Mike King's website on Napoleon has a lot of information that made me really re-visit just who Napoleon was, just as the anti-New World Order movement made me revisit just who Hitler was.
In both cases, I came away with admiration.
Napoleon certainly does command respect for his accomplishments -- for how fiercely he defended his nation in particular against Jewry's destructive capacity.
And Napoleon was 5'7" -- he was not a short guy with a "complex."
The freemasons fought very sloppy at Jena and Auerstädt. Kutuzov was a freemason and fought very badly at Austerlitz, Borodino, south of Moscow and later he did not want to capture Napoleon. The russians leet him go away at Berezina and once before that. Why? Of course Ther Russians wanted to go to Paris. But Kutuzov was too slowely and Napoleon managed to raise another great army.
Napoleon abandoned Lousiana to the raising USA. Napoleon allowed Roithschilds to come and go and make money from smuggling etc. Napoleon wanted to create the European Union soon 200 years ago. He allowed the jews to assimilate into the societies and guaranteed the civil rights for them.
Napoleon chose poor leaders 1815 and he lost in Waterloo a bit strangely.
I think that napoleon may have been a hoax. At least he was in control. His task was to kill and destroy and plunder. He robbed everything and was a great raper of Prussia and the German countries.
Many lodges have named themselves "Napoleon Bonapate" (like "Victor Hugo" etc.) I think that Napoleon was a part of a great plan. The jews were funding both sides in the war. They could not play too bad cards for the goym in those days. They ruined the Europe and proposed then a new world order to the czar.
The czar was maybe more aggressive 1810-1812. The war was inavoidable. Right, the freemasons forced the czar into the war and were encouraging him. Napoleon did not try properly to win. He could have raised the peasants and to conquer the Russia etc. Instead of this he only tried to make a deal with the czar and to save the peace again.
I'm as suspicious of your so-called "objective comparison" as you are of Mike King's. It makes a lot of claims that are unsubstantiated and smell of Jew-influence.
Mike King's website and talk did for me something your website suggestion could never do: made me see something new in Napoleon. In other words, it didn't try to put me back to sleep -- "I already knew that".
Rather than talk about "these guys," stick to the topic at hand: Napoleon.
Why make Napoleon out to be a hero?
Why not have a little bright light in all this darkness and about him in particular? Why not show the good side of a man after all the shit that's been's laid over him for more than a hundred years?
Why not shed light on the fact that Jesus wasn't the only one to call out the Jews and try to defeat them?
I can't possibly understand what would be the point to something like that. God knows we already have plenty of heroes right now in our midst who are willing to stake their lives for their fellow men and country -- to the point that talking about Napoleon is simply overkill. We are so overwhelmed with heroes that we actually have a surfeit of them, and Napoleon is just an old canard and redundancy, eh?
In fact our history textbooks for over a hundred years have all been written by non-Jewish publishers with no agenda but the truth, right?
Hitler was not a good guy... ditto Napoleon. Jesus wasn't even real.
And, for the life of me, i fail to see why it matters... what it changes.
Truly, analyze this interview... he generalizes everything he talks about makes no references to any part of "his" book where he discloses this or that, which you pretty much hear anyone who writes a book do.
Listen to Deanna struggle with the questions... hear the comments of the callers... the guy knows nothing about a book he supposedly authored... how many times does he state "i don't know"...???
Don't invite me (as you have -- twice now) to listen to the broadcast again. It would bore me to tears. I know it was a dud. I know he was a dud as a speaker.
Female novelist Lurie Allison writes the funniest novels but if you hear her speak in an interview, you'd doubt she had the intelligence to write any book, let alone a funny one.
The oddity of disparity between the work and the life can happen.
I was glad I read the news about Napoleon on his website before he spoke -- because I had zest and enthusiasm after reading it -- and Mike King's words did nothing to improve the matter. In fact, the radio broadcast made me question for a moment whether I had indeed understood what I read . . . .
So, I do hear you loudly and clearly on the topic of King's inability to present ideas and answer questions, Wanda. I agree with you.
Deanna's responses at times led me to feel that even she was puzzled by King's verbal behavior. Maybe he took one sedative too many . . . ?
None of this, however and in my opinion, has anything to do with King's website on Napoleon or the hope and inspiration a revisit to Napoleon's accomplishments might give to people trying to understand the past and to understand what present losses to our freedoms we are all suffering and will continue to suffer for future generations, which was the purpose for King coming onto Deanna's radio broadcast in the first place in order to talk about Napoleon.
Rothschilds created and controlled Napoleon as their instrument, and that they disposed of him once the Corsican genius woke up to this fact and went into a state of rebellion, the first manifestation of which came when he divorced his wife, the Creole, Josephina. Philip Francis, writing in the New York American under the title The Poison in America's Cup stated: The British Government is the camouflage
Nominally we govern ourselves; actually we are governed by an oligarchy of the American branch of The International Banker's Federation, Plunderbund.
The British Government is the camouflage behind which the money kings of the world have hitherto hid their economic warfare upon the masses of the people.
A puppet going rogue, sounds credible, stalin probably did the same. Russia 100 yeras later paid dearly for their alliance with the jews
I still say this guy didn't even read this book, let alone write it. Because we all know that those who craft reality for "us" don't have books handed to them. That doesn't happen... and good luck with Pootin' is a great guy meme too.
My knowledge of Napoleon is conversational at best, but i could have pulled off a better interview than this bozo. As to too many sedatives, he was plenty loquacious when he knew his topic.
Our problem is we are not skeptical enough... that we swallow too much lies and bullshit... that we worship heroes. You might try playing a little hard to get now and then.
@ ruuperti do you read what was posted??? your comment "Napoleon was a freemason. The men behind the revolution raised him to power. They gave him the power."
this was dealt in my post just above yours already, about napoleon turning on the rotchilds.
your next comment: " If You compare Napoleon to Hitler, the other is a praised hero and the other is worse than Lucifer in the historybooks, media etc."
I also addressed in my post above yours about how jews smear napoleon, and you not having read it say "oh he was praised" lololol, read for fuck sake. jews have denigrated napoleon in many of their movies, this should be a sign that " hey maybe was a good guy"
2nd part of your comment, just because in the jewish historybooks and media hitler is portrayed as the bad guy doesn;t mean that is correct lol.
Wanda: "still say this guy didn't even read this book, let alone write it. Because we all know that those who craft reality for "us" don't have books handed to them. That doesn't happen... and good luck with Pootin' is a great guy meme too.
My knowledge of Napoleon is conversational at best, but i could have pulled off a better interview than this bozo. As to too many sedatives, he was plenty loquacious when he knew his topic."
This is a good comment. I think that the author is a clown and an agent. Almost everybody who praises Putin and believes in him is a traitor too. The rest are fools.
Would it matter Roy? Did you happen to notice my first post was a link to an objective comparison or were you too eager to club me on the head for having a differing opinion?
Do you think i didn't used to try to post opposing material? Yes, i did. Here are some typical responses:
-I am a jew. (just happens to #1 on the list in the shills and disinformation playbook)
-I don't know what i'm talking about. (Which carries the obtuse implication you do know what you're talking about.)
-Whatever "they" say, the opposite is true. (Which is a false statement and faulty logic)
-So and so wouldn't lie... right, that old carrot. (Despite the fact that given enough time, they all show their true colors... no shortage of examples there)
Now i save it for forums where critical thinking is taking place... and i don't mean the kind of thinking that is critical of anyone expressing an opinion outside the herd think.
I am entitled to my opinion. My mind can be changed with valid information... not with cheer-leading... cheer-leading is how we got here.
You know... i think i get it now. Why fill everyone's heads with competing and nonsensical information?
Because they think they have a divine right to rule and steal everything from us through their "red" tape jewdicial systems, they want you to walk into their court rooms and sputter some unsupported bullshit.
Deanna wants Werner to enter court and say how the government is using directed energy weapons on his cows, because it will fail. If Werner isn't part of this, i feel sorry for the guy.
Deanna wants nut bags out there going around spewing Heil Hitler... up is down, left is right... bass ackwards information that will do more to discredit you than help any case you try to make.
Yeah, take that into their courtrooms and you'll be left standing there with your dick in your hand and egg on your face. Good luck with that, in other words.
I find your recent rant irrational. Probably it's because you don't understand and are confused and nothing makes sense to you. It happens.
I wrote someone in the U.S. who is experienced in fighting Agenda 21 -- which is what Werner is dealing with.
Since I did not ask his permission to publish his name, I will refrain from doing so at this point, but his advice for Werner was this:
"There are a number of people in Canada who know of and are opposed to Agenda 21. Such is the good news. The particular problem for Canadians is that there is no recognition of Natural Law by government, so government does not exist to protect unalienable rights as it was originally designed in America.
Property rights under Crown rules are civil (granted by government), meaning at the core, nothing is immutable. Canadian property rights come by rule of the Queen. I think Australia and Canada are now feeling the loss of the property rights they never really had. This occurs while property rights in this country were at one time sacrosanct but are slipping steadily. Now that ours are being stripped, theirs are in much freer fall.
I know of no way that this can reverse unless the Canadians strike for a 1776 American style system of government that protects unalienable rights. But that means rejecting the Queen. Since rejection of the Crown is unlikely, my surmise is that restoring American heritage is the most practical method of protecting people and their natural rights which then will have something of an effect on rights elsewhere around the world. Natural Law must be revived in America for any realistic hope for humanity."
As dismal as the news is for any Canadian finding himself getting robbed of his property, there are -- or were -- lawyers like Doug Christie who still defends innocent Canadians.
If someone is trying to rob you through "legal means," the only way to fight "legally" is through a lawyer who knows the game and how to fight it.
Your position for Werner in your rant is just to feel pity for him while you watch him lay down and get screwed.
Good... I commend you for that Signifier. Well done and thank you. Attacking it from an Agenda 21 aspect is totally feasible. Hitting it with unreasonable "the government is blasting my cows with laser weapons" is the wrong way to go at it.
You will remember that it was my suggestion that Werner not take it in that direction... NOT DEANNA's.
Because, i recall you and i did have discourse on that issue. So, i wonder why you attack me here... because i don't believe everything that comes through the sainted airwaves of Spingola?
Wanda....I'm sorry you feel I attempted to "bash you over the head".
I was merely asking you for some examples of why Hitler is, in your opinion, not a good guy.
I did read the article you posted and I could not find an answer to my question within that document.
I just want people who make claims such as yours to back it with either links or statements.
What did Hitler do that makes him 'not a good guy'?
For example -- do you feel that the nsdap's treatment of the white rose society was unfair? Did this make Hitler "not a nice guy"?
I'm just looking for some balance here. I do not believe Hitler to be a hero; but I do not believe him to be a monster either. I'm sincerely attempted to find the truth.
I was not attacking YOU but your words and your position. Attacking YOU would involve your person, not your ideas or your words or position.
Agenda 21 and "the government" are very much interwoven in Canada and there are similar inroads in the United States -- with public-private partnerships, which are growing, in Chicago, in San Francisco, and other cities in the U.S.
Law firms in the U.S. are developing "new practices" based on Agenda 21 principles. Environments, including private property, are to be "controlled" -- by unelected bureaucrats.
The stuff they're coming up with now is insidious!
It's very hard for an individual to differentiate what is "the government" from what is "Agenda 21." It's not like the bad men come out wearing black hats so you can tell they're bad men. They were suits and ties and pearls and high-heells and they smile, like me or you. They speak in City Hall, just like any elected politician.
Your position doesn't take into account that Werner is right: the government is blasting his cows -- but through Agenda 21 agents or methods.
This isn't a personal disagreement or argument; it's a disagreement on what are the facts and in what context are these facts to be understood. IMO.
Signifier... i have known about Agenda 21 since six years ago. They start out in local small town politics and get their tendrils in... it needs to be extracted pretty much the same way... locally... that's a good thing perhaps. And i do think it may help Werner.
I called out the Celtic Rebel when he said Agenda 21 wasn't real... i call out all b.s. whenever i hear it.
Roy, the reference i posted was not about Hitler because the topic for this post is Napoleon. But, here is Eustace Mullins on the topic of Hitler, which i have posted here to the refrain of Eustace Mullins is wrong... !!? here you go: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LL2s11qReYc
This is very tiring. The point i came on here to make is that guy, Michael King (and that is an occulted name, probably not his own) did not read the book, for sure he didn't write the book. Refer to your own ears and common sense to see truth in that... and if you don't, well, i am still entitled to my opinion.
Wanda...I spend a good amount of time on websites not dealing directly with the Jewish Question. I have to CONSTANTLY correct people's false understanding of Hitler, ww2 and the Holocaust. It is a never ending task. memoryholeblog is an amazing blog dedicated to the lies and misinformation of sandy hook, the boston bombing and now the navy yard shooting. I encourage people here to get on that site and correct the false propaganda.
That being said, I expect comments negative toward Hitler on a site such as memoryholeblog. But not here. Wanda...you said Hitler was a bad guy.
All I wanted to know is "why". Why do you think Hitler is bad guy.
You started it. Not me. If this is tiring, then stop making accusations you are unwilling to back up.
That's the game... that's how it is played. We are cannon fodder... and no one gets into a position of power if they don't play the game.
It has been played that way for thousands of years.
The only way out of this mess is truth... absolute truth and an end to the systems of religion and government... which are one in the same.
Now, if you don't mind, i am done with this topic.
Because the only point i came to make is this fraud is lying about writing this book... why should we believe anything he says? He is in the business of throwing tomatoes and creating bubbles... he is a fraud.
Hitler did not kill the milloions. He could have done nothing to avoid it. It was the jews who were behond everything. And Hitler is their worst enemy ever. Because of the war the mankind suddenly was very near the victory. Hiter was its last hope.
@ wanda you started the meme mike king (king is a normal english last name) to be a fraud,and a propagandist proof pls.
you have a set mindset and don't like any revisions we get it Wanda, 6 million people died in the holocaust, hitler was evil, napoleon was a bad guy etc etc., and no one should dare to revise any of this history (coming from the jews)
sure Wanda continue to bullshit, not answering questions and not providing proof, and deferring to other topics to avoid all of this.
funny thing, relisten the last 3 min of the broadcast, where spingola said she very much liked the two books coming from Mike, WOW she must be a fraud and a propagandist too aye Wanda?
Of course i meant on the battlefields, and the people of Germany suffered, and they suffer still... all by design. I definitely was NOT referring to the fake Holocaust.
Some around here have got the mistaken idea that FREEDOM means i am free to think only what they tell me i can.
They have more of a problem with what i think and say than they do with a phony pimping a book he did not read or write. What does that tell you? I know what that tells me.
34 comments:
Mike King's website on Napoleon has a lot of information that made me really re-visit just who Napoleon was, just as the anti-New World Order movement made me revisit just who Hitler was.
In both cases, I came away with admiration.
Napoleon certainly does command respect for his accomplishments -- for how fiercely he defended his nation in particular against Jewry's destructive capacity.
And Napoleon was 5'7" -- he was not a short guy with a "complex."
What's next? Revisionist Stalin? Is there a point to this? Where are we being lead with this tripe?
Try this for an objective comparison: http://www.big-lies.org/napoleon-revisited/napoleon-revisited.html
The freemasons fought very sloppy at Jena and Auerstädt. Kutuzov was a freemason and fought very badly at Austerlitz, Borodino, south of Moscow and later he did not want to capture Napoleon. The russians leet him go away at Berezina and once before that. Why? Of course Ther Russians wanted to go to Paris. But Kutuzov was too slowely and Napoleon managed to raise another great army.
Napoleon abandoned Lousiana to the raising USA. Napoleon allowed Roithschilds to come and go and make money from smuggling etc. Napoleon wanted to create the European Union soon 200 years ago. He allowed the jews to assimilate into the societies and guaranteed the civil rights for them.
Napoleon chose poor leaders 1815 and he lost in Waterloo a bit strangely.
I think that napoleon may have been a hoax. At least he was in control. His task was to kill and destroy and plunder. He robbed everything and was a great raper of Prussia and the German countries.
Many lodges have named themselves "Napoleon Bonapate" (like "Victor Hugo" etc.) I think that Napoleon was a part of a great plan. The jews were funding both sides in the war. They could not play too bad cards for the goym in those days. They ruined the Europe and proposed then a new world order to the czar.
The czar was maybe more aggressive 1810-1812. The war was inavoidable. Right, the freemasons forced the czar into the war and were encouraging him. Napoleon did not try properly to win. He could have raised the peasants and to conquer the Russia etc. Instead of this he only tried to make a deal with the czar and to save the peace again.
Wanda,
I'm as suspicious of your so-called "objective comparison" as you are of Mike King's. It makes a lot of claims that are unsubstantiated and smell of Jew-influence.
Mike King's website and talk did for me something your website suggestion could never do: made me see something new in Napoleon. In other words, it didn't try to put me back to sleep -- "I already knew that".
C'mon... try listening to this interview again. I don't even think he wrote the book... he didn't sound like he even read it.
I don't claim to know Napoleonic history, but the Hitler revisionism stinks to high heaven, Napoleonic revisionism gives me equal pause.
I would ask again... what is the point? Why make these guys out to be heroes? Where are we being lead with this baloney?
Wanda, Wanda, Wanda,
What's the point? What's the point to what?
Rather than talk about "these guys," stick to the topic at hand: Napoleon.
Why make Napoleon out to be a hero?
Why not have a little bright light in all this darkness and about him in particular? Why not show the good side of a man after all the shit that's been's laid over him for more than a hundred years?
Why not shed light on the fact that Jesus wasn't the only one to call out the Jews and try to defeat them?
I can't possibly understand what would be the point to something like that. God knows we already have plenty of heroes right now in our midst who are willing to stake their lives for their fellow men and country -- to the point that talking about Napoleon is simply overkill. We are so overwhelmed with heroes that we actually have a surfeit of them, and Napoleon is just an old canard and redundancy, eh?
In fact our history textbooks for over a hundred years have all been written by non-Jewish publishers with no agenda but the truth, right?
Right?
You do agree, no? Do you get the point?
Hitler was not a good guy... ditto Napoleon. Jesus wasn't even real.
And, for the life of me, i fail to see why it matters... what it changes.
Truly, analyze this interview... he generalizes everything he talks about makes no references to any part of "his" book where he discloses this or that, which you pretty much hear anyone who writes a book do.
Listen to Deanna struggle with the questions... hear the comments of the callers... the guy knows nothing about a book he supposedly authored... how many times does he state "i don't know"...???
Wanda,
Can you stay on one subject of attack? LOL!
Don't invite me (as you have -- twice now) to listen to the broadcast again. It would bore me to tears. I know it was a dud. I know he was a dud as a speaker.
Female novelist Lurie Allison writes the funniest novels but if you hear her speak in an interview, you'd doubt she had the intelligence to write any book, let alone a funny one.
The oddity of disparity between the work and the life can happen.
I was glad I read the news about Napoleon on his website before he spoke -- because I had zest and enthusiasm after reading it -- and Mike King's words did nothing to improve the matter. In fact, the radio broadcast made me question for a moment whether I had indeed understood what I read . . . .
So, I do hear you loudly and clearly on the topic of King's inability to present ideas and answer questions, Wanda. I agree with you.
Deanna's responses at times led me to feel that even she was puzzled by King's verbal behavior. Maybe he took one sedative too many . . . ?
None of this, however and in my opinion, has anything to do with King's website on Napoleon or the hope and inspiration a revisit to Napoleon's accomplishments might give to people trying to understand the past and to understand what present losses to our freedoms we are all suffering and will continue to suffer for future generations, which was the purpose for King coming onto Deanna's radio broadcast in the first place in order to talk about Napoleon.
Fair enough Signifier...
and thanks for not arguing the existence of Jesus... (yes, i'm being sarcastic.)
:)
i find it interesting that jews have been trashing napoleon so much, and also that rotchilds said that they controlled europe in 1820.
http://antimatrix.org/Convert/Books/Coleman/Rothschild_Dynasty/Rothschild_Dynasty.htm
Rothschilds created and controlled Napoleon as their instrument, and that they disposed of him once the Corsican genius woke up to this fact and went into a state of rebellion, the first manifestation of which came when he divorced his wife, the Creole, Josephina. Philip Francis, writing in the New York American under the title The Poison in America's Cup stated:
The British Government is the camouflage
Nominally we govern ourselves; actually we are governed by an oligarchy of the American branch of The International Banker's Federation, Plunderbund.
The British Government is the camouflage behind which the money kings of the world have hitherto hid their economic warfare upon the masses of the people.
A puppet going rogue, sounds credible, stalin probably did the same.
Russia 100 yeras later paid dearly for their alliance with the jews
Wanda is a stupido. Hitler was a hero. Napoleon was a freemason. The men behind the revolution raised him to power. They gave him the power.
If You compare Napoleon to Hitler, the other is a praised hero and the other is worse than Lucifer in the historybooks, media etc.
Well, i will admit, i am a stupido.
I still say this guy didn't even read this book, let alone write it. Because we all know that those who craft reality for "us" don't have books handed to them. That doesn't happen... and good luck with Pootin' is a great guy meme too.
My knowledge of Napoleon is conversational at best, but i could have pulled off a better interview than this bozo. As to too many sedatives, he was plenty loquacious when he knew his topic.
Our problem is we are not skeptical enough... that we swallow too much lies and bullshit... that we worship heroes. You might try playing a little hard to get now and then.
@ ruuperti do you read what was posted??? your comment "Napoleon was a freemason. The men behind the revolution raised him to power. They gave him the power."
this was dealt in my post just above yours already, about napoleon turning on the rotchilds.
your next comment: " If You compare Napoleon to Hitler, the other is a praised hero and the other is worse than Lucifer in the historybooks, media etc."
I also addressed in my post above yours about how jews smear napoleon, and you not having read it say "oh he was praised" lololol, read for fuck sake.
jews have denigrated napoleon in many of their movies, this should be a sign that " hey maybe was a good guy"
2nd part of your comment, just because in the jewish historybooks and media hitler is portrayed as the bad guy doesn;t mean that is correct lol.
Wanda: "still say this guy didn't even read this book, let alone write it. Because we all know that those who craft reality for "us" don't have books handed to them. That doesn't happen... and good luck with Pootin' is a great guy meme too.
My knowledge of Napoleon is conversational at best, but i could have pulled off a better interview than this bozo. As to too many sedatives, he was plenty loquacious when he knew his topic."
This is a good comment. I think that the author is a clown and an agent. Almost everybody who praises Putin and believes in him is a traitor too. The rest are fools.
"....Hitler was not a good guy...."
According to who, Wanda?
Please provide me with a link as to why Hitler was not a good guy. In your opinion, why was he not a good guy?
Would it matter Roy? Did you happen to notice my first post was a link to an objective comparison or were you too eager to club me on the head for having a differing opinion?
Do you think i didn't used to try to post opposing material? Yes, i did. Here are some typical responses:
-I am a jew. (just happens to #1 on the list in the shills and disinformation playbook)
-I don't know what i'm talking about. (Which carries the obtuse implication you do know what you're talking about.)
-Whatever "they" say, the opposite is true. (Which is a false statement and faulty logic)
-So and so wouldn't lie... right, that old carrot. (Despite the fact that given enough time, they all show their true colors... no shortage of examples there)
Now i save it for forums where critical thinking is taking place... and i don't mean the kind of thinking that is critical of anyone expressing an opinion outside the herd think.
I am entitled to my opinion. My mind can be changed with valid information... not with cheer-leading... cheer-leading is how we got here.
You know... i think i get it now. Why fill everyone's heads with competing and nonsensical information?
Because they think they have a divine right to rule and steal everything from us through their "red" tape jewdicial systems, they want you to walk into their court rooms and sputter some unsupported bullshit.
Deanna wants Werner to enter court and say how the government is using directed energy weapons on his cows, because it will fail. If Werner isn't part of this, i feel sorry for the guy.
Deanna wants nut bags out there going around spewing Heil Hitler... up is down, left is right... bass ackwards information that will do more to discredit you than help any case you try to make.
Yeah, take that into their courtrooms and you'll be left standing there with your dick in your hand and egg on your face. Good luck with that, in other words.
Wanda,
I find your recent rant irrational. Probably it's because you don't understand and are confused and nothing makes sense to you. It happens.
I wrote someone in the U.S. who is experienced in fighting Agenda 21 -- which is what Werner is dealing with.
Since I did not ask his permission to publish his name, I will refrain from doing so at this point, but his advice for Werner was this:
"There are a number of people in Canada who know of and are opposed to Agenda 21. Such is the good news. The particular problem for Canadians is that there is no recognition of Natural Law by government, so government does not exist to protect unalienable rights as it was originally designed in America.
Property rights under Crown rules are civil (granted by government), meaning at the core, nothing is immutable. Canadian property rights come by rule of the Queen. I think Australia and Canada are now feeling the loss of the property rights they never really had. This occurs while property rights in this country were at one time sacrosanct but are slipping steadily. Now that ours are being stripped, theirs are in much freer fall.
I know of no way that this can reverse unless the Canadians strike for a 1776 American style system of government that protects unalienable rights. But that means rejecting the Queen. Since rejection of the Crown is unlikely, my surmise is that restoring American heritage is the most practical method of protecting people and their natural rights which then will have something of an effect on rights elsewhere around the world. Natural Law must be revived in America for any realistic hope for humanity."
As dismal as the news is for any Canadian finding himself getting robbed of his property, there are -- or were -- lawyers like Doug Christie who still defends innocent Canadians.
If someone is trying to rob you through "legal means," the only way to fight "legally" is through a lawyer who knows the game and how to fight it.
Your position for Werner in your rant is just to feel pity for him while you watch him lay down and get screwed.
Have I misinterpreted your words?
Good... I commend you for that Signifier. Well done and thank you. Attacking it from an Agenda 21 aspect is totally feasible. Hitting it with unreasonable "the government is blasting my cows with laser weapons" is the wrong way to go at it.
You will remember that it was my suggestion that Werner not take it in that direction... NOT DEANNA's.
Because, i recall you and i did have discourse on that issue. So, i wonder why you attack me here... because i don't believe everything that comes through the sainted airwaves of Spingola?
Wanda....I'm sorry you feel I attempted to "bash you over the head".
I was merely asking you for some examples of why Hitler is, in your opinion, not a good guy.
I did read the article you posted and I could not find an answer to my question within that document.
I just want people who make claims such as yours to back it with either links or statements.
What did Hitler do that makes him 'not a good guy'?
For example -- do you feel that the nsdap's treatment of the white rose society was unfair? Did this make Hitler "not a nice guy"?
I'm just looking for some balance here. I do not believe Hitler to be a hero; but I do not believe him to be a monster either. I'm sincerely attempted to find the truth.
Wanda,
I was not attacking YOU but your words and your position. Attacking YOU would involve your person, not your ideas or your words or position.
Agenda 21 and "the government" are very much interwoven in Canada and there are similar inroads in the United States -- with public-private partnerships, which are growing, in Chicago, in San Francisco, and other cities in the U.S.
Law firms in the U.S. are developing "new practices" based on Agenda 21 principles. Environments, including private property, are to be "controlled" -- by unelected bureaucrats.
The stuff they're coming up with now is insidious!
It's very hard for an individual to differentiate what is "the government" from what is "Agenda 21." It's not like the bad men come out wearing black hats so you can tell they're bad men. They were suits and ties and pearls and high-heells and they smile, like me or you. They speak in City Hall, just like any elected politician.
Your position doesn't take into account that Werner is right: the government is blasting his cows -- but through Agenda 21 agents or methods.
This isn't a personal disagreement or argument; it's a disagreement on what are the facts and in what context are these facts to be understood. IMO.
Signifier... i have known about Agenda 21 since six years ago. They start out in local small town politics and get their tendrils in... it needs to be extracted pretty much the same way... locally... that's a good thing perhaps. And i do think it may help Werner.
I called out the Celtic Rebel when he said Agenda 21 wasn't real... i call out all b.s. whenever i hear it.
Roy, the reference i posted was not about Hitler because the topic for this post is Napoleon. But, here is Eustace Mullins on the topic of Hitler, which i have posted here to the refrain of Eustace Mullins is wrong... !!? here you go: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LL2s11qReYc
This is very tiring. The point i came on here to make is that guy, Michael King (and that is an occulted name, probably not his own) did not read the book, for sure he didn't write the book. Refer to your own ears and common sense to see truth in that... and if you don't, well, i am still entitled to my opinion.
That Eustace Mullins video is a classic piece of disinformation and deceit! LOL!
Mullins is talking straight out of his asshole and making it up as he goes. He loves a worshipping audience!
LOL!
"....This is very tiring....."
Exactly!
Wanda...I spend a good amount of time on websites not dealing directly with the Jewish Question. I have to CONSTANTLY correct people's false understanding of Hitler, ww2 and the Holocaust. It is a never ending task. memoryholeblog is an amazing blog dedicated to the lies and misinformation of sandy hook, the boston bombing and now the navy yard shooting. I encourage people here to get on that site and correct the false propaganda.
That being said, I expect comments negative toward Hitler on a site such as memoryholeblog. But not here. Wanda...you said Hitler was a bad guy.
All I wanted to know is "why". Why do you think Hitler is bad guy.
You started it. Not me. If this is tiring, then stop making accusations you are unwilling to back up.
Sincerely.
Millions died Roy.
That's the game... that's how it is played. We are cannon fodder... and no one gets into a position of power if they don't play the game.
It has been played that way for thousands of years.
The only way out of this mess is truth... absolute truth and an end to the systems of religion and government... which are one in the same.
Now, if you don't mind, i am done with this topic.
Because the only point i came to make is this fraud is lying about writing this book... why should we believe anything he says? He is in the business of throwing tomatoes and creating bubbles... he is a fraud.
"......millions died......"
And so therefore, 'hitler is not a good guy'.
Wow. Thanks, I've learned so much.
Of course i can't teach you anything. You prefer to get your "learning" from propagadists like Michael King.
It doesn't matter one whit to you whether or not he wrote this... which he clearly did not.
But i thank you... i have learned a quite a bit here these past two days.
Hitler did not kill the milloions. He could have done nothing to avoid it. It was the jews who were behond everything. And Hitler is their worst enemy ever. Because of the war the mankind suddenly was very near the victory. Hiter was its last hope.
@ wanda you started the meme mike king (king is a normal english last name) to be a fraud,and a propagandist proof pls.
you have a set mindset and don't like any revisions we get it Wanda, 6 million people died in the holocaust, hitler was evil, napoleon was a bad guy etc etc., and no one should dare to revise any of this history (coming from the jews)
Maybe AJ forum is a better place for you?
Now you all are just being obvious.
http://jewishracism.blogspot.com/2010/01/in-defense-of-truth-and-right-to-speak.html
sure Wanda continue to bullshit, not answering questions and not providing proof, and deferring to other topics to avoid all of this.
funny thing, relisten the last 3 min of the broadcast, where spingola said she very much liked the two books coming from Mike, WOW she must be a fraud and a propagandist too aye Wanda?
Oh. I thought she meant the millions that died on the battlefields.
Ruupertti...
Of course i meant on the battlefields, and the people of Germany suffered, and they suffer still... all by design. I definitely was NOT referring to the fake Holocaust.
Some around here have got the mistaken idea that FREEDOM means i am free to think only what they tell me i can.
They have more of a problem with what i think and say than they do with a phony pimping a book he did not read or write. What does that tell you? I know what that tells me.
Post a Comment