I didn't get past the first misquote from James Warburg.
Warburg didn't say "Jewish world government" he said "world government".
Bad enough for sure but not what is claimed.
Feed bullshit and half-truths to people if that's your way but the moment your game is discovered then you're finished for ever as a credible source.
Here's Warburg's original statement...
STATEMENT OF JAMES P. WARBURG OF GREENWICH, CONN.
I am James P. Warburg, of Greenwich, Conn., and am appearing as an individual.
I am aware, Mr. Chairman, of the exigencies of your crowded schedule and of the need to be brief, so as not to transgress upon your courtesy in granting me a hearing.
The past 15 years of my life have been devoted almost exclusively to studying the problem of world peace and, especially, the relation of the United States to these problems. These studies led me, 10 years ago, to the conclusion that the great question of our time is not whether or not one world can be achieved, but whether or not one world can be achieved by peaceful means.
We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.
Today we are faced with a divided world—its two halves glowering at each other across the iron curtain. The world's two superpowers—Russia and the United States—are entangled in the vicious circle of an arms race, which more and more preempts energies and resources sorely needed to lay the foundations of enduring peace. We are now on the road to eventual war—a war in which the conqueror will emerge well nigh indistinguishable from the vanquished.
The United States does not want this war, and most authorities agree that Russia does not want it. Indeed, why should Russia prefer the unpredictable hazards of war to a continuation of here present profitable fishing in the troubled waters of an uneasy armistice? Yet both the United States and Russia are drifting—and, with them, the entire world—toward the abyss of atomic conflict. =====================
Source and rest of statement: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/James_Warburg_before_the_Subcommittee_on_Revision_of_the_United_Nations_Charter
Misquote or not, Henry, we cannot deny the power of Patrick's words. Thanks for the proper statement, but I know I won't take him to court over the issue because the overall message is so powerful and, to be honest, few are of an intellectual level to notice. That is not a good thing, agreed, but it is the way of it.
One of your most powerful (and that is saying something) messages to date Patrick.
2 comments:
I didn't get past the first misquote from James Warburg.
Warburg didn't say "Jewish world government" he said "world government".
Bad enough for sure but not what is claimed.
Feed bullshit and half-truths to people if that's your way but the moment your game is discovered then you're finished for ever as a credible source.
Here's Warburg's original statement...
STATEMENT OF JAMES P. WARBURG OF GREENWICH, CONN.
I am James P. Warburg, of Greenwich, Conn., and am appearing as an individual.
I am aware, Mr. Chairman, of the exigencies of your crowded schedule and of the need to be brief, so as not to transgress upon your courtesy in granting me a hearing.
The past 15 years of my life have been devoted almost exclusively to studying the problem of world peace and, especially, the relation of the United States to these problems. These studies led me, 10 years ago, to the conclusion that the great question of our time is not whether or not one world can be achieved, but whether or not one world can be achieved by peaceful means.
We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.
Today we are faced with a divided world—its two halves glowering at each other across the iron curtain. The world's two superpowers—Russia and the United States—are entangled in the vicious circle of an arms race, which more and more preempts energies and resources sorely needed to lay the foundations of enduring peace. We are now on the road to eventual war—a war in which the conqueror will emerge well nigh indistinguishable from the vanquished.
The United States does not want this war, and most authorities agree that Russia does not want it. Indeed, why should Russia prefer the unpredictable hazards of war to a continuation of here present profitable fishing in the troubled waters of an uneasy armistice? Yet both the United States and Russia are drifting—and, with them, the entire world—toward the abyss of atomic conflict.
=====================
Source and rest of statement: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/James_Warburg_before_the_Subcommittee_on_Revision_of_the_United_Nations_Charter
Misquote or not, Henry, we cannot deny the power of Patrick's words. Thanks for the proper statement, but I know I won't take him to court over the issue because the overall message is so powerful and, to be honest, few are of an intellectual level to notice. That is not a good thing, agreed, but it is the way of it.
One of your most powerful (and that is saying something) messages to date Patrick.
Post a Comment