See more cartoons @ SNIPPITS AND SNAPPITS
December 17, 2016
Truth Jihad radio with Kevin Barrett 2016.12.16
Ex-freemason Dr. Omar Zaid on the NWO and trinity conspiracies; Elizabeth Woodworth on her book with David Ray Griffin, "Unprecedented Climate Mobilization"
First hour: Dr. Omar Zaid, MD is an expert on Occult Symbolism, having been a member of the Freemasonic movement himself for many years. He has since reverted to Islam and authored several books, including The Time of Turning; Cain's Creed: The Cult(s) of Rome; Forgotten Saints: The Gospel of Barabas; The Hand of Iblis, an Anatomy of Evil; and Trinity, the Metamorphosis of a Myth. He teaches at UNITAR International University in Malaysia.
Second hour: Elizabeth Woodworth is co-founder and coordinator at Consensus 9/11: The 9/11 Best Evidence Panel which uses a rigorous scientific consensus model derived from medical research to discover and highlight the strongest evidence about what really happened on September 11th, 2001. In this interview we discuss David Ray Griffin's book Unprecedented and the follow-up co-authored by Woodworth and Griffin, Unprecedented Climate Mobilization, which Elizabeth recently discussed at the UN COP22 Climate Summit in Marrakesh, Morocco.
Kevin's blog
TruthJihad.com
Freedom Slips.com
64k CF Download
Download From Archive.org
Jeff Rense Radio Show - 2016.12.16
Jeff Rense is an American anti-New World Order activist. He hosts a website at Rense.com and is the radio talk-show host of the Jeff Rense Program. His show broadcasts on US satellite radio and internet radio. The website and show often discuss topics such as 9/11, World War II revisionism, Zionism, contemporary geopolitical developments, alternative medicines and some more eccentric aspects such as Ufology.
Listen Download Hour 1 - Dr. Michael Salla - The Incredible Documentation Validating William Tompkins Astonishing Revelations & Disclosure
Listen Download Hour 2 - Dr. Michael Salla - The Incredible Documentation Validating William Tompkins Astonishing Revelations & Disclosure
Listen Download Hour 3 - David John Oates - America Under Attack
56k CF
Rense's site
Download From Archive.org
Circus Maximus with Nick Spero 2016.12.16
Nick is an independent researcher from the Chicagoland area. He started podcasting in 2008; tackling issues related to history revisionism, maritime/admiralty law, the Vatican, Israeli crimes, secret societies, esoteric knowledge & symbols, controlled opposition, health/nutrition. Over the years, Nick has expanded his understanding & knowledge of Kosher Nostra’s web of control and deceit. Nick connects the dots that many other radio hosts don’t.
Rainer – Fake News, PizzaGate & Psyops
Nick speaks with Rainer from Aryan Skynet about a whole host of relevant topics, such as pizzagate, fake news, the bigger picture, what kinds of psychological operations appear to be in place, and much more.
Circus Maximus
Renegade Archive
Renegade Broadcasting
Renegade Tribune
56k CF Download
Download From Archive.org
December 16, 2016
German Law Would Require Facebook, Social Media to Delete Fake News, Hate Speech
Legislators’ proposal prompted by concerns over manipulating elections
Developments
in the U.S. have triggered fears in Germany that some people may try to
tip the outcome of elections by spreading misinformation on Facebook
and other social media.
Photo:
Franz-Peter Tschauner/Zuma Press
BERLIN—
Facebook
Inc.
and its social media peers would be required to swiftly remove fake news
and hate speech from their platforms under a law proposed by senior
German legislators aimed at addressing fears of meddling in next year’s
parliamentary elections.
The
companies would be required to act within 24 hours after a person
affected by a post flagged it to them, said Volker Kauder, the
parliamentary floor leader of Chancellor
Angela Merkel’s Christian Democrats, on Friday. The governing coalition
would move early next year to create a law obliging the platforms to
establish a complaint-management system, he added.
Mr. Kauder’s statement followed allegations that
the proliferation of fake news
on social media affected public discourse during the U.S. presidential
campaign. Developments in the U.S. have triggered fears in Germany and
other countries that some people may try to tip the outcome of elections
by spreading misinformation.
“After
years of discussions, the social media must now unfortunately be forced
to take responsibility,” said Mr. Kauder. “Only in this way we can
counter further brutalization and willful manipulation of political
debate in the net,” he said.
Thomas
Oppermann, the floor leader of junior coalition partner the Social
Democrats, said he largely agreed with Mr. Kauder’s demand for such a
law. Facebook should face fines of as much as €500,000 ($520,750) if it
failed to remove fake news in a timely manner, Mr. Oppermann told
magazine Der Spiegel.
Facebook didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
The proposal comes amid warnings that
Russia may attempt to sway
Germany’s parliamentary elections, due in the second half of next year.
Michael Grosse-Brömer, a senior lawmaker of the Christian Democrats,
said Tuesday that Russia may try to weaken Ms. Merkel in the election
and called for an assessment of how to combat manipulative activity on
the internet.
Messrs. Kauder and Oppermann proposed the law a day after Facebook said it would take steps to
demote some fake information from users’ news feed.
Mr.
Kauder said that victims of fake news should have the right to get
information from the social platforms to find out who created the
hateful posts.
Mr.
Oppermann said that social media platforms should be obliged to publish
a correction and give it the same reach if demanded by an affected
person, according to Der Spiegel.
Facebook started
an initiative in Germany
about a year ago aimed at encouraging users to counter hateful posts on
its websites, in a response to criticism from politicians that the
company didn’t do enough to counter racist comments.
Write to
Friedrich Geiger at
friedrich.geiger@wsj.com
Fake News = Hate Speech = Racist And without it, it's all gonna be rainbows and unicorns.
Fake News and the Electoral College
Electors
from the 30 states Donald Trump carried are being “hounded to abandon”
the president-elect and cast a vote for somebody else when they meet
Monday, the
Associated Press
reports. The effort will not succeed:
Whether they like Trump or not, and some surely don’t, scores of the Republicans chosen to cast votes in the state-capital meetings told AP they feel bound by history, duty, party loyalty or the law to rubber-stamp their state’s results and make him president.
A
team of nine AP reporters attempted to contact all 538 electors from
both parties, and was successful in reaching “more than 330 of them.
. . . Only one Republican elector told AP he won’t vote for Trump. . . .
Even a leader of the anti-Trump effort, Bret Chiafalo of Everett,
Washington, calls it a ‘losing bet.’ ” The GOP defector is almost
certainly
Chris Suprun
of Texas, who announced his intention last week in a New York Times op-ed piece.
Some of the details are entertaining:
“Let me give you the total as of right now: 48,324 emails about my role as an elector,” said Brian Westrate, a small-business owner and GOP district chairman in Fall Creek, Wisconsin. “I have a Twitter debate with a former porn star from California asking me to change my vote. It’s been fascinating.” . . .
Most of the pleas to reject Trump are coordinated, automated, professionally generated and, for those reasons, none too persuasive.
“We got a stack of letters from idiots,” said Republican elector Edward Robson, 86, a Phoenix, Arizona, homebuilder.
Call it the “Animal House”
ploy, after this exchange from the classic 1978 comedy: “I think that
this situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be
done on somebody’s part!” “We’re just the guys to do it.”
But the idiots have a lot of loud megaphones. Mediaite notes that “there’s a new celebrity PSA out” in which “Martin Sheen, Richard Schiff, Debra Messing, James Cromwell, BD Wong, Bob Odenkirk, Moby, and some other big names” urge electors “to do the right thing and step in to vote their conscience”—that is, the conscience of Sheen, Schiff, Messing, et al., who can’t stand Trump.
But the idiots have a lot of loud megaphones. Mediaite notes that “there’s a new celebrity PSA out” in which “Martin Sheen, Richard Schiff, Debra Messing, James Cromwell, BD Wong, Bob Odenkirk, Moby, and some other big names” urge electors “to do the right thing and step in to vote their conscience”—that is, the conscience of Sheen, Schiff, Messing, et al., who can’t stand Trump.
The spot is similar to an
ad that played before Election Day
urging voters to reject Trump. It’s likely to prove even less
persuasive, since its targets, the electors pledged to vote for Trump,
are all Republicans. Were they to heed the celebs’ call, it would be a
breach of faith with both their states’ voters and their party.
The idiots are also getting plenty of respectful attention from the so-called mainstream media.
Politico
reports that Larry Lessig, a Harvard law professor, “claimed Tuesday
that 20 Republican members of the Electoral College are considering
voting against Donald Trump.”
Even
20 would be 17 short of the number required to deny Trump a majority
and send the election to the House for the first time since 1824. (In
that event, each state’s delegation would have one vote, with 26
required to win. Republicans have a majority in the House delegations of
all 30 states Trump carried.) In any case, the under is a very safe
bet:
Lessig’s claims contradict the assertions of Republican National Committee sources who report that a GOP whip operation intended to ensure Republican electors remain loyal to Trump found only one elector . . . would defy Trump. . . .
Lessig provided no evidence to back up his claim.
So
this is fake news. But the idea of an Electoral College revolt is being
widely propagated by anti-Trump journalists and commentators. Some of
them, like
E.J. Dionne
of the Washington Post, more or less acknowledge that the idea is a
fantasy. They offer three basic arguments for why it should be
entertained nonetheless.
First, that Hillary Clinton “won the popular vote.” In a New York Times op-ed,
Dahlia Lithwick and Davis S. Cohen,
respectively a Slate writer and a law professor, go so far as to assert
that Trump “lost the election by nearly three million votes,” a flatly
false statement since the election is not decided by aggregate popular
vote. (It’s like saying the 2016 World Series ended in a tie because the
Cubs and the Indians scored 27 runs apiece.)
To
say that the Electoral College should defer to the national popular
vote is an exercise in question-begging, one to which Dionne devotes a
full paragraph:
Yet defenders of the electoral college cannot claim that following the state results is an explicit “constitutional” obligation. The Constitution makes no mention of popular election of electors, leaving the manner of their selection to the states. It’s worth asking why the national popular vote should be seen as meaningless while the state-by-state popular vote should be regarded as sacred.
We’d
rephrase the question to use a less loaded term than “sacred,” but in
any case the answer is that in all of living memory—to be precise, in
every election since 1880—every state has allocated its electors on the
basis of popular vote. (In 1876 the Legislature of newly admitted
Colorado appointed the Centennial State’s electors.) Twice before, in
1888 and 2000, the losing candidate had a nationwide popular-vote
plurality, a statistical anomaly that had no bearing on the outcome.
The
Electoral College is consistent with the U.S.’s constitutional
character as a union of states. We suppose we can understand why one
might prefer direct nationwide election by popular vote, but the way to
achieve that would be through a constitutional amendment. Good luck with
that: It’s unlikely the requisite 38 states would agree to defer to
California (where Mrs. Clinton’s margin was more than four million,
meaning that Trump “won the popular vote” in the other 49 states
combined.)
The second argument is Trump is really, really bad. As
David Pozen, another law professor, puts it in another New York Times op-ed:
Many of Mr. Trump’s critics believe he is not just an embodiment of the unqualified trickster with “talents for low intrigue, and the little arts of popularity” feared by Hamilton; they believe he is a one-man constitutional crisis who empowers white nationalists, conflates his business interests with the public good and displays contempt for the rule of law. They fear he could use existing institutions to destroy our liberal democracy, just as autocrats have done abroad.
If
only Trump’s critics had thought to make those arguments during the
campaign! But of course they did, ad nauseam, and voters in 30 states
with 306 electoral votes, found them unconvincing, or at any rate less
convincing than the arguments against Mrs. Clinton, who by any
reasonable accounting is no bargain either. In other words, Pozen’s
argument is another exercise in begging the question.
The third argument is the claim of “Russian interference,” which this column
discussed Monday. Again, this was widely aired during the campaign, with Mrs. Clinton even calling Trump a “puppet” of Vladimir Putin during a
presidential debate. (Trump’s rejoinder: “You’re the puppet!”)
The
only new element of the Russia story is that the Central Intelligence
Agency reportedly has now expressed the opinion—in a secret report whose
existence somebody leaked to the press—that the Russians were trying to
help Trump win rather than just to cause general mischief. Other U.S.
intelligence agencies reportedly do not agree with the CIA.
So
we have reached a point where the liberal left wants to throw out the
results of an American election on the say-so of . . . the CIA! Frank
Church must be turning in his grave.
When
the electors meet on Monday, the outcome of their vote will be very
close to 305 for Trump, 232 for Mrs. Clinton and 1 for somebody else.
The “Animal House” crowd will have one more opportunity for a really
stupid and futile gesture—on Jan. 6, when Congress meets to certify the
results. One representative and one senator can raise an objection,
which both houses will then have to consider. It happened in 2005, as
CNN
reported at the time:
Alleging widespread “irregularities” on Election Day, a group of Democrats in Congress objected . . . to the counting of Ohio’s 20 electoral votes.
The challenge was defeated 267-31 by the House and 74-1 by the Senate, clearing the way for the joint session to count the votes from the remaining states.
The move was not designed to overturn Bush’s re-election, said Ohio Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones and California Sen. Barbara Boxer, who filed the objection.
Since
Republicans will retain majorities in both houses, no meritless
objection will be sustained next year either. Congress will certify the
result, and President Trump will be sworn in two weeks later. How will
the Times and the Post explain to their readers that all the news they
saw fit to print about faithless electors and congressional challenges
was fake?
False Flag Weekly News with Kevin Barrett and Prof. Tony Hall 2016.12.16
It’s a False Flag World Out There
Special Guest Hosts: Jim Fetzer and Scott Bennett
Kevin is on a working vacation and will be back in early January
Tony is engaged in a vital defense of the remnants of academic freedom in North American Universities. You will be hearing from him again on False Flag Weekly News.
Questioning Official Stories Is Not Hate Speech, It Is Free Speech.
Kevin's blog
TruthJihad.com
NoLiesRadio Archive
64k CF Download
Download From Archive.org
David Duke Show 2016.12.16
Today: Dr. Duke and Mark Collett Expose the Lies of the Jewish Media on Russian Hacking and the Jewish organized efforts to Destroy Richard Spencer's Family!
David's site
Rense Archive
56k CF Download
Download From Archive.org
Jeff Rense Radio Show - 2016.12.15
Jeff Rense is an American anti-New World Order activist. He hosts a website at Rense.com and is the radio talk-show host of the Jeff Rense Program. His show broadcasts on US satellite radio and internet radio. The website and show often discuss topics such as 9/11, World War II revisionism, Zionism, contemporary geopolitical developments, alternative medicines and some more eccentric aspects such as Ufology.
Listen Download Hour 1 - Det Jim Rothstein
Listen Download Hour 2 - Dr. Henry L. Niman - Bird Flu Report
Listen Download Hour 2 - Patricia Doyle - America Under Attack
56k CF
Rense's site
Download From Archive.org
Truth Hertz with Charles Giuliani 2016.12.16
Today: Charles deals with one of his favorite subjects – Bible dupes. He talks about how Christians call everyone else a cult, but refuse to acknowledge they are in a massive cult, by definition.
Renegade Broadcasting
Renegade Tribune
Renegade Archive for Truth Hertz
40k CF Download
Download From Archive.org
December 15, 2016
The Raw Deal With Jim Fetzer 2016.12.15
JamesFetzer.blogspot.com
The Raw Deal Archives *Rense
The Real Deal Archives *Blog
Today: Hey Jim! Mark Zuckerberg knows all about 9/11, JFK and the fake news. The guy is a Jewish Freemason. It makes you look bad when you pretend that you don't know that.
56k CF Download
Download From Archive.org
David Duke Show 2016.12.15
Today: Dr. Duke and Eric Striker on the Vicious Zio Propaganda against Assad on Behalf of ISIS!
David's site
Rense Archive
56k CF Download
Download From Archive.org
Truth Hertz with Charles Giuliani 2016.12.15
Today: Charles discusses the detrimental effects of circumcision regarding the sex lives of both men and women.
Renegade Broadcasting
Renegade Tribune
Renegade Archive for Truth Hertz
40k CF Download
Download From Archive.org
Jeff Rense Radio Show - 2016.12.14
Jeff Rense is an American anti-New World Order activist. He hosts a website at Rense.com and is the radio talk-show host of the Jeff Rense Program. His show broadcasts on US satellite radio and internet radio. The website and show often discuss topics such as 9/11, World War II revisionism, Zionism, contemporary geopolitical developments, alternative medicines and some more eccentric aspects such as Ufology.
Listen Download Hour 1 - James Fetzer - COUP Against America
Listen Download Hour 2 - David John Oates, Jim Marrs & Jeanette Teagle - Reverse Speech Solves The RFK Murder
Listen Download Hour 3 - David John Oates, Jim Marrs & Jeanette Teagle - Reverse Speech Solves The RFK Murder
56k CF
Rense's site
Download From Archive.org
December 14, 2016
The Conspiracy Guy with Jim Fetzer 2016.12.14
The Conspiracy Guy
JamesFetzer.blogspot.com
The Raw Deal Archives *Rense
The Real Deal Archives *Blog
Today: The atrocities of 9/11 were not as they have been presented to the American people through THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT (2004) and other venues. None of the 9/11 aircraft, for example, appear to have crashed on 9/11, where two were not even in the air and the other two were not taken out of service until four years later. A review of the evidence, in including research by Pilots for 9/11 Truth, confirms that this was a scam on the public, intended to motivate becoming involved wars in the Middle East to take out the modern Arab countries that were serving as a counterbalance to Israel’s domination of the region. Once understood, the importance of being able to sort out reality from illusion becomes apparent, where the alternative media has been the primary source of real news and the mainstream of fake.
64k CF Download
Download From Archive.org
Blackbird9's Breakfast Club Podcast # 52 - 2016.12.14
Selling Santa Claus Symbolism
Welcome to Blackbird9's Breakfast Club's Wednesday Podcast. In tonight's episode, Selling Santa Claus Symbolism, we look at the marketing of the Santa Claus meme that has become associated with Christmas.
In the First Hour Host Frederick C. Blackburn will cover the recent chaotic events brought on by the teachings of the Frankfurt School Marxists. Their mission: establish a greater Israel ruled by Globalism under the direction of Talmudic Noahide Law and at the same time force all other countries to surrender their independent sovereignty. Also, as we go into year two of Blackbird9's Breakfast Club, the host will discuss short term and long term goals for 2017.
In the Second Hour, the host looks at the history of the Santa Claus meme, analyzes the associated symbolism and discusses how these have been used in mass marketing especially in the USA. From the 1897 New York Sun's Yes, Virginia, There Is A Santa Claus editorial to the 2016 Bad Santa 2 movie. . . and everything in-between and beyond. . . Jews and non-Jews have embraced this fictional character and narrative to express a myriad of themes . . . and sell a ton of merchandise.
Keeping you up to date - One Knowledge Sphere at a time
Blackbird9's TradingPosts
BlackBird9's Chat
BB9 on Spreaker
Download
The Real World of Money with Andrew Gause 2016.12.14
Show Highlights: HERE
The Real World of Money Archive
Andy's site
64k CF Download
Download From Archive.org
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)