Not to speak overly critical of James and James' report, there appears to be in this particular episode, a subtle genuflection pattern common in nearly all public discourse. Whenever overt Jewish criminality is exposed, the term "Nazi" must enter the discourse to absolve the sinner (the borderline anti-Semite) of his "blaspheme" by deflecting to "those evil Nazis." So what's wrong with a non-limp-wristed wave? What does that have to do with the tea in China?
This pattern of absolving self from Jewish scorn appears to operate in the realm of subconscious mind control.
1 comment:
Not to speak overly critical of James and James' report, there appears to be in this particular episode, a subtle genuflection pattern common in nearly all public discourse. Whenever overt Jewish criminality is exposed, the term "Nazi" must enter the discourse to absolve the sinner (the borderline anti-Semite) of his "blaspheme" by deflecting to "those evil Nazis." So what's wrong with a non-limp-wristed wave? What does that have to do with the tea in China?
This pattern of absolving self from Jewish scorn appears to operate in the realm of subconscious mind control.
Post a Comment