33 minutes in, Charlie raises the matter of Noam Chomsky, who talks about government staged events like Vietnam, yet when asked about 9/11, despite it fitting the same template, he says there's nothing to see here.
It really is blatant how Chomsky does it, too, basically saying that since the Bush administration didn't blame Iraq for 9/11, therefore it couldn't have been an inside job.
And he compares the anomalies pointed to by researchers as being akin to unexplained phenomenon found by scientific researchers in the lab, which is a bogus comparison when you are looking at blatant examples like steel beams being hurled through the air with such force supposedly from a gravity-driven collapse, to name just one issue.
And he engages in ad hominem attacks, trying to belittle the researchers, asking about what journals they have published their works in. Considering that he has lamented about the corporate control of publishing ideas, he should know darn well that you can't get your findings published in many scientific journals, especially when there is federal funding on the line. All you have to do is look to the AIDS scam, to see how a top retrovirologist like Dr. Peter Duesberg and Nobel Prize Winner Dr. Kary Mullis couldn't get wider publication of their views.
As Charlie has alluded to in the past, it's no threat to expose cases of past government misdeeds long after the fact, and a perfect illustration of that is Jesse Ventura, who came out with the book, 63 Documents the Government Doesn't Want You to Read, but when Sandy Hook happened, he said, nothing to see here folks.
2 comments:
33 minutes in, Charlie raises the matter of Noam Chomsky, who talks about government staged events like Vietnam, yet when asked about 9/11, despite it fitting the same template, he says there's nothing to see here.
It really is blatant how Chomsky does it, too, basically saying that since the Bush administration didn't blame Iraq for 9/11, therefore it couldn't have been an inside job.
And he compares the anomalies pointed to by researchers as being akin to unexplained phenomenon found by scientific researchers in the lab, which is a bogus comparison when you are looking at blatant examples like steel beams being hurled through the air with such force supposedly from a gravity-driven collapse, to name just one issue.
And he engages in ad hominem attacks, trying to belittle the researchers, asking about what journals they have published their works in. Considering that he has lamented about the corporate control of publishing ideas, he should know darn well that you can't get your findings published in many scientific journals, especially when there is federal funding on the line. All you have to do is look to the AIDS scam, to see how a top retrovirologist like Dr. Peter Duesberg and Nobel Prize Winner Dr. Kary Mullis couldn't get wider publication of their views.
As Charlie has alluded to in the past, it's no threat to expose cases of past government misdeeds long after the fact, and a perfect illustration of that is Jesse Ventura, who came out with the book, 63 Documents the Government Doesn't Want You to Read, but when Sandy Hook happened, he said, nothing to see here folks.
http://www.jesseventura.net/2013/01/17/jesse-ventura-sandy-hook-shooting-not-a-false-flag/
Chomsky is nothing but a Jewish expert in obfuscation.
Post a Comment