October 21, 2019

Merkel Admits German Multiculturalism Has "Utterly Failed"

German Chancellor Angela Merkel says her attempt to create a multicultural society has "utterly failed," and that too little had been required of immigrants who refuse to integrate into German culture.

Merkel told an audience of young members of her Christian Democrats (CDU) that allowing people of differing cultural backgrounds to live side by side without such integration was a huge mistake, according to Reuters, which notes that approximately four million Muslims live in the country.

"This (multicultural) approach has failed, utterly failed," said Merkel during the meeting in Potsdam, south of Berlin.

Merkel faces pressure from within her CDU to take a tougher line on immigrants who don’t show a willingness to adapt to German society and her comments appeared intended to pacify her critics.

She said too little had been required of immigrants in the past and repeated her usual line that they should learn German in order to get by in school and have opportunities on the labor market. -Reuters

1 comment:

slurp said...

There's always a little hoopla in our circles when a politician says, 'Multiculturalism has failed,' and we've been slow to explain what that pol actually does mean. When Cameron, Sarkozy and Merkel [this time - plus that one time a few years ago], say 'multiculturalism has failed' we should all recognise what they mean by 'multiculturalism'.

They are talking about a specific strategy of easing into Western societies non-Western peoples, of making it easier - for these Asians and Africans principally, to be here and feel welcomed and respected.


You see in the above link that Will Kymlicka is the major 'thinker' behind this particular ideology, adopted as a strategy by politicians, for making native Western peoples feel accommodative to invaders, and invaders comfortable that they need not reject their own native cultures. It is his ideas these politicians are rejecting.

These politicians are saying we were too accepting of their norms and did not make enough demands that they conform to our relatively moderate standards of welfare-funded rapiness, murderousness, gangsterism, terrorism and mayhem. How generous of our 'leaders.'

They are not saying, 'it turns out we cannot all live together peaceably,' and that we therefore face the choices of separation or eternal conflict. They are saying, 'we can all live together [and race-mix the Whites out of existence], but we need a new model.'

[We can speculate with little doubt of hitting the nail true why his ideas were ever adopted in the first place - it eased mass-non White invasion; and why it is now being discarded - it allows a cultural assault on Muslims such as White natives have endured. And we know the one demographic that benefits from both].

They are just talking about the failure of their first preferred primary social engineering strategy for managing the race-replacement of our peoples as regarded the invasive groups. Some other strategy will follow.

Their first preferred primary social engineering strategy for managing the race-replacement of our peoples as regards the natives was to call them racist and that also is failing. We should be more worried about that new strategy, because I think it's going to bodily-invasive if it isn't already.