October 23, 2013

“Was 9/11 an Inside Job, or a Mossad Job?”

Laurent Guyenot July 16, 2013 32

The role of the Israeli Deep State in the Sept. 11th terror attacks, which have laid the foundation for the 21st century on the biggest lie in human history, is surrounded by a taboo even within the so-called 9/11 Truth Movement. Most activists groups remain focused on the slogan “9/11 was an Inside Job”, and keep their eyes “wide shut” on the evidence incriminating the secret services of the Jewish State. Laurent Guyénot reviews the key evidence, and questions the process of denial. 

by Laurent Guyénot





Anonymous said...

This must be a rhetorical-question, but the truth is that it was BOTH, as the cabal has traitors working for it from within our "Western" nations, obviously.


Anonymous said...

When I first started demonstrating on the street about seeking 9-11 truth, my large sign said

9-11 = Inside Job

Now I knew that by using the term "inside job" I was not strictly limiting the perpetration to U.S. citizens and U.S. secret government operations (CIA black ops, etc). I knew that there well could have been powerful people and factions from other countries. However, I admit that at that time in about 2005 to 2008, I really did not think much about the MOssad and Zionists. My thinking of course has changed very much since that time but I am still not a member of an "truth group" or any 9-11 theory. I have always questioned authority, have never been a groupie, and always think for myself. I would very much like a person who is truly objective and smarter than me to listen to my questions and let me bounce my ideas off of him or her. I have never found that person.

I read about one fourth of this very long article. I may read the rest later but two things so far have turned me off of this article.

"their cover as art student being really designed to draw attention on their undercover as spies monitoring al-Qaeda."

OK, this part is good. The writer of this article identifies 2 layers of cover and acknowledges that the bottom layer is not all the layers there are.

I guess I will have to read more of the article to see what, if any, further layers, or what is the real bottom layer of covers are identified. I would comment that these first two layers are clear and easy for most of us to understand, but their identification of the real bottom layer will I presume be based on much less clear and sure reasoning.

I know from reading some of John Friend's material that this "deep state" multi-layered approach to staging false flag events by the Mossad and Israeli interests is very consistent with what we observe about 9-11 patsies and others.

I had to stop reading when the writer of this article brought in the old nanothermite stuff.
speaking of Ehud Barack...

"When replaced by Sharon, he took a job as adviser for Electronic Data Systems and for SCP Partners, a front company specialized in security, known as a front for Mossad, and with access to high tech explosives such as NANO-THERMITE [my caps] through its partners Metallurg Holdings and Advanced Metallurgical. "

Now Bollyn and most of other 9-11 researchers who identify the Mossad as the main perpetrator of 9-11 ALL seem to be infected with the nano-thermite theory, a theory concocted by U.S. government operative, Dr. Steven Jones. So I'm assuming that is the way the rest of this long article will go.

The truth of the matter is that nano-thermite, or the ingredient to make it, thermite, was readily available to the public, and it was even for sale on Ebay. So it is false to give the idea that Ehud Barack only could have gotten the stuff through his affiliation with this one company. Dr. Steven Jones made a big deal of how there are now very specialized forms of thermite that can only be made in top secret government labs and indicates that that is the kind that was used in NYC on 9-11.

Thermite was found in the dust but so were many radioactive substances that also should not have been there, and Dr. Jones just forgot, in all of his "rock solid, forensic evidence" and "hard science" to tell us at all about those other substances.

I do not subscribe to any theory, but I do have a fondness for the truth.

So this article is going down the same old tired road that all the other articles and videos seem to take about Israeli involvement in perpetrating 9-11, and for that reason, I believe what we may be seeing here is just more very sophisticated bamboozling by the perpetrators of 9-11.