Judgment seems potentially dodgy e.g. he thinks world government is in concept a good idea, whereas history proves centralisation of power leads to abuse.
Requires prolonged and mature scrutiny for sound assessment.
I can no longer trust Deanna's judgement, and this is the last show I will waste my time to hear. This is not the first time that she has allowed complete bullocks on her show, but it will be the last time that I will be subjected to her batshit insanity.
@9:13 PM interesting, give us some examples of what you reckon is her whacked out judgment.
DS runs a daily show, researches, writes books and has several blogs/sites. And maybe more. Even the least severe critic must admit that by maintaining such volume there is the risk of burn-out if not diminished value. For instance she sounded a bit drained and non-reactive occasionally in the last Dr Daniels show, or maybe that's me misinterpreting, although the content seemed OK at first listen.
Or is there a dawning reprise of: http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/download/goyfire/GoyFire_18.mp3
Peter Schaenk in 2005 about his firing from the "Uncensored" RBN Network for daring to promote White discussion, and his return to radio.
"For instance she sounded a bit drained and non-reactive occasionally in the last Dr Daniels show, or maybe that's me misinterpreting, although the content seemed OK at first listen."
Listen again Sherlock. She was doing a show and reading email and chat questions at the same time. I noticed to her responses to her guest sounded more like "uh huh" as if she didn't catch everything said. In other words, a bit less engaging due to her attention being given elsewhere a few times. I can accept this as she is trying to keep a pulse on her listeners as well as the guest. Does she work to hard in trying to share extremely important information? Perhaps. I mentioned to someone a while back that if I was rich I would send her $25K and demand she take a vacation for several weeks. She is giving her audience the best show on the internet (IMHO) to try to keep them out of harms way and discover very important factual history. She is a rare spirit; some sort of unselfish Truth Angel - at least to me she is.
I wish there a few intelligent comments on nclear stuff. But to pretend to take the 2 comments above seriously
[1] World government is not a particularly new idea & the world up to 1914 seemed to trend that way. All political groups had got larger, because of technical improvements. In the same way east coast US states are tiny compared to west coast. The logical conslusion seems to be world government BUT not by a bunch of lunatic Jews. . In any case govenrments can be different sizes. Russell thought (he belived nukes were true) that a world governement should have *no other purpose* than prevent war. This is not a government in any usual sense. . [2] There's a site which google promotes aginst nukelies, also using the word 'batshit'. I'm a bit disappinted they only seem to have one troll - can't they find someone better
@ 4:43 PM: I listened to that interview last week, and although I'm neutral and open to his theories, which may or may not be true, I believe he has another agenda. From what I gathered he's trying to lump his fringe "Nuke Denial" theories, with "Holocaust Denial" FACTS. He seemed rather anxious to bring up the Holohoax, and I found that suspicious. Would that not be damaging to the Holocaust argument? In this world void of critical thought, we don't need anymore strawmen for the other side to use.
I am not a troll you lunatic, but YOU did a fantastic job of putting Spingola's credibility in the shitter and flushing it away. In fact, for her to not have called you on many points about the deadly dangers of radiation, in general, shows her to be too much of a chickenshit lightweight to be of any use in separating truth from fiction. You are in good company because she refused to confront the jew who posed as a neo-Nazi Frank Cohen "Collins" when she had him on her show as a guest under another one of his aliasis discussing ancient civilizations. Like I said, Spingola has let people like you destroy the credibility of her show multiple times with her allowing it to happen by her inability to confront her guests, and this was the last straw. For her to even let this kind of bulllshit on her show shows that she has lost her discernment, and I, personally, can not trust her judgement any longer. Congratulations on fooling this old woman with your radiation is not dangerous and nuke-weapons are a hoax horseshit.
Deanna has always come across as being almost excruciatingly sincere, definitely not a shill of any sort, and you cannot say that about many radio hosts. She is extremely solid on history, a bit flaky on science. Notice when 'Rae West' debunked beam weapons she went 'hmmm....'. Previously she had on Judy Wood, whose energy beam hypothesis is nonsense, and now she is perhaps realising this. The nuke hoax is not as ridiculous as some might try to make out, at least as far as pretty much all of the iconic blasts go. Check out the evidence... especially the available FOOTAGE of the blasts
Spingola did have Frank Joseph on her program back in June. She asked him all about his education, his birth name, what he was doing in the eighties when he was in jail for child molestation, who funded his travels and other direct questions. She was leading him into areas that he did not want to go and he was obviously lying his ass off. The next day she did a full expose on him with audio files of him pretending to be a Nazi. It was priceless. She knew exactly what she was doing.
She did not do anything while Cohen was on her show, and didn't even say his name until many people during her next day show kept asking her during the show what the fuck she was talking about because she was talking in riddles the whole fucking show. Spingola has jumped-the-shark and had this freak on her show because she is as much a dupe as some of you are to believe that radiation is not deadly, mutagenic, and that there are no nuclear-weapons. I have defended her for too long, and I will never again, and that 88 minutes of pure bullshit were the last minutes of her show I will listen to again. I will not have my intelligence insulted like that again, and for you people to not be calling her out on this disinformation shows how intellectually dishonest many of you are. One more thing about her show with Cohen and her feeble attempt at explaining to the audience who the guy was without mentioning his name: Spingola let this infiltrator PUSH HIS BOOK and never gave his real name so that people would know who the fuck this "Frank Joseph" is! FUCK THAT BULLSHIT. That is inexcusable, and this show is just as inexcusable and unacceptable. I will be writing to her to give her a piece of my mind because Spingola needs to know that disinformation will not be tolerated, and those of you as fed up and pissed off as I am about this should write to her and say how you feel, to.
Only three are by me, sycophant, and abortion is murder. The saddest part of all is that you are so reliant upon Spingola that you refuse to hold her accountable when she is completely out to lunch. She did NOT name Cohen until a caller had to ask her directly who and what the fuck she was talking about. That was toward the end of the show, and I still made excuses for why she would be so cryptic, and much worse, allow Cohen/Joseph to be able to publicize his books, and no doubt sold some from the interview, so it can be said that this Spingola chacter you people worship provided support and legitimacy to our enemy. You people will continue to make excuses for her, but I will not. You would never accept shit like this from Rivero or Stadtmiler, so why the Helll do you keep giving this old woman a pass? Radiation is our friend!!!???
Is Rerevisionist saying that the many images of plant and animal mutations we have seen on the internet since sometime after Fukushima are all fakes? - They may be - I am just asking.
Also I am wondering what he thinks about Yablakovs: "Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment" that is available as a pdf.
Finally, I think the Japanese are desperately trying to hire clean up crews from all over Asia. I wonder if he would:
a)be prepared to put his money where his mouth is and take up the job and grab a shovel.
b)recommend that a young person among his family or friends do the same.
Of course if there is no radiation he would not need to wear a suit, or even a mask.
"..you are so reliant upon Spingola.." "..she is completely out to lunch." "..this Spingola chacter you people worship.." "You would never accept shit like this.." "..this old woman.."
Could you list three radio hosts that you prefer more than Deanna. Or, perhaps a few dozen?
Interesting how you seem to know the level of reliance I might have for someone I have never met. Also, knowing what I would never accept is also seems to be a special insight you feel to have concerning myself. Very interesting, in a way. It speaks volumes of what you are. Keep typing. Please.
"Peter Schaenk about his firing from the "Uncensored" RBN Network for daring to promote White discussion, and his return to radio."
In the audio linked first in the comments above Rae says it's possible "nuclear power" ('sic') may be in course of being phased out however my measly holding of uranium mining co. stocks was bought out compulsorily after a takeover bid following FukUshima, someone wanted them bad and I think another miner went the same way soon after; also I once knew a physicist by academic training who worked in a nuclear power plant and he said the main electric drain in TV commercial breaks is on water supply to replenish water cisterns when lavatories are flushed, not tea making although that was the 'polite' version given on TV for the m/asses. Does a 'scientific background' agree?
Is Rerevisionist saying that the many images of plant and animal mutations we have seen on the internet since sometime after Fukushima are all fakes? - They may be - I am just asking.
There aren't many images. Check it.
Also I am wondering what he thinks about Yablakovs: "Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment" that is available as a pdf.
As far as I know, this document is regarded everywhere as bullshit, conflating virtually all deaths together.
Finally, I think the Japanese are desperately trying to hire clean up crews from all over Asia.
The Japanese have their own systems; why would they want people from 'all over Asia'? They also, uniquely, have the experience of Hiroshima and they know how f*ing stupid and brainwashed Americans are. They will explain there are no radiation effects in Hiroshima but Americans scream and froth.
Real dangers are chemical - not all chemicals, but some of them. There's a youtube showing miners walking around in a uranium mine, btw.
It's disappointing to me how few people are able to discuss this or any other topic. Even the Jewish links which are very obvious are ignored.
However, I'm pleased DS allowed me to speak. Please look at big-lies.org (which has material including the holohoax) and also nukelies.org (lots on nukes - but you have to make an effort). RW
'Anonymous' says (1) 'nuclear power' 'sic' may be in the course of being phased out; (2) he had some stocks in uranium mines which were taken off him compulsorily ; (3) He was told water flushing uses a lot of electricity.
(1) It IS being phased out in Germany and France; it appears that there are new plants planned in a few areas, notably the 'third world'. That is to say, people are seeing through the pretence, but a few corrupt regimes are having their arms twisted. nukelies.org has a section on nuclear power including puzzles such as why, if it's so wonderful, don't they use it in Antarctica and Hawaii? Watch for it - test the hypothesis that it's a jewish money-making scam that never worked.
(2) Uranium stocks; so what?
(3) The point about kettles is the wattage and numbers are guessable. Who knows how much electricity is needed to pump water?
NB maybe someone can persuade Deanna to put the intro to my talk on Youtube, so I can link to it? It isn't there; or at least I couldn't find it.
Someone, somewhere, said that I said 'women suck'. I'd guess this refers to me saying that hardly any revisionists are women. This, unfortunately, is true.
I still wish this site (and the asscoaited ones) was easier to navigate.
25 comments:
Earlier show with Rae-Rerevisionist on Abirato Radio - 03 / 31 / 2013 :
http://radio.abirato.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/ep35-Rerevisionist-and-FirstclassSkeptic.mp3
Great show Deanna. One of your best. Keep up the good work. Very interesting guest.
Judgment seems potentially dodgy e.g. he thinks world government is in concept a good idea, whereas history proves centralisation of power leads to abuse.
Requires prolonged and mature scrutiny for sound assessment.
Deanna continuously amazes me. Thanks for covering this and thanks for the post.
I can no longer trust Deanna's judgement, and this is the last show I will waste my time to hear. This is not the first time that she has allowed complete bullocks on her show, but it will be the last time that I will be subjected to her batshit insanity.
@9:13 PM interesting, give us some examples of what you reckon is her whacked out judgment.
DS runs a daily show, researches, writes books and has several blogs/sites. And maybe more. Even the least severe critic must admit that by maintaining such volume there is the risk of burn-out if not diminished value. For instance she sounded a bit drained and non-reactive occasionally in the last Dr Daniels show, or maybe that's me misinterpreting, although the content seemed OK at first listen.
Or is there a dawning reprise of:
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/download/goyfire/GoyFire_18.mp3
Peter Schaenk in 2005 about his firing from the "Uncensored" RBN Network for daring to promote White discussion, and his return to radio.
"For instance she sounded a bit drained and non-reactive occasionally in the last Dr Daniels show, or maybe that's me misinterpreting, although the content seemed OK at first listen."
Listen again Sherlock. She was doing a show and reading email and chat questions at the same time. I noticed to her responses to her guest sounded more like "uh huh" as if she didn't catch everything said. In other words, a bit less engaging due to her attention being given elsewhere a few times. I can accept this as she is trying to keep a pulse on her listeners as well as the guest. Does she work to hard in trying to share extremely important information? Perhaps. I mentioned to someone a while back that if I was rich I would send her $25K and demand she take a vacation for several weeks. She is giving her audience the best show on the internet (IMHO) to try to keep them out of harms way and discover very important factual history. She is a rare spirit; some sort of unselfish Truth Angel - at least to me she is.
I think the site ought to be arranged better; I couldn't even find a searchable list of past shows, or alphabetical list of guests or topics.
I wish there a few intelligent comments on nclear stuff. But to pretend to take the 2 comments above seriously
[1] World government is not a particularly new idea & the world up to 1914 seemed to trend that way. All political groups had got larger, because of technical improvements. In the same way east coast US states are tiny compared to west coast. The logical conslusion seems to be world government BUT not by a bunch of lunatic Jews.
.
In any case govenrments can be different sizes. Russell thought (he belived nukes were true) that a world governement should have *no other purpose* than prevent war. This is not a government in any usual sense.
.
[2] There's a site which google promotes aginst nukelies, also using the word 'batshit'. I'm a bit disappinted they only seem to have one troll - can't they find someone better
@ 4:43 PM: I listened to that interview last week, and although I'm neutral and open to his theories, which may or may not be true, I believe he has another agenda. From what I gathered he's trying to lump his fringe "Nuke Denial" theories, with "Holocaust Denial" FACTS. He seemed rather anxious to bring up the Holohoax, and I found that suspicious. Would that not be damaging to the Holocaust argument? In this world void of critical thought, we don't need anymore strawmen for the other side to use.
I am not a troll you lunatic, but YOU did a fantastic job of putting Spingola's credibility in the shitter and flushing it away. In fact, for her to not have called you on many points about the deadly dangers of radiation, in general, shows her to be too much of a chickenshit lightweight to be of any use in separating truth from fiction. You are in good company because she refused to confront the jew who posed as a neo-Nazi Frank Cohen "Collins" when she had him on her show as a guest under another one of his aliasis discussing ancient civilizations. Like I said, Spingola has let people like you destroy the credibility of her show multiple times with her allowing it to happen by her inability to confront her guests, and this was the last straw. For her to even let this kind of bulllshit on her show shows that she has lost her discernment, and I, personally, can not trust her judgement any longer. Congratulations on fooling this old woman with your radiation is not dangerous and nuke-weapons are a hoax horseshit.
Okay, that's it. Deanna Spingola has officially "jumped the shark".
Deanna interviews Frank Collins(Cohen) and didn't confront him about being a false-flagging subversive Jew?
Okay, now I know she's either an idiot or a plant.
Deanna has always come across as being almost excruciatingly sincere, definitely not a shill of any sort, and you cannot say that about many radio hosts. She is extremely solid on history, a bit flaky on science. Notice when 'Rae West' debunked beam weapons she went 'hmmm....'. Previously she had on Judy Wood, whose energy beam hypothesis is nonsense, and now she is perhaps realising this. The nuke hoax is not as ridiculous as some might try to make out, at least as far as pretty much all of the iconic blasts go. Check out the evidence... especially the available FOOTAGE of the blasts
Spingola did have Frank Joseph on her program back in June. She asked him all about his education, his birth name, what he was doing in the eighties when he was in jail for child molestation, who funded his travels and other direct questions. She was leading him into areas that he did not want to go and he was obviously lying his ass off. The next day she did a full expose on him with audio files of him pretending to be a Nazi. It was priceless. She knew exactly what she was doing.
She did not do anything while Cohen was on her show, and didn't even say his name until many people during her next day show kept asking her during the show what the fuck she was talking about because she was talking in riddles the whole fucking show. Spingola has jumped-the-shark and had this freak on her show because she is as much a dupe as some of you are to believe that radiation is not deadly, mutagenic, and that there are no nuclear-weapons. I have defended her for too long, and I will never again, and that 88 minutes of pure bullshit were the last minutes of her show I will listen to again. I will not have my intelligence insulted like that again, and for you people to not be calling her out on this disinformation shows how intellectually dishonest many of you are. One more thing about her show with Cohen and her feeble attempt at explaining to the audience who the guy was without mentioning his name: Spingola let this infiltrator PUSH HIS BOOK and never gave his real name so that people would know who the fuck this "Frank Joseph" is! FUCK THAT BULLSHIT. That is inexcusable, and this show is just as inexcusable and unacceptable. I will be writing to her to give her a piece of my mind because Spingola needs to know that disinformation will not be tolerated, and those of you as fed up and pissed off as I am about this should write to her and say how you feel, to.
I think she did great with Cohen. Got him on record lying his ass off. Some may not like the way she goes about things. Maybe some can do better.
I bet the person that wrote the last comment and apparently a few others really like abortions. Am I right?
9:13 PM
3:15 PM
3:53 PM
6:04 PM
All posted by same abortion lover.
Only three are by me, sycophant, and abortion is murder. The saddest part of all is that you are so reliant upon Spingola that you refuse to hold her accountable when she is completely out to lunch. She did NOT name Cohen until a caller had to ask her directly who and what the fuck she was talking about. That was toward the end of the show, and I still made excuses for why she would be so cryptic, and much worse, allow Cohen/Joseph to be able to publicize his books, and no doubt sold some from the interview, so it can be said that this Spingola chacter you people worship provided support and legitimacy to our enemy. You people will continue to make excuses for her, but I will not. You would never accept shit like this from Rivero or Stadtmiler, so why the Helll do you keep giving this old woman a pass? Radiation is our friend!!!???
Is Rerevisionist saying that the many images of plant and animal mutations we have seen on the internet since sometime after Fukushima are all fakes? - They may be - I am just asking.
Also I am wondering what he thinks about Yablakovs: "Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment" that is available as a pdf.
Finally, I think the Japanese are desperately trying to hire clean up crews from all over Asia. I wonder if he would:
a)be prepared to put his money where his mouth is and take up the job and grab a shovel.
b)recommend that a young person among his family or friends do the same.
Of course if there is no radiation he would not need to wear a suit, or even a mask.
"..you are so reliant upon Spingola.."
"..she is completely out to lunch."
"..this Spingola chacter you people worship.."
"You would never accept shit like this.."
"..this old woman.."
Could you list three radio hosts that you prefer more than Deanna. Or, perhaps a few dozen?
Interesting how you seem to know the level of reliance I might have for someone I have never met. Also, knowing what I would never accept is also seems to be a special insight you feel to have concerning myself. Very interesting, in a way. It speaks volumes of what you are. Keep typing. Please.
That Schaenk link is **wrong** it should be
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/download/goyfire/GoyFire_17.mp3
"Peter Schaenk about his firing from the "Uncensored" RBN Network for daring to promote White discussion, and his return to radio."
In the audio linked first in the comments above Rae says it's possible "nuclear power" ('sic') may be in course of being phased out however my measly holding of uranium mining co. stocks was bought out compulsorily after a takeover bid following FukUshima, someone wanted them bad and I think another miner went the same way soon after; also I once knew a physicist by academic training who worked in a nuclear power plant and he said the main electric drain in TV commercial breaks is on water supply to replenish water cisterns when lavatories are flushed, not tea making although that was the 'polite' version given on TV for the m/asses. Does a 'scientific background' agree?
Al ....
Is Rerevisionist saying that the many images of plant and animal mutations we have seen on the internet since sometime after Fukushima are all fakes? - They may be - I am just asking.
There aren't many images. Check it.
Also I am wondering what he thinks about Yablakovs: "Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment" that is available as a pdf.
As far as I know, this document is regarded everywhere as bullshit, conflating virtually all deaths together.
Finally, I think the Japanese are desperately trying to hire clean up crews from all over Asia.
The Japanese have their own systems; why would they want people from 'all over Asia'? They also, uniquely, have the experience of Hiroshima and they know how f*ing stupid and brainwashed Americans are. They will explain there are no radiation effects in Hiroshima but Americans scream and froth.
Real dangers are chemical - not all chemicals, but some of them. There's a youtube showing miners walking around in a uranium mine, btw.
It's disappointing to me how few people are able to discuss this or any other topic. Even the Jewish links which are very obvious are ignored.
However, I'm pleased DS allowed me to speak. Please look at big-lies.org (which has material including the holohoax) and also nukelies.org (lots on nukes - but you have to make an effort).
RW
'Anonymous' says (1) 'nuclear power' 'sic' may be in the course of being phased out; (2) he had some stocks in uranium mines which were taken off him compulsorily ; (3) He was told water flushing uses a lot of electricity.
(1) It IS being phased out in Germany and France; it appears that there are new plants planned in a few areas, notably the 'third world'. That is to say, people are seeing through the pretence, but a few corrupt regimes are having their arms twisted. nukelies.org has a section on nuclear power including puzzles such as why, if it's so wonderful, don't they use it in Antarctica and Hawaii? Watch for it - test the hypothesis that it's a jewish money-making scam that never worked.
(2) Uranium stocks; so what?
(3) The point about kettles is the wattage and numbers are guessable. Who knows how much electricity is needed to pump water?
NB maybe someone can persuade Deanna to put the intro to my talk on Youtube, so I can link to it? It isn't there; or at least I couldn't find it.
{
Someone, somewhere, said that I said 'women suck'. I'd guess this refers to me saying that hardly any revisionists are women. This, unfortunately, is true.
I still wish this site (and the asscoaited ones) was easier to navigate.
Post a Comment