Kyle,you gotta be more careful when you quote the "total fascist" website about criteria for death or encampment. Many people are going to take you seriously.I had to stop and think about it for a minute when you were going on about the obesity.You sounded like you meant what you said.Perhaps you were serious.WORDS ARE POWERFUL MAN.
Actually I was more concerned with the other stuff on the list.But he went on about the fat asses.Why would Kyle even promote that type of mindset ? Just saying.
I cannot believe people are not commenting on this TOTAL FASCISM BLOG.This seems to be what we are fighting against,that is the state telling us what to do,how to think,how to dress,how to look.What is scruffy ? Who defines these terms ? The state does.Look at the lists on that website of what is forbidden people.It seems like the longer I am on this planet, the more ridiculous the situation becomes.If this is fascism,I say that we have been pretty much been told the truth about it.Fuck this authoritarian bullshit.Enough is enough.Now I must re evaluate the whole Hitler question.How much of what we were taught is true about the National Socialists being oppressive ?Just when I was feeling that there was some hope for humanity,this T.F. site pops up with its orders to humanity clearly having many grey areas that could be interpreted many different ways.Maybe I just don't like to be told what to do by the government.My apologies.Thought crime!Thought crime!Your under arrest for video addiction.And our sources tell us that you are a non believer.Arrest that atheist.Oh and you were seen at the casino,you will be shot at dawn.Now drop this acid and take these mushrooms so we can say you are part of a religious cult. Bam you are under arrest.I say fuck these people.They gotta be kidding.
ok then,that means all of Renegade Broadcasters wou;d be on death row or dead already according to the people running things.There you have it Kyle.The Rebel gets it first.
The trick is to have a talented writer that attracts people to the website. That's the bait. When you hear a guy on the radio that sounds really polished, like he just came out of broadcasting school, be suspicious, same with really polished writers.
Then the good articles that make a lot of sense are coupled with completely off-the-wall, ridiculous stuff or straight out tyrannical garbage masquerading as 'fair' or pretending to be based on National Socialism.
National Socialism was basically the 25 points laid down by Hitler and Anton Drexler in 1920:
http://www.hitler.org/writings/programme/
That's it. Nothing more, Nothing less.
Those 25 points are National Socialism. "Mein Kampf" is basically just an elaboration in detail of those 25 points put in the context of history and Hitler's own life.
If you agree with all of those 25 points you can call yourself a National Socialist.
If you disagree with even one point, then you can call yourself something else, a libertarian, a Jeffersonian or whatever, but sympathetic to most of the National Socialist ideals, sympathetic to the degree of how many of the points you agree with, etc.
No other cointelpro or useful idiot bullshit put out by somebody today that masquerades as 'National Socialism' or pretends to be derived from National Socialism is the real deal.
If it's anything BUT the 25 points, then it's not National Socialism but some other guy's wet dream of a dictatorship.
Obviously the problem with all socialism is that the 'common interest' is defined by the party and its leader and will only work when this 'common interest' coincides with what the majority of the people in the country consider their 'common interest.' You need a genius leader like Hitler or a great one like Mussolini, otherwise you'll have a mess on your hands.
You have to always keep in mind what Hitler wrote:
"The Programme of the German Workers' Party is designed to be OF LIMITED DURATION. The leaders have no intention, once the aims announced in it have been achieved, of establishing fresh ones, merely in order to increase, artificially, the discontent of the masses and so ensure the continued existence of the Party."
Hitler stuck by this, he had no intention of 'seizing power' against the will of the German people. Even after the economic miracle in Germany, he put himself and his party up, as promised, for a free and full monitored election in 1936. He was voted back in by an overwhelming 98% majority when in 1933, just three years previous, he had only received 44% out of an 11 party race (not the joke of a 2 party system pretending to be 'choice' you have in the U.S.)
And if you want to understand Italian Fascism or what Mussolini was all about read his autobiography:
My Autobiography by Benito Mussolini (1928) - pdf download here:
http://archive.org/details/MyAutobiography
It was not the same as National Socialism although there were many similarities, the main one being, if you want to narrow it down to the most basic things Mussolini was AGAINST which Hitler was also against, you get what is shown on this propaganda poster:
That's the main reason Ezra Pound, a Jeffersonian American patriot who never gave up his American citizenship and never stopped trying to keep America and England from getting into a war with Germany and Italy was pro-Fascist. He wasn't pro-Fascist relative to Jefferson and the true libertarianism, he was pro-Fascist relative to Roosevelt and Churchill, stooges of the Jews and usury both.
"Mussolini has steadily refused to be called anything save 'Leader' (Duce) or 'Head of the Government,' the term dictator has been applied by foreign envy, as the Tories were called cattle-stealers. It does not represent the Duce's fundamental conception of his role. His authority comes, as Eirugina proclaimed authority comes, 'from right reason' and from the general fascist conviction that he is more likely to be right than anyone else is." ---Ezra Pound, Jefferson and/or Mussolini, 1935
"The nation has not disappeared. We used to believe that the concept was totally without substance. Instead we see the nation arise as a palpitating reality before us! ... Class cannot destroy the nation. Class reveals itself as a collection of interests—but the nation is a history of sentiments, traditions, language, culture, and race. Class can become an integral part of the nation, but the one cannot eclipse the other. The class struggle is a vain formula, without effect and consequence wherever one finds a people that has not integrated itself into its proper linguistic and racial confines—where the national problem has not been definitely resolved. In such circumstances the class movement finds itself impaired by an inauspicious historic climate" -- Benito Mussolini
"I understand that I am under indictment for treason. I have done my best to get an authentic report of your statement to this effect. And I wish to place the following facts before you.
I do not believe that the simple fact of speaking over the radio, wherever placed, can in itself constitute treason. I think that must depend on what is said, and on the motives for speaking.
The legal mind of the Attorney General will understand the interest inherent in this distinction, as from unqualified right of expression.
The declaration was made several times in the announcement of my speeches; with the declaration 'He will not be asked to say anything contrary to his conscience, or contrary to his duties as an American citizen'
These conditions have been adhered to.
I have not spoken with regard to this war, but in protest against a system which creates one war after another, in series and in system. I have not spoken to the troops, and have not suggested that the troops should mutiny or revolt.
The whole basis of democratic or majority government assumes that the citizen shall be informed of the facts. I have not claimed to know all the facts, but I have claimed to know some of the facts which are an essential part of the total that should be known to the people.
I have for years believed that the American people should be better informed as to Europe, and informed by men who are not tied to a special interest or under definite control.
The freedom of the press has become a farce, as everyone knows that the press is controlled, if not by its titular owners, at least by the advertisers.
Free speech under modern conditions becomes a mockery if it does not include the right of free speech over the radio.
And the point is worth establishing. The assumption of the right to punish and take vengeance regardless of the area of jurisdiction is dangerous. I do not mean in a small way; but for the nation.
I returned to America before the war to protest against particular forces then engaged in trying to create war and to make sure that the USA should be dragged into it.
The course of events following the foundation of the Bank of England should be known, and considered in sequence: the suppression of colonial paper money, especially in Pennsylvania! The similar curves following the Napoleonic wars, and our Civil War and Versailles need more attention.
We have not the right to drift into another error similar to that of the Versailles Treaty.
We have, I think, the right to a moderate expansion including defence of the Caribbean, the elimination of foreign powers from the American continent, but such expansion should not take place at the cost of deteriorating or ruining the internal structure of the USA. The ruin of markets, the perversions of trade routes, in fact all the matters on which my talks have been based is of importance to the American citizen; whom neither you nor I should betray either in time of war or peace. I may say in passing that I took out a life membership in the American Academy of Social and Political Science in the hope of obtaining fuller discussion of some of these issues, but did not find them read for full and frank expression of certain vital elements in the case; this may in part have been due to their incomprehension of the nature of the case.
At any rate a man's duties increase with his knowledge. A war between the U.S. and Italy is monstrous and should not have occurred.
And a peace without justice is no peace but merely a prelude to future wars. Someone must take count of these things. And having taken count must act on his knowledge; admitting that his knowledge is partial and his judgment subject to error."
~ Ezra Pound -- Letter to Francis Biddle, Attorney General of the United States during WWII and primary American judge during the postwar Nuremberg Trials. During World War II Biddle used the Espionage Act to attempt to shut down 'vermin publications'. This included Father Coughlin's publication entitled Social Justice.
"we need to move towards more of a communist society, where people are getting up and working for the people"
What is this guy Drew Ma writing on his tweeter page in between rolls on the wrestling mat with sweaty guys ? Is he totally off his rocker ? He should loosen his jockstrap and stop inhaling fumes from other guys' crotches wrapped around his neck. lol What in the fuck does that mean ? 'People getting up working for 'the people' ?
11 comments:
Kyle,you gotta be more careful when you quote the "total fascist" website about criteria for death or encampment. Many people are going to take you seriously.I had to stop and think about it for a minute when you were going on about the obesity.You sounded like you meant what you said.Perhaps you were serious.WORDS ARE POWERFUL MAN.
@Anonymous - it sounds like you are a fat.
Actually I was more concerned with the other stuff on the list.But he went on about the fat asses.Why would Kyle even promote that type of mindset ? Just saying.
I cannot believe people are not commenting on this TOTAL FASCISM BLOG.This seems to be what we are fighting against,that is the state telling us what to do,how to think,how to dress,how to look.What is scruffy ? Who defines these terms ? The state does.Look at the lists on that website of what is forbidden people.It seems like the longer I am on this planet, the more ridiculous the situation becomes.If this is fascism,I say that we have been pretty much been told the truth about it.Fuck this authoritarian bullshit.Enough is enough.Now I must re evaluate the whole Hitler question.How much of what we were taught is true about the National Socialists being oppressive ?Just when I was feeling that there was some hope for humanity,this T.F. site pops up with its orders to humanity clearly having many grey areas that could be interpreted many different ways.Maybe I just don't like to be told what to do by the government.My apologies.Thought crime!Thought crime!Your under arrest for video addiction.And our sources tell us that you are a non believer.Arrest that atheist.Oh and you were seen at the casino,you will be shot at dawn.Now drop this acid and take these mushrooms so we can say you are part of a religious cult. Bam you are under arrest.I say fuck these people.They gotta be kidding.
The Jewish controlled truth movement says it's the state.
It's hard to break out of that mindset but the enemy isn't the "state" it's the TRIBE
Filth. Absolute filth.
ok then,that means all of Renegade Broadcasters wou;d be on death row or dead already according to the people running things.There you have it Kyle.The Rebel gets it first.
The trick is to have a talented writer that attracts people to the website. That's the bait. When you hear a guy on the radio that sounds really polished, like he just came out of broadcasting school, be suspicious, same with really polished writers.
Then the good articles that make a lot of sense are coupled with completely off-the-wall, ridiculous stuff or straight out tyrannical garbage masquerading as 'fair' or pretending to be based on National Socialism.
National Socialism was basically the 25 points laid down by Hitler and Anton Drexler in 1920:
http://www.hitler.org/writings/programme/
That's it. Nothing more, Nothing less.
Those 25 points are National Socialism. "Mein Kampf" is basically just an elaboration in detail of those 25 points put in the context of history and Hitler's own life.
If you agree with all of those 25 points you can call yourself a National Socialist.
If you disagree with even one point, then you can call yourself something else, a libertarian, a Jeffersonian or whatever, but sympathetic to most of the National Socialist ideals, sympathetic to the degree of how many of the points you agree with, etc.
No other cointelpro or useful idiot bullshit put out by somebody today that masquerades as 'National Socialism' or pretends to be derived from National Socialism is the real deal.
If it's anything BUT the 25 points, then it's not National Socialism but some other guy's wet dream of a dictatorship.
Obviously the problem with all socialism is that the 'common interest' is defined by the party and its leader and will only work when this 'common interest' coincides with what the majority of the people in the country consider their 'common interest.' You need a genius leader like Hitler or a great one like Mussolini, otherwise you'll have a mess on your hands.
You have to always keep in mind what Hitler wrote:
"The Programme of the German Workers' Party is designed to be OF LIMITED DURATION. The leaders have no intention, once the aims announced in it have been achieved, of establishing fresh ones, merely in order to increase, artificially, the discontent of the masses and so ensure the continued existence of the Party."
Hitler stuck by this, he had no intention of 'seizing power' against the will of the German people. Even after the economic miracle in Germany, he put himself and his party up, as promised, for a free and full monitored election in 1936. He was voted back in by an overwhelming 98% majority when in 1933, just three years previous, he had only received 44% out of an 11 party race (not the joke of a 2 party system pretending to be 'choice' you have in the U.S.)
And if you want to understand Italian Fascism or what Mussolini was all about read his autobiography:
My Autobiography by Benito Mussolini (1928) - pdf download here:
http://archive.org/details/MyAutobiography
It was not the same as National Socialism although there were many similarities, the main one being, if you want to narrow it down to the most basic things Mussolini was AGAINST which Hitler was also against, you get what is shown on this propaganda poster:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-YJ-_IPVngrY/UGcbrQ8EauI/AAAAAAAACug/lXg10rm-mVY/s1600/boccasile.jpg
Any questions ? LOL
That's the main reason Ezra Pound, a Jeffersonian American patriot who never gave up his American citizenship and never stopped trying to keep America and England from getting into a war with Germany and Italy was pro-Fascist. He wasn't pro-Fascist relative to Jefferson and the true libertarianism, he was pro-Fascist relative to Roosevelt and Churchill, stooges of the Jews and usury both.
Jefferson and/or Mussolini by Ezra Pound
http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/pound_ezra/jeffmuss.html
"Mussolini has steadily refused to be called anything save 'Leader' (Duce) or 'Head of the Government,' the term dictator has been applied by foreign envy, as the Tories were called cattle-stealers. It does not represent the Duce's fundamental conception of his role. His authority comes, as Eirugina proclaimed authority comes, 'from right reason' and from the general fascist conviction that he is more likely to be right than anyone else is." ---Ezra Pound, Jefferson and/or Mussolini, 1935
"The nation has not disappeared. We used to believe that the concept was totally without substance. Instead we see the nation arise as a palpitating reality before us! ... Class cannot destroy the nation. Class reveals itself as a collection of interests—but the nation is a history of sentiments, traditions, language, culture, and race. Class can become an integral part of the nation, but the one cannot eclipse the other. The class struggle is a vain formula, without effect and consequence wherever one finds a people that has not integrated itself into its proper linguistic and racial confines—where the national problem has not been definitely resolved. In such circumstances the class movement finds itself impaired by an inauspicious historic climate" -- Benito Mussolini
"I understand that I am under indictment for treason. I have done my best to get an authentic report of your statement to this effect. And I wish to place the following facts before you.
I do not believe that the simple fact of speaking over the radio, wherever placed, can in itself constitute treason. I think that must depend on what is said, and on the motives for speaking.
The legal mind of the Attorney General will understand the interest inherent in this distinction, as from unqualified right of expression.
The declaration was made several times in the announcement of my speeches; with the declaration 'He will not be asked to say anything contrary to his conscience, or contrary to his duties as an American citizen'
These conditions have been adhered to.
I have not spoken with regard to this war, but in protest against a system which creates one war after another, in series and in system. I have not spoken to the troops, and have not suggested that the troops should mutiny or revolt.
The whole basis of democratic or majority government assumes that the citizen shall be informed of the facts. I have not claimed to know all the facts, but I have claimed to know some of the facts which are an essential part of the total that should be known to the people.
I have for years believed that the American people should be better informed as to Europe, and informed by men who are not tied to a special interest or under definite control.
The freedom of the press has become a farce, as everyone knows that the press is controlled, if not by its titular owners, at least by the advertisers.
Free speech under modern conditions becomes a mockery if it does not include the right of free speech over the radio.
And the point is worth establishing. The assumption of the right to punish and take vengeance regardless of the area of jurisdiction is dangerous. I do not mean in a small way; but for the nation.
I returned to America before the war to protest against particular forces then engaged in trying to create war and to make sure that the USA should be dragged into it.
The course of events following the foundation of the Bank of England should be known, and considered in sequence: the suppression of colonial paper money, especially in Pennsylvania! The similar curves following the Napoleonic wars, and our Civil War and Versailles need more attention.
We have not the right to drift into another error similar to that of the Versailles Treaty.
We have, I think, the right to a moderate expansion including defence of the Caribbean, the elimination of foreign powers from the American continent, but such expansion should not take place at the cost of deteriorating or ruining the internal structure of the USA. The ruin of markets, the perversions of trade routes, in fact all the matters on which my talks have been based is of importance to the American citizen; whom neither you nor I should betray either in time of war or peace. I may say in passing that I took out a life membership in the American Academy of Social and Political Science in the hope of obtaining fuller discussion of some of these issues, but did not find them read for full and frank expression of certain vital elements in the case; this may in part have been due to their incomprehension of the nature of the case.
At any rate a man's duties increase with his knowledge. A war between the U.S. and Italy is monstrous and should not have occurred.
And a peace without justice is no peace but merely a prelude to future wars. Someone must take count of these things. And having taken count must act on his knowledge; admitting that his knowledge is partial and his judgment subject to error."
~ Ezra Pound -- Letter to Francis Biddle, Attorney General of the United States during WWII and primary American judge during the postwar Nuremberg Trials. During World War II Biddle used the Espionage Act to attempt to shut down 'vermin publications'. This included Father Coughlin's publication entitled Social Justice.
Drew Ma@DrewMA1313 Jan 4
"we need to move towards more of a communist society, where people are getting up and working for the people"
What is this guy Drew Ma writing on his tweeter page in between rolls on the wrestling mat with sweaty guys ? Is he totally off his rocker ? He should loosen his jockstrap and stop inhaling fumes from other guys' crotches wrapped around his neck. lol What in the fuck does that mean ? 'People getting up working for 'the people' ?
Post a Comment