Did Eric Cantor Lose Because He's Jewish? Of Course.
Did Eric Cantor lose because of his Judaism? Everybody’s been
tiptoeing around the question for the last two days, so let’s just come
out and say it: Of course he did. That and redistricting.
What the GOP’s redistricting mavens forgot to factor in — what’s eluded pretty much the entire chattering class wrestling with this earthquake — is that the prairie fire that’s turned so much of middle America red is as much about Christianity as anything else.
And if it’s about Christianity, then it’s also about not-Jewish. How does that factor in? Most talk of Jews in politics begins and ends with Israel and anti-Semitism. If it’s not one of those two, we’re done. Hence the endless repetition of the line that Dave Wasserman of Cook Political Report gave to the New York Times: “You can’t ignore the elephant in the room.” No, you can’t. But nobody knew what to make of the elephant. (Actually, it’s more about the elephant that’s suddenly out of the room, isn’t it?) Even Wasserman didn’t mention it in his Cook coverage.
"Oy Vey" Cantor’s Jewishness mattered because we tell you what matters, we're gods chosen! Now
can we please talk about Hitler and what a bad boy he was!
Read more here
House's No. 2 Republican defeated by a campaign run by a 23-year-old with a flip phone
5 comments:
Some interesting discussions over on the comments of Goldberg's article yet most of them miss the key point regarding the 'Jewish question'.
Exclusivity and supremacist ideologies are not just a by-product of Jewish culture and it's history of interactions with gentiles - it is the CORE, central underpinning for all forms of religious, mystical and atheistic Judaism, the "Chosenitus Disease".
Although derived from the religious doctrines of Orthodox Judaism the "chosen" status of the Jews being inseparable from "Jewishness" of any kind is best exposed by the non-religious leftist, Marxist, Masonic Jews that seek "assimilation".
To the non-religious/mystical Jew "assimilating" with gentile society means changing gentile society to better suit the Jews and their culture, despite them being a very tiny minority compared to the gentiles.
But as noted by Theodor Herzl there really is no other way for "assimilation" of Jews with gentile societies and the backlash against Jews for the perversion of gentile races and cultures as such is a natural 'defense mechanism'.
This is why I agree with Herzl that a Jewish society with it's own culture and identity is the only way for Jews and gentiles to co-exist without near or total destruction of one or the other group.
I also agree with Hitler and his National Socialists however in the fact that a "Jewish State" run by Jewish political power without being accompanied by a global emigration of all world Jewry to that state will/has become merely a protected HQ with direct political influence to serve as the center of world Jewry's power and gentile-destroying NWO operations.
For those who support Hitler, National Socialism, "White Nationalism" and so forth supporting a physical "Jewish nation"(not the religious/"racial" one) should be an important ideological cornerstone.
"The recognition of Jewry as a racial community based on blood and not on religion leads the German government to guarantee without reservation the racial separateness of this community. The government finds itself in complete agreement with the great spiritual movement within Jewry, the so-called Zionism, with its recognition of the solidarity of Jewry around the world and its rejection of all assimilationist notions. On this basis, Germany undertakes measures that will surely play a significant role in the future in the handling of the Jewish problem around the world."
~ Official SS newspaper 'Das Schwarze Korps', Sept. 26, 1935. Quoted in: F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question (1985), pp. 56-57.
It is true what Rabbi Harry Waton stated in his 1939 "A Program for the Jews and An Answer to all Anti-Semites: A Program for Humanity"(pages 53-57) -
"What is Nazism? Nazism is an imitation of Judaism; Nazism adopted the principles and ideas of Judaism with which to destroy Judaism and the Jews. This alone places Hitler on the same level with Balaam"
http://www.gwb.com.au/2000/myers/book.htm
Peace
Edit to prior post - I shouldn't have added "racial" when referring to the 'Jewish nation' as I do support the 'Jewish race' identification, but I was trying to distinguish between the religious and cultural notion of the Jewish Nation being all Jews of the world and an actual physical nation-state/entity.
Peace
Hello unknown, welcome to mamis.
We don't get many chosenites commenting here, and it would be nice to get y'alls side of the story.
Nazism is a Hollywood term, where Jews depict their own character in German uniforms and deflect it onto their enemies (non-Jews who understand Jewry). National Socialism is self-sustaining and racially autark. Judaism relies on the filthy goy to be part of a Jewish society to leech off of. How is that similar?
@ Mami - Although I admit I am a follower of "occult" mystical doctrines based around Thelemic ideas which have been inspired, influenced or used/abused by the Jews and their mystical doctrines I myself am 100% Gentile - and not the 'righteous' kind(by their definitions) either, I am a member of no organizations(Jewish or otherwise).
Like Hitler I don't have much respect for organized religion but grew up with and do believe in more-or-less traditional Christian values making a good basis for a strong society and that religion/spirituality is a free choice of the individual and as such should NOT be purposefully attacked and destroyed(science will do that gradually, "naturally" over time).
God said He granted us 'free will' to live as we please and although He gave us His word that He preferred we live by it was entirely our choice to do so or not.
When we die after a life of free will it is God(or his agents) who has the task of judging us for our free choices and either rewarding or punishing us as such.
For man-made religious books to then tell people to violate the natural system and Word of God by placing themselves above God and judging others for their 'free will' choices because some man-made ink on man-made paper says "god" approves is "evil" to my view.
All a man must do is confess and ask forgiveness of God to cease being "evil" under most religious doctrines, so if you judge a 29 year old man to be "evil" and kill him on behalf of "god" how do you know at 30 he wouldn't have confessed and asked forgiveness and become a great supporter of God's Word?
You are not judged until death by God for a reason.
This is "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. -- Love is the Law, Love under Will!"
Even if I personally would judge you to be spiritually bankrupt and morally decrepit based on my own moral views I still LOVE you and don't have any ill will toward you - it's not up to me to judge your 'free will' - only God can do such a thing.(if you break accepted social laws that is another matter)
I am no 'chosenite' or 'righteous Jew' but I do agree with many of their doctrines and I do at least come close to understanding their perspective of why they are doing this all.
To them conquering Christianity and other religions is 'fighting evil', just as much so as to gentiles fighting against them they see it as 'fighting evil'.
To them they(the Jews/"Illuminati") are fighting for God it/Him/Herself(the 'Kingdom of God' aka NWO) while the gentiles continue to fight over man-made concepts, words and interpretations of God.
One can't fight the Jews without understanding them, yet as noted by Rabbi Waton and many others understanding the Jewish ideals and doctrines makes it very difficult for one to not become a Jew themselves.
@ Tele Funken - yeah yeah, I'm well aware of the 'Nazi' canard and how Hitler would be disgusted by modern pop-culture "Nazism" produced by Hollywood retardation like 'American History X'.
Rabbi Waton in 1939 however wasn't aware of all that and likely wouldn't have cared if he was, and I was merely quoting his words.
Peace
Post a Comment