July 19, 2015

The Solar Storm with Kyle Hunt 2015.07.19

Stefan Timm

Kyle speaks with Stefan Timm from ThuleProductions on Youtube. Topics include: Being Aryan, National Socialism: The Right and Only Way to Free Ourselves, White National Socialism vs. Nationalism, reactions to Hellstorm, signs of hope in the German nation today, and much more.

Renegade Archive
BlogTalk Archive
Renegade Broadcasting



rodin said...

I can't wait for the 2017 rescue mission by NAZIs in flying saucers....
centenery of 1917 capture of Russia and Balfour Declaration
tricentenery of the establishment of The Jerusalem Lodge
and half millenial anniversary of the splitting of the Church....

Erik Paul said...

If that clown is an Aryan, I'll eat my Fritz!

Unknown said...

So Erik, I just made a simple, quick observation like you obviously did and now I get to make my comment as a result of my quick evaluation. It appears you looked upon a single picture at Mami's and deduced that because a guy doesn't have blonde hair he's obviously not "an Aryan"? And therefore also "a clown"? And then because your almost instantaneous emotional reaction to this situation was so overwhelming you felt you had to share that simple 10 word outburst with anybody reading this? Did you listen to the show? Do you know anything else at all about this guy or have any realistic grounds for making such a statement here? If so can you please share this information so that we can validate your reasons for being critical? Without this vital data we are left hanging, pondering the reason(s) for this erudite critique! Our never-ending thirst for TRUTH is left cruelly unsatiated!!!

Who's the REAL clown here?! :rolleyes:

WV Foundations said...

Stefan is a pure blood German moron. He moved from Germany to the U.S. with his father. What many American WN know about Race can be put in a thimble and still have room left for a thumb.

Anonymous said...

Stefan is obviously an Americanized German, hence the blatant racism. 'Aryan' literally means 'noble person', as Adolf literally translates to 'noble wolf'. I'm not sure how a blatant racist hypocrite could ever be considered Aryan, just like I'm not sure how an obvious right-wing nut could ever consider himself a Socialist? Stefan may be of German origin, but he is right where he belongs now. You guys keep him, we don't need him, or want him.

waitpu4 said...

People that need to look down at others to feel superior don't realize that is the jew way of thinking.

Anonymous said...

@waitpu4: People that are incapable of recognizing immoral and unethical behavior are Judaised beyond the any hope of return, Jew & Gentile vs. Aryan, period!

Anonymous said...

*beyond any hope of return. 'waitpu4', you are Judaised, just like Stefan, and you're to dumb to ever realize it. If I had power now, I would put you in a labor camp, alongside Stefan the barbarian, and all of your Jewish brethren!

Negentropic said...

@"Stefan is obviously an Americanized German, hence the blatant racism. 'Aryan' literally means 'noble person', as Adolf literally translates to 'noble wolf'"

Being "racist" or not, has nothing to with "nobility" or know-able-ity. It's funny though that this Stefan guy should consider adultery to be one of the ultimate proofs of "degeneracy" when it is well-known how many mistresses Joseph Goebbels had.

Just because you factor in "race" or "breed" into your thinking does not mean you consider everyone of your own tribe "superior," or "hate" other races and try to demean and dehumanize them, nor that you are rude and disrespectful to other races and itch to initiate violence against them. It simply means you acknowledge general, observable and consistent differences in genetic predispositions and behavior among the different breeds, in the same way that you would not buy a Poodle and except it to guard your house like a Rottweiler would.

Of course, Human beings have CONDITIONAL free will, conditional on whether they d.
take command of their own subconscious programming or not, so you can't judge them with the same criteria you use for animal breeds. However, excluding individual exceptions who always transcend, the general behavioral characteristics of this or that culture or tribe tend to be valid, hence even the possibility of isolating them from others, and there is absolutely no reason to ignore these phenomena as if they didn't exist.

Ultimately, noble and know-able people should LEAD the herd and allow free choice but not without making sure people are well-appraised of the possible consequences of irrational and emotionally-arrived-at "free" choices.

"The question of the sovereignty of the people amounts at bottom to the question whether anyone could have the natural right to rule a people against its will. I cannot see how that question could be answered affirmatively. It is therefore a fact that the people is sovereign: but this sovereignty never comes of age and therefore has to remain under the permanent care of a guardian: it can never exercise its rights itself without giving rise to limitless dangers, especially as, like all minors, it is easily fooled by cunning imposters, who are therefore called demagogues." ~ Arthur Schopenhauer

Who is this guardian ? He who has "come of age" the most relative to the rest and is elected by them as a father-figure to lead or he who has "come of cunning" the most and elected by the rest to lead the plunder ?

Negentropic said...

(continued . . . )

If all individuals are made ‘equal before the law’ to pursue the happiness of their inevitably unequal results, then there will always be a ‘power imbalance’ even in the fairest, most libertarian society of win-win contracts and general goodwill, simply because no two human beings are equal and hence no two groups comprised of unequal individuals, no two results of any group endeavors and ultimately no two cultures. When a group or collective of unequal individuals achieve a consistency of behavior that tends towards the more or less homogeneous because they all adhere to certain basic principles, then these wealth-creating good-for-me compendium of moral choices results in what is called THEIR cultural achievement. Not that of "all humanity," not that of "all white people" or "all yellow people" but THOSE specific people of THAT specific culture, whose genes are then programmed by the very culture they created and become more likely to pass on similar pre-dispositions and tendencies to their offspring.

When a person also observes that groups of unequal individuals whose behavior tends to be far more consistent than those of other groups are of similar genetic background and decides to become a ‘racist’ by considering the preservation of these genes an important factor, he or she is just making a free choice for better or worse and is not engaged in any coercive activity. If a large portion of an entire society makes similar free choices and decides to become ‘racist,’ then that is still not institutionalized ‘violence’ but simply an aggregate of free choices.

It is only when initiation of force against individuals is ‘institutionalized’ that injustice or a violation of the inalienable natural right to free choice occurs and to initiate it in ‘collective retaliation and collective punishment’ is, in principle, as wrong as shooting the residents of an entire neighborhood for the crimes of a handful. It is coercion that is always the problem and not the free choice whether to factor in genetics into your thinking or not.

Negentropic said...

"German racialism has been deliberately distorted. It never was an anti-'other race' racialism. It was a pro-German racialism. It was concerned with making the German race strong and healthy in every way. Hitler was not interested in having millions of degenerates, if it was in his power not to have them. Today one finds rampant alcohol and drug addiction everywhere. Hitler cared that the German families be healthy, cared that they raise healthy children for the renewal of a healthy nation. German racialism meant re-discovering the creative values of their own race, re-discovering their culture. It was a search for excellence, a noble idea. National Socialist racialism was not against the other races, it was for its own race. It aimed at defending and improving its race, and wished that all other races did the same for themselves.

That was demonstrated when the Waffen SS enlarged its ranks to include 60,000 Islamic SS. The Waffen SS respected their way of fife, their customs, and their religious beliefs. Each Islamic SS battalion had an imam, each company had a mullah. It was our common wish that their qualities found their highest expression. This was our racialism. I was present when each of my Islamic comrades received a personal gift from Hitler during the new year. It was a pendant with a small Koran. Hitler was honoring them with this small symbolic gift. He was honoring them with what was the most important aspect of their lives and their history. National Socialist racialism was loyal to the German race and totally respected all other races."
-- General Léon Degrelle of the Waffen SS


Campaign In Russia: The Waffen SS on the Eastern Front - Leon Degrelle


"We want to re-establish the value of personality as an eternal priority; that is, the creative genius of the individual. In this way, we want to sever ties with any appearance of a listless democracy. We want to replace it with the timeless awareness that everything great can only spring from the force of the individual personality, and that everything destined to last must again be entrusted to the abilities of the individual personality." -- Adolf Hitler, Berlin Speech, February 1933 - Max Domarus, Hitler Reden und Proklamationen, p. 206 -- Translation quoted from Richard Tedor's book "Hitler's Revolution."


"To be a boy or girl at that time was wonderful. In the Hitler Youth the differences between Christian denominations or the different German states didn’t count. We all truly felt that we were members of one body of people – one nation. Youth hostels were opened all over the Reich, enabling us to hike from one beautiful town to another seeing our fatherland. Every effort was made to strengthen our minds and bodies. Contrary to what is said today, we were encouraged to become free in spirit, and not to succumb to peer (or authority) pressure. In peacetime, no military training was allowed by the Hitler Youth leadership; scouting yes. Incidentally, to 'snitch on our parents' was frowned upon." -- Hans Schmidt, "Living in Hitler's Germany"


Anonymous said...

Please, did you really believe I would fall for your BS? You are a Jew, or a Judaised Anglo, this is obvious.

1. "Being "racist" or not, has nothing to with "nobility" or know-able-ity.". Thank you for the laugh, nice try!

Noble means: "having or showing fine personal qualities or high moral principles and ideals...". You mean to argue that someone who-so judges another by race or skin color is noble?

I was going to continue and refute all of your points, but only a Jew or an Anglo would make the statement you made above, which is obviously utter nonsense to anyone with spirit.

You fool idiots, and that is how you believe you will win? Interesting, and good luck with your army of idiots!

Negentropic said...

"There is no such thing as a superior 'race' per se, in the sense that
every member of one 'race' is superior to every member of another 'race.'
Neither is there such a thing as 'racial' equality in the sense that the average
strength or intelligence of one 'race' is equal to the average strength or
intelligence of every other 'race.' By judging people as individuals, one could
perhaps identify a (superior) socio-biological class which might be a cross section
of all 'races' although not in equal proportion." -- The Eugenics Manifesto


"The intrinsic (genetic) characteristics of any generation can be better than those of the preceding generation only as a result of some kind of selection, that is, by those persons of the preceding generation who had a better genetic equipment and have produced more offspring, on the whole, than the rest, either through conscious choice, or as an automatic result of the way in which they lived. Under modern civilized conditions such selection is far less likely to be automatic than under primitive conditions, hence some kind of conscious guidance of selection is called for to make this possible. However, the population must first appreciate the force of the above principles, and the social value which a wisely guided selection would have." ~ Social Biology and Population Improvement


Anonymous said...

Tuned you out right about here actually: "...Being "racist" or not, has nothing to with "nobility" or know-able-ity. It's funny though that this Stefan guy should consider adultery to be one of the ultimate proofs of "degeneracy" when it is well-known how many mistresses Joseph Goebbels had..."

I have no reason to waste my time on the rest of your Jew psycho dribble.

Absolutely disgraceful, and true to the Judeo-Anglo, ignoble to the core.

Negentropic said...

@Numinous Sun

Only someone who SEEKS KNOW-LEDGE (a process of balance) and judges things ONLY BY THE KNOW-ABLE can be KNOW-ABLE himself or NOBLE. That's where the word comes from. The way a word sounds is more important than how it is spelled if you want to dig into why the metaphor was even created in the first place.

Are a Poodle and a Dalmatian and a Chihuahua and a Doberman THE SAME under the coat?

Obviously not.

Are you judging all dogs by "coat-color" when you prefer to have one or the other as a pet?

How dare you, you racissss! lol Don't you know you're supposed to let all Poodles mate with all Saint Bernards freely? How dare you prefer a "pure-bred" dog with stable characteristics that only good genetics can bring? Genetics that never stops at coat color.

Yet, SOMEHOW, you have convinced yourself that ALL HUMANS are EXACTLY THE SAME under the skin?

How did that bizarre non-sequitur of non-sequiturs manage to implant itself into your brain, my poor boy?


And save the ad-hominems and "name calling" for amateur hour, huh?

I've been doing this too long to give one sewer rat's ass if some troll thinks I'm a "Jew" or "Judaized Anglo" or whatever else snot-nosed term it was you pulled out of that big hairy ass between your ears. LOL

Anonymous said...

Perhaps the better question ultimately is, for you, personally: what's if your leaders are not as intelligent as you believe them to be, and there are ideological breaks in your organization as Eternal Arya rises again, and everything flips on its head, and those you believed to be your comrades turn you in to the new force in town, did you ever think of this before you engaged in your immoral and unethical behavior? Would be a bitch if I were true, would it not?

Unknown said...

Numinous Sun said - "Would be a bitch if I were true, would it not?"

Ahh and herein lies the rub. The outcome of this scenario is probably realistically unknown thus far and the probability that YOU are in fact wrong at best guess is probably 50%. Would you yourself be noble in defeat if proven wrong or just call everyone else on the "opposing team" a jew or judaic? I can only really base my estimation of the outcome on the data I see before my eyes and so my estimation of that probability is somewhere up around the 95% mark that yes, indeed you would! And of course, again based on the data before us, that would most likely be regardless of whether the "opposing team" happened to be jews/judaic or not.

PS. Btw, I think the grammatically correct term you meant to use in the above quote is "correct" and not true ;)

Unknown said...

Oy Vey!! These guys are loons? That would be putting it mildly. This dude is a classic example of the ridiculous spectacle of the “fragment expounding the whole”. Paganism = true spiritualism? No wonder WN is in deep shit. Complete ignorance of historicity. Let’s just create a warm and fuzzy myth that we can feel good about. Hey, anything is better than reality. If these guys are the true representatives of WN, and I was a white guy, I’d be the first in line to miscegenate with a black she-ape.

waitpu4 said...

For myself I believe that first & foremost in seeking the truth that you have to be honest with yourself, it's so hard to know what the absolute truth is when it comes to other people or sauced information nobody's perfect even though they may be genuine no one is beyond self deception, misinformation or tainted truths, You're the best person to keep yourself in check & you can easily become arrogant to a greater or lesser degree in maintaining self dignity & defence of beliefs, heritage & culture.
It takes great courage to acknowledge the truth of what is really going on in the world these days & I believe many including myself have put up a tough front & not realise how much of that is actually a way to deny our fears of what is really happening to us.
For me fear has to be confronted taken on & transformed into courage & that is where you find your own truth & therefore give you a greater ability to discern the truth to be found outside the self.

zapoper said...

And the comment of the month goes to?

Unknown said...

Just listened to this show and I have a few comments. Hitler actually banned the Thule Society. All this esoteric pagan stuff was completely foreign to Hitler. It's crazy to hear someone talk as if Hitler believed any of it. He did not and was completely against all secret societies.