Just like with Trump both the politics and the media reaction are being ignore in this uber ultra skeptical broadcast.
The referendum didn't happen because the Jews who already are in control and already are 100% pro EU (London absolutely didn't vote leave!!) wanted to derail themselves on purpose just so they can spend years making their own institutions in the media and finance world look stupid and broken - for crying out loud.
The referendum was called because Cameron piggy-lips was facing pressure from his right flank who were getting pressure from UKIP. Initially it was perfect because it destroyed UKIP in the UK parliament - BUT nobody thought the referendum would be yes. Nobody. Period. And its a lie to go back and cast all these runes and see a hidden jew inside it the whole time. It also utterly devalues anything white/Europeans acheive as tainted from the get-go and we're too stupid to change it...
The only people who wanted Trump to run as the Republican candidate were the Democrats and a handful of Jews - from the establishment I mean.
I'm not saying those factions don't exist I'm saying if they do exist and they are fighting then WE should use that to divide and conquer (((THEM))) for a change. Not be paralysed from action because we must remain uber critical. We'll never win that way and worst of all we'll have missed this opportunity to get one over on (((them)) using their own medicine...
Alan says 'Jews control the Tories so no one would pressure Cameron to act against their wishes' - fine, but I would argue throwing out that bone was in their interest right up until the result came. Otherwise Alan would have us belive a power hungry cretin like Cameron deliberately sabotaged his prime ministership after winning an unlikely election and putting the Tories in power for years. Where's the speculation about that? These broadcasts tend to be heavy with both factual background and non sequitur speculation that appear related and relevant...
Zap: Intellectual antifa Brendon O'Connell recently mentioned briefly that the major split among Jews is between 'American' and 'Israeli/Russian' factions, which makes a certain amount of sense. Also, note that Mahathir is taking Malaysia 'cashless' (11:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXd6fIsdUNA
Thank you all for your comments and feedback, they are much appreciated. I would like to respond to a few of the critical points made here.
"Alan would have us believe a power hungry cretin like Cameron deliberately sabotaged his prime ministership after winning an unlikely election and putting the Tories in power for years. Where's the speculation about that?"
The prime ministership is not the be all and end all. Cameron was not really in power, because politics is not the top of the hierarchy. The Jewish financials control everything and although the members of the Jewish establishment who take roles in politics are rewarded well for a difficult role, i do not believe that it's as important as, say, media roles, roles in finance and even roles in some NGOs and "charities" as far as the Jewish establishment goes. I believe that the benefit of blaming whatever catastrophe - supposedly resulting from the Brexit referendum - on the indigenous nationalist British people is far more valuable to long-term Jewish goals. Politicians are little more than actors in a theatre in my assessment, and these actors, like in movies, are sometimes killed off prematurely.
"I'm not saying those factions don't exist I'm saying if they do exist and they are fighting then WE should use that to divide and conquer (((THEM))) for a change."
I think the division within the Jewry is more or less non-existent, and that any publicised division, like between pro- and anti-Zionist, is purely for the consumption of the goyim, to keep us confused as to the Jews' real ambitions. The outward perception of disunity among the Jews is extremely beneficial to them.
I doubt very much that the elite Jews at the top are all holding hands and singing kumbaya. After all, duality is the nature of this plane of existence.
I think that while they might have different thoughts on which tactics to adopt in order to obtain the final goals as described in the Protocols, they also have a strictly-observed hierarchy, leaving large-scale decision-making in the hands of a very small number of them. I don't think duality is in the Jews' nature. I think they have survived and thrived throughout history through their unity, organisation and through the observation of their hierarchy.
Well at least you doubled down on the speculation good stuff. So being PM is not that important huh? Ever met a politician?
Further, if the financial jews own and control everything why even bother having a parliament??
I too would encourage you to keep posting, and I even a request: you trash everyone from Corbyn to Assads wife to UKIP but don't mention all of that comes from London. Your city. I think you should do a show on that disgusting cesspit ...
You're very welcome to disagree with me of course, but i really don't see that being PM is that important. Not as important as many positions held within the country. After all it is a very temporary role. People own newspapers for 50 years. People run all sorts of corporations for decades, and then pass those corporations down to their children. I'm sure that politicians act full of their own importance, but they also know their place. I think that the PM is largely-speaking a figurehead, to absorb criticism and deflect attention from the people really pulling the strings. Why do we have a parliament? For the same reason as we have 2/3 major political parties instead of just 1; to give the goyim public an illusion of control over who gets to run their countries.
I'm no fan of London either, though i'm not sure i could make an effective episode out of purely focusing on London but i'll give it some thought thanks.
Murdoch and Maxwell spent all their time trying to control the PM or the parties. Why if it's so immaterial? And politicians spend decades getting to be PM, you might think its pointless but they don't so why would Cameron or Macron deliberately trash themselves?
I really don't follow your logic. Are you saying that because Murdoch and Maxwell made some effort to control politicians that it somehow proves that politicians come higher up in the Jewish pecking order than media moguls? Do you think George Osborne leaving politics to run the Evening Standard was a demotion? Do you think that David Milliband leaving politics to run the IRC was a demotion? I dispute that they were. The former prime minister of Denmark, who would surely have had a long career in politics if she wanted, instead now runs Save the Children International. I would also say that these kind of characters are still no-where near the top of the pyramid. Whereas Jacob Rothschild, who has never won any election and never held a public office, certainly is far higher up. I think some porn producers and child traffickers come higher up in the pecking order than politicians, honestly. What's important is how much progress can be made towards the final Jewish goals.
I don't see what Cameron or Macron have done as deliberately trashing themselves, although i'm not sure what you mean when you say that. Cameron came out of Brexit looking pretty good, albeit without his job, which he voluntarily resigned. However, i don't think it's important for these kind of people how they are viewed by the goyim public. I believe they only care about their standing within the tribe. Unlike the goyim - disunited, individualistic - to these tribespeople the tribe means everything. If it's in the tribe's interest that their individuals resign their public positions in politics for tactical reasons, they are rewarded with an equal or better role.
Well we certainly disagree - running Save the Children vs running one of the oldest and wealthiest countries in Europe? Running The Nobody Cares About Newspapers is more important than being little big chief of the oldest parliament in the world? Sure.
Thanks for clarifying your position Alan, I suspected it was so cynical that the baby was getting thrown out.
15 comments:
Just like with Trump both the politics and the media reaction are being ignore in this uber ultra skeptical broadcast.
The referendum didn't happen because the Jews who already are in control and already are 100% pro EU (London absolutely didn't vote leave!!) wanted to derail themselves on purpose just so they can spend years making their own institutions in the media and finance world look stupid and broken - for crying out loud.
The referendum was called because Cameron piggy-lips was facing pressure from his right flank who were getting pressure from UKIP. Initially it was perfect because it destroyed UKIP in the UK parliament - BUT nobody thought the referendum would be yes. Nobody. Period. And its a lie to go back and cast all these runes and see a hidden jew inside it the whole time. It also utterly devalues anything white/Europeans acheive as tainted from the get-go and we're too stupid to change it...
The only people who wanted Trump to run as the Republican candidate were the Democrats and a handful of Jews - from the establishment I mean.
If the Trump election taught us something is that there are two distinct factions of Jews clearly at odds with each other.
Why would it not be the case with the brexit vote?
https://grizzom.blogspot.com/2016/06/brexit-another-jewish-dialectic.html
I'm not saying those factions don't exist I'm saying if they do exist and they are fighting then WE should use that to divide and conquer (((THEM))) for a change. Not be paralysed from action because we must remain uber critical. We'll never win that way and worst of all we'll have missed this opportunity to get one over on (((them)) using their own medicine...
Alan says 'Jews control the Tories so no one would pressure Cameron to act against their wishes' - fine, but I would argue throwing out that bone was in their interest right up until the result came. Otherwise Alan would have us belive a power hungry cretin like Cameron deliberately sabotaged his prime ministership after winning an unlikely election and putting the Tories in power for years. Where's the speculation about that? These broadcasts tend to be heavy with both factual background and non sequitur speculation that appear related and relevant...
Zap: Intellectual antifa Brendon O'Connell recently mentioned briefly that the major split among Jews is between 'American' and 'Israeli/Russian' factions, which makes a certain amount of sense. Also, note that Mahathir is taking Malaysia 'cashless' (11:00):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXd6fIsdUNA
What's the difference between Russian/Israeli Jew and Russian/American Jew? OConnell is fraud.
Just like ZioJones - what's the only day infowars doesn't broadcast? The Lords day Sunday? Nope, Sabbathday
Thank you all for your comments and feedback, they are much appreciated. I would like to respond to a few of the critical points made here.
"Alan would have us believe a power hungry cretin like Cameron deliberately sabotaged his prime ministership after winning an unlikely election and putting the Tories in power for years. Where's the speculation about that?"
The prime ministership is not the be all and end all. Cameron was not really in power, because politics is not the top of the hierarchy. The Jewish financials control everything and although the members of the Jewish establishment who take roles in politics are rewarded well for a difficult role, i do not believe that it's as important as, say, media roles, roles in finance and even roles in some NGOs and "charities" as far as the Jewish establishment goes. I believe that the benefit of blaming whatever catastrophe - supposedly resulting from the Brexit referendum - on the indigenous nationalist British people is far more valuable to long-term Jewish goals. Politicians are little more than actors in a theatre in my assessment, and these actors, like in movies, are sometimes killed off prematurely.
"I'm not saying those factions don't exist I'm saying if they do exist and they are fighting then WE should use that to divide and conquer (((THEM))) for a change."
I think the division within the Jewry is more or less non-existent, and that any publicised division, like between pro- and anti-Zionist, is purely for the consumption of the goyim, to keep us confused as to the Jews' real ambitions. The outward perception of disunity among the Jews is extremely beneficial to them.
I doubt very much that the elite Jews at the top are all holding hands and singing kumbaya. After all, duality is the nature of this plane of existence.
I think that while they might have different thoughts on which tactics to adopt in order to obtain the final goals as described in the Protocols, they also have a strictly-observed hierarchy, leaving large-scale decision-making in the hands of a very small number of them. I don't think duality is in the Jews' nature. I think they have survived and thrived throughout history through their unity, organisation and through the observation of their hierarchy.
Alan - I enjoy your shows and insights.
Keep them coming.
Cheers
Well at least you doubled down on the speculation good stuff. So being PM is not that important huh? Ever met a politician?
Further, if the financial jews own and control everything why even bother having a parliament??
I too would encourage you to keep posting, and I even a request: you trash everyone from Corbyn to Assads wife to UKIP but don't mention all of that comes from London. Your city. I think you should do a show on that disgusting cesspit ...
You're very welcome to disagree with me of course, but i really don't see that being PM is that important. Not as important as many positions held within the country. After all it is a very temporary role. People own newspapers for 50 years. People run all sorts of corporations for decades, and then pass those corporations down to their children. I'm sure that politicians act full of their own importance, but they also know their place. I think that the PM is largely-speaking a figurehead, to absorb criticism and deflect attention from the people really pulling the strings. Why do we have a parliament? For the same reason as we have 2/3 major political parties instead of just 1; to give the goyim public an illusion of control over who gets to run their countries.
I'm no fan of London either, though i'm not sure i could make an effective episode out of purely focusing on London but i'll give it some thought thanks.
Murdoch and Maxwell spent all their time trying to control the PM or the parties. Why if it's so immaterial? And politicians spend decades getting to be PM, you might think its pointless but they don't so why would Cameron or Macron deliberately trash themselves?
I really don't follow your logic. Are you saying that because Murdoch and Maxwell made some effort to control politicians that it somehow proves that politicians come higher up in the Jewish pecking order than media moguls? Do you think George Osborne leaving politics to run the Evening Standard was a demotion? Do you think that David Milliband leaving politics to run the IRC was a demotion? I dispute that they were. The former prime minister of Denmark, who would surely have had a long career in politics if she wanted, instead now runs Save the Children International. I would also say that these kind of characters are still no-where near the top of the pyramid. Whereas Jacob Rothschild, who has never won any election and never held a public office, certainly is far higher up. I think some porn producers and child traffickers come higher up in the pecking order than politicians, honestly. What's important is how much progress can be made towards the final Jewish goals.
I don't see what Cameron or Macron have done as deliberately trashing themselves, although i'm not sure what you mean when you say that. Cameron came out of Brexit looking pretty good, albeit without his job, which he voluntarily resigned. However, i don't think it's important for these kind of people how they are viewed by the goyim public. I believe they only care about their standing within the tribe. Unlike the goyim - disunited, individualistic - to these tribespeople the tribe means everything. If it's in the tribe's interest that their individuals resign their public positions in politics for tactical reasons, they are rewarded with an equal or better role.
Well we certainly disagree - running Save the Children vs running one of the oldest and wealthiest countries in Europe? Running The Nobody Cares About Newspapers is more important than being little big chief of the oldest parliament in the world? Sure.
Thanks for clarifying your position Alan, I suspected it was so cynical that the baby was getting thrown out.
Post a Comment