through our common official language: French,” Roberge said in the video."