On this edition of The Realist Report, we'll be joined by Dr. Jim Fetzer, founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth. Dr. Fetzer and I will be discussing all aspects of 9/11.
Below are relevant links for this program:
- Sandy Hook: Free homes and "big bucks" incentives for leaders and players - Dr. Jim Fetzer with Wolfgang Halbig
- September Clues: The Central Role of the News Media on 9/11
- 9/11 Attacks - 102 Minutes That Changed America
- The National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences - Simon Shack
- Electronic Jamming on 9/11 - The Street-View Clips - Simon Shack
- Missing in Fiction - Simon Shack
- 9/11 Scams: Why Jim Fetzer, Ace Baker and Richard Hall Etc. Are Wrong About the Hezarkhani Video - OneBornFree
John-Friend.net
The Realist Report (BlogTalk)
The Realist Report (TalkShoe)
The Realist Report (YouTube)
Download
5 comments:
At 1h22m, Dr. Fetzer said he has presumed that the Hezarkhani video is genuine, but of a fake plane.
We know for sure that one or both the Hezarkhani and Fairbanks videos are fake because there are puffballs coming out above the plane's wings in the Fairbanks video and below them in the Hezarkhani video.
At 1h15m, he cites Rosalee Grable and Ace Baker, and at 1h23m, he cites John Lear, but all three of them are highly questionable, though they each make some good points, which is to be expected, with mixing in good with bad in order to confuse people.
Just as Dr. Fetzer speculates that they thought of using drones at first but dropped the idea because of the issue of things going wrong, like the drones not hitting the towers, he therefore later concludes that holographic images of drones were used after concluding that the planes were not CGI.
He is a retired professor of logic, and I see the same logic applying to problems with using holographic projection, which can also go awry, and cause even more problems than errant drones, which they could at least still say were piloted by hijackers.
Therefore, there is a similar reason to conclude that the perpetrators did not employ holographic projections for the same reason Dr. Fetzer said they rejected drones.
In Fetzers article regarding Sandy Hook latest scams ie the homes, he links to an article that links to God Like Productions, a suspected website with CIA and Tavistock links.
http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/02/14/strange-purchase-date-price-sandy-hook-homes/
A unnamed Dr says he received this explanation for the date the homes were sold and the zero price listed;
Feb. 5, 2013
Thank you for your inquiry Dr ____. In most instances of a sale price of $0 the reason would be because of a family sale where the house ownership is simply transferred. [In other words, no money actually changed hands.] The other reason for that to happen would be a town entering a parcel into their database for the first time they must puta first owner and a sale price. Often times they will put $0 as a filler price. The sale date of 12/25/2009 would be the same thing.
Kind Regards,
Chase Moltedo
Customer Support Representative
Vision Government Solutions
44 Bearfoot Road
Northboro, MA 01532
And who the hell is Wolfgang? I can't find very many photos of this guy. And one is on his facebook page which appears to have been put up after Sandy Hook.
Jim asks how can they threaten a guy with the credentials he claims he has. Well, how do we know Wolfgang's credentials are real or he is real. Do a search for this guy and you decide.
You have to remember that Gordon Duff admits that he writes 40% False Information and that at least 30% of the information on Veterans Today is false as well.
Remember that this is who Dr. Fetzer works for. Duff is an untrustworthy jew yet people still promote Veterans today and their writers who admittedly put out 30% false information.
Dr. Fetzer cannot be trusted.
Furthermore why does Mr. Friend promote a guy who is affiliated directly with Gordon Duff?
Post a Comment