August 31, 2013

Mami's Shit: The Road to a better future for all.

A word from Us

Unbeknownst to the majority of visitors to mami's Shit, we have been under sustained attack for the last few weeks by a small hardcore of disgruntled,disorganised & very unprofessional Trolls.
Their track record of disruption & stupidity stretches back a few years to other Chat-rooms & Forums.Most of which either no longer exist, or have systematically banned them from pursuing their asinine agendas.
Because Mami's used to experiment with a policy of "Absolute Free Speech" for a time, we unintentionally attracted the very people we are constantly warning others to look out for.

They abused the free speech policy for so long, it convinced other Networks & Pod-cast personalities that mami's had become a lost cause:Overrun with spite,hate,Actors & shills:All looking to ruin the reputation of both themselves and mami's at the same time. They took their broadcasts,Pod-casts & radio shows elsewhere. Or Just denied mami's the right to post them.

Grizz and Zap, being fair & honest people, had to accept this state of affairs for a time. & Then decided on measures to clean up mami's act & repair the damage these "trolls" were causing.
Hence new Admins were recruited to provide extra sources of news & Information. And to also act as moderators in the Chat Room. The rules regarding who could & couldn't post were tightened up by using Bloggers own system of only letting registered members post. & Similarly, The avenue of playing in the sandpit of the chat-room was denied to Anonymous posters. Everyone now has to post comments under a chatango name, which is so easy to set up, even the most brain-damaged troll should be capable of doing this for themselves.

These changes have made the new Admins the target of the Disruptive element's wrath. They can't accept that they are no longer welcome here, & blame us for spoiling their "fun".

Well. mami's is a News Aggregation Blog which also posts Pod-casts from those awake to the truth of how the world really is run. We welcome anyone who wishes to join in the task of enlightening those who still need to hear the truth unfiltered by the Mainstream Media. Write articles. make Pod-casts yourself for us to post. Become activists & spread the truth to your friends,neighbours & anyone who will give you the time of day & listen to you. If you are here to do any of those things & make a difference,however small, then you are welcome. Those who just live for disruption, chaos,the Lulz etc,or are actively working as paid dis-info agents of the SPLC,ADL & their ilk can kindly look elsewhere for their entertainment. We won't let you spoil the right of others to enjoy uninterrupted conversation about the things that matter to them most. We won't let you attack & harass other members. & we will no longer tolerate those who only wish to bully, upset or act in an anti-social manner. You don't like these rules? Sorry, they are non-negotiable. Either act responsibly whilst a guest here, or go elsewhere.

Below are the 25 rules of Disinformation that these deluded individuals all appear to follow; and which we Admins here at mami's have to be constantly on the lookout for, in order to keep the site informative,friendly and above all,Truthful.

 Tactics of shills & online trolls/zombies

Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation

1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil.

Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -- especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it's not reported, it didn't happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

2. Become incredulous and indignant.

Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used to show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the 'How dare you!' gambit.

3. Create rumor mongers.

Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such 'arguable rumors'. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a 'wild rumor' from a 'bunch of kids on the Internet' which can have no basis in fact.

4. Use a straw man.

Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule.

This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

6. Hit and Run.

In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain critical reasoning -- simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent's viewpoint.

7. Question motives.

Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.

8. Invoke authority.

Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough 'jargon' and 'minutia' to illustrate you are 'one who knows', and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.

9. Play Dumb.

No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.

10. Associate opponent charges with old news.

A derivative of the straw man -- usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with - a kind of investment for the future should the matter not be so easily contained.) Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues -- so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.

11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions.

Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the 'high road' and 'confess' with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made -- but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, 'just aren't so.' Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later, and even publicly 'call for an end to the nonsense' because you have already 'done the right thing.' Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for 'coming clean' and 'owning up' to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.

12. Enigmas have no solution.

Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to lose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.

13. Alice in Wonderland Logic.

Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards or with an apparent deductive logic which forbears any actual material fact.

14. Demand complete solutions.

Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best with issues qualifying for rule 10.

15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions.

This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.

16. Vanish evidence and witnesses.

If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won't have to address the issue.

17. Change the subject.

Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can 'argue' with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents.

If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'

19. Ignore facts presented, demand impossible proofs.

This is perhaps a variant of the 'play dumb' rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required that you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.

20. False evidence.

Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations -- as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.

21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body.

Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed. Usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim.

22. Manufacture a new truth.

Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.

23. Create bigger distractions.

If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.

24. Silence critics.

If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by destroying them financially, emotionally, or severely damaging their health.

25. Vanish.

If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.


Unknown said...

There's a bit of a leap of logic there about Grizzom and Zapoper wanting to change the site to make it less troll-friendly therefore new admins were recruited. I just assumed they were getting tired of constantly providing new content for the site after a year and a half.

Your idea of what Mami's Shit is primarily (new aggregator site) is interesting.

But nitpicking aside I wish you all good luck in denying the trolls any satisfaction. It's good that Grizzom no longer finds them entertaining.

RJ said...

it's as if they play straight from this list. Well said F1.

delcroix said...

Quite right and well said my friend
Foon1e ...feck the begrudgers man
and keep on keeping on

Anonymous said...

Lets face it. Most of these trolls are probably jews/CI. Maybe a few dummies with an axe to grind but mostly the former.

Papa Doc John said...

Why would normal people should be interested about newsblog called "Mami's SHIT" anyway?

foon1e said...

Oh come on papa doc. You're relatively Normal & *you're* obviously interested in it :)

& yes RC, they are probably Jews/CI as well as Mentally Unstable. Especially the ones who go around threatening violence against Admins. You have to wonder why these individuals bother with a small Blog on the net when there's so many more juicy targets for them to disrupt out there!