Tuesday, March 25, 2014

Will Israel kill US empire this week?

The US empire, which might be more accurately termed the New World Order bankster empire, seems to be lashing out blindly as it enters its death spasms.

In Ukraine – as in Syria, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere – the Empire’s forces are in disarray. The loss of Crimea, and setbacks in Syria, are merely the latest of many debacles. The cause of this ongoing disaster: A series of self-inflicted wounds.

The worst wounds have been self-inflicted by the Empire’s lunatic fringe: the Israel-centric neoconservatives. This group, which includes both Jewish chauvinists and Christian armageddonites, is burdened by fanatical devotion to an impossible project: The maintenance of a sustainable “Jewish state” in Occupied Palestine.

Read more here

3 comments:

Nick Dean said...

"The US empire, which might be more accurately termed the New World Order bankster empire" -- Barrett

... or more accurately still, the Jewish Empire. How can Barrett and PressTV get this wrong? Are they uninterested in who's really behind all the Bad Shit they gripe about?

"Jay Kolar, whose essay proving that no Muslim hijackers were involved in 9/11 was issued by Europe’s leading scholarly publisher Elsevier" -- Barrett

I appreciate the tip. Link here (access required): http://www.emeraldinsight.com/books.htm?chapterid=1758113

Abstract:

Inconsistencies and contradictions in the US government's story of hijackers and their masterminds are examined to account for what happened on 9-11. A little-known initial FBI list of 19, scrutinized for four names not on its final list, calls into question the FBI naming process. We discovered 11 of the FBI-named finalists could not have been on those planes, with 10 still alive and another's identity improvised by a double. The Dulles videotape, essentially the government's case that hijackers boarded the 9-11 flights, is found to have serious problems including authentication, as does the so-called bin Laden “confession” video.

Were “hijackers” known to be in the US before intelligence alleges it knew? Evidence is examined which shows that they were closely monitored by agencies which denied this knowledge; in particular, an undercover FBI agent lived with them the prior year.

Noting government refusal to disclose evidence called for by investigators, we find some pieces altered or fabricated and others confiscated or destroyed. Other revelations point to hijackers with national security overrides, protection in their alternate roles as drug traffickers, and deep political connections with government elites. We investigate patterns, reminiscent of historical intelligence involvement, revealing the presence of a covert intelligence operation disguised as an outside enemy attack.

/endquote

If the abstract is a guide, Kevin Barrett can't even accurately report to us the significance of Kolar's article. The article does not '[prove] that no Muslim hijackers were involved in 9/11' (which end would be better be served by showing we have no reason to think any planes really were hijacked at all on 9/11, or that any plane crashed on 9/11, either of which is not hard to do), it merely shows that there are serious problems we should have to overcome before believing that the named 'hijackers' really were guilty of any hijacking on 9/11. The article appears to leave open the possibility of that Muslims or others really did hijack one or more planes on 9/11:

Other revelations point to hijackers with national security overrides, protection in their alternate roles as drug traffickers, and deep political connections with government elites. We investigate patterns, reminiscent of historical intelligence involvement, revealing the presence of a covert intelligence operation disguised as an outside enemy attack.

/endquote

How can Barrett and PressTV get this wrong? Are they uninterested in the truth about 9/11?

Nick Dean said...

I said it isn't hard to show we have no reason to think any planes really were hijacked on 9/11. Yet Kolar writes and Barret quotes,

“No evidence exists that any of the ‘hijackers’ ever boarded planes that crashed on 9/11.”

How about this, dumbasses: No good evidence exists that planes were involved at all in 9/11. In the NY film footage we 'see' planes not decelerating as they entered the towers; no breaking apart and falling debris; and impossible speeds for that altitude. While at the Pentagon and Shanksville, there isn't even phoney film footage to make us believe the impossible: crash sites without debris, planes getting sucked into tiny holes and disappearing forever.

"the Empire’s lunatic fringe: the Israel-centric neoconservatives" -- Barrett

In fact, of course, they are hardly the lunatic fringe. Israel-centrism is the norm precisely because the Empire is a Jewish one. How can Barrett and PressTV get this wrong? Don't they know who runs our media, pays our politicians, owns our financial-parasitism-system and etc.

" the Israel-centric neoconservatives. This group, which includes both Jewish chauvinists and Christian armageddonites" -- Barrett

In fact, of course, American Christians of any persuasion have no power at all, Christian Zionists certainly included. On every issue that matters to them - abortion, Church/State division, race-replacement immigration, the whorification of their daughters thru coarsening of the media and myriad other social issues, they get what they don’t want and get what Jews do want. On one issue only - Israel - their desires coincide with Jews and then only they get what they want.

It's very clear then that Jews control Mideast policy. How can Barrett and PressTV get this wrong?

Here I have an answer after exchanging arguments with Barrett several times over the years. Including Christians in the dealing out of blame is 1) a way for Barrett and PressTV to protect themselves from accusations of antisemitism by attacking (by implication) White people. As a White man I say they're worse than antisemites - they're anti-White; and 2) a useful tactic in Barrett's express ploy of using the prevailing Jew-scripted anti-White culture to advance the global Muslim cause. [See also the reference to 'Western bankster oligarchs' when is meant South-west Asian or Middle Eastern or simply Jewish bankster oligarchs.]

I'll leave it there for now.

Roy Hobs said...

Both Barret and Fetzer stand behind this comparison to the White Rose Society. If not Jews, then they are Jew thinkers between the ears.



"The Dynamic Duo: White Rose Blooms in Wisconsin -- This book is a biography of Jim Fetzer and Kevin Barrett. But it is also a call to resistance: - Stop the wars - End the empire - Help the poor * It connects the dots between resistance efforts against the American Empire and the White Rose resistance against Hitler.