June 14, 2025

Israel-Iran WAR Begins ~ THE FREEMASON FRIDAY THE 13TH WAR ~ Dan Dicks Speaks At A Big Bilderberg Protest ~ MASONIC AMERICA ~ Peaceful Riots in Crazy Clown Land

 
 
Remarque88, Jeremy MacKeenzie, Mark Sleboda, Dialogue Works,PETER THIEL, Dan Dicks, Henry Makow, Quiet Riot
 
 
 
 
Henry Makow 
  
 



Also here:

Press For Truth
‼️ PETER THIEL CHAIRMAN OF PALANTIR BUSTED AT BILDERBERG CONFERENCE

https://t.me/maximeouimet/157658


Depopulation and Migration, as well as other interesting topics, are currently discussed at the Bilderberg Meeting in Stockholm, Sweden.

https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel/72729

Bilderberg 2025 And The Grand Lodge Of Freemasonry In Stockholm Sweden
Press For Truth
AI, depopulation, and migration are on the agenda for this year’s meeting. 



MASONIC AMERICA

Most historians won't tell you this. In Upton Sinclair's words: "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it."

Freedom and opportunity are illusions gradually dispersing like morning mist. Our governments ask Cabalist (Masonic) bankers for credit like children asking for their allowance. Governments are just a veil for these bankers.  

The people of the world and even their governments" will be "as children under-age."  The Protocols of Zion (15)

"Successful" people are their agents. Freemasons control every important social institution: government, media, medicine, corporations, military, justice, education and the church. They are the "Deep State." Humanity is being re-engineered to serve the Cabalist bankers and their god Lucifer in a world prison-plantation.  As historian Bernard Fay explains below, Freemasons established the United States to implement this satanist globalist agenda.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

16 comments:

Big Mouth said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Big Mouth said...

The authors of the UN

In the 20th century, as the nation-state system faced existential challenges through world wars and imperial
decline, a new architecture of international legal order emerged. At its center were legal theorists such as
Hans Kelsen and Hersch Lauterpacht, who laid the groundwork for what would become modern
international law. These figures were not merely scholars — they were ideological engineers, helping to
construct a legal framework for a world increasingly governed not by natural law or divine right, but by
juridical consensus and supranational authority.
This document explores the biographies, theories, and implications of these legal philosophers and their
role in shaping a law-based global order.

1. Hans Kelsen (1881–1973)
Early Life and Education:
Born in Prague (then part of Austria-Hungary) into a middle-class Jewish family.
Studied law in Vienna; heavily influenced by Kantian philosophy, particularly the notion of
autonomous reason.
Core Contribution: The Pure Theory of Law
Kelsen’s most famous work, Reine Rechtslehre (Pure Theory of Law), argued that law should be
separated from politics, sociology, and morality.
He proposed that all law rests on a “Grundnorm” (basic norm), a hypothetical foundational rule
from which all other legal norms derive.
His theory became foundational for legal positivism — the idea that law’s validity comes from its
form, not its content.
Role in Global Governance:
Architect of Austria’s 1920 constitution (still in use).
Emigrated to the U.S. during WWII; taught at Harvard and other American universities.
Advised on legal theory for the United Nations Charter.
Legacy:
Kelsen’s vision was of a hierarchy of laws, culminating in international law as superior to national
law — a radical departure from the older, sovereignty-based system.
His legal positivism paved the way for rule-based global governance, but also divorced law from
justice, drawing sharp criticism.

Big Mouth said...

2. Hersch Lauterpacht (1897–1960)
Early Life and Education:
Born in Galicia (then part of Austria-Hungary, now Ukraine) to a Jewish family.
Studied in Lviv, Vienna, and later at the London School of Economics under Harold Laski.
Core Contribution: International Human Rights Law
Advocated that individuals, not just states, should be subjects of international law.
Authored An International Bill of the Rights of Man (1945), influencing the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights.
Instrumental in codifying “crimes against humanity” and “genocide” as prosecutable offenses at
the Nuremberg Trials.
Role in Global Governance:
Served as a legal adviser to the British government during WWII.
Played a key role in shaping the legal structure of the United Nations.
Became a judge at the International Court of Justice in The Hague.
Legacy:
Lauterpacht's work anchored the idea that individual dignity and rights must be protected by
international institutions.
He helped shift the global legal paradigm from state sovereignty to cosmopolitan responsibility.
Critics argue this move diluted national sovereignty and opened the door to selective
interventionism.

Big Mouth said...

3. Others at Arm’s Reach: Key Allies and Contemporaries
a. Raphael Lemkin (1900–1959)
Polish-Jewish lawyer who coined the term genocide.
Pushed relentlessly for the Genocide Convention (1948).
Worked closely with Lauterpacht, though they had theoretical differences (Lauterpacht focused on
individual rights; Lemkin on group protection).
b. Carl Schmitt (1888–1985) (the counterpoint)
German jurist and political theorist.
Criticized liberal legalism; argued that the sovereign is the one who decides the exception.
While associated with the Nazi regime, his work deeply influenced realist critiques of international
law and globalist structures.

c. Philip Jessup (1897–1986)
American legal scholar, judge at the ICJ.
Defined “transnational law” as the merging of domestic and international norms.
Worked to blur the line between internal governance and international legal standards

4. The Ideological Program Behind Legal Internationalism
The move from natural law (moral universals) to legal positivism (procedural consensus) allowed
elites to engineer legal systems free from public moral constraints.
This created the foundation for modern lawfare — the use of legal systems to wage political or
ideological war.
These legal architects enabled the rise of post-sovereign governance, where UN bodies, trade
courts, and human rights councils often override national constitutions.

Kelsen and Lauterpacht were not just theorists — they were engineers of an emerging legal operating
system. Their work formalized the replacement of divine, local, or traditional authority with codified
international governance, managed by unelected legal elites.
In the wake of empire, these jurists built the framework for a new empire of rules — often impartial in
theory, but susceptible to geopolitical manipulation in practice.
Their legacy is mixed: a world with fewer wars between nations, perhaps — but also a world where law is
globalized, localized sovereignty is weakened, and justice is often whatever the dominant legal
regime defines it to be.

Big Mouth said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Big Mouth said...

SECTION 1: ELITE EDUCATION AND THE CREATION OF GOVERNING CASTES
Elite educational institutions - such as Eton, Le Rosey, Andover, and Lycée Louis-le-Grand - do not merely teach knowledge, they encode *epistemological hierarchies*. The trivium (grammar, logic,
rhetoric) and quadrivium (arithmetic, geometry, music, astronomy) form the basis of elite training because they equip future rulers with both *discursive mastery* and *cosmological perspective*. - **Purpose**: Codify power, induct into ruling networks, and gatekeep systemic access.
- **Curriculum**: Often includes Latin, formal logic, jurisprudence, diplomatic history, and subtle exposure to classics in law, theology, and empire administration. - **Contrast**: Modern mass education, under policies like "No Child Left Behind," promotes behavioral compliance, emotional framing, and credentialism - not mastery.
---
SECTION 2: LEGAL PERSONHOOD VS NATURAL LAW
Legal personhood is a *fiction* - an abstract construct created by statute. In contrast: **Man/Woman**: A sovereign being under natural or divine law.
Page 1
Global Legal Control Structure
- **Legal Person**: An entity with granted privileges and obligations, managed under statutes. - **Key Distinction**: Rights vs. privileges; duties from nature vs. obligations from codified policy.
Statutes do not *create* men and women. They conjure legal roles with conditional standing in legal forums. This is what enables the selective empowerment or silencing of groups.
---
SECTION 3: INTERNATIONAL LAW AND JURIDICAL ENGINEERING
Hans Kelsen and Hersch Lauterpacht were pivotal in shifting international law from moral foundations to *procedural consensus*. This made law modular, scalable, and *globalizable*.
- Kelsen's Pure Theory: Law as form, not moral content.
- Lauterpacht's Innovation: Individuals as partial subjects in international law (e.g., Nuremberg, Human Rights).
These theories built a system where *international institutions could override national sovereignty*, forming the modern UN-based order. However, the law often remains discretionary, selectively
applied based on strategic interest.
---
SECTION 4: THEOCRATIC SHADOWS AND SPIRITUAL VACUITY
Modern law is technocratic, secular, and often aggressively post-religious. Kelsen, though baptized

Global Legal Control Structure
Catholic, was atheist and removed divine or moral referents from legal design. **Result**: A global regime of procedural legitimacy but moral ambiguity.
- **Effect**: The law becomes a veil - a tool for bureaucratic hegemony dressed as neutrality.

Big Mouth said...

SECTION 6: ZIONISM, IDENTITY POLITICS, AND POST-WAR PSYCHOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
The modern Zionist project is an extension of European colonialism, not an organic Jewish religious return. European powers racialized Jews and converted them into a stateless buffer group for Western interests.
- Atheist Zionists vs. traditional religious Jews.
- Holocaust memory weaponized to create moral immunity for Israel.
- Legal framing (e.g., antisemitism laws) used to silence critique and regulate memory.
Page 3
Global Legal Control Structure
---
FURTHER READING AND RESOURCES
1. **Stephan Mitford Goodson** - *A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind*
2. **Michael Hoffman** - *Judaism Discovered* and *Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare*
3. **Carl Schmitt** - *Political Theology*
4. **Hans Kelsen** - *Pure Theory of Law*
5. **Hersch Lauterpacht** - *International Law and Human Rights*
6. **Raphael Lemkin** - *Axis Rule in Occupied Europe*
7. **Islamic Political Thought** - For alternative models of sovereignty and justice
8. **Trivium/Quadrivium Studies** - Classical education for critical analysis
---
CONCLUSION
The global legal order is not a neutral structure but a layered mechanism of control. Rooted in elite consensus and sustained by legal fictions, it manages perception, obligation, and sovereignty through the strategic use of words, procedures, and symbols.
To understand it is to begin to see through it.

Big Mouth said...

Google keeps deleting The Swiss Beast video series i posted

Big Mouth said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Big Mouth said...

play at a sped up speed for the dialog to flow nicer.

The Swiss Beast - Home of the Devil: Part 1.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-BFmn2S_jU

The Swiss Beast - Home of the Devil: Part 2.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8Z2UJUySXk&t=2s

The Swiss Beast - Home of the Devil: Part 3.
https://salt.odysee.tv/@brasilverdade:7/The-Swiss-Beast---Home-of-the-Devil--Part-3.-Final-Assault:0

The Swiss Beast - Home of the Devil Part 4.
https://salt.odysee.tv/@earthsoul:1/The-Swiss-Beast---Home-of-the-Devil-Part-4.-Breaking-Individuals--Nations:9

Dr. SDF. Sean Hross - The Swiss Beast - Home of the Devil - Part 5
https://salt.odysee.tv/@TruthVault:0/The-Swiss-Beast-Home-of-the-Devil-Part-5-Per-Seth-House-of-the-Lord-of-Chaos:6

The Swiss Beast - Home of the Devil Part 6
https://salt.odysee.tv/@montysthinkingoutsidethebox:2/The-Swiss-Beast---Home-of-the-Devil-Part-6-Switzerlands-Haldemann-Dynasty:0



The Swiss Beast - Home of the Devil Part 7
https://salt.odysee.tv/@montysthinkingoutsidethebox:2/The-Swiss-Beast---Home-of-the-Devil-Part-7-Switzerlands-Sleeper-Agent-Putin:7

The Swiss Beast - Home of the Devil; Part 8
https://salt.odysee.tv/@earthsoul:1/The-Swiss-Beast---Home-of-the-Devil--Part-8-Pharaoh's-Worldwide-Templar-Mafia:3

The Swiss Beast - Home of the Devil; Part 9
https://salt.odysee.tv/@earthsoul:1/The-Swiss-Beast---Home-of-the-Devil--Part-9-Endtimes-Mob-Rule:b

The Swiss Beast - Home of the Devil; Part 10
https://salt.odysee.tv/@earthsoul:1/The-Swiss-Beast---Home-of-the-Devil--Part-10-Pharaoh's-Re-Set:b

The Swiss Beast - Home of the Devil Part 11
https://salt.odysee.tv/@Qwinten:b/The-Swiss-Beast---Home-of-the-Devil--Part-11_-Global-Crime-Syndicate:7

Big Mouth said...

Zionism Unpacked | A non-Jewish, Jewish Identity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbMwdVze10k


Is Zionism a Trojan Horse for Judaism? Debunking a Dangerous Misconception
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-JEAbrjk0c

Anonymous said...

Get a life ffs

Big Mouth said...

Can i be like you? LOL

Big Mouth said...

1. Zionism Is Not Judaism
Zionism is a secular, political ideology — not religious

Its founders were irreligious and often hostile to Judaism.

Orthodox Jews have historically rejected Zionism on theological grounds.

2. Secular “Jewishness” Is a Construct
Many who identify as “Jews” today are secular or atheist.

In religious terms (Islamic and rabbinic), someone who doesn’t follow the Torah is not a Jew.

Secular Jewish identity is often based on:

Mythical Jewish "blood" or ancestry (something most here at Mamis believe)

Collective trauma (e.g., Holocaust)

Identification with the State of Israel

3. Anti-Semitism Enables Zionism
Zionism thrives because non-Jews (especially anti-Semites) insist secular Jews are still “Jews.” (Know what I mean Zap? LOL)

This forces people into a Jewish label they may not want, pushing them to adopt Israel as their identity base.

Zionism becomes a psychological shelter for identity insecurity.

4. Orthodox Jews Often Oppose Zionism
Traditional Judaism forbids re-establishing a Jewish kingdom before the Messiah.

Many ultra-Orthodox Jews consider Zionism heretical.

Historically, Jews thrived under Muslim protection, including in Palestine.

5. Zionism Is a Power Project, Not a Faithful One
Zionists use religion instrumentally, like extremists in other traditions.

It borrows selectively from scripture to justify control, war, and state-building.

Most Zionist leaders (e.g., Herzl, Ben-Gurion, Netanyahu) are secular nationalists, not religious authorities. Netanyahu is Polish and does not follow the Torah obviously.

Big Mouth said...

6. Zionism Is Politically and Morally Corrupt
Zionism seeks dominance, not justice — evidenced by brutal policies in Gaza and beyond.

Zionist violence (e.g. targeting civilians, hospitals) reflects a secular nationalist extremism.

It mirrors other extremist movements (e.g. ISIS) in its selective scriptural use and lack of ethical restraint.

7. Historical Relationship: Jews and Muslims
Jews historically lived peacefully under Muslim rule — especially in Islamic Spain, North Africa, and Palestine.

Muslim societies often welcomed Jewish refugees exiled from Europe.

Islam recognizes Jews as Ahl al-Kitab (People of the Book) and cousins of Muslims (descendants of Ishmael and Isaac).

8. Zionism Weaponizes Religious Identity
It manipulates Jewish suffering and history to justify occupation and expansion.

Zionism presents itself as the only refuge for Jews, which reinforces dependence on a militarized state.

The result: Jews are turned against the very people (Muslims) who historically protected them.

9. Modern Secular Zionism Has Evangelical Partners
A key driver of Zionism today is Christian Zionism, especially in the U.S.

Figures like Ben Shapiro align with religious-sounding rhetoric, but work with groups hostile to actual Jewish orthodoxy.

Many right-wing Christian Zionists view Israel as a vehicle to trigger Armageddon, not out of love for Jews.

10. The Muslim World as the New Moral Opposition
In contrast to Zionist brutality, Muslim-majority countries (e.g. Malaysia, Turkey, Qatar) lead global diplomatic efforts.

Muslims around the world engage in peaceful protest and boycott movements (e.g., Starbucks, McDonald's).

The Islamic stance against Zionism is rooted in justice, not bigotry — offering a prophetic alternative to secular Western hegemony.

These are the points made in the i2 videos above and well worth watching, for a Better understanding of the dynamics/manipulations at play here.

Big Mouth said...

From the Makow article,

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it."

Upton Sinclair