One thing is patently obvious in terms of the UN’s outlook on the Syrian
crisis – when Assad gets the upper hand, it is time to talk peace and
immediately declare a cease-fire (in the areas where he has gained the
upper hand). When Assad falls behind, cease-fires have failed and peace
talks are no use. In some instances, options for negotiations may be
offered if it is deemed that the Assad government may be losing heart or
enough territory to warrant a desire for a bargain.
In other words, the UN has become more and more transparent in the way
it addresses the potential for peace in the Syrian crisis. And it has
nothing to do with peace. It has to do with the fact that the UN is
acting as chief negotiator for terrorist proxies. The UN functions as a
slow-down mechanism for Assad victories while it ignores any calls for
cease-fires when Assad is losing.
***Read full article here***
