April 17, 2019

Is the US Preparing to Attack Iran for Israel?


I've never heard a former high level official talk like this.  A must see...


10 comments:

Red Orchid said...

"So newly reelected Israeli monster-in-chief Benjamin Netanyahu has boasted, with a grin, that America’s President Donald J. Trump followed through on his proposal to declare the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) a terrorist group. Bibi was smiling because the timing of the move, one day before the Israeli election, strongly suggests it was done to assist him against what had become a very strong opposition challenge. That Trump likely colluded with Netanyahu to blatantly interfere in the election has apparently bothered no one in Israel or in the tame American media.

The gift from Washington came on top of recognizing Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, threatening members of the International Criminal Court if they try to prosecute Israel for war crimes, moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem, removing the word “occupation” from the State Department’s assessments of human rights infringements on the West Bank, eliminating relief funding for Palestinian refugees, leaving the U.N. Human Rights Council because it was too critical of Israel, and looking the other way as Israel declared itself a state only for Jews. Washington also ignored the bombing of hospitals, schools and water treatment infrastructure in
Gaza while Israeli army snipers were shooting unarmed demonstrators demanding their freedom".
__________________________________________________________________________________

Philip Giraldi, latest article at unz.com that happens to be down right now. Made a PDF of this as I do with all great articles. I salute you Mr Giraldi. As for Trump...he's mad enough to go to war for Israel

Red Orchid said...

"As social democracy became ascendant, Jewish strategies to maintain privileges and security had to make significant adaptations. Most obviously, social democracy was ostensibly the move to protect mass interests over those of an elite. Since Jews were an intimate part of the elite, this would necessarily lead to a decline in power, unless Jews could undergo a transformation in the popular mind into a more generic “mercantile elite,” “bourgeois elite,” or even most audaciously, masquerade as part of the proletariat. It was in eastern Europe that the clash between Jews and the interests of the masses became most acute. Faced with increased calls for freedom and democratic representation, the Tsars sided with the masses rather than the Jews, freeing the serfs and withdrawing protections and privileges from Jews. I would argue that this move, rather than the specific content of Bolshevism or Communism, was the most decisive factor in the eventual rise of the Jews against the Tsar and the Russian aristocracy during the Bolshevik revolution. The apparently incongruous position of Jews fighting alongside the peasant class against the elite wasn’t altogether lost on contemporaries. As one Ukrainian Communist put it in 1876, “The weight of the Jews’exploitation is great and their harmfulness unlimited … If we find it possible to preach revolution, and only revolution against the nobles, how can we defend the Jews?”[4] But Jews did want to be defended, and if they weren’t going to be defended by the Tsar, and they couldn’t trust the masses, then they would simply disguise themselves as part of the proletariat (Proudhon’s “secret spies”) and establish their protections and privileges themselves.

These measures reach a level of protection for Jews not seen since the immediate aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution, and only contribute to the growing reality that much of our politics now seems to exclusively revolve around the issue of anti-Semitism. It used to be the case that Jews considered everything within the framework “Is this good for the Jews?” Today, it seems that our governments, media, and academia are preoccupied with the same question. This reality, of course, clashes dramatically with the narrative that Jews have no overarching influence in our politics and society. On this note, I might add that I was recently axed from Twitter for the ninth time. On my last two Twitter accounts, I pursued a strategy of presenting such glaring contradictions in short, witty comments – just enough information to make the point clearly, and just enough humor to make it stick in the mind. In very short periods of time, I amassed many thousands of followers before the accounts were invariably suspended for “targeted harassment” even though I never interacted with other users, and merely presented facts or witticisms. I don’t think I will now return to Twitter, but one of my last parting shots, before being reported by a delusional neurotic named Gabe Hoffman (who apparently claimed I insulted him personally, without evidence, despite the fact I never interacted with other users), was:

Red Orchid said...

Jews are the most oppressed people in history and I know this because they used their extraordinary wealth, their near monopoly of mass media, their massive political influence, and their censorship of alternative viewpoints to make sure I got the message.
This is the central paradox of our time. Jews enjoy extraordinary privileges while presenting themselves as the most oppressed people in history. Were they oppressed when they lived in the fortress in Lincoln? When they received the personal protection of King John? When they received charters and special protections to live in the German principalities, complete with reinforced walls for the streets in which they lived? When they intermarried with the aristocracy? Were they oppressed when the Tsar and his family were butchered? Were they oppressed when they made anti-Semitism illegal, had show trials against anti-Semites around Russia, and flooded the schools and universities with information on how marvellous they truly are? Are they oppressed when they produce legislation for the European Union and have it imposed at their will? Are they oppressed when they dictate to Big Tech what is and isn’t allowed on their platforms, under legal penalty? Are they oppressed when they demand a percentage of the GDP of each one of our nations to protect them? Are they oppressed when a leading figure at the U.S. State Department says: “The world’s greatest power is focused, by law and design, on protecting the Jews.”
No. They are not oppressed. Oppression is having your hands cut off by the King’s men because you refused to pay your debt to Aaron the
Jew. Oppression is being told what you can’t say in your country, your own land that your fathers sweat and bled on in the hope that you could one day walk on that soil a free man. Oppression is being made to hand over your taxes and a percentage of your GDP, without any vote taking place on the matter, so that it can be passed to a population already influential and extraordinarily wealthy. Oppression is being banned from participating in politics because you happen to object to the influence of foreign actors in the business of your own people and country. Oppression is when the wealthy and powerful use their influence to starve you financially into submission to their interests. Oppression is when you go to prison because you disagree with something written in the history books.

Andrew Joyce unz.com Part of his very informative essay

Red Orchid said...

This presentation is a year old. America and Trump has gotten a lot crazier since then.

Forge The Bond said...

Keep in mind that The Deep State will never allow Trump to be the figurehead for such a crucial war (from the Global Zionist perspective) - unless they can engineer it to be a massive fail to hang around his neck. An outcome that the Netanyahu neocon crowd cannot afford, since it would postpone a rematch *indefinitely*.

It's more likely that a "savior" who defeats Trump in 2020 would have the widespread approval of both an ecstatic media and euphoric sheeple to make an 'heroic' bold move against Iran. Hillary may the man for that dirty deed.

Voltman said...

Trump, the Criminal-in-Chief, says Israelis should be immune from International Criminal Court prosecution
Ron Kampeas – JTA April 12, 2019


The super criminals officially declared themselves immune from the ICC around 2001.

They HAVE to be immune! Otherwise, the US government, israeli government and british government along with all the shitheads in Shitstream Media would be rotting away in these concentration camps they've built for all these
vicious antisemitic dissidents.

https://www.jta.org/quick-reads

JTA - Jewish Telegraphic Agency?
What do these dummies do? Operate telegraphs?
I guess they haven't heard of the telephone yet...

A primitive mind is all they are!

The real criminals fucking everything up on this planet will declare all dissidents criminal!

Criminal Mind - Gowan
STYX - A Criminal Mind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDFjaIlp74A

Society is spared the knowledge that it is under constant attack by the Cabalist central banking cartel.

Sounds crazy but this is the most important information out there. The Notre Dame Cathedral fire is but the latest in a long list that will continue to grow.

The list below is not meant to be detailed or exhaustive but to simply provide a template with which to see history and current events.

The Satanist (Cabalist) central bankers are extending their credit monopoly into a monopoly over everything.

They are dispossessing humanity and establishing a world Communist police state.

Mind-Controlled Prisoners of a Death Cult - We Are
https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/04/Ten-Ways-We-Are-Enslaved%20.html

Scorpio said...

Great comments Red Orchid.
I don't think there's anyone out there that can beat DJT right now.
Bernie is probably the best bet but I think Amerikwa's socialist transformation is still a few election cycles away but it's a comin'.
Hilldog is already a 2 time loser and (cough cough) I don't think she's in such great health unless they hatch another clone at the underground base.

Scorpio said...

Just saw your comments, Voltman - great stuff as usual.
Cheers

Voltman said...

Thanks Scorpio.

Scorpio said...

Yeah, MS - since 2008. That's when I first heard about it.
Hearing a high level official talking in such a manner is quite unique, for the most part.