Hitler "had" one stone I've sometimes thought that as we find smaller and smaller "particles" (or compression by that man in the video) the smallest particle would be "no dimension" which implies a kind of continuum which I think this man is saying. But, as someone once said, after a long discussion on how we cannot really understand/know something, "pass the salt". I think at every level of understanding we always come to a level of acceptance. One "why" is expalined by another excepted "fact" etc. The level becomes more obscure, the deeper the understanding. But, the answer must always be verified by reality, if practical, ie. if not so hypothetical that it reamins hypothethical.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeO91URF7dM That is an example of gyro anti gravity. I have said this before, if anyone noticed. It where I observed this example of how science has been screwed by the rich and powerful, besides the CO2 crap. 1973 I was in a first year university course. The lecture(s) said here is a video of three gyros intially spun by compressed air. The video showed how the three gyros were attached to a board. As they said the horizontal components of the angular momentum cancelled each other, and the vertical added. It lifted. The above example used electronically controlled gyros. I have done a job for a guy from the CSIRO and he knew about it. There was a famous inventor who had his life ruined by this type of search, but he never got it to work because he used one gyro, Eric Laithwaite. The Royal Society refused to publish his talk (only time ever) and ridiculed him the rest of his life. But he started about 1973, when it had been done. Maybe that is how they did the spaceships Bill Cooper saw, he believed it was aliens then, realised the photos were fake, and believed it was a human fakery. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAv5eLfEdQ4&t=6418s
5 comments:
Einstein means "one stone"
Hitler has "one stone"
Is Fred Flintstone really Fred "Flintstein"?
Hitler "had" one stone
I've sometimes thought that as we find smaller and smaller "particles" (or compression by that man in the video) the smallest particle would be "no dimension" which implies a kind of continuum which I think this man is saying.
But, as someone once said, after a long discussion on how we cannot really understand/know something, "pass the salt".
I think at every level of understanding we always come to a level of acceptance. One "why" is expalined by another excepted "fact" etc. The level becomes more obscure, the deeper the understanding. But, the answer must always be verified by reality, if practical, ie. if not so hypothetical that it reamins hypothethical.
Ahem...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeO91URF7dM
That is an example of gyro anti gravity. I have said this before, if anyone noticed. It where I observed this example of how science has been screwed by the rich and powerful, besides the CO2 crap.
1973 I was in a first year university course. The lecture(s) said here is a video of three gyros intially spun by compressed air. The video showed how the three gyros were attached to a board. As they said the horizontal components of the angular momentum cancelled each other, and the vertical added. It lifted. The above example used electronically controlled gyros. I have done a job for a guy from the CSIRO and he knew about it. There was a famous inventor who had his life ruined by this type of search, but he never got it to work because he used one gyro, Eric Laithwaite. The Royal Society refused to publish his talk (only time ever) and ridiculed him the rest of his life. But he started about 1973, when it had been done. Maybe that is how they did the spaceships Bill Cooper saw, he believed it was aliens then, realised the photos were fake, and believed it was a human fakery. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAv5eLfEdQ4&t=6418s
But the flying saucers were real, man made, according to him.
Post a Comment