November 25, 2020

The Brizer Show 2020.11.23



Brizer's guest: John Waters.


Cornwall Stream

thebrizershow@mail.com


36 comments:

Zeebra said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Zeebra said...

Brizer, nice job w the kind/gentle pushback when John evoked the WW2 myths which we're all taught in skool & continually bludgeoned with thru adult life.

& great show overall

those who like John Waters, he & vlogger Dave Cullen have done several interviews together, this search will pull them all up:

https://www.youtube.com/c/LACK78/search?query=waters

John Miller said...

"The Brizer Show"
Interesting, as always.

Walter Crick, British Manufacturer, in the Northampton:

"Jews can destroy empires by means of finance. Jews are International.
Control of credits in this country is not in the hands of the English, but of Jews. It has become the biggest danger the Brits ever had to face."

John Miller said...

apropos... Jew control of credit/finances

Also in Germany after WW I 1918, it has become the biggest danger this country ever faced.

So, in 1933 the German people voted, in free democratic elections, the National Social German Workers Party into government.

Control of finances/economy and media went immediately into German hands !
Jew bankers left Germany, went to USA and Great Britain

The rest is history with tens of millions of innocent people that lost their lives.

International Jew banksters planned to destroy Germany, the 'American' Jew Theodor Kaufman tells the world with his book : "Germany Must Perish" !!

And the British News Paper...and American Papers, had these headlines

Daily Express
Friday, March 24, 1933 (!!)

JUDEA DECLARES WAR ON GERMANY
Jews Of All The World Unite In Action

John Miller said...

Btw...

Jew Bolshevik Communist Antifa Red Rats, were looting, burning and most of all, were murdering thousands of innocent Germans citizens just because they voted a patriotic party into government

But brave Patriots, German Storm Troopers, so called Brown Shirts, "took care" of these Jewish terrorists/bastards..... once and for all, NO leftovers !!

Albert said...

:-)

michael said...

"So, in 1933 the German people voted, in free democratic elections, the National Social German Workers Party into government."

ROFL, John you keep embarrassing yourself. Hitler was appointed into office he never held any majority.

"Control of finances/economy and media went immediately into German hands !
Jew bankers left Germany, went to USA and Great Britain"

You make it sound as if the Reichsbank got up and went AWOL.

Nothing in banking was changed throughout the 1930s as under Hitler. It's the sole reason why Feder in 1933 resigned out of public disgust that Hitler would not act upon any of his monetary reform policies. Hitler instead went with Schacht, nothing in banking was changed. Aside some dummy corporations used for rearmament, Germany still had interest-rates, while Hitler sold off Germany's gold reserves from pre-1933 holdings by 1937.

"National Socialist agitators led by Gottfried Feder had carried on a vicious campaign against private banking and against our entire currency system. Nationalization of banks, abolition of bondage to interest payments and introduction of state Giro ‘Feder’ money, those were the high-sounding phrases of a pressure group which aimed at the overthrow of our money and banking system.

To keep this nonsense in check, I called a bankers’ council, which made suggestions for tighter supervision and control over the banks. These suggestions were codified in the law of 1934... by increasing the powers of the bank supervisory authority. In the course of several discussions, I succeeded in dissuading Hitler from putting into practice the most foolish and dangerous of the ideas on banking and currency harbored by his party colleagues ." — Hjalmar Schacht, "The Magic of Money" p. 49

"He [Hitler] understood nothing whatever about economics." — Hjalmar Schacht, "My First Seventy-Six Years" p. 327

Hitler in 1934 having been fined 400.000 marks by the German tax-office on his then annual income of 1.2 million even forced his tax-file to be closed. Through 1934-45 Hitler was tax-exempt while he continued pandering to the German people that he was a poor man. In fact he became Germany's leading tax evader in their nation's history.

"International Jew banksters planned to destroy Germany, the 'American' Jew Theodor Kaufman tells the world with his book : "Germany Must Perish" !!"

As you are such a simpleton to even read the 2-page "Judea Declares War on Germany" article and its surrounding context, I seriously doubt that you have read Kaufman's pamphlet.

michael said...

"I succeeded in dissuading Hitler from putting into practice the most foolish and dangerous of the ideas on banking and currency [interest-usury free money] harbored by his party colleagues." — Hjalmar Schacht, "The Magic of Money" p. 49

"He [Hitler] understood nothing whatever about economics." — Hjalmar Schacht, "My First Seventy-Six Years" p. 327

It's worth nothing after Hitler made himself tax-exempt on his 1.2 million annual income in 1934, in the same year he also blocked the Reich budget reports so that no one who visited Germany or the German population could follow the state of the economy and the damage he was causing with his armament spending. The Third Reich's economy even struggled to reach the peak of 1927 as under the Weimar Republic all without the use of concentration camps to threaten layabouts with, rearmament spending, cooking the books and removing women and the Jews from the employment figures and by 1935 pushing people into the military.

Germany throughout the 1930s had lower living standards and GDP income than either Great Britain or the United States. By 1936 the Germans were struggling with their hands out all seeking help attesaving on their 5 mark weekly instalments to afford to purchase a car. Germany being one of the least automotive nations' in the West, by 1937 these factories were closed and turned back over to the production of armaments. At the same time as their food crisis, to quote Goring, "Guns not Butter."

Henry said...

michael's having a field day here but one wonders if he accepts everything that his chosen witness, Schacht, has to say about Hitler and German economic policies or is michael just cherry picking to suit?

Which iis it michael....are you cherry pickng history or pushing the truth about Nazi Germany and the jewish question?

Do let me know your motivation before we move it forward.....

BTW: did you just use the jew David Ceserani as a source and not cite him?

michael said...

What is being cherry-picked? If you want to debate something try being less vague.

"BTW: did you just use the jew David Ceserani as a source and not cite him?"

On Hitler's tax evasion? No, this is general history found in any of the biographies. From Bullock, Kershaw to Ullrich etc. Sources for above, Tooze and Aly, the rest from reading past scholarly papers on the economic comparisons of the 20-30s.

So what do you want to debate? That Hitler was some grand economic wizard while he never studied economics? So much that he blocked the budget reports from being published. Or that Hitler was not looting his personal wealth off their backs? Whichever make your case.

Henry said...

Strange that you knew immediately to what the Ceserani remark refered to. Not sure what '"economic papers" you're claiming to have read because you never cite them but you don't appear to have studied the formerly Top Secret OSS reports authored by the Frankfurter (school) Jew, Franz Neumann. Herr Neumann would disagree with much of what you posted and infact he compiled data which renders your mainstream claims about Germany under-performing the western democracies as a catalogue of post-war nonsense and lies.

I wasn't being "vague". I asked you a straight forward question (I know that's a simple honesty alien to your kind) so I'll isolate it and ask it again so you make no mistake this time around....

Which is it michael....are you here cherry picking history or pushing the truth about Germany and the jewish question?

Henry said...

Oh well...Perhaps it's daylight where michael is and he's off out cherry picking but it's gone 2:30 am here and so I'm off to bed. In the meantime if michael cares to answer the simple question asked of him twice already, then we can pick this up again later.

michael said...

"Strange that you knew immediately to what the Ceserani remark refered to."

Ceserani is not an economic historian, he focuses on Jewish relations and the Holocaust. Why would I depend on his input for Hitler's tax evasion which is general history anyway written in the biographies of your favourite house painter?

"Not sure what '"economic papers" you're claiming to have read because you never cite them"

I cannot cite a source to something when you have not raised anything I have stated. The above though is still general history. The German worker were less paid than the British, they worked longer hours, both nations were behind the United States while Germany was one of the least automotive in the West all waiting on the state handouts. While booking their upcoming Strength through Joy travels. What is there to say?

"but you don't appear to have studied the formerly Top Secret OSS reports authored by the Frankfurter (school) Jew, Franz Neumann. Herr Neumann would disagree with much of what you posted and infact he compiled data which renders your mainstream claims about Germany under-performing the western democracies as a catalogue of post-war nonsense and lies."

Cite this "Top Secret" report then, so I can read it. It hardly sounds related, but if it gets you excited enough it must be some good stuff. Likely written in 1935-6, uh?

"I wasn't being "vague". I asked you a straight forward question (I know that's a simple honesty alien to your kind) so I'll isolate it and ask it again so you make no mistake this time around...."

You claimed I was cherry-picking something, (I still don't know what, as you never raised anything) same with this reply.

"Which is it michael....are you here cherry picking history or pushing the truth about Germany and the jewish question?"

I am not an ideologue looking for a saviour type for these shadowy name-less phanton Jews that you are watching out for. You sound as paranoid as Johnny.

michael said...

I came out of this conspiracy playpen a long time ago, this whole industry is based off myths, hoaxes and fabrications. I only visit Mami's for the entertainment, not many of you have moved on. It's still the same lot from Concen. #tripe

Henry said...

FYI Professor Moron, there was no OSS in 1935-36.....it was created on June 13, 1942.....unlucky for some, eh?

Like I said I'm going to bed......

michael said...

Well the OSS is not the place I go to read about any economic history, such tripe nothing you have stated in these platitudes even relates to anything stated. In your mid 50s wasting your time away listening to conspiracy pods, no wonder you think the nameless Jews are responsible for your present outcome.

Albert said...

CHECK-OUT: Odysee !!!

(I think that it is sort of LBRY ... except WITH a GREAT Layout/Interface !!!)

It HAS Lots of Great: DELETED YT Channels !!!

https://odysee.com/$/rabbithole

Henry said...

michael said..."Well the OSS is not the place I go to read about any economic history, such tripe nothing you have stated in these platitudes even relates to anything stated"

You don't even know what the OSS was or is today (CIA). Only by examining the documents that they claim to have examined can one discover the important facts that a so-called "economic historian" may have distorted or omitted from their sanctioned version of history, no matter what archive they claim to have mined.

michael said..."In your mid 50s wasting your time away listening to conspiracy pods, no wonder you think the nameless Jews are responsible for your present outcome"

You can't even get close to giving my age even though you have my year of birth to work from. That doesn't bode well for a budding economist like you. This is what you do: you take the year 2020 and subtract from that date the year of my birth....use a calculator if you find your balls aren't sliding up and down your abacus as well as well as they might. BTW...I have no problem naming the Jews that you pretend aren't responsible for the ongoing shit-storm you call "history".

michael said..."I came out of this conspiracy playpen a long time ago, this whole industry is based off myths, hoaxes and fabrications. I only visit Mami's for the entertainment, not many of you have moved on"

Projecting much michael? You seem not know that you're wasting your life trolling and stalking people here for (as you put it) purposes of "entertainment"

Very Sad.

Henry said...

This...

michael said..."Nothing in banking was changed throughout the 1930s as under Hitler. It's the sole reason why Feder in 1933 resigned out of public disgust that Hitler would not act upon any of his monetary reform policies"

But, michael, your own source, Hjalmar Schacht, said that he fired Feder and (according to Schacht's description) Feder almost begged him to be kept on.

Quote: "Immediately after my opening address at the Ministry of Economic Affairs I sent for Herr Gottfried Feder, whom Hitler had previously appointed Secretary of State in the ministry. I told him that his connection with the ministry ceased on the day I took office.

"But, sir, I am prepared to co-operate loyally with you."

"That may be, Herr Feder, but I am not."

So Herr Feder departed. He will be remembered as the inventor of the "featherweight currency"

Source: Confessions of "The Old Wizard" The Autobiography of Hjalmar Schacht. pp, 297-298.

--------------------

michael in the above example did you cherry pick from your own source and instead of using Schacht as a witness did you choose instead to lie about Feder or peddle a lie from another unnamed source?

John Miller said...

Oy vey..

Schacht : " I sent for Herr Gottfried Feder...."

Herr Gottfried Feder to his Boss Herr Schacht :
"But, sir, I am prepared to co-operate loyally with you.."

Herr Schacht:" That may be, but I am not.."

PS:
Herr Schacht : Because I am a Internationalist, a Free Masonic bankster, a buddy of G.P. Morgan, and I give a shit in the recovery of Germany, and YOU HERR Feder are nothing but a nobody, just a German Patriot. Get the f**k OUT of my office !!

That explains why the 'Nuremberg Tribunal', run by Communist Bolshevik Red Rats and US and GB Free Mason bastards let Herr Schacht go free in 1946...

Henry said...

John Miller, the Nuremberg trials were almost entirely a Jewish affair. Mainly Jews in American uniforms. In fact the Soviets got nearly everything from these 'American' jews and brought it into court as if it were their own.

As for Schacht going free? You'e not far off the truth but we'll get to the very probable reason for his escape once michael returns to his vomit.

John Miller said...

Thanks a lot for this info...

I didn't know that Bolshevism/Communism and Freemasonry is JEWISH :-))

Shallomm

and have a great day

Henry said...

Really, then you must've forgot to mention the jew in relation to Nuremberg when you cited just about every fucking handmaiden they've ever created and controlled.

Your issue here is with michael who puts his cock up you every time he fancies it and then calls it "entertainment" .and you can't even muster a whimper in your own defence.

John Miller said...

oy vey

WHAT ??
"You're not far off the truth as for Schacht going free...."

Herr Schacht emphasized: " I ALWAYS did and I always will kiss Jew asses and suck Jew dicks."


A short time later Herr Schacht opened a bank in the newly created 'BRD'.....


Shallomm
and have good day

Panzerfaust said...

The Jews at YouTube attacked my channel
https://ibb.co/SfLCSwW

JT Custer said...

Schacht was a crypto-jew. Look into his history and add up the evidence, as I did a decade ago. And get this: His middle name was "Horace Greeley". He was named after another crypto-jews.

Adolf Hitler never trusted Schacht but wisely used him, and later Adolf Hitler dismissed Schacht.

Being a jew is why Schacht was not prosecuted after the war.

As Adolf Hitler explained, as quoted in the book "Hitler's Table Talk," he and Feder split over a particular program and the size of it, where Feder opposed it, but it turned out that Adolf Hitler was correct, and the program was a success. Sorry, I cannot immediately recall the name or exact type of program.

I share knowledge. I do not debate. So, whatever is further spewed by the liar monopolizing this comment thread, I won't respond.

https://MyWhiteTV.nfshost.com

Henry said...

JT Custer, IIRC the program was a plan of Feder's for the establishment of garden cities.

Henry said...

People forget that Hitler dismissed Schacht in early 1939 and fought the entirety of the war without him and was able to contain inflation during that long and testing period.

Henry said...

The following is the reason why Schacht was able to escape punishment at Nuremberg. While at Nuremberg a slot was included for 'a special' witness to address the world via the tribunal about the so-called devastating impact the war and the years preceeding the war had had on first German and then world Jewry. The witness to this 'catastrophe' was to be World Zionist Organization leader, Chaim Weizmann. The problem for the Jews and the US authorities that dominated proceedings was that among those being prosecuted at least one (Schacht) had been privy to an action by Hitler that not only undermined the prosecution case in the Crimes Against the Jews, a charge which was eventually abandoned in favour of the more general charge of Crimes Against Humanity, but in light of Schacht's possible testimony, Weizmann himself could have been in danger of having to bear guilt in bringing about whatever calamity allegedly befell the Jews of Europe.

In the Magic of Money (pp 58-60) Schacht writes....

"[After Kristallnacht]....My attitude makes it plain that I had the strongest desire to find a solution to the Jewish question which Hitler would fmd acceptable.

I put it to him that the terrorist treatment meted out to the Jews was a political error, and that he ought to use other means if he would be rid of the German Jews. I pointed out to him that the Reichsbank had estimated the value of Jewish property in Germany at around six billion Reichsmark. I·suggested that this Jewish property should be administered by an international trust committee, and that on the basis of the security ofthis property at its valuation of 6 billion, a dollar loan amounting to some I billion Reichsmark should. be raised. Jews all over the world would be invited to subscribe to this loan. I thought that the taking up of such a Ii billion loan should not prove too difficult for the many well-to-do Jews living abroad. Out of the Dollar proceeds of this loan the trust committee would give each German Jew who intended to emigrate a suitable amotmt which would enable him to make a new life for himself in another coU1ltry. This would not only serve the interests of the emigrating Jews, but also those of countries which hesitated to grant entry to pennilessJews. The German Government would guarantee payment of interest in Dollars, and undertake to repay the loan within 20 years.

Cont....

Henry said...

.....Cont

Astonishingly enough Hitler agreed to this suggestion, and authorised me to negotiate with my London friends in order to ascertain whether such a plan were feasible. Accordingly, early in 1939 I went to London, and first of all put the plan to Montagu Norman, governor of the Bank of England. He approved of my proposals, and arranged for me to discuss them with one of London's most prominent Jews, Lord Bearstead, the chief of the well-known firm of Samuel & Samuel. He signified his agreement to the plan,but remarked that he would have to discuss it with the spiritual leader of the London Jews; Chaim Weizmann. Two days later he returned to tell me that unfortunately he could not accept my proposal, because Weizmann had been vehemently opposed to the plan.

No reason was given. I had to resign myself to the fact that my attempt to give the German Jews their personal and political freedom through. a fiancial transaction had failed, although it was not even a question of a forced sale, but merely one of an interest'- bearing loan which would be repaid, and which would leave the Jews with their German property intact. I have never understood why my plan was rejected. The fact that Hitler agreed to it shows that at that time, at the end of 1938, he was still prepared to reach a compromise. Whether the Jews of the world would have been in a position to save their German brethren from the fate which later overtook them will always remain a debatable point amongst people of good will everywhere. The monstrous idea of the 'Final Solution' obviously came to fruition only at a later date. Even if at that time there was no suggestion of such a thing, the desire of many Jews to leave Germany was understandable. The refusal of the leading Jews to entertain my suggestion led to much discussion and dispute in Jewish circles too.

John Miller said...



The 'historian' @'Henry' said : "People forget that Hitler dismissed Schacht in early 1939..."

I guess 99.9% of 'people' NEVER heard of a guy named 'Schacht'... they would say : WHO the f**k was Schacht?

BTW :
Who started the 'Schacht story' and WHY ? may be to distract ?
@ michael, I suspect a Jew boy.

Read his comments on 11.24... responding to my comments about greasy Jew bankers leaving Germany IN 1933 for USA and Great Britain.

The German people voted in 1933, after 15 years of incredible misery during the "Weimar Jew Republic", in free democratic elections, the National Social German Workers Party into government.
Immediately the control of finances, economy and media was taken out of Jew hands and went were it belongs : Into German hands !!





John Miller said...

correction !!
@ michael comments on November 26 at 5:16

Shallomm
and Good evening

Henry said...

I should add that the anticipated appearence of the 'special witness' Weitzmman never hapened and orthodox historians pretend to be baffled as to why he never appeared. Weizmann then went on to be the first President of the terrorist state of Israel but after Nuremberg he had to have one last shot at the German people. Chaim Weizmann was one of the worlds leading organic chemiists and lthe leading authority on botulinum toxins. When back in Palestine he was approached by Jewish terrorists who proposed to him a plan to enter Germany and kill at least six million Germans by introducing deadly toxins into thier fresh water systems. Weizmann approved the plan and arranged for them to collect the poisons they needed from his collegues at the Weizmann Institute. This they did and then made their way to Europe. Fortunately for the Germans the terrorists recieved information that the authorities had become aware of their plan and were about to arrest them, at this point they lost their nerve and disposed of the deadly evidence by (IIRC) throwing it from a passenger boat they were traveling on. The Jews didn't just give up though. Instead they obtained what they thought would be enough arsenic to wipe out a camp where ex-soldiers were being held and after gaining access as workers in the camp bakery they proceeded to use the arsenic in the flour for the bread that fed the camp. Many people were made seriously ill and some died but once the truth began to emerge the authorities decided to bring an end to its circulation in the media.

There's much more that can be said about Weizmann and his pre-war plans for the Jews of Europe and this involves an issue that Adam Green is currently searching for information about. Adam Green is starting to be taken seriously and is now gaining access to Kevin MacDonald's people and media. I could give it to Green with all the relevant sources but I don't like his association with Christopher Jon Bjerknes.

John Miller said...

Hello

I recommend Steven Anderson, Pastor, Videos.. people should watch !!

'Did the Holocaust really happen ?'

Shallomm

Archie Titus said...

Here's hoping Zap is not on a ventilator?

Vaccines and treatments

There is currently no specific treatment or approved vaccine that cures or prevents COVID-19. Researchers and companies across the world are developing potential vaccines and treatments, and the Australian Government has a strategy to deliver them to Australians.

I wonder if we will be able to self-administer the vaccine?
Can't imagine there would be this kind of vaccine nonsense under a National Socialist German Workers' Party,

Archie Titus said...

I wonder if we will be allowed to self-administer the vaccine at home and in private?