Corbett still promotes the possibility that the planes alleged to have hit the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11 were actually remotely hijacked, despite all the evidence showing that no commercial airliner could've gone at the speeds seen in the videos shown, nor have any serialized parts been identified at the scene and traced to Boeing airliners. Oh, but they did find that intact hijacker passport, of course.
It was not romote control commercial planes but a missile that looks like a plane. These planes aka missiles where built never to carry passengers... They where not flying slow because they where not built to fly like a commercial plane but more like a missile... Why crash a commercial plane that would have bounced off the building and then be discovered to not fit into the official story... Have the plane hit the building and then dissipate leaves no evidence... Why build a faster jet/missile is because it was use as a missile that needed to penetrate the building making it appear that the plane weakened the building enough to cause its callapse... A slow flying commercial plane would have hit the building and bounced off it... Why do people think it was a commercial plane, most eye witness said it did not look like a commerical plane, the pictures taken of the underbelly dont like like a commerical plane... It was a retrofitted military plane that was used like a missile... Oh but the military plane could never fly at high speeds "Really" with a budget in the trillions I would be pissed if they didn't have a plan that flew faster then commercial plane... It's like saying the military truck could never knock over a brick wall because my commerical truck can't!!!
I agree... The planes were retrofitted to cause more damage by remote control aka Missle/Plane... I agree that the third plane was suppose to hit wtc7... I don't believe in September Clues
5 comments:
Corbett can ramble on and on and on. At least he doestn play five minutes of bumper music before he starts rambling
Corbett still promotes the possibility that the planes alleged to have hit the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11 were actually remotely hijacked, despite all the evidence showing that no commercial airliner could've gone at the speeds seen in the videos shown, nor have any serialized parts been identified at the scene and traced to Boeing airliners. Oh, but they did find that intact hijacker passport, of course.
http://www.corbettreport.com/how-to-steal-an-airplane-from-911-to-mh370/
It was not romote control commercial planes but a missile that looks like a plane.
These planes aka missiles where built never to carry passengers... They where not flying slow because they where not built to fly like a commercial plane but more like a missile... Why crash a commercial plane that would have bounced off the building and then be discovered to not fit into the official story... Have the plane hit the building and then dissipate leaves no evidence...
Why build a faster jet/missile is because it was use as a missile that needed to penetrate the building making it appear that the plane weakened the building enough to cause its callapse... A slow flying commercial plane would have hit the building and bounced off it... Why do people think it was a commercial plane, most eye witness said it did not look like a commerical plane, the pictures taken of the underbelly dont like like a commerical plane... It was a retrofitted military plane that was used like a missile... Oh but the military plane could never fly at high speeds "Really" with a budget in the trillions I would be pissed if they didn't have a plan that flew faster then commercial plane... It's like saying the military truck could never knock over a brick wall because my commerical truck can't!!!
When there is missing gold or any other precious medal there is only one culprit
I agree... The planes were retrofitted to cause more damage by remote control aka Missle/Plane...
I agree that the third plane was suppose to hit wtc7...
I don't believe in September Clues
Post a Comment