Dr. Duke started the show by discussing an interview that the anti-Zionist Jewish commentator Steve Lendman gave in which he succinctly described the mad push for war with Russia in Ukraine, and that in fact the danger of war with Russia is greater now than it has ever been during Lendman's 80 years. However, Lendman never points out that the main actors, both in Ukraine and in the U.S. State Department, involved in the overthrow of the Ukrainian government and the provokation of Russia are in fact Jews, and that this is part of a broader Jewish supremacist agenda.
Dr. Duke and Dr. Slattery then discuss the problem of commentators talking about the symptoms of Jewish power but being afraid to acknowledge the existance of Jewish power. Some may fear for their livelihoods should they break the taboo on mentioning Jewish power, yet sounding the alarm on dangers like the one in Ukraine without correctly identifying the cause of the danger can lead people to incorrect conclusions and thus prevent necessary actions. This, of course, is often done intentionally.
Davids' site
Rense Archive
56k CF Download
2 comments:
No, it's absolutely true that Stephen Lendman doesn't specifically out the Jewish supremacists.
Can I criticize him for that? He's Jewish himself, so why would he need the hassle of the Jewish Defense League or ruining his Jewish social networks possibly entirely? He already outs the Zionists enough that he said even his own late mother probably wouldn't have supported him in that.
He's very accessible by email at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net, so one could simply ask him outright or start up a dialogue with him and then start sending him articles about Jewish supremacists in action and see if you get a reaction.
As far as anti-Zionists go, and especially Jewish ones, he's the most staunch, more than Michael Rivero, because while Rivero will go on about Israel doing this or that, Lendman absolutely takes no prisoners and doesn't just say Israel, but also Zionism.
And speaking of hardly mentioning Zionism, Paul Craig Roberts could never bear to say it all these years, it seemed, until recently. I heard him twice now, as recently as his last Lendman appearance, saying Zionist, and I nearly fell out of my chair (slightly true) when I heard him say it, because he preferred to use the intellectually dishonest term Israel Lobby. They call themselves Zionists, so why shouldn't we?
And Duke shouldn't take much exception with Lendman not specifically focusing on Jewish supremacists, since he at best is still saying alleged 19 Arab Muslim hijackers, and not even saying it's an obvious false flag, and that there are at least strong indications of Israeli involvement.
Big correction: Lendman has written about Jewish supremacism. I've mostly listened to him regularly, with his usual guests, where he rails into Zionism and particular Zionists, but never heard him mention Jewish supremacism, but came across an article of him mentioning it, and see at least 39 articles mentioning "Jewish supremacy" in them.
https://www.google.ca/?gws_rd=ssl#q=site:sjlendman.blogspot.com+%22jewish+supremacy%22&start=0
Just goes to show there can be a big difference between what is written about versus what is said "on air."
And overall, Duke really shouldn't have criticized Lendman when he won't himself call 9/11 a false flag, as Lendman does.
Post a Comment