February 12, 2014

The Spingola Zone at AFP 2/11/2013


Deanna's discussion will be:
Unraveling Sofia Smallstorm's Video on Sandy Hook, Part 1

Show-page 

American Free Press 
 



Download

9 comments:

RJ said...

Will this bullshit ever end? Who gives a fuuuuuuuuuuuuck!?

mephistopheles lux said...

I agree man. Was just about to post the same thing.

Anonymous said...

The important part starts 35 minutes in, where Deanna actually addresses issues in Sofia's video.

While the matter of the accuracy and intention of certain individuals is important in an overall fact-finding expedition, for me, the big questions are, do you find Robbie Parker's reaction suspicious?

Or what about:

2) A photo of one of the Parker daughters that has her hair parted the same way and she is wearing the same dress as the photo of Emilie Parker who was listed as one of the victims of Sandy Hook, sitting on the lap of Obama afterwards?

3) that they spent so much more to demolish the school than usual?

4) that they blacked out lots of footage from the school of a nearby parking lot when they released their final report?

5) that they never posited a motive for Adam Lanza?

If not, then you probably won't gain much from analyzing the drama of the past month and a half.

Omni Presence said...

Talk about beating a dead horse.

When I saw this video I thought of this the SH issue.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjoMQJf5vKI

Aleksa said...

I have hoped that Deanna will distance her self from debating SH topic!

It does not do any good!

Why does she stick to SH so much!?
Its like going after Icke to prove that reptoids do not exist and that moon is not hollow and a spaceship!

I see its part.1 so there is a scond one coming and maybe the third,who knoes!

I hope this is the last show where Deanna covers Sandy Hook Nose!

I am tierd of SH sillynes,who cares ,move on!

Expose Supremacists said...

Now people are attacking Deanna for telling the truth?

"Do you hate me because I have told you the truth?"

I don't remember who said it but in this case it's true.

Great job Deanna but I have always said these people will never accept the truth even when it's right in their face. It's hard to let go of what people invested so much time in.

Oh well.

Anonymous said...

I think that a shill is probably thet perosn who constantly attacks others and accuses them being shills without any logic or proof. I think that they remind me perfectly about Sunstein's visions.

foon1e said...

Just because you "think" something,doesn't make it the truth
Ruupertti.
A "Shill" by definition is a "Saleman" - there to sell you something you never even knew you needed. And by that definition, we could call every Podcaster and alternative News Pusher "Shills" too. Because as far as the Great Unwashed are concerned;they don't need us. They have their MSM,and for the most part are entirely satisfied with their chosen mode of Brainwashing.
Attack-Mode is mostly employed by those who get so desperate to have *their* message heard;that they feel that can only happen if they attempt to take other competing visions off the play-board. And seeing as a lot of broadcasters today exhibit all the symptoms of "Obsessive Winning Syndrome" (A term i just made up because it's easy to attach labels to things these days), you can see some of them employing shill-like tactics to do so.
Does that make it morally right what they're doing? No. But it shows how truely Brainwashed even the popular names in Truther circles are:When all that matters to them is *I am Right*, rather than *We are right*.

Beep said...

This isn't just about SH, its about the techniques of deception used by infiltrators and dis-info agents like Fetzer and Co.