Deanna talked about the dissemination of propaganda, accurate research
standards, the holocaust, Germany, Eisenhower and his 200 death camps in the Rhine Meadow, the Hollywood producers and directors who created the
holocaust films that millions of people have seen. The essence of the
program was the idea that just because millions of people believe
something is true does not provide adequate proof or validity of what,
in fact, are devised propaganda, conceived to deceive. Moshe Solomons
admitted, “The holocaust is Hollywood at its absolute best.”
Show-page
Eisenhower's Holocaust..
The Eisenhower holocaust
The Final Solution - Exterminate the Germans
Ethnic Germans - A Forgotten Genocide
The Holocaust Mega-post
The New Babylon - PDF
Who Controls America?
Download
9 comments:
This woman wants to prevent me from speculating and thinking immediately when something happens. I should wait the official and other researchs and committees. Although the official information is obviously false and has usually been. And the leaders are murderers and criminals and liars.
And usually everything is very obvious and many things can be guessed.
I do not want to prevent anyone from doing anything. In fact, I do not have the power to prevent others from speculation or believing whatever they wish. If millions of people wish to believe that vaccines are beneficial without reading the history, science or ingredients, that is their choice. If millions of people wish to believe that the Germans killed six million jews, that is their choice. Research in actual records, along with science disprove that claim. If someone by the name of Windsor wants to claim a family relationship to queen Elizabeth, that is his/her choice. The point is that guesses, opinions, speculation and first impressions do are not constitute fact. Research takes time and effort. Many people do not understand the principles of research but simply accept the opinions of others without fact-checking. The most incriminating evidence against the medical industry, the education system, the media, the ABC agencies of the federal government or the records of profit-hungry corporations are often within those records themselves. Of course, everyone can speculate but then a responsible person follows that speculation with logic and hard proof that stands up under scrutiny. In family history research, one can claim that he/she is descended from Pocahontas, as many people have alleged over the years. One can rarely build a logical, factual case on a false premise such as descendancy from Pocahontas.
I admit that claims are not guesses.
A resposibe person must be able to speculate also without hard proof, if there is not anything that contradictes the speculations. He or she knows what the traitors have done before etc.
I believe, based on research, that there is (1) the "official" version of an event for general consumption, (2) the version for those who are skeptical of the "official" version and (3) significantly more egregious truths that are typically more evil than most of us can conceive. For instance, as I mentioned in my radio broadcast, "they" wanted us to focus on the alleged deaths of six million jews to conceal the massive slaughter of 73,000,000 deaths, 49,000,000 of which were civilian. Focusing on the German labor camps also distracted people from Eisenhower's 200 death camps in the Rhine meadows where they deliberately starved about 1.5 million reclassified German prisoners, including women and children. I quoted Moshe Solomons who admitted, “The holocaust is Hollywood at its absolute best.”
In order to test speculation, one must still research to determine if contradictions exist and exactly what those inconsistencies are. One can then, armed with legitimate facts, persuade others. Of course, even the general population justifiably distrusts government officials. But using hyperboles such as "everything" and "everyone" tends to instill a sense of individual hopelessness whereas proof of specific details empowers people. Friends and family regularly roll their eyes when skeptics attempt to inform them. That is why we need hard evidence, not speculation, so that we can be convincing. It is easy to say that the Germans did not kill six million but armed with statistics from the Red Cross or Soviet records carries more weight than mere statements. One may apply the same principles to the dangers of vaccines. Even then, brainwashed people are going to revert to the comfort of their herd mentality thinking.
Deanna,
I really enjoyed this show. Thanks.
This was a great podcast.
Deanna, hurry and do a New $$$ book on how "Noah Pozner" one of the child stars of Sandyhook is now a child star in the Pakistani School shooting!
http://youtu.be/Zg-v3METgcM
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-30629751
Was it worth it?
Deanna, some folks seem unable to follow a soundly built thesis; yours, in this expository, was impeccable from beginning to end. It seems that cranial exercise insults those who are not used to employing it while listening ...or, sort-of listening. It astounds me that anyone would miss the scholarship of your presentation.
Deanna should not claim any post-war census conflicts with the Holocaust story line as she did in this broadcast. This is not the case. I see a few comments on Daily Stormer repeating this falsity. If she is referring to things such as the first few post-war Almanacs, those Jewish population statistics were forward estimates from 1937 and state as much in them. Anything claiming those bogus "statistics" (pre-war forward estimates) as having any validity is simply wrong. Anyone claiming any post-war census conflicts with the Holocaust narrative is simply wrong. And not only wrong, but spectacularly wrong. Obviously, there were not 3-4 million people claiming to be Jews in post-war Poland. Quit making the dumbo "census" claims.
Post a Comment