October 20, 2019

Over a Barrel Documentary (2019)



25 comments:

zapoper said...

Where do they get that $16 million over ten years figure? @ 29m21s, I only see $16 089 not 16 million.

Adanac said...

At the top heading you will see (thousands CAD) so you need to add three zeros.

zapoper said...

Thanks Chain. I did not notice it. Thanks also for alerting me to that doc.

Adanac said...

No problem Zap.Thanks for doing what you do!

Liam said...

Do we still believe oil is a fossil fuel?
Do Canadians really believe it is their oil?

Adanac said...

1.No I don't think its a FF
2. Alberta grants oil and gas leases and receives oil and gas royalties.No? I think under that arrangement The people do benefit. There is of coarse in Canada no Private property rights. We are just "privileged"enough to rent our property with the illusion of ownership.

Liam said...

"Alberta grants oil and gas leases and receives oil and gas royalties.No?"
OK, thanks for telling me, to who does Alberta grants oil and gas leases?

Adanac said...

I not sure but a cursory search netted this result, https://thedrillings.com/entities/by-location/can This is Canada wide so in includes other provinces too.

Tero said...

WHAT - Oil is not made from dead dinosaurs?

Liam said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Liam said...

@ Tero Did you miss the memo? It comes from live dinosaur's farts.

Adanac said...

Liam are you still paying your taxes? LOL I agree with you in principle. Unfortunately you are going up against the crime families who run "The Crown". I know how this story ends. They might let you run one of their rides if you can be as entertaining as this guy LOL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjlC02NsIt0

Adanac said...

Tomorrow people who go out and vote are "electors" under the elctions act. We are "drivers" under the motor vehicle act,etc. We are always redefined into legal fictions in each and every act of Parliament. To do what you advocate for (and i stand with you brother) we need to walk away from the current society. This is a fantasy because most have zero knowledge of this scam. Statutes are contracts but these statutes are contracts presented to the body politic as "laws". If you think they are going to let you stroll in and start calling the tune I dont know what to tell you. We belong to the "law society". Now if we could form a consensus and light our torches and ready our pitchforks join as one as a nation under God and show up in Ottawa to dissolve Parliament as sovereign people that reject this Roman law based slave system then we would be on our way to real freedom. What day and time are we going to tell the nation to be there at?

Adanac said...

Maybe between you and I we could figure out how many legal maxims still apply to our legal system that is still so heavily tied to ancient Roman Law in its basic principles and foundations. http://www.inrebus.com/legalmaxims_a.php. Ask yourself why are we still using legal maxims from times when slavery was common and accepted? When there was status that categorized you as free or in servatude. We are still in a slave system.
This is at the core of your argument. Voluntary servitude is not against the law. Through legal maxims and the right of contract they continue to run a legal matrix in this so called progressive society that has come so far in recognizing the rights of individuals. The law is supposed to be in unequivocal english. Our legal system is not unequivocal. Most people if not all are wards of the state. We have been turned into the cattle/animals that the rule obsessed talmudics that run this planet say we are. I'm convinced that the term Monster found in the Blacks law dictionary is being applied to this segment of the population. So fascinating......

Adanac said...

Monsters are us not them just to clarify that last sentence..

MONSTER
A prodigious birth; a human birth or offspring not having the shape of mankind, which cannot be heir to any land, albeit it be brought forth in marriage. Bract fol. 5; Co. Litt. 7, 8; 2 Bl. Comm. 246.

Liam said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Adanac said...

Liam i am indeed referring to income tax. If you are wage slave and not self employed your social insurance number that was attached to the income tax act in 1963 makes you a government employee.You are subject to the income tax act by contract. It gets into the whole contract of service or contract for hire debate/scheme. Not going to get into that. However being self employed is only a slight edge in the argument. I have studied this for years and can tell you at present this fancy lingo and perverted interpretation will not bring you freedom. I really wish it would. We need to stand up as group. Individuals on a case by case basis just are not having any success. Its empowering to think otherwise until the reality starts coming back into view.I do wish you well on your journey an I am cheering for you. Do you have any victories to report against the CRA concerning income tax? I will say i ran 2 businesses over 12 years and found that I was able to get hefty amounts of tax back. So it seems they have found a way to keep that segment of taxpayers in the population appeased LOL

Liam said...

"the income tax act in 1963 makes you a government employee" Please provide evidence that I am a government employee and the terms of the agreement and the subsequent remuneration agreed upon to be paid to my bank account.

"subject to the income tax act by contract". Please provide evidence that I agreed, in writing, to all terms of the contract, after being provided full disclosure, that has my wet ink signature making it binding.

I agree to being subject to these conditions. Is not the contract, under contract law, required to be entered into with my consent, without duress to be binding?

"segment of taxpayers in the population appeased LOL" again, by consent.

Liam said...

Of course, I am a slave, by my consent, to be in this great northern land.

Adanac said...

Hey Liam. Don't get me wrong I think what you are doing is great. Everyone should have an understanding of this stuff. I dont mean to make my posts sound like I'm in a pissing match with you. I'm just sharing my findings fron my own research.

, "the income tax act in 1963 makes you a government employee" I said the social insurance act was attached to the income tax act in 1963. If you use a SIN you have been tricked into being a Gov employee.The way the income tax is written and if you follow the progression of its structure you will find its an "internal tax" that really only applies to Gov employees. Here's the thing Liam we can be right all day long, but we are dealing with the mafia and from an individual case basis you are challenging the whole system. They use their perceived authority and the notion of plausible deniability to their benefit.

Liam "I agree to being subject to these conditions. Is not the contract, under contract law, required to be entered into with my consent, without duress to be binding?" It is the concept of tacit agreement that has got the nation/nations into trouble.

“He who does not deny, admits.” (Qui non negat fatetur. – Black’s Law Dictionary Revised 4th Edition page 1414).

“An error which is not resisted or opposed is approved.” (Error qui non resistitur approbatur – Black’s Law Dictionary Revised 4th Edition page 639).

Yes of course we are all slaves. Some people get upset about this. There is a way out of this mess. It is possible but extremely difficult do fight and win. Through the right of contract you can pick and choose how much infringement you can live with and consent to.

In all these statutes you are almost always redefined into some other legal fiction in addition to the legal fiction created on your birth certificate. Its all very fascinating :)




Adanac said...

Liam i see you are deleting comments. That is not acting in honor :) It misrepresents the timeline. That is something I would expect from our masters not from my brother LOL

Adanac said...

Here is an interesting video I watched years ago and illustrates some of the historic deceit in Canada. Its a good starting point for further research for those just entering into this labyrinth The second video deals more with statute creation and you place in them. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THuf65W7gSI Like most important and deceit ridden organizations a person within it that has a little knowledge can find himself in a pickle :)

This one is by Russ Porisky who currently serving a 5 1/2 year sentence for tax evasion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUs2MW6a9aQ

Liam said...

I do not and will not perceive your posts to sound like we are in a pissing match and same said for you, I trust. I am not arguing or competing in anyway. Learning to ensure self-protection is all. I comprehend tacit agreement.
"Liam i see you are deleting comments. That is not acting in honor." That is your opinion and always welcomed. I reserve the right to delete or add to my comments, if this site provides such facility. This is a private site and terms and conditions do apply.
I will watch the utubes you have provided and am aware of a 50+ woman serving 4.5 years for teaching people about tax in Canada. Apparently, the judge described her as belligerent to the end. Corporate courts are no place to enter into willingly.
Do you know of Cal Washington and the NOL processes he and his group are perusing here, US, Australia, NZ and some of Europe?

Liam said...

^^Cal Washington and the NOL processes he and his group are pursuing here.

Adanac said...

Yeah well i'M Canadian so I/we have to work within our own frameworks to arrive at the truth of the scam perpetrated within our jurisdiction. Peace Liam.
Liam said " I reserve the right to delete or add to my comments, if this site provides such facility. This is a private site and terms and conditions do apply." I do not agree with this as a country bumpkin LOL