yeah expose .... don't just hook sandy on the fetzer ..... there's more to it than that .....try hooking uncle fetzer to 9/11 ..has the same effect they're all jew media fakery the jews run hollywood ... i think many are just pissed off that they were fooled by the t v on 9/11 and can't get over that ...just my humble observation .....
Snopes is run by two jewish democrats-Barbara and David Mikkelson, in So. Cal. Their site tracks to Pennsylvania. Snopes has been considered very unreliable for quite a while, and has been proven so by people/companies mentioned in their self acclaimed investigative reporting, otherwise known as "making it up as you go along."
*Still* the "Distraction Du Jour"? Why can't people realise that the more you focus on what can never be proved, the more divided it makes us all? It's a Psy-Op people! Only the target is all of us!
Amusing toon with a horrific future! More debate! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! The comment section is rather telling and quite interesting as well. Thanks for a goodie Chris.
Horst is persona non grata here at Mami's,and was banned from commenting for being a complete Dick last week. If he tries posting here again, it will be deleted as promised.
You mean the faking of his own suicide, or calling Fetzer a shill after his post-suicide appearance? The latter is why Fetzer isn't paying more attention to him.
But he has since cited Baker's video compositing "theory" as one of three theories, also mentioning the Webfairy (who made the CGI theory look ridiculous by having a James Bond song playing with a plane going in the tower and coming out as a dancing figure) and John Lear (who claims there are 2 billion entities living on the Moon and that Bigfoot is from Mars).
As for Baker's video presentation, when talking about Norman Mineta's testimony about Dick Cheney, Baker taints the information and his whole presentation with a cartoon of Cheney acting all ridiculous.
Sure, there are legitimate things raised in his presentation, but that's his MO -- to mix good with bad.
Just visited www.takeourworldback.com and read the "Top Ten Reasons: Jim Fetzer and John Friend are the Sunstein Shills"
Very good analysis.
Only one thing: the planes that hit WTC Towers were not AA and UA planes but military planes.
Watch the 3 videos that were posted on Nov. 27, 2013 by videorebel
www.videorebel.wordpress.com
September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor
In the first video, it explains that how the criminals used an aviation technology called "Plane Swap" to evade the detection from the air traffic controllers. The planes hit the Twin Towers were actually military planes. These videos are the best and most updated 9-11 documentary I have ever seen.
Your "Top Ten Reasons: Jim Fetzer and Friend are Sustein Shills" should go viral.
The "planes" that hit the WTC towers were military planes?
What about the "live" Fox helicopter shot of the plane's nose coming out the other side? It also comes out from another shot on the other side, so it's not just some glitch with the Fox feed.
Also, where is the plane in the wide pan shot before the zoom in? I can't find it.
And when comparing the Hezarkhani and Evan Fairbanks videos, why does a puff of smoke come out on the top of the left wing in one shot, and below the left wing in another?
Sandy Hook is only a psychological operation if you let it be one. What is all the fighting all about? Why can't people simply allow the other person to have their own opinion about an event that cannot be proven one way or another? And how is this effecting the movement? And just what is the movement by the way?
Having said that, if it can't be proven and as we know not one drop of blood was shown, why would you believe it ever happened? Wouldn't it be much easier to do such a psyop without spilling blood?
Perhaps the super rich are afraid to show their emotions and not having a common and homogenous society and no faith to fall back on they have to play it cool and need to have the entire event sanitized. That is the only explanation for me that could explain it happening and the bizarre way in which it was reported. So I guess that is possible. And if it is, perhaps that would be an interesting topic for examination and discussion.
So bottom line, if it happened or did not happen, we are extremely screwed. So what is their to fight about? Mark Glenn has made a fool of himself over this and from where I sit, he has created the infighting. So maybe we should take a closer look at him. Just sayin'.
The "planes" that hit the WTC towers were military planes?
What about the "live" Fox helicopter shot of the plane's nose coming out the other side? It also comes out from another shot on the other side, so it's not just some glitch with the Fox feed.
Also, where is the plane in the wide pan shot before the zoom in? I can't find it.
And when comparing the Hezarkhani and Evan Fairbanks videos, why does a puff of smoke come out on the top of the left wing in one shot, and below the left wing in another?
All i can say is: It's good to see that the "Muslim hi-jackers meme" has been de-bunked
16 comments:
Jim Fetzer and Friends are Sunstein Shills
http://www.takeourworldback.com/fetzersunstein.htm
Catch Chris Katko from NWO Cartoons
tomorrow night @ 5pm Central time.
Circus Maximus on Outside Radio
nice one chris
lol ...
yeah expose .... don't just hook sandy on the fetzer ..... there's more to it than that .....try hooking uncle fetzer to 9/11 ..has the same effect
they're all jew media fakery
the jews run hollywood ... i think many are just pissed off that they were fooled by the t v on 9/11 and can't get over that ...just my humble observation .....
Snopes is run by two jewish democrats-Barbara and David Mikkelson, in So. Cal. Their site tracks to Pennsylvania.
Snopes has been considered very unreliable for quite a while, and has been proven so by people/companies mentioned in their self acclaimed investigative reporting, otherwise known as "making it up as you go along."
LOL. That cartoon pretty much sums it up.
*Still* the "Distraction Du Jour"?
Why can't people realise that the more you focus on what can never be proved, the more divided it makes us all? It's a Psy-Op people! Only the target is all of us!
If you can't keep up with Jim Fetzer, it should not be an opportunity for some to criticize him.
He makes a lot of sense to me. My only criticism of him is that he doesn't pay enough attention to the great work Ace Baker has done.
John Friend should also ditch "September Clues or at least introduce Ace into the conversation when on the subject of 9/11.
The official story of Sandy Hook? Don't believe it.
Amusing toon with a horrific future! More debate! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! The comment section is rather telling and quite interesting as well. Thanks for a goodie Chris.
Ken Horst did you listen to the show? So far it's a slam dunk for Deanna. Only a troll would call her a Sunstein Shill
Horst is persona non grata here at Mami's,and was banned from commenting for being a complete Dick last week. If he tries posting here again, it will be deleted as promised.
Don Damore said:
"the great work Ace Baker has done."
You mean the faking of his own suicide, or calling Fetzer a shill after his post-suicide appearance? The latter is why Fetzer isn't paying more attention to him.
But he has since cited Baker's video compositing "theory" as one of three theories, also mentioning the Webfairy (who made the CGI theory look ridiculous by having a James Bond song playing with a plane going in the tower and coming out as a dancing figure) and John Lear (who claims there are 2 billion entities living on the Moon and that Bigfoot is from Mars).
As for Baker's video presentation, when talking about Norman Mineta's testimony about Dick Cheney, Baker taints the information and his whole presentation with a cartoon of Cheney acting all ridiculous.
Sure, there are legitimate things raised in his presentation, but that's his MO -- to mix good with bad.
@ Expose Supremacists
Just visited www.takeourworldback.com and read the "Top Ten Reasons: Jim Fetzer and John Friend are the Sunstein Shills"
Very good analysis.
Only one thing: the planes that hit WTC Towers were not AA and UA planes but military planes.
Watch the 3 videos that were posted on Nov. 27, 2013 by videorebel
www.videorebel.wordpress.com
September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor
In the first video, it explains that how the criminals used an aviation technology called "Plane Swap" to evade the detection from the air traffic controllers. The planes hit the Twin Towers were actually military planes. These videos are the best and most updated 9-11 documentary I have ever seen.
Your "Top Ten Reasons: Jim Fetzer and Friend are Sustein Shills" should go viral.
@SmashEvil:
The "planes" that hit the WTC towers were military planes?
What about the "live" Fox helicopter shot of the plane's nose coming out the other side? It also comes out from another shot on the other side, so it's not just some glitch with the Fox feed.
Also, where is the plane in the wide pan shot before the zoom in? I can't find it.
And when comparing the Hezarkhani and Evan Fairbanks videos, why does a puff of smoke come out on the top of the left wing in one shot, and below the left wing in another?
Sandy Hook is only a psychological operation if you let it be one. What is all the fighting all about? Why can't people simply allow the other person to have their own opinion about an event that cannot be proven one way or another? And how is this effecting the movement? And just what is the movement by the way?
Having said that, if it can't be proven and as we know not one drop of blood was shown, why would you believe it ever happened? Wouldn't it be much easier to do such a psyop without spilling blood?
Perhaps the super rich are afraid to show their emotions and not having a common and homogenous society and no faith to fall back on they have to play it cool and need to have the entire event sanitized. That is the only explanation for me that could explain it happening and the bizarre way in which it was reported. So I guess that is possible. And if it is, perhaps that would be an interesting topic for examination and discussion.
So bottom line, if it happened or did not happen, we are extremely screwed. So what is their to fight about? Mark Glenn has made a fool of himself over this and from where I sit, he has created the infighting. So maybe we should take a closer look at him. Just sayin'.
FauxCapitalist said...
@SmashEvil:
The "planes" that hit the WTC towers were military planes?
What about the "live" Fox helicopter shot of the plane's nose coming out the other side? It also comes out from another shot on the other side, so it's not just some glitch with the Fox feed.
Also, where is the plane in the wide pan shot before the zoom in? I can't find it.
And when comparing the Hezarkhani and Evan Fairbanks videos, why does a puff of smoke come out on the top of the left wing in one shot, and below the left wing in another?
All i can say is: It's good to see that the "Muslim hi-jackers meme" has been de-bunked
Post a Comment