"In this presentation I'm addressing failures of the scientific community and suggesting that we cannot fully trust it without question. Topics include the creation of the Conspiracy Theorist category as a divide and conquer psyop, and later the creation of recent Flat Earth movement around 2015 as a means to merge them in the eyes of the general public with those who understand the moon landings to be faked--in order to more easily dismiss the later with the former. "
In addition, Creation Scientist Danny Faulkner is called out for his fallacious book "Falling Flat."
In addition, Creation Scientist Danny Faulkner is called out for his fallacious book "Falling Flat."
• Do We See The Sun Change Size? (here Danny does some good refutations of Flat Earth but demonstrates bad attitude that doesn't help people)
[Correction in what I shared in the video. The video I was talking about wasn't "A funny thing happened on the way to the Moon." but "What Happened On the Moon Analysis of the Lunar Photography" (2000).
• What Happened On the Moon Analysis... It is interesting to note that Danny Falkner avoided addressing this video and any of it's proof and mentioned that the funny thing video was the first production of this kind.]
One of the most incredible statements ever made: "I'd go to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don't have the technology to that any more. We used to but we destroyed that technology and it's a painful process to build it back again."
• "I'd go to the Moon in a nano second.... What's even worse than such lunacy is how Danny enlarged upon that as I quote in the video.
Finally, notice is given of the Historic gathering of prominent Flat Earthers and Globe believers in Antarctica who, in Dec 2024 filmed the sun for more than 24 hours while filming each other filming and disproving their own and Flat Earth theories and expectations, even though some of them were Flat Earthers who then admitted it to be the case. This can be seen at https://www.the-final-experiment.com/
This appears to mark the end of the Flat Earth movement as this fulfills the conditions of proof that the Flat Earthers had previously laid out. A fair examination of the claims that this final experiment was fake is found here:
• DID they LIE? The FINAL EXPERIMENT in...
In addition to all this, a new hypothesis is tabled that there appears to be a policy of revealing the fact of faking world events while presenting them as real events. That is, the very videos and pictures given are deliberately showing the events themselves to be substantially fake. This contradicts the assumptions of Faulkner in his above mentioned book who argued that NASA would have made sure that they would have covered up their fakery (if that was the case).
But it very well could be that they wanted at least some people to see the truth in order to create the Conspiracy Theorist category. In doing that it became much easier to destroy another person or even fellow scientist's credibility by easily branding anyone pointing out facts and the truth to be considered a crazy conspiracy theorist. Furthermore, it is tabled that the big names in the conspiracy theory camp are all controlled opposition agents fostering a "craziness" culture which never reveal the most important facts and methodology.
@milesjargon:
2:16:42 Speaking of angles of light, this is one of the reasons why the “trip to 🇦🇶” looked like it was on a 
set. When the guys walk around in front of the cameras their shadows change shape and direction rather quickly, almost like there’s a spotlight above their head, aka not the
that we’re used to seeing. You’ve seen Ä’rÃç Dübâÿ’s video right? I’m still skimming through your video so idk if you mention him.
set. When the guys walk around in front of the cameras their shadows change shape and direction rather quickly, almost like there’s a spotlight above their head, aka not thethat we’re used to seeing. You’ve seen Ä’rÃç Dübâÿ’s video right? I’m still skimming through your video so idk if you mention him.
1 comment:
In Nietzsche's 1886 book 'Beyond Good and Evil,' he asks about what impells men to seek truth, and what their motivations for it might be for it. Why is there a "will to truth" instead of a "will to ignorance?: Or, are there actually compelling arguments to be made for men actually seeking and maintaining ignorance over against truth?
Can certain truths be so painful and uncomfortable that men will do almost anything to avoid confronting or accepting them? Under these conditions, could one then equate "ignorance" with "false knowledge?"
For Nietzsche then, if truth or falsehood were accepted or denied, depending on how much pain it caused one, then there was one key or central ingredient for individuals in coming to accept truth- great strength! So that, those individuals who possessed this strength would also have the capacity for "great knowledge."
In this, there would come to be what he called an "order of rank" among men with regards to such knowledge, or what he also called a "pathos of distance" between them, depending on that capacity for strength and weakness when it came to knowledge. In a note from 1885, Nietzsche wrote, "But what is truth? Perhaps a kind of belief that has become a condition of life. Then, of course, strength would be a criterion!"
"The strength of a person's spirit would be measured by how much "truth" he could endure and tolerate, or more precisely, to what extent he needs to have it diluted, disguised, sweetened, muted, and falsified....Sometimes people don't want to hear the truth because they don't want their illusions destroyed" - Nietzsche
Post a Comment